\ 


LIBRARY  OF  CONGRESS 


LIST  OF  REFERENCES  ON  THE 
TREATY- MAKING  POWER 


COMPILED  UNDER  THE  DIRECTION  OF 
HERMAN  H.  B.  MEYER 

CHIEF  BIBLIOGRAPHER 


lor  sale  by  the 

Superintendent  of  Documents 
Government    Printing    Omoe 


WASHINGTON 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

1920 


Price  ;J0  '"exits 


: 


::!::- 


LIBRARY  OF  CONGRESS 


LIST  OF  REFERENCES  ON  THE 
TREATY-MAKING  POWER 


COMPILED  UNDER  THE  DIRECTION  OF 

HERMAN  H.  B.  MEYER 

CHIEF  BIBLIOGRAPHER 


112868 

WASHINGTON 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

1920 


n 


L.  C.  card,  20-26005 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 


Page 

Prefatory  note 5 

Treaty-making  power:   General 7-37 

Treaty-making  power  in  foreign  States,  particularly  Great  Britain 38-48 

Treaty-making  power  in  the  United  States : 

I.  General  discussions  and  collections 49-96 

II.  Under  the  Confederation 96-100 

III.  As    considered    in    the   Federal    convention    and   before    the 

adoption  of  the  Constitution 101-109 

IV.  As  considered  in  writings  on  the  Constitution 109-117 

Considerations  in  respect  to  special  treaties 118-204 

Author  index 205-213 

Subject  index 214-219 

3 


PREFATORY  NOTE 


The  provisions  in  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  concerning 
treaty  making  have  always  given  rise  to  a  great  deal  of  discussion 
but  never  more  so  than  at  the  present  time.  The  list  here  presented 
covering  such  discussions  and  related  literature  is  arranged  with  a 
view  to  the  logical  development  of  the  subject.  It  begins  with  general 
discussions  on  treaty  making  as  found  largely  in  treatises  of  inter- 
national law,  followed  by  discussions  of  the  practice  in  other  coun- 
tries. Then  the  United  States  is  taken  up  and  here  the  grouping  is 
largely  historical.  First  general  discussions,  then  treaty  making 
under  the  Confederation,  discussions  attending  its  disposition  in  the 
constitutional  convention,  and  constitutional  treatises,  lastly  a  group 
of  discussions  of  special  treaties  arranged  chronologically  from  the 
beginning  down  to  recent  date. 

The  bulk  of  the  material  for  the  list  was  brought  together  and  the 
general  scheme  of  presentation  devised  under  the  former  Chief 
Bibliographer,  Mr.  A.  P.  C.  Griffin,  who  had  the  assistance  of  Mr. 
William  A.  Slade,  the  chief  assistant  in  the  division.  The  compila- 
tion of  later  material  and  the  preparation  for  the  press  has  been 
done  under  the  present  Chief  Bibliographer  with  the  assistance  of 
Miss  F.  S.  Hellman. 

The  object  in  view  in  the  arrangement  of  the  material  is  to  afford 
a  historical  view  of  the  treaty-making  power  as  exercised  in  typical 
instances. 

H.  H.  B.  Meyer, 

Chief  Bibliographer 
Appleton  P.  C.  Griffin 

Acting  Librarian  of  Congress 

Washington,  D.  C,  September  8t  1919 


TREATY -MAKING  POWER:  GENERAL 

1  ATbin,  Pierre.     Les  grands  traites  politiques;  recueil  des  princi- 

paux  textes  diplomatiques  depuis  1815  jusqu'a  nos  jours 
avec   des   notices   historiques   et   des   notes;    preface   de 
M.  Maurice  Herbette.    2.  ed.  rev.  et  mise  au  courant. 
Paris,  F.  Alcan,  1912.    2  p.  I,  xi,  605  p.    23cm.     (Biblio- 
theque  (Phistoire  contemporaine) 

13-8163  JX172.A6 

Reviewed  by  Amos  S.  Hershey,  in  American  journal  of  inter- 
national law,  v.  7:  426-427. 

2  Anzilotti,  Dionisio.    II  diritto  internazionale  nei  giudizi  interni. 

Bologna,  Ditta  N.  Zanichelli,  1905.    2  p.  Z.,  vi  p.,  1  Z., 
328  p.    23\cm. 

See  Index  :  Trattati  internazionali :  p.  328. 
8-36405  JX1248.A6 

3  Interpretazione  dei  trattati. 

Rivista  di  diritto  internazionale,  1915,  v.  9:  211-214- 

JX7.B6,v.9 

4  ■ Volonta  e  responsabilita  nella   stipulazione  dei  trattati 

internazionali. 
Rivista  di  diritto  internazionale,  1910,  v.  5:  3-46. 

JX7.R6,v.5 

5  Appert,  G.    De  Interpretation  des  traites  diplomatiques  au  cours 

d'un  proces. 
Journal  du  droit  international  prive,  1899,  v.  26:  433-461. 

JX6002.J5,v.26 

6  Baker,  Sir  George  Sherston,  hart.     First  steps  in  international 

law ;  prepared  for  the  use  of  students. 
Boston,   Little,   Brown,   &    company;    London,    K.    Paul, 
Trench,  Triibner  &  co.,  ltd.,  1899.    3  p.  I.,  \ix~] — xxxi, 
428  p.    22%cm. 

Treaty-making  power,  p.  94-95;  Legislation  to  give  effect  to 
treaties,  p.  96 ;  under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States, 
p.  97 ;  How  far  a  treaty  operates  Proprio  vigore,  p.  97-98. 
See  also,  in  general,  chapter  VIII,  Rights  of  legation  and 
treaty,  p.  92-108. 
10-17119  JX3211.F5     1899 

7 


8  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

7  Barbeyrac,  Jean.     Histoire  des  anciens  traitez,  on,  Reeueil  his- 

torique  et  chronologique  des  traitez  repandus  dans  les 
auteurs  grecs  &  latins,  &  autres  monumens  de  l'antiquite, 
depuis  les  terns  les  plus  reculez,  jusques  a  I'empereur 
( lharlemagne. 
Amsterdam,  Chez  les  Junsxons  <)  Wtwsberge,  Wetstein  & 
Smith;  [etc.,  etc.]  1739.    2v.ini.    front.    4?'cm. 

10-16929  JX2001.B3 

8  Barclay,  Sir  Thomas.     Problems  of  international  practice  and 

diplomacy,  with  special  reference  to  the  Hague  confer- 
ences and  conventions   and   other   general   Internationa] 
agreements. 
London,  Swet  I  it'  Maxwell  ltd.;  Boston,  Mass.,  Boston  book 
company,  1907.    xix,  383,  [1]  p.    28  x  22\™. 

See  p.  137-142. 
7-42317  JX1593.B3 

9  Bergbohm,  Carl.     Staatsvertrage  und  Gesetze  als  Quellen  des 

Volkerrechts. 

Dorpat,  C.  Mattiesen,  1877.    2  p.  I.,  110  p.    21cm. 

3-10983  JX1245.B5 

10  Bernard,  Mountagne.    Four  lectures  on  subjects  connected  with 

diplomacy. 
London,  Macmillan  and  co.,  1868.    via,  205  p.    22Ym. 
The  obligation  of  treaties:  p.  103-205. 
10-10532  JX1387.B5 

11  Bluntschli,    Johann   Kaspar.     Le    droit    international    codifie, 

tr.  de  l'allemand  par  M.  C.  Lardy.    5.  ed.,  rev.  et  augin. 
Paris,  Guillauminetcie,  1895.     xxxii,602  p.    23cm.     (Econo- 
mistes  et  publicistes  contemporalns) 
Des  traites:  p.  238-203,  350-357,  395-406. 
4-8225  JX1268.B45     1895 

12  Das   moderne   Volkerrecht   der   civilisirten    Staten    als 

Rechtsbuch  dargestellt.    3.  mit  Riicksicht  auf  die  neueren 
Ereignisse  bis  1877  erganzte  Aufl. 

Nordlingen,  C.  U.  Beck,  1878.     xii  p.,  1  L,  5/f/  p.     front, 
(port.)     23\cm. 

Volkerrecbtliche  Vertriige:  Krfordernlsse  and  Wlrkungen  del 
vBlkerrecht  lichen  Vertriige:  p.  233-230;  Form  « 1 « - r  Vertriige: 
p.  239  212;  Verstiirkung  der  Vertriige:  Garantleyertr&ge : 
p.  242-248;  Arten  der  vOlkerrechtlichen  Vertriige:  p.  249- 
252;  V"ii  den  Alllanzen  Insbesondere :  p.  252-254;  Aufhoren 
der  Vertragsverblndllchkeit :  p.  255  259. 
&-10741  JX1268.B4     1878 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  9 

13  Bonfils,  Henry  Joseph  F.  X.     Manuel  de  droit  international 

public  (droit  des  gens)  destine  aux  etudiants  des  facultes 
de  droit  et  aux  aspirants  aux  fonctions  diplomatiques  et 
consulages.    7.  ed.,  rev.  et  mise  au  courant  .  .  . 
Paris,  Rousseau  et  c°.  1914-     viii,  1209,  [1]  p.   23™. 
Les  conventions  entre  etats  ou  les  traites :  p.  557-631. 
15-6791  JX2608.M2    1914 

14  Bonucci, .     Die  clausula  rebus  sic  stantibus  im  zwischen- 

staatlichen  Recht. 

Zeitschrift  filr   Volkerrecht  und  Bundesstaatsrecht,  1910, 

v.p  449-471. 

Tr.  by  Josef  Kohler. 

JX5.Z5,v.4 

15  Borchardt,  Felix.     Entwickelungsgeschichte  der  Meistbegiinsti- 

gung  im  Handelsvertragssystem. 
Konigsberg  i.  P>\,  Hartungsche  buchdr.,  1906.    2  p.  I.,  83, 
[1]  p.,  1  I.    23cm. 

"  Literaturverzeichnis,"  1  p.  at  end. 
8-27463  HF1721.B7 

16  [Buonamici,  Francesco.]     Dei  trattati  interna zionali  in  quanto 

sono  mezzi  d'incivilimento.     Discorso  inaugurale  per  la 
riapertura  dell'  anno  scolastico  1878-79  nella  R.  Universita 
di  Pisa. 
[Pisa,  Tip.  I.  Nistri  e  c,  1878]     1  p.  I,  [5],  58  p.   23™. 

Privately  printed. 
13-8680  JX4169.B8 

17  Calonne,  Alphonse  de.     Sur  l'interpretation  de  Particle  4  du 

traite  de  Prague. 
Revue  contemporaine,  1870,  v.  74-'  737-74-4- 

AP20.R255,v.74 

18  Calvo,    Carlos.    Le   droit   international   theorique   et    pratique; 

precede  d'un  expose  historique  des  progres  de  la  science 
du  droit  des  gens.    5.  ed.,  rev.  et  completed  par  un  supple- 
ment. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1896.    6  v.    25 V"'. 

Accords  interna tionaux,  (Droit  conventionnel,  negoeiations, 
execution  et  interpretation  des  traites),  v.  3,  p.  346-404,  v.  6, 
p.  285-295 ;  Alliances,  secours  et  subsides,  v.  4,  p.  101-120, 
v.  6,  p.  494 ;  Des  traites  de  paix,  v.  5,  p.  359-395,  v.  6,  p.  527- 
554. 
10-15585  JX2984.D5     1896 


10  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

19  Calwer,  Richard.  Die  Meistbegiinstigung  der  Vereinigten  Staa- 

t(  11  \(»n  Xordamerica. 
Bi  rlin  \etc.~]  Akademischer  Verlag  fur  sociale  Wissenschaf- 
U  n,  Dr.  John  Edelheim,  1902.     154  V-    M¥m- 

2_ii2H  HF1732.G3C2 

20  Cattell,  J.  McKeen.    Outworn  treaties. 

Nation,  May  1,  1913,  v.  96:  439-440.  AP2.N2,v.96 

21  Cavarretta,  Giuseppe.     La  clausola  della  nazione  piu  favorita. 

Palermo,  A.  Reber,  1906.    236,  [2]  p.    25™. 

8-37664  HF1721.C4 

22  Cobbett,  Pitt.     Cases  and  opinions  on  international  law,  and 

various  points  of  English  law  connected  therewith.     3d  ed. 
London,  Stevens  and  Ilaynes,  1909-13.      2  v.    22\™. 

Treaties  and  other  international  agreements :  pt.  1,  p.  7,  10,  11, 
13,  19,  22,  38,  39,  86,  104,  159,  314-321;  Termination  of 
treaties:  p.  321-328;  The  interpretation  of  treaties:  p.  104, 
317-318,  328-333;  Treaty-making  power:  p.  319-320.  The 
effect  of  war  on  treaties:  pt.  2,  p.  35-44. 
10-20525  JX68.C72 

22a  A   complete   collection  of  the  treaties  and   conventions,   and 
reciprocal  regulations  at  present  subsisting  between  Great 
Britain  and  foreign  powers     .     .     .     Comp.  from  authen- 
tic documents. 
London,  1827-1917.   27  v.    22\™. 

1_4023  JX636     1827a 

23  Conway,  Eustace.     Treaties. 

(In  Lalor,  John  J.  cd.  Cyclopedia  of  political  science,  politi- 
cal economy,  and  of  the  political  history  of  the  United 
States,  v.  3.     New  York,  1899.     p.  935-941.) 

Treaties  of  the  United  States  in  conflict  with  laws  in  com- 
mercial subjects,  p.  938. 

H41.L22,v.3 

24  Coudert,  Frederic  R.     Eights  of  consular  officers  to  letters  of 

administration  under  treaties  with  foreign  nations. 
Columbia  law  n  vit  w,  Mar.  WIS,  v.  13:  181-201. 

25  Crandall,  Samuel  Benjamin.     The  American  construction  of  the 

most-favored  nation  clause. 
[Nt  //■  York]   1913.    p.  708  723.     :-'"". 

•■  Reprinted  from  the  American  journal  of  international  law, 
October,  1913." 

17-3U!».;5  HF1721.C7 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER:   GENERAL  11 

26  Creasy,  Sir  Edward  Shepherd.    First  platform  of  international 

law. 
London,  J.  Van  Voorst,  1876.     xv,  710  p.    23cm. 
Treaties :  p.  40-44,  86-87,  105,  407-411. 
5-26345  JX2514.F5     1876 

27  Dauzat,  Albert.     Du  role  des  chambres  en  matiere  de  traites 

nationaux. 
Paris,  F.Alcan,  1899.    2  p.  I,  219  p.    24cm. 
"  Bibliographie  "  :    p.    213-215. 
4-19603  JN2675.D24 

28  Davis,   George   Breckenridge.     The   elements   of   international 

law,  with  an  account  of  its  origin ;  sources,  and  historical 
development.     4th  ed.,  rev.  by  Gordon  E.  Sherman. 
New  York  and  London,  Harper  <&  brothers  [1916]  xxiv, 
668  p.    21cm. 

Treaties  and  conventions:  execution,  ratification,  interpreta- 
tion :  p.  223-239 ;  Treaties  of  peace :  p.  342-354. 
16-16751  JX2458.E3    1916 

29  Despagnet,    Frantz    Clement    Bene.      Cours    de    droit    inter- 

national public.    4.  ed.  complement  revue,  augm.  et  mise 
au  courant,  par  Ch.  de  Boeck. 
Pans,  L.  Larose  et  L.  Tenin,  1910.    vi,  H30  p.    23cm. 

Des  rapports  d'obligations  entre  les  etats:  Des  traites  inter- 
nationaux:  p.  675-731;  Effets  de  la  guerre  sur  les  traites: 
p.  826-827,  944. 
11-29651  JX2641.C8     1910 

30  Dickey,  Francis  W.    The  sanctity  of  contracts. 

Nation,  May  22,  1913,  v.  96:  519-520.  AP2.N2,v.96 

31  Donati,  Donato.     I  trattati  internazionali  nel   diritto  costitu- 

zionale. 
Torino  [etc.]  Unione  tipografico-editrice  torinese,  1906.   1  v. 

25\cm. 

8-36159  JF269.D67 

32  Du  Bouzet,  Ch.     Traites  politiques,  de  commerce  et  de  naviga- 

tion.    II.  Principaux  traites. 

(In   Block,   Maurice.     Dictionnaire   general   de   la    politique, 
Paris,  1874.    24rm.    v.  2,  p.  1050-1052.) 

JA62.B7,v.2 

33  Erich,   Rafael.     Uber   Allianzen  und  Allianzverhaltnisse  nach 

heutigem  Volkerrecht. 
Eelsingfors,  Buchdruckerei-Aktiengesellschaft  Sana,  1907. 
1  p.  I.,  286,  [4]  p.,  1  I.    22<™. 

"  Verzeichnis  der  angefuhrten  Litteratur  ".  4  p.  at  end. 
8-25857  JX4005.E8 


12  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

34  Farra,  Raphael  A.     Les  effets  de  la  clause  de  la  nation  la  plus 

favorisee  et  la  specialisation  des  tarifs  douaniers. 
Paris,  Joitve  d-  cie,  1910.     209  p.,  1  I.    25\cm. 

•  Bibliographie  "  :  p.  207-209. 
13-13446  HF1721.F3 

35  Fiore,  Pasquale.     Le  droit  international  codifie  et  sa  sanction 

juridique.    Nouv.  ed.  entierement  refondue  et  completee  en 
tenant  compte  des  Conferences  de  la  Haye  de  1899  et  de 
1907;  tr.  de  l'italien  par  Ch.  Antoine. 
Paiis,  A.  F *  alone,  1911.    2  p.  I,  ii  p.,  1  I.,  893  p.    24cm. 

Des  traites  et  des  conditions  requises  pour  lour  validite:  p. 

384-394;    Efticacite    et    execution    des    traites:    p.    395-409; 

Abrogation  et  annulation  des  traites:  p.  410-417;  Des  traites 

speciaux :  418-455. 

11-2G963  JX1268.F5     1911 

36  International  law  codified  and  its  legal  sanction;  or,  The 

legal  organization  of  the  society  of  states  .  .  .  Transla- 
tion from  the  5th  Italian  ed.,  with  an  introduction  by  Ed- 
win M.  Borchard. 

New  York,  Baker,  Voorhis  and  company,  1918.  xix,  750  p. 
%4cm. 

Treaties  and   the  conditions   for  their   validity;   p.   328-335; 
Legal  force  and  execution  of  treaties:  p.  336-347;  Abroga- 
tion and  annulment  of  treaties:  p.  348-354;  Special  treaties: 
p.  355-382. 
18-8499  JX2881.D3    1918 

37  Fish,  Carl  Russell.     American  diplomacy.     3d  ed.,  rev. 

New  York,  II.  Holt  and  company,  1919.  xi,  551  p.  maps 
(3  double)  21cm.  (American  historical  series.  General 
editor:  C.  II.  Raskins) 

See  Index  under  Treaties. 
19-8551  JX1407.F5     1919 

38  Fisk,  George  Mygatt.     International  commercial  policies,  with 

special  reference  to  the  United  States;  a  text  book. 
New  York,  The  Macmillan  company ;  London,  Macmillan 
&  co.,  ltd. ,1911.     xvi,288  p.     19cm.     (The  citizen's  library 
of  economics,  politics,  and  sociology,  ed.  by  R.  T.  Ely) 
Commercial  treaties;  their  nature,  form  and  contents:  p.  145- 
160;  Commercial  treaties,  reciprocity  and  the  .Most   favored 
nation  clause:  p.  161-176. 
15-12900  HF1401.F54    1911 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  I   GENERAL  13 

39  Foster,  John  Watson.    The  practice  of  diplomacy  as  illustrated 

in  the  foreign  relations  of  the  United  States. 
Boston  and  New   York,  Houghton,  Mifflin  and  company, 
1906.    4  V-  I;  401,  [1]  p.    23cm. 

Negotiation  and  framing  of  treaties :  p.  243-261 ;  Ratification 

of  treaties:  p.  262-283;  Interpretation  of  treaties:  p.  284- 

297;  Termination  of  treaties:  p.  299-311;  Compacts  other 

than  treaties  :  p.  312-329. 

6-39718  JX1705.F7 

40  Foulke,  Roland  R.    Treaties. 

Columbia  law  review,  May,  1918,  v.  18:  422-458. 

41  Geffcken,  Friedrich  Heinrich.     On  treaties  of  guaranty.     Read 

at    the    twelfth    conference,    held    in    the    Patriotische- 
gebaude,  at  Hamburg. 
London,  Printed  by   W.  Clowes  and  sons,  limited,  1885. 
12  p.    21\cm. 

The  Association  for  the  reform  and  codification  of  the  la\r 
of  nations. 
17-23712  JX4171.G8G4 

42  A  general  collection  of  treatys. 

London,  Printed  for  J.  J.  and  P.  Knapton    [etc.]   1732. 
4  v.    20cm. 

"Catalogue  of  the  several  treatys  and  other  publick  papers 
contain'd  in  the  four  volumes  of  this  collection,  in  a  chron- 
ological order,"  v.  4,  at  end. 
10-6387  JX131.G42 

43  Glenn,  Edwin  Forbes.     Hand-book  of  international  law. 

St.  Paul,  Minn.,   West  publishing  co.,  1895.     xix,  478  p. 
23\cm.     {Hornbook  series) 

Treaties :  p.  7,  35,  122,  139-154,  254,  257-260. 
10-17134  JX2469.G4H31     1895 


44  Glier,  L.  Die  Meistbegiinstigungs-Klausel.  Eine  entwicke- 
lungsgeschichtliche  Studie  unter  besonderer  Beriicksichti- 
gung  der  deutschen  Vertrage  mit  den  Vereinigten  Staaten 
von  Amerika  und  mit  Argentinien. 
Berlin,  G.  Reimer,  1905.  xix,  434  p.  26cm.  (Veroffent- 
lichungen  des  Mitteleuropaischen  Wirtschaftsverein, 
hft.  II) 

"Versuch    einer   Chronologie   der   Meistbegiinstigungs-Klausel 
(1703-1903)  :  p.  376-434. 
5-31359  HC281.M6 


14  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

45  Gt.  Brit.    Foreign  office.    Return  of  most-fa voured-nation  clauses 

in  ex i  sting  treaties  of  commerce  and  navigation  between 
Great  Britain  and  foreign  powers,  stating  the  period  when 
terminable;  and  showing  whether  they  apply  to  the  Brit- 
ish colonies:  in  force  on  the  1st  July,  1903.  Presented  to 
both  houses  of  Parliament  by  command  of  His  Majesty. 
October  1903.  F°. 
(In  Great  Britain.  Parliament.  Sessional  papers,  1003. 
Cd.  1807.) 

Commercial,     no.  9  (1903) 

46  Griffith.,  William.     International  law:  history,  principles,  rules, 

and  treaties. 
[London,  Printed  by  the  Hansard  publishing  union,  limited, 
1802]     viii,  130  p.    U\cm. 

See  index  under  Treaties. 
10-17132  JX2523.G6I6     1892 

47  Grotius,  Hugo.    Hugonis  Grotii  De  jure  belli  ac  pacis  libri  tres, 

in  quibus  jus  naturae  &  gentium,  item  juris  publici  prae- 
cipua  explicantur.  Editio  nova  cum  annotatis  auctoris, 
ex  postrema  ejus  ante  obitum  cura  multo  nunc  auctior. 
Accesserunt  &  annotata  in  Epistolam  Pauli  ad  Phile- 
monem  .  .  . 
[Washington,  D.  C]  Carnegie  institution  of  Washing- 
ton, 1013.  1  v.  port.  26\cm.  (The  classics  of  inter- 
national law,  ed.  by  J.  B.  Scott) 

With  facsimile  reproduction  of  original  t.-p. 
Book  2,  chap.  11,  De  promissis ;  chap.  12,  De  contractibus ;  " 
chap.  13,  De  jurejurando;  chap.  14,  De  eorum  qui  summum 
imperium  habent  promissis  &  contractibus  &  juramentis; 
chap.  15,  De  federibus  ac  sponsionibus ;  chap.  16,  De  inter- 
pretatione. 
13-5664  JX2093.A1     1646a 

48  The  rights  of  war  and  peace,  including  the  law  of  na- 
ture and  of  nations;  tr.  from  the  original  Latin  of  Gro- 
tius. with  notes  and  illustrations  from  political  and  legal 
writer-,  by  A.  C.  Campbell  .  .  .  with  an  introduction  by 
D.  J.  Hill  .  .  .   [Autograph  ed.  de  luxe] 

Washington  \I>.  C]  cfe  London,  M.  W.  Dunne  [1001] 
1  p.  I.,  v  p.,  1  /,  vii-x,  1$3  p.  front,  (port.)  plates  (partly 
col.)     8°.     (Universal  classics  library) 

Book  '_'.  chap.  11,  "On  promises";  chap.  12,  "On  contracts"; 
chap.  13,  "On  oaths";  chap.  15,  "On  treaties  and  on  en- 
gagements made  by  delegates,  exceeding  their  power";  chap. 
16,  "The  Interpretation  of  treaties." 
1-15202  JX2093.E5     1901 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  15 

49  Hall,  William  Edward.    A  treatise  on  international  law.    7th  ed. 

Ed.  by  A.  Pearce  Higgins. 
Oxford,  The  Clarendon  press;  London,  New  York  \_etc.']  H. 
Milford,  1917.     xl,  864  V-    2®cm- 

Treaties:    p.    7-12,    21-22,   92-101,    334-372.      Termination    of 
war:  p.  598 -K 
18-5S99  JX2524.T7     1917 

50  Halleck,  Henry  Wager.     Halleck's  International  law  or  rules 

regulating  the  intercourse  of  states  in  peace  and  war. 
4th  ed.,  thoroughly  revised  and  in  many  parts  rewritten; 
by    Sir    G.    Sherston    Baker,    assisted    by    Maurice    N. 
Drucquer. 
London,  K.  Paul,  Trench,  Trubner  &  co.,  ltd.,  1908.    2  v. 

Eights  of  legation  and  treaty :  v.  1,  p.  288-327 ;  List  of  Ameri- 
can  and   English  cases  on   the  interpretation   of  treaties : 
p.  326-327;  Treaties  of  peace:  p.  328-348.     See  also  Index 
under  Treaties,  v.  2:  p.  667-668. 
8-26218  JX2475.I6    1908 

51  Hartmann,  Adolf.    Institutionen  des  praktischen  Volkerrechts 

in  Friedenszeiten,  mit  Rucksicht  auf  die  Verfassung,  die 
Vertrage  und  die  Gesetzgebung  des  Deutschen  Reichs. 
Hannover,  C.  Meyer,  1874.    %vi,  287  p.    22cm. 

Von  den  Beziehungen  der  Staaten  zu  einander  rucksichtlich 
willkiirlicher  Verhaltnisse  Oder  von  den  Vertragen :  p.  125- 
154. 
10-15580  JX2786.H3I3     1874 

52  Heffter,  August  Wilhelm.     Le  droit  international  de  l'Europe. 

.  .  .  Tr.  par  Jules  Bergson.    4  ed.  franchise,  augm.  et  an- 
notee  par  F.  Heinrich  Geffcken. 
Berlin,  H.  W.  M tiller;  Paris,  A.  Cotillon  &  cie,  1883.     xv, 
576  p.    22  Vm. 

Caracteristique  des  traites  publics :  p.  26-30 ;  Traites  de  pro- 
tection;  p.  57-58;  Des  traites  publics:  p.  188-224;  Engage- 
ments qui  se  forment  sans  convention :  p.  225-232 ;  Traites 
d'alliance :  p.  256-258 ;  Conventions  de  guerre :  p.  327-333 ; 
Traites  de  paix :  p.  431-444 ;  Traites  et  Stablissements  de 
commerce  et  de  navigation :  p.  552-555. 
4-19581  JX2787.E5     1883 

53  Hepp,  Frangois.    Theorie  generale  de  la  clause  de  la  nation  la 

plus  favorisee  en  droit  international  prive. 
Paris,  Jurisclasseurs,  1914.   142,  [2]  p.   25\™. 

15-14600  HF1721.H4 

Reviewed  by  Stanley  K.  Hornbeck  in  American  journal  of  in- 
ternational law,  v.  8 :  681-685. 


16  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

54  Herod,  Jo-eph  Rogers.     Favored  nation  treatment;  an  analysis 

of  the  Most  favored  nation  clause,  with  commentaries  on 
its  uses   in  treaties  of  commerce  and  navigation. 
Xt  ir  York.  Th>  Hanks  /a to  pub.  co.,  1901.    v,  134  P-    %4cm- 
1   27902  HF1721.H5 

54a  Hertslet,  Sir  Edward.  The  map  of  Africa  by  treaty.  3d  ed. : 
in  three  volumes  and  a  collection  of  maps.  Rev.  and 
completed  to  the  end  of  1908,  by  K.  W.  Brant  and  H.  L. 

Sherwood. 

London,  Printed  for  II.  M.  Stationery  off.,  by  Hanison  and 
sons,  1909.    3  v.    maps,    and  portfolio  of  maps.    £5cm. 
10-833  JX1026      1896a 

54b The  map  of  Europe  by  treaty;  showing  the  various 

political  and  territorial  changes  which  have  taken  place 
since  the  general  peace  of  1814.     With  numerous  maps 
and  notes. 
London,  Butterworths   [etc.]   1875-91.     4  v-    maps    (part 
fold.)     25¥m. 

10-1503S  JX626     1875 

55  Holland,  Thomas  Erskine.    Studies  in  international  law. 

Ox ford.  Clarendon  press,  1898.    viii,  314  p.    23cm. 

( !oncerning  duties  arising  out  of  treaty,  Acts  of  Parliament 
relating  to  treaties,  etc. ;  p.  190  et  seq. 
4-14210  JX2531.S3     1898 

5G  Holls,  Frederick  W.    Treaties  and  promises. 

\In  Kuemelin,  Gustav.  Polities  and  the  moral  law.  Tr.  from 
the  German  by  Rudolf  Tombo,  jr.,  Ed.  with  an  introduction 
and  notes  by  Frederick  W.  Holls.  New  York,  1901.  18cm. 
p.  92-122.)  JA79.R8 

57  Holtzendorff,  Franz  J.  W.  P.  von,  ed.    Die  Staatsvertrage  und 
die   internationalen  Magistraturen. 
Hamburg,  J.  F.  RicMer,  1887.   xv,  797  p.   23cm.    (Handbuch 
des  Volkerrechts,  Bd.  3.) 

Die  Staatsvertrage  Im  Allgemeinen,  by  Ludwlg  Gessner:  p. 
3-82;  Garantievertr&ge,  by  Dr.  Geffcken:  p.  83-112;  P.iind- 
nissvertriiL'e,  by  Dr.  Geffcken:  p.  113-139;  Handels-  und 
Schicfahrtsvertrage,  by  Dr.  Werner  von  Melle:  p.  141-256; 
Elsenbahn  vert  rage,  by  Dr.  Meili:  p.  257-315;  Die  1'nsiver- 
trage  and  Telegraphenvertrttge,  by  Otto  Dambach:  p.  317- 
841;  Stiiatsvertriige,  betreffend  Rechtshilfe  und  Ansliefe- 
nmg,  by  Heinrich  Lammasch:  p.  843-579;  Die  Staatsvertrage 
tiber  Urheberrecbt,  Musterschutz,  Markenschutz  und  Pa- 
tentrecht:  by  Otto  Dambach :  p.  581-601.      JX2791.H2,v.3 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  17 

58  Hornbeck,  Stanley  K.    The  most-favored-nation  clause. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr. -Oct.  1909,  v. 
3:  395-422,  619-647,  797S27. 

JXl.A6,v.3 

50  Hosack,  John.    On  the  rise  and  growth  of  the  law  of  nations,  as 
established  by  general  usage  and  by  treaties,  from  the 
earliest  time  to  the  treaty  of  Utrecht. 
London,  J.  Murray,  1882.     xii,  394  P-    22^cm. 

10-17131  JX2538.05     1888 

60  Hyde,  Charles  Cheney.    Concerning  the  interpretation  of  treaties. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1909,  v.  3: 
46-61. 

Bibliographical  foot-notes.  JXl.A6,v.3 

61  Idman,  K.  G.    Le  traite  de  garantie  en  droit  international. 

Eelsingfors  [JSociete  dHmprimerie  Littera]  1913.    358,  [2] 
p.    23\cm. 

"  Bibliographie  " :  p.  347-358. 
17-24052  JX4171.G8I3 

62  Institute  of  international  law.    Effects  of  war  upon  treaties 

and  international  conventions.    A  project  adopted  by  the 
Institute  of  international  law  at  its  session  in  Christiania, 
in  August,  1912. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1913,  v.  7: 
149-155.  JXl.A6,v.7 

63  Ion,  T.  P.    The  sanctity  of  treaties. 

Yale  law  journal,  Feb.  1911,  v.  20:  268-291. 

64  Jacomet,  Robert.    La  guerre  et  les  traites ;  etude  de  droit  inter- 

national et  d'histoire  diplomatique,  preface  de  M.  Leon 
Bourgeois. 
Paris,  H.  Charles-Lavauzelle  [1909]     2  p.  I,  v,  [7]-188  p. 
25cm. 

"  Bibliographie  "  :  p.  7-11. 
9-30486  JX4525.J2 

Reviewed  by  George  G.  Wilson  in  American  journal  of  inter- 
national law,  v.  6:  765-766.  JXl.A6,v.6 

65  Jellinek,   Georg.     Die   rechtliche  Natur   der    Staatenvertrage. 

Ein  Beitrag  zur  juristischen  Construction  des  Volker- 
rechts. 
Wien,  A.  Holder,  1880.    iv,  66,  [2]  p.    23\™. 

6^6469  JX4167.J3 

137190°— 20 2 


18  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

66  Justifiable  repudiation  of  treaties. 

Ohio  law  built  tin,  Apr.  1,  1918,  v.  62:  122-123. 

67  Kaufmann,  Erich.    Das  Wesen  des  Volkerrechts  und  die  clau- 

sula rebus  sic  stantibus;  rechtsphilosophisehe  Studie  zum 
Rechts-  Staats-  und  Vertragsbegriffe. 
Tubingen,  J.  C.  B.  Mohr  (P.  Siebeck)  1911.    xii,  231,  [1] 
p.    25cm. 

"  Abkiirzungen  "  :  p.  x-xii. 
12-33767  JX4171.C6K3 

68  Kent,  James.     Kent's  commentary  on  international  law,  ed.  by 

J.  T.  Abdy.    2d  ed.,  rev.  and  brought  down  to  the  present 
time. 
Cambridge,  D  eight  on,  Bell,  and  co.;  [etc.,  etc.']  1878.    xvi, 
525  p.     19rm. 

Conventions    and    treaties:    p.    29,    95-96,    161-162,    382-396, 
495-610. 
15-14611  JX2478.C4     1878 

69  Kliiber,  Johann  Ludwig.     Droit  des  gens  moderne  de  l'Europe. 

•J.  ed. 
Park,  (i  a  HI  nun,  in  et cie,  187  If.     xxxii,  573  p.    22\cm. 

Droit  des  traitgs:  p.  179-216. 
9-lSvr,7  JX2804.D6     1871 

70  Koumanoudi,  Constant  in.     Les  traites  d'alliance  an  xixe  siecle; 

etude  de  droit   international  et  cUhistoire  diplomatique. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1901.    2  p.  I,  212  p.    25Ym. 

Bibliography  at  the  beginning  of  chapters  ii-iv. 
2-2S815  JX4005.K7 

71  Laghi,  Ferdinando.     Teoria  dei  trattati  internazionali.     Parte 

generale. 

Parma,  L.  Battei,  1882.    Ixiv,  396  p.    22cm. 

13-1 462  1  JX4169.L3 

72  The  law  <d'  the  breach  of  treaties, — Russia. 

Law  times,  Oct.  31,  1863,  v.  38:  637. 

73  Lawrence,  Thomas  Joseph.    Essays  on  some  disputed  questions 

in  modern  international  law.    2d  ed.  rev.  and  enl. 

I     ■■,/,,;</</,    [etc.]   Deighton,  />'<//  "/id  co.  [etc.]  1885.     xiii 

p..  I  /..  .;/-;  p.    na1'". 

The  Interpretation  <>f  treaties  discussed  with  reference  to  the 
Clayton-Bulwer  treaty:  i>.  89-162. 
1-27UO-  JX2542.E7     1885 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  19 

74  Lawrence,   Thomas   Joseph.     The   principles   of   international 

law.     4th  ed.,  rev.  and  rewritten. 
Boston,  D.  C.  Heath  &  co.,  1910.    xxi,  745  p.    21cm. 

Treaties,  those  that  make  law:  p.  43-51;  Interpretation  and 
obligation  of  treaties:  p.  326-330;  Effect  of  war  on  treaties: 
p.  360-365. 
10-26825  JX2542.P3     1910 

75  Lehr,  Ernest.     La  clause  de  la  nation  la  plus  favorisee,  speciale- 

ment  d'apres  les  regies  en  vigueur  en  Angleterre  et  aux 
Etats-Unis. 
Revue  de  droit  international  et  de  legislation  comparee, 
1910,  2.  ser.  t.  12:  657-668.  jX3.R4,2d  ser.v.12 

76  Leoni,  A.    Ein  Beitrag  zur  Lehre  von  der  Giiltigkeit  der  Staats- 

vertrage  in  den  Verfassimgs-Staaten. 
Archiv  fur  offentliches  Recht,  1886,  v.  1:498-511. 

JA14.A67,v.l 

77  Levi,  Leone.     International  law,  with  materials  for  a  code  of 

international  law. 
London,  K.  Paul,  Trench  d-  co.,  1887.     xii,  346  p.     19cm. 
{The  international  scientific  series.     [English  ed.]     vol. 
lxii) 

Treaties:  p.  128-184,  237-252. 
10-17124  JX2545.I6    1887 

78  Liszt,  Franz  von.    Das  Volkerrecht.    9.  umgearb.  Aufl. 

Berlin,  O.  Having,  1913.     xii,  565  p.    23cm. 

Die  volkerrechtlichen  Vertrage:  p.  163-172;  Meistbegiinsti- 
gungsklausel :  p.  127-129,  132,  135,  161,  168-169,  191,  196-197, 
217-218,  330,  427 ;  Aufhebung  von  Vertragen  :  p.  169,  171-176, 
294-296;  Hanclelsvertriige :  p.  163,  168,  170,  178,  218-219; 
Politische  Vertrage :  p.  179,  295-296. 
13-13375  JX3445.V4    1913 

79  Lorimer,  James.    The  institutes  of  the  law  of  nations ;  a  treatise 

of  the  jural  relations  of  separate  political  communities. 
Edinburgh  and  London,  W.  Blackwood  and  sons,  1883-84. 

2  v.    23cm. 

Of  treaties :  v.  1,  p.  37-50 ;  Of  the  negotiation  and  ratification 
of  treaties:  p.  260-269. 
5-394  JX2548.I5    1883 

80  Ludwig",  Ernest.     Consular  treaty  rights  and  comments  on  the 

"  most  favored  nation  "  clause. 
Akron,  0.,  The  New  Werner  company  [c1913~\    239  p.    24cm. 
13-24124  JX1698.A4L8 

81  Macdonell,  Sir  John.    Development  of  treaties. 

Law  times  {London)  Nov.  29,  Dec.  27,  1913,  Mar.  21,  1914, 
v.  136:  127-128,  242,  546-547. 


20  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

82  Maine,  Sir  Henry  James  Sumner.    International  law ;  a  series  of 

lectures  delivered  before  the  University  of  Cambridge, 

1887. 
New  York,  II.  Holt  and  company,  1888.    3  p.  I,  234  p. 
£3cm. 

Treaties  of  savages:  p.  13. 
9-9828  JX2555.I6    1888a 

83  Manning,  "William  Oke.    Commentaries  on  the  law  of  nations. 

A  new  ed.,  rev.  by  Sheldon  Amos. 
London,  II.  Sweet,  1875.     lix,  520  p.    22\™. 
Of  rights  accruing  by  treaty :  p.  122-130. 
10-17126  JX2558.C7    1875 

84  Martens,  Fedor  Fedorovich.     Traite  de  droit  international.     Tr. 

du  russe  par  Alfred  Leo. 
Paris,  Ghevalier-Marescq  et  cie.,  1883-87.    3  v.    22\cm. 

Des  conventions  internationales :  v.  1,  p.  510-564;  Traites  de 
commerce:  v.  2,  p.  297-323. 
1-188S1  JX2951.T5    1883 

85  Volkcrrccht.     Das  internationale  Recht  der  civilisirten 

Nationen.    Deutsche  Ausg.  von  Carl  Bergbohm. 

Berlin,  Weidmann,  1883-86.    2  v.    23\™. 

Die  internationalen  Vertriige  im  Allgemeinen:  v.  1,  p. 
389-393;  Abschluss  unci  Reehtskral't  der  internationalen 
Vertriige:  p.  393-407;  Betheiligung  dritter  Staaten  an  den 
Vertragen:  p.  407-410;  Aeussere  Form  der  Internationalen 
Vertragen :  p.  410-412 ;  Arten  der  Internationalen  Ver- 
triige: p.  413-415;  Erfullung  der  internationalen  Vertrage: 
p.  416-417;  Verstiirkung  der  Internationalen  Vertriige:  p. 
417-423;  Auslegung  der  internationalen  Vertrage:  p.  423- 
425;  Erloschung  der  Internationalen  Vertriige:  p.  425-427; 
Anhang :  Internationale  Verblndllchkelten  aus  erlaubteu  und 
unerlaubten  Handlungen :  p.  42S-430. 
11-22992  JX2951.V6    1883 

86  Martens,  Georg  Friedrich  von,  ed.     Recueil  des  principaux  traites 

d'alliance,  de  paix,  de  trove  .  .  .  conclus  par  les  puissances 
de  l'Europe  .  .  .  depuis  1761  jusqua'a  present  .  .  . 
Gottingue,  J.  O.  Dieterich,  1791-1801.    7  v.    21"n. 

Supplement  au  Eeccuil  des  principaux  traites  d'alliance, 

de   paix,    de    trove  .  .  .  precede    de    traites    du    xviiiftma 
si&cle  anterieurs  h.  cette  epoque  et  qui  ne  so  trouvent  pas 
dans  le  Corps  universe!  diplomatique  de  Mrs.  Dumont  et 
Ilousset. 
Gottinc/ue,  II.  Dieterich,  1802-28.    10  v.  in  12.    21cm. 

10-14622  JX142.M28 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  21 

87  Martens,  Georg  Friedrich  von,  ed.     Recueil  des  traites  d'alli- 

ance,  de  paix,  de  treve  .  .  .  et  plusieurs  autres  actes  serv- 
ant a  la  connaissance  des  relations  etrangeres  des  puis- 
sances et  etats  de  l'Europe  .  .  .  depuis  1761  jusqu'a 
present  ...     2.  ed.,  rev.  et  augm. 

Gottingue,  Dieterich,  1817-35.    8  v.    20\cm. 

10-14624  JX142.M3    vol.1-8 

88  Nouveau  recueil  de  traites  d'alliance,  de  paix,  de  treve 

.  .  .  et  de  plusieurs  autres  actes  servant  a  la  connaissance 
des  relations  etrangeres  des  puissances  .  .  .  de  l'Europe 
.  .  .  depuis  1808  jusqu'a  present. 

Gottingue,  Dieterich,  1817-41.    16  v.    20\cm. 

10-14609  JX142.M3    vol.9-24 

89  Table  generale  chronologique  et  alphabetique  du  Recueil 

des  traites  .  .  .  des  puissances  de  l'Europe  et  d'autres 
parties  du  globe. 

Gottingue,  Dieterich,  1837-43.    2  v.    20\cm. 

10-14613  JX142.M3    vol.28-29 

90  Nouveaux  supplemens  au  Recueil  de  traites  .  .  .  depuis 

1761  jusqu'a  present;  fonde  par  George  Frederic  de  Mar- 
tens. Suivis  d'un  appendice  contenant  des  traites  et  actes 
public  importans  d'une  date  anterieure  .  .  .  Par  Fre- 
dric  Murhard  .  .  . 

Goettingue,  Dieterich,  1839-1$.    3  v.    W\cm. 

10-14615  JX142.M3    vol.25-27 

91  Nouveau  recueil  general  de  traites,  conventions  et  autres 

transactions  remarquables,  servant  a  la  connaissance  des 
relations  etrangeres  des  puissances  et  etats  dans  leurs  rap- 
ports mutuels.  Redige  sur  des  copies  authentiques,  par 
Frederic  Murhard.  Continuation  du  grand  recueil  de  feu 
M.  de  Martens. 

Goettingue,  Dieterich,  1843-75.    20  v.  in  22.    fold,  tables. 
20\cm. 

10-14616  JX142.M3    vol.30-49 

92  s Table  generale  du  Recueil  des  traites  de  G.  F.  de  Mar- 

tens et  de  ses  continuateurs.  1494-1874.  Recueil  (lre 
edition) ,  7  volumes — Supplements,  4  volumes — Recueil  (2° 
edition),  8  volumes — Nouveau  recueil,  16  volumes — Nou- 
veaux supplements,  3  volumes — Nouveau  recueil  general, 
20  volumes. 
Gottingue,  Dieterich,  1875.  2  v.  22™. 
Preface  signed:    J.  Hopf. 

Contents. — Partie  chronologique. — Partie  alphabetique. 
10-14620  JX142.M3   vol.50  i-ii 


22  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

93  Martens,  Georg  Friedrich  von.  ed.     Xouveau  recueil  general  de 
traites  el  autres  actes  relatifs  aux  rapports  de  droit  inter- 
national.    Continuation  du  grand   recueil  de  G.  Fr.  de 
Martens,  par.  Charles  Samwer  et  Jules  Hopf.    2.  ser. 
Gottingue,  Dieterich,  1876-1908.   35  v.   fold,  forms.   .!-:ym. 

JX142.M3    vol.51-85 

Table  generate.     Tonics  i  a  xxv. 


Leipzig,  Dieterich,  1900.    348  p.    23^'\     [With  his  Nou- 
veav   recueil  general  de   traites...    2.  ser.     Gottingue^ 

1876-1908.      V.  25  ]  JX142.M3      vol.75 

Table  generale.     Tomes  i  a  xxxv. 

Leipzig,  DieU  rich.  1010.    483  p.    24"". 

10-14014  JX142.M3    vol. 85a 

94:  Xouveau  recueil  general  de  traites  et  autres  actes  rela- 

tifs  aux  rapports  de  droit  international.     Continuation  du 
grand  recueil  de  G.  Fr.  de  Martens,  par  Heinrich  Trie- 
pel  ...     3.  ser. 
Leipzig.  Dl  terich,  1908-1914.    8  v.    24cm. 

10-14011  JX142.M3    vol.86-93 

95  Maxey,  Edwin.    Rights  of  aliens — A  study  in  treaty  making. 

American  lawyer,  Mar.  1908,  v.  10:  171-178. 

The  articles  adopted  at  The  Hague  conference  in  relation  to 
the  rights  of  aliens. 

96  Meier,  Ernst.    Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertriigen. 

Leipzig,  Duncker  &  Humblot,  1874.    xiii  (1),  368  p.    23cm. 

2-18052  JX4171.T5M4 

97  Merignhac,  Alexandre.    Traite  de  droit  public  international. 

Paris,  Librairic  generale  de  droit  &  de  jurisprudence,  F. 
Pichon  '  f  hiirand-Auzias,  administrateurs,  1905-12.     4  v. 

23cm. 

Les  rapports  qui  s'etablissent  entre  les  etats  durant  la  paix. 
Les  traites  international!* :  Conditions  de  validity  lies  traites 
Internationaux:  v.  2,  p.  030;  Des  conditions  de  fond:  Du 
consentement :  p.  037-039;  De  l'objet :  p.  040-041;  De  la 
capacitS:  p.  642  645;  Negociation  et  conclusion  des  traites: 
p.  045-051;  Ratification  des  train's:  p.  652  666;  Effets  des 
trait6s:  p.  667-673;  Execution  des  traites:  p.  673-678;  In- 
terpretation des  traites:  p.  678-679;  Classification  des 
traites  internationaux:  Traites  politiques:  p.  <;si  <;n7; 
Traites  economiques:  p.  688-718;  Traites  de  droit  prlvfi  in- 
ternational: p.  718-723;  Traites  de  pacification:  p.  723-724; 
Traites  portant  sur  des  questions  d'ordre  public  interna- 
tional: p.  724-7SS;  Extinction  des  traites  internationaux: 
p.  788-790. 
6-5104  JX3351.T7     1905 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  23 

98  Mill,  J.  S.    Treaty  obligations. 

Fortnightly  review,  Dec.  1870,  v.  1J/.:  715-720.       AP4.F7,v.l4 

99  Milovanovic,   M.     Droit   romain:   Des  sui   heredes   d'apres   le 

droit    civil    primitif.      Droit    frangais:    Des    traites    de 
garantie  en  droit  international. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1888.    2  p.  I.,  M,  4U  p.    26cm. 

2-16491  JX4171.G8M6 

99a  Les  traites  de  garantie  au  xixe  siecle.     Etude  de  droit 

international  et  d'histoire  diplomatique. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1888.    2  p.  I.,  4J5  p.    28cm. 

19-13118  JX4171.G8M65 

100  Moore,  John  Bassett.    A  digest  of  international  law. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1906.    8  v.    2^cm.     ([U.  S.] 

56th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    House.    Doc.  551) 

Treaties:  v.  5,  p.  155-387.     For  details  see  General  index:  v. 
8,  p.  149-152. 

6-35196  JX237.M7 

101  Moser,    Johann    Jakob.      Versuch    des   neuesten    europaischen 

Volker-rechts  in  Friedens-  und  kriegs-zeiten. 
Frankfurt  am  Mayn,  Varrentrapp  Sohn  und  Wenner,  1777- 
80.    10  v.  in  12.    20\cm. 

Von  Traetaten  und  Bundnissen :  pt.  8,  p.  53-391. 
10-16946  JX2333.V5     1777 

102  Munch,  Hans.     Zwei  badische  Staatsvertriige ;  ein  Beitrag  zur 

Lehre  vom  internationalen  Vertragsrecht. 
Annalen  des  Deutschen  Reichs,  Feb.,  Apr.  1907,  v.  Ifi:  161- 
179;  266-291.  H5.A6,v.40 

103  Munroe,  J.  E.  C.    England's  treaties  of  guarantee. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  May,  1881,  4th  ser.,  v.  6:  215-238. 

104  Myers,  Denj^s  P.    The  control  of  foreign  relations. 

American  political  science  review,  Feb.  1917,  v.  11:  21^-58. 

JAl.A6,v.ll 

105 Violation  of  treaties  by  adverse  national  action. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1918,  v.  12: 
96-126.    '  JX1.A6.V.12 

Treats  of  numerous  instances  where  treaties  have  been  vio- 
lated; arranged  chronologically.    Bibliographical  foot-notes. 


24  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

10G  Neyron,  Peter  Joseph.  Principes  du  droit  des  gens  euro- 
peen  conventionnel  et  coutumier,  ou  bien  Precis  historique 
politique  &  juridique  des  droits  &  obligations  que  les  etats 
de  l'Europe  se  sont  acquis  &  imposes  par  des  conven- 
tions &  des  usages  regus,  que  l'interet  commun  a  rendu 
necessaires. 
Bronswio,  A  la  librairie  des  Orphelins,  17S3.  8  p.  I.,  272  p. 
fold.  tab.    17cm. 

Des  traites  en  general,  p.  383-202. 
9-23599  JX2274.P6    1783 

107  Nippold,  Otfried.    Der  volkerrechtliche  Vcrtrag,  seine  Stellung 

im  Rechtssystem  und  seine  Bedeutung  fur  das  Interna- 
tionale Recht. 
Bern,  K.  J.  Wyss,  1894.   n\  285,  [/]  p.   2^cm. 

"  Erkliirnng  der  abgekiirzten  Citate  " :  p.  283-2S5. 
12-30164  JX4167.N6 

108  Nys,  Ernest.    Le  droit  international ;  les  principes,  les  theories, 

les  faits.     Nouv.  6d. 
Bruxelles,  M.  Weissenbach,  1 912.    3  v.    25\cm. 

Traitfe :  v.  2,  516-523 ;  v.  3,  p.  18-24,  43-48,  746-757. 
12-23096  JX2702.D7    1912 

109 Les  origines  du  droit  international. 

Bruxelles,  A.  Castaigne,  189  If.   3  p.l.,v,  \7~\-4H  p.   25cm. 
See  p.  278-294. 
F-26S8  JX2041.N9 

110  Olivi,  Luigi.    Manuale  di  diritto  internazionale  pubblico  e  pri- 

vate    2.  ed.  riveduta  con  nuove  note  ed  aggiunte. 
Milano,  Societa  editrice  libraHa,  1911.    viii,  96^  p.    13^cm. 
(Piccola  biblioteca  scientifica — 8) 

Obbligazioni  internazionali :  p.  355-428. 
12-16417  JX2910.O7M3     1911 

111  Olney,  Richard.    General  arbitration  treaties. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1912,  v.  6: 
595-O00.  JXl.A6,v.6 

112  Oncken,  A.    ITandelsvertrage. 

{Ill   Handworterbneb   der   Staatswlsspnsrbafton,  brsg.   von  J. 

Conrad.    2d  ed.  v.  4.    Jena,  1900.    p.  1067-10S  1. 1 
Die  Klausel  der  Meistbegiinstigten  Nation :  p.  1073-1074. 

H45.H22,v.4 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  25 

113  Oppenheim,  Lassa   Francis  Lawrence.     International  law,  a 

treatise.     2d  ed. 
London,  New  York  [etc.']  Longmans,  Green  and  co.,  1912. 
2  v.    23\™. 

Bibliographical  notes. 

Treaties :  Character  and  function  of  treaties :  v.  1,  p.  540-543 ; 
Parties  to  treaties :  p.  543-548 ;  Objects  of  treaties :  p.  548- 
552;  Ratification  of  treaties:  p.  553-561;  Effect  of  treaties: 
p.  561-567 ;  Participation  of  third  states  in  treaties :  p.  567- 
569;  Expiration  and  dissolution  of  treaties:  p.  570-576; 
Voidance  of  treaties:  p.  576-577;  Cancellation  of  treaties: 
p.  578-580;  Renewal,  reconfirmation,  and  redintegration  of 
treaties :  p.  580-582  ;  Interpretation  of  treaties  :  p.  582-586 ; 
Important  groups  of  treaties:  Important  law-making  trea- 
ties: p.  587-595;  Alliances:  p.  595-599;  Treaties  of  guar- 
antee and  of  protection  :  p.  599-604  ;  Commercial  treaties :  p. 
605-612;  Unions  concerning  common  non-political  interests: 
p.  612-626. 
12-9559  JX3264.I6     1912 

114  The  meaning  of  coasting-trade  in  commercial  treaties. 

Law  quarterly  review,  July,  1908,  v.  24:  328-334. 

115  Paignon,  Eugene.    Ratification. 

{In   Block,    Maurice.     Dictionnaire   general    de    la    politique, 
Paris,  1874.       24$cm.     v.  2,  p.  767-768.)  JA62.B7,v.2 

116  Pflaum.     Die  Meistbegiinstigungsklausel. 

WeltwirtschafiUches  Archiv,  Jan.  1914,  v.  3:  20-36. 

H5.W4,v.3 

117  Philbert,  V.    De  la  liberte  du  commerce  dans  les  traites  de  com- 

merce. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1902.    viii,  197  p.,  1  I.    25\cm. 

3-22916  HF1721.P5 

118  Phillimore,  G.  G.    Most  favored  nation  clause  in  treaties. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  Dec.  1903,  v.  28:  208-213. 

119  Phillimore,  Sir  Robert  Joseph,  hart.    Commentaries  upon  in- 

ternational law.     3d  ed. 
London,  Butterworths;  [etc.,  etc.]  1879-89.    4  v.    22cm. 
See  Index  to  each  volume  under  Treaties. 
10-15576  JX2565.C4     1879 

120  Phillimore,  Sir  Walter  George  Frank,  hart.    Three  centuries 

of  treaties  of  peace  and  their  teaching. 
London,  J.  Murray,  1917.    xvi,  227  p.    front,  (port.)    21\cm. 
"  List  of  authorities  to  which  reference  is  made  " :  p.  xiii-xvi. 
17-31431  JX5181.P5 

Reviewed  by  C.  N.  Gregory  in  American  journal  of  interna- 
tional law,  v.  12:  679-f. 


26  LIBRARY    OF    CONGRESS 

121  Phillipson,  Coleman.      Termination  of  war  and  treaties  of  peace. 

X,  w  York.  E.  P.  Button  <&  company,  1916.     xix,  486  p.,  1  I 

25rm. 

17_oS3  JX5166.P5     1916a 

122  Pic,  P.    De  Interpretation  des  traites  internationaux. 

Revue  generals  de  droit  international  public,  J  an -Feb.  1910, 
v.  17:5-35. 

Bibliographical  foot-notes.  JX3.R56,v.l7 

123  Ponsonby,  Arthur  Augustus  William  Harry.    Wars  &  treaties, 

L815  to  1914,  [3d  ed.,  rev.  and  enl.] 

London,  G.  Allen  <&  Unwin  ltd.;  New  York,  The  Macmillan 

company    1919      103,  [i]  p.    21h'm. 

Bibliography:  1  p.  at  end. 
19-6362  D361.P6     1919 

124  Pradier-Fodere,  Paul  Louis  Ernest.     Cours  de  droit  diploma- 

tique a  I'usage  des  agents  politiques  du  ministere  des  af- 
faires etrangeres  des  etats  europeens  et  americains.     2.  ed. 
completement  rev.,  augm.  et  mise  au  courant  d'apres  las 
plus  recents  documents  officiels. 
Paris,  A.  Pedone,  1899.    2  v.    22™. 

Les  traites  et  les  conventions:  v.  2,  p.  461-493. 
10-16278  JX1659.P8 

125  Traite  de  droit  international  public  europeen  &  ameri- 

cain,  suivant  les  progres  de  la  science  et  de  la  pratique  con- 
temporaines. 

Paris,  G.  Pedone-Lauriel,  1885-1906.    8  v.    23™. 

Table  generate  analytique,  par  C.  Pradier-Fodere. 

Paris,  - 1 .  Pedone,  1906.    2  p.  1, 198  p.,  1  I.    23™. 
Droits  accidentels.— Les  traites:  v.  2,  p.  459-945. 
6-32700  JX2725.T7     1885 

12G  Prudhomme,  A.  La  loi  territoriale  et  les  traites  diplomat iques 
(levant  les  juridict ions  des  etats  contractants ;  essai  sur 
^interpretation  des  traites. 
Paris,  /:'.  Pichon  <  t  I  >"rand-Auzias,  1910.  2  p.  I,  vii,  346  p. 
25\™.  (Bibliotheque  de  jurisprudence  civile  contempo- 
raine,  vni) 

,_•   L5806  JX4166.P8 

127  Pufendorf,   Samuel,  freiherr  von.     Samuelis   Pufendorfii   De 
jure  naturae  et  gentium,     libriocto.    Editio  vltima, auctior 
multo,  &  emendatior. 
Amstelcedami,  apud  Joannem  Wolters,  1698.    4  P-  I;  9%9-> 
[ ;  |  p.    24  x  18™. 

.j_17G40  JX2136.A1     1698 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  I   GENERAL  27 

128  Pufendorf,  Samuel,  freiherr  von.     Sam.  1.  b.  a  Pvfendorf  De 

ivre  natvrae  et  gentivm,  libri  octo.  Cvm  integris  com- 
mentariis  .  .  .  Io.  Nic.  Hertii,  atqve  Io.  Barbeyraci.  Ac- 
cedit  Eris  scandica.  Recensvit  et  animadversionibvs  il- 
Jvstravit  Gottfridvs  Mascovivs. 
Francofvrti  et  Lipsiae,  ex  officina  Knochio-eslingeriana, 
1759.     2  v.     front,  (port.)  25cm. 

10-16938  JX2136.A1     1759 

129  S.   Pufendorfii   De   officio   hominis  et   civis  secundum 

legem  naturalem  libri  duo. 

Lugduni  Batavorum,  apud  S.  et  J.  Luchtmans,  1769.     2  v. 
in  1.     21cm. 

De  Foederibus,  Book  2,  Chap.  17,  (p.  873-882)— De  ministris 
obligationum  eontrabendarura  in  genere,  Book  3,  chap.  9, 
(v.  1,  p.  425-450) — De  pactics  bellicis,  Book  8,  chap.  7 
(v.  2,  p.  454-461) — De  pactis  pacem  reducentibus,  Book  8, 
elm  p.  8  (v.  2,  p.  462-466) — De  foederibus,  Book  8,  chap.  9 
(v.  2,  p.  466-478) — De  pactis  regum  promiscius,  Book  8, 
chap.  10,  (v.  2,  p.  479-484). 
9-33998  JC156.P7     1769 

130  Le  droit  de  la  nature  et  des  gens,  ou  Systeme  general 

des  principes  les  plus  importans  de  la  morale,  de  la  juris- 
prudence, et  de  la  politique.  Nouv.  ed.,  revue  de  nou- 
veau  &  augm.  considerablement. 

Londres  [Paris]  J.  Nours,  171^0.    3  v.    front,  (port.)    26cm. 

3-23650  JX2136.F5     1740 

131 Of  the  law  of  nature  and  nations.     Eight  books.  Writ- 
ten in  Latin  by  the  Baron  Pufendorf  ...     Tr.  into  Eng- 
lish, from  the  best  edition.     With  a  short  introduction. 
Oxford,  A.  and  J.  Churchil  [etc.]  1703.    4  p.  I,  27,  [17], 
lfiO,  262  p.,  1  I.    33cm. 

9-22554  JX2136.E5     1703 

132  QuaVjbe,  Georg.    Die  volkerrechtliche  Garantie. 

Breslau,M.&  H.Marcus,  1911.  x,17j,p.  23\™.  (Abhand- 
hmgen  ans  dem  Stoats-  und  verwaltungsrecht,  mit  Ein- 
schluss    des    Kolonialrechts    und    des  Volkerrechts  .  .  . 

21  Hft.) 

"  Literaturverzeiehnis"  :    p.    [vii]-ix. 
"Quellenvverke" :  p.  x. 
11-14728  JX4171.G8Q3 


28  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

132a  Recueil  international  des  traites  du  xixe  siecle,  contenant 
Tensemble  dn  droit  conventionnel  entre  les  6tats  et  les 
sentences  arbitrales  (textes  originaux  avec  traduction 
franchise)  pub.  par  le  baron  Descamps  et  Louis  Renault 
.  .  .  avec  le  concours  de  M.  Jules  Basdevant. 
Paris,  A  Rousseau,  [1914]    1  v.    28cm. 

15-19035  JX172.R6 

132b  Recueil  international  des  traites  du  xxe  siecle  . .  .  Annee  1901- 
190G. 
Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  [1904-1913]    5  v.  fold,  tables,  forms. 
88cm. 

6-12236  JX172.R5 

133  Richard,  Henry.    On  the  obligation  of  treaties. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  Nov.  1877,  4th  ser.,  v.  3:  91-103. 

"  Read  before  the  Association  for  the  Reform  and  Codifica- 
tion of  the  Law  of  Nations,  at  the  Antwerp  Conference, 
September,   1877.     Revised   and   corrected  by   the  Author." 

134  Rivier,  Alphonse  Pierre  Octave.     Principes  du  droit  des  gens. 

Paris,  A.  Rousseau,  1896.    2  v.    22\cm. 

Des  conventions  entre  Gtats,  ou  des  traites:  v.  2,  p.  31-146; 

Traites  de  paix,  v.  2,  p.  145,  442,  451-461.     See  also  v.  1, 

p.  35,  37,  S3,  310,  335,  348,  365,  868.  370,  374,  379 ;  v.  2,  34, 

35,  45,  88,  107,  109,  110,  111,  116,  120,  172,  215. 

2-19974  JX3091.P9     1896 

135  Rolin-Jaequemyns,  M.  G.    Les  alliances  europeennes  au  point 

de  vue  du  droit  international. 
Revue  de  droit  international  et  de  legislation  comparee, 
1888,  v.  20:  5-35.  JX3.R4,v.20 

13G  Salvioli,  Gabrielle.     Sulla  clausola  "  Rebus  sic  stantibus  "  nei 
trattati  internazionali. 
Rivista  di  diritto  internazionale,  1914,  v.  8:  264-275. 

JX7.R6,v.8 

137  Sanctity  of  a  treaty. 

Spectator,  Jan.  27,  1917,  v.  118  93-94.  AP4.S7,v.H8 

138  Sanctity  of  international  contracts. 

Spet  tator,  Mar.  %8,  1918,  v.  120:  308-309.  AP4.S7,v.i20 

139  Sanctity  of  international  contracts. 

Living  age,  May  4,  1018,  v.  297:  312-315.  AP2.L65.V.297 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  29 

140  Satow,  Sir  Ernest  Mason.     A  guide  to  diplomatic  practice. 

London,  New  York  [etc.']  Longmans,  Green  and  co.,  1917 
2    v.     23\cm.      {Contributions  to  international  law   and 
diplomacy,  ed.  by  L.  Oppenheim) 
Bibliography :  v.  2,  p.  363-379. 

Treaties  and  other  international  compacts:  v.  2,  p.  172-288. 
17-14175  JX1635.S3 

141  Scala,  Rudolf  von.     Die  Staatsvertrage  des  Altertums.     1.  Teil. 

Leipzig,  B.  G.  Teubner,  1898.   xiv  p.,  1  I.,  226  p.  23cm. 
No  more  published. 
G-1689  JX2001.S3 

142  Schmalz,  Theodor  Anton  Heinrich.     Das  europaische  Volker- 

recht ;  in  acht  Buchern. 
Berlin,  Duncher  und  Humblot,  1817.     vi,  306  p.    19^cm. 

Von  Vertragen  und  besondern  Normen  unter  europaischen 
Volkern,  p.  47-70;  Von  schriftlichen  Verhandlungen  unter 
den  Machten,  p.  70-79;  Von  Vertragen  mit  dem  Feinde,  p. 
254-258;  Von  der  Schliessung  des  Friedens,  p.  259-268. 
"  Von  verbundeten  Machten,  p.  269-278. 
10-15584  JX2834.E6     1817 

143  Le  droit  des  gens  europeen,  tr.  de  l'allemand  .  .  .  par 

le  comte  Leopold  de  Bohm. 

Paris,  N.  Maze,  1823.    2  p.  I.,  vj,  237  {i.  e.  304)  P-    ®®cm- 

Des  tarites,  et  des  regies  observees  a  cet  egard  par  les  gou- 
vernemens  Europ§ens,  p.  49-72 ;  Des  transactions  par  6crit 
entre  les  puissances,  p.  73-80;  Des  traites  avec  l'ennemi, 
p.  254-258 ;  Des  traites  de  paix,"  p.  259-268 ;  Des  puissances 
alliees,"  p.  269-277. 
10-17041  JX2834.E63     1823 

144  Schmidt,  Bruno.     Uber  die  volkerrechtliche  clausula  rebus  sic 

stantibus  sowie  einige  verwandte  Volkerrechtsnormen. 
Zugleich  ein  Beitrag  zu  grundsatzlichen  Problemen  der 
Rechtslehre. 
Leipzig,  Duncker  &  Humblot,  1907.  ix,  [1],  226  p.  23cm. 
{Stoats-  wnd  volkerrechtliche  Abhandlwngen  .  .  .  hrsg. 
von  dr.  G.  Jellinek  und  dr.  Anschiltz  .  .  .  vi.  1) 

7-26012  JX4171.C6S7 

145  Schoen,  Die  volkerrechtliche   Bedeutung  staatsrecht- 

licher     Beschrankungen     der     Vertretungsbefugnis     der 
Staatsoberhaupter  beim  Abschlusse  von  Staatsvertragen. 
(Eine  Kritik  der  Anzilottischen  Theorie) 
Zeitschrift  fur  Volkeirecht  mid  Bundesstaatsrecht,  1911, 
v.  5:400-431.  JX5.Z5,v.5 


30  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

146  Schraut,    Max    von.      System    der    Handelsvertrage    und    der 

Meistbegiinstigung. 
Li  ipzig,  Duncfa  r  <&  Uuinllot,  188$.    x,  121,  [1]  p.    22cm. 

4-S209  HF1721.S4 

147  Scott,  James  Brown,  ed.     Cases  on  international  law,  selected 

from  decisions  of  English  and  American  courts. 
St.  Paul,  West  publishing  co.,  1906.     Ixvii,  961  p.    23\cm. 

Treaties     (syllabus):     p.     xliv-xlvi,     lii,     lvii-lviii ;     (cases): 
p.  412-149. 
6-6913  JX68.S34 

148  Seligmann,  Ernst.     Beitriige  zur  Lehre  vom  Staatsgesetz  und 

Staatsvertrag. 
Berlin  and  Leipzig,  J.  Guttentag  (D.  Collin);  [etc.,  etc.] 
1886-90.    2  v.    2$cm. 

II.  th.  Abschluss  und  Wirksamkeit  der  Staatsvertrage. 
6-12242  JX4167.S4 

140  Shepheard,  Wallyn  P.  B.     The  most-favored-nation  article. 
Socii  ty  <>f  comparative  legislation.  Journal.  Dec.  1901,  v.  3: 
231-237;  Aug.  1903,  v.  5: 132-136.  JA29.S7,v.3,5 

150  Sherman,  Gordon  E.     The  permanent  neutrality  treaties. 

Yal<   law  journal.  Jan.  1915,  v.  24 :  217-2 ',1-' 

151  Skelton,  Oscar  Douglas.    Canada  and  the  most  favored  nation 

treaties. 
Kingston,  Ont..  Printed  at  the  Jackson  press  [1912]     24  p. 
J .'},•'".      (Bullet hi  of  the  departments  of  histoiy  and  of 
political    and    economic    science    in    Queen's   unive rs i t y , 
Kingston,  Ontario^  Canada,  no.  2,  January  1912) 

AS42.Q6 
12-4953  HF1733.C2S6 

152  Smith,  Sir  Frederick  Edwin,  hart.     International  law.    5th  ed., 

rev.  and  enl.  by  Coleman  Phillipson. 
London  *(•  Toronto,  J.  M .  hent&  sons,  ltd.;  [etc.,  etc.]  1918. 
456  /:     .'■>"". 

The  treaty  law  of  nations:  p.  141-152. 
18-20321  JX3281.I6     1918 

153  Stoerk,  Felix.     Das  Ansfnhrverhot  und  die  partielle  Suspen- 

sion volkerrechtlicher  Vertrage. 
ArcAic  fur  oft entliches  Recht,  l$9Jh  v.  9:23-51. 

JA14.A67,v.9 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER!   GENERAL  31 

154  Tariff    commission,  London.     Most-favored-nation    arrange- 

ments and  British  trade.     Prepared  by  the.  Tariff  com- 
mission, London,  England.     Printed  for  Committee  on 
finance,  United  States  Senate. 
■Washington  [Govt,  print,  off.]  1911.    34  V-    ^\cm- 

11-35530  HP1721.T32 

155  Taylor,  Hannis.     A  treatise  on  international  public  law. 

Chicago,  Oallaghan  d-  company,  1901.    Ixocvi,  912  p.    24\cm. 

The   treaty-making  power:    p.   362-404.     See  also   Index:   p. 

897-899. 
2_762/2  JX3181.T7     1901 

156  Teubern,   Ernst   Gottwalt,   freiherr  von.     Die  Meistbegiinsti- 

gungsklausel  in  den  international  Handelsvertragen. 
Breslau,  J.  V.  Kern  (31.  Mutter)  1913.     vi,  75  p.    25\™. 
(Beiheft  i  zum  vn,  Bande  der  Zeitschrift  fur  Volker- 
recht) 

"Literaturverzeichnis" :  p.  v-vi. 
14-4452  JX5.Z6    vol.  1,  suppl.  1 

157  Thompson,  Joseph  P.     Concerning  treaties  as  matter  of  the 

law  of  nations.  (Prepared  for  the  "Association  for  the 
reform  and  codification  of  the  law  of  nations,"  at  its  con- 
ference in  Antwerp,  August,  187T.) 

(In  his  American  comments  on  European  questions,  interna- 
tional and  religious.     Boston,  18S4.     p.  132-150.) 

158  Treaty-law. 

Solicitors'  journal  and  reporter,  Feb.  20, 1864,  v.  8:  300-301. 
Discusses  the  abrogation  of  treaties  by  war. 

159  Treaty  obligations  and  American  fishermen. 

Laio  times,  Dec.  9,  1871,  v.  52:94. 

160  Triepel,  Heinrich.     Volkerrecht  und  Landesrecht. 

Leipzig,  G.  L.  HirschfeU,  1899.    xii,  452  p.    23™. 
Staatsvertriige,  see  Index:  p.  451-452. 
6-38456  JX1248.T8 

161  Twiss,  Sir  Travers.     The  law  of  nations  considered  as  inde- 

pendent political  communities.    On  the  rights  and  duties 
of  nations  in  time  of  peace.    New  ed.  [2d]  rev.  and  enl. 
Oxford,   Clarendon  press;    [etc.,  etc.]    1884.     Ivi,   486  p. 

22icm. 

"Treaty   limitations  of   right   of   self   defense,"    p.    145-146; 
"  Right  of  treaty,"  p.  320-378. 
16-8764  JX2582.L4    1884 


32  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1G2  Ullmann,  Emanuel,  ritter  von.     Volkerrecht.     Neubearb.  auf 

dcr  Grundlage  der  1.  Ann.  (1898)  im  "  Handbuch  des 
offentlichen  Rechts." 
Tubingen,  J.  C.  B.  Mohr  (P.  Siebeck)  1908.  viii,  555,  [1]  p. 
27cm.  (Das  ofeniliche  Perht  der  Gegenwart  .  .  . 
hrsg.  von  dr.  G.  Jellinek  .  .  .  dr.  P.  Ldband  .  .  .  dr.  R. 
Piloty  ...    Bd  III.) 

Die  Staatsvertrnge :  p.  247-2S6. 
8_19104  JF13.03,v.3 

163  U.  S.  Bureau  of  trade  relations.     "Reciprocity"  treaties— Fa- 

vored nation  clauses.  Letter  to  Hon.  Boies  Penrose, 
chairman  of  the  Committee  on  finance,  from  the  secretary 
of  state,  relative  to  favored-nation  clauses  in  the  treaties 
of  the  United  States,  particularly  reciprocity. 
Washington  [Govt,  print,  of.]  1911.  19  p.  mcm.  (62d 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate.    Doe.  29) 

Ll_35427  HF1731.A5     1911 

164  Dept.    of    state.     Tentative    list    of    treaty    collections. 

{Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1919.]  103  p. 

19-26327 

165  The  Validity  and  enforcement  of  treaties.     [Their  relation  to 

statutes  in  England  and  the  United  States] 
Solicitor's  journal  and  weekly  reporter,  Apr.  16,  1910,  v. 
54:  422-423. 

166  Vattcl,  Emmerich  de.     Le  droit  des  gens;  ou,  Principes  de  la 

loi  naturelle  appliques  a  la  conduite  et  aux  affaires  des 
nations  et  cles  souverains,  par  M.  de  Vattel,  with  an  intro- 
duction by  Albert  de  Lapradelle. 
"Washington,  Carnegie  institution  of  Washington,  1916.  3  v. 
front,  (port.)  26cm.  (The  classics  of  international  law, 
ed.  by  J.  B.  Scott.     [4] ) 

Contents. — v.  1.  Reproduction  of  books  i  and  n  of  edition  of 
1758. — v.  2.  Reproduction  of  books  in  and  iv  of  edition  of 
1758.— v.  3.  Translation  of  tbe  edition  of  1758,  by  Charles 
G.  Fenwlck,  with  an  introduction  by  Albert  de  Lapradelle. 
Des  traites  d'alliance  &  autres  train's  publics,  Bk.  2,  chap.  12, 
v.  1,  p.  308-404;  De  la  dissolution  &  du  renouvellement  des 
traitfes,  'bap.  13,  p.  405-413;  Des  autres  conventions  pu- 
bliques;  chap.  14,  p.  414-432;  De  la  foi  des  traites,  chap.  15, 
p.  433^144;  Des  sflretes  donnees  pour  l'observatlon  des 
traites,  chap.  L6,  p.  115-459;  De  Interpretation  des  traites, 
Chap.  17,  p.  400-514.  Des  traites  de  paix,  Bk.  4,  chap.  2, 
v.  2.  p.  255-208;  De  l'execution  du  traite  de  paix,  chap.  3, 
p.  L'<;;n;77;  D>  ['observation  &  de  la  rupture  du  traite  de 
paix,  chap.  4,  p.  277-2'J L  JX64.C5    vol.4 

10-17702  JX2414.A1     191G 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:    GENERAL  33 

167  Vattel,  Emmerich  de.  The  law  of  nations ;  or,  Principles  of  the 
law  of  nature,  applied  to  the  conduct  and  affairs  of  na- 
tions and  sovereigns.  From  the  new  ed.,  by  Joseph 
Chitty.  With  additional  notes  and  references,  by  Ed- 
ward D.  Ingraham,  esq. 
Philadelphia,  T.  &  «/.  W.  Johnson  c&  co.,  1857.  Ixvi,  656  p. 
23\cm. 

Of  treaties  of  alliance,  and  other  public  treaties:  p.  192-213; 
Of  the  dissolution  and  renewal  of  treaties:  p.  213-217; 
Of  other  public  conventions,  etc.:  p.  217-228;  Of  the  faith 
of  treaties  :  p.  228-235 ;  Of  securities  given  for  the  observance 
of  treaties:  p.  235-243;  Of  the  interpretation  of  treaties: 
p.  243-274;  Treaties  of  peace:  p.  432-439;  Of  the  ex- 
ecution of  the  treaty  of  peace:  p.  439-444;  Of  the  ob- 
servance and  breach  of  the  treaty  of  peace :  p.  444-451. 
10-17157  JX2414.E5     1857 

168  Verge,  Ch.     Traites  politiques,  de  commerce  et  de  navigation. 

I.  Regies  generales. 

(In   Block,    Maurice.     Dictionnaire   general   de   la   politique, 
Paris,  1874.     24icm.     v.  2,  p.  1046-1050.)  JA62.B7,v.2 

169  Vincent,  Rene,  and  lildouard  Penaud.     Dictionnaire  de  droit 

international  prive ;  legislation— doctrine— jurisprudence 
franchises. 
Paris,  L.  Larose  et  Force!,  1888.    xxv  p.,  1  I.,  951  p.    28cm. 

"Traites  diplomatiques  " :  p.  884-892.     Bibliography:  p.  884- 
885. 
6-37275  JX6042.V5     1888 

1^° Dictionnaire  de  droit  international  prive.    Revue 

de  l'annee  1888,  suivie  d'une  table  chronologique. 
Paris,  L.  Larose  et  Forcel,  1889.    2  p.  I.,  128  p.    28cm. 

"Traites  de  commerce":   p.   113;   "Traites  diplomatiques": 
p.  113-116. 
6-37274  JX6042.V5     1889 

171 Revue  de  l'annee  1889,  suivie  d'une  table 

chronologique. 
Paris,  L.  Larose  et  Forcel,  1890.    3  p.  I.,  3-140  p.   27\cm. 

Traites  de  commerce:  p.  127;  Traites  diplomatiques:  p    127- 
128. 
10-17301  JX6042.V5     1890 

172  Visser,  L.  E.     La  clause  de  "  la  nation  la  plus  favorisee  "  dans 

les  traites  de  commerce. 

Revue   de   droit  international  et  de   legislation  comparee 

1902,  2.  sir.  t.  4:  66-87, 159-177,  270-280. 

JX3.R4,2.ser,v.4 
137190°— 20 3 


34  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

173  Vosberg-Rekow,  Max.     Die  Handelsvertrage  des  Jahres  1903. 

Betrachtungen  and  Vorschlage. 
H,  rlin,  J.  GutU  ntag,  1900.    ',  p.  /..  128  p.    %3\<™.    {Schriften 
der  CentralstelU  fur  Vorbereitung  von  Handelsveriragen. 

U-  lift.) 

3-10238  HF1721.V7 

174  Die  Politik  der  Handelsvertrage  in  ihren  Grundziigen 

gemeinfassli'ch  dargestellt. 

Berlin,  Siemenroth  <&  Troschel,  1808.  viii,  180  p.  fold. 
tab.  23Vm.  {Schriften  der  Gentralstelle  fur  Vorbereitung 
von  Hand<  Isvertragen.    in.  lift.) 

8-10240  HF1733.G3V8 

175  Walker,   Thomas   Alfred.     A  manual   of  public  international 

law. 
Cambridge^  University  press,  1805.    xxviii,  2M  p.    22\cm. 

"The  definition  of  the  effeel  of  a  treaty  is  a  matter  of  inter- 
pretation to  be  determined  in  accordance  with  certain  well- 
recognized  canons":  p.  85-86. 
See  Index  under  Treaties:  p.  242. 
8-26244  JX2584.W3M3     1895 

17G  The  science  of  international  law. 

London,  C.  J.  Clay  and  sons,  1803.     xvi,  [2],  5U  P-     ^cm- 
Extradition   treaties:  p.  234-285;  Effect  of  war  on  treaties: 
p.  326-328. 
10-17175  JX2584.W3S4     1893 

177  Washburn,   Albert  IT.     The  American   interpretation  of  the 

most   favored  nation  doctrine. 
Virginia  law  review,  Jan.  1014,  v.  1 :  '257-206. 

178  Wehberg,  Hans.     Restrictive  clauses  in  international  arbitra- 

tion treaties. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1013,  v.  7: 
JU1-3U. 

Points  out  and  analyzes  the  special  grounds  for  the  different 
reservations  contained  In  several  arbitration  treaties  con- 
cluded up  to  the  presenl  time. 

JXl.A6,v.7 

17!i  Weil,  Bruno.     Die  Mitwirkung  dor  Volksvertretung  bei  Staats- 
vertragen. 

Strasshurg  i.  /•:..  J.  Singer,  1006.   2  p.  1.,  \7\~136,  Hi  p.   22™. 

"  Literaturnachweis " :  ill  p.  at  end. 
9-26483  JF269.W5 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  :   GENERAL  35 

180  Westlake,  John.     Chapters  on  the  principles  of  international 

law. 
Cambridge,   University   press,   189^.     xicc,275,[l~\  p.    23cm. 

„    Treaties  with  uncivilised  tribes :  p.  143-155. 

12-40263  JX2588.C4     1894 

181  International  law. 

Cambridge,  The  University  press,  1910-13.    2  v.    22em. 

Treaties:  v.  1,  p.  59,  66,  84,  290-299,  304. 
11-1990  JX2588.16     1910 

182  Wharton,  Francis,  ed.    A  digest  of  the  international  law  of  the 

United  States,  taken   from   documents  issued  by  presi- 
dents and  secretaries  of  state,  and  from  decisions  of  fed- 
eral courts  and  opinions  of  attorneys-general.     [2d  ed.] 
Washington,   Govt,    print,    of.,   1887.    3    v.     fold.    form. 

Treaties :  v.  2,  chap.  6,  p.  1-166. 
10-6949  JX237.W5     1887 

183  Wheaton,  Henry.     Elements  of  international  law.    4th  English 

ed.,  bringing  the  work  down  to  the  present  time,  by  J. 
Beresford  Atlay. 
London,  Stevens   and   sons,   limited,  190 1^.     xxxv,  8^8  p. 
25\cm. 

Rights  of  negotiation  and  treaties  :  p.  364-410 ;  Treaty  of  peace  : 
p.  723-733. 
4-21093  JX2495.E3     1904 

184  Wicquefort,  Abraham  van.     L'ambassadeur  et  ses  fonctions. 

LaHaye,  J.  &  D.  Steucker,  1681,  W.    2  v.    21cm. 

See  v.  2,  sec.  xv. 
10-34832  JX1652.W5     Office 

185  Wolff,  Christian,  freiherr  von.     Institutions  juris  naturae  et 

gentium,  in  quibus  ex  ipsa  hominis  natura  continuo  nexu 
omnes  obligationes  et  jura  omnia  dedvcvntvr. 
Hales  Magdeburgicce,  prostat  in  officina  Rengeriana,  1754- 
12  p.  I,  782,  [55]  p.     17cm. 

De  modo  sese  alteri  obligandi,  seu  promissis  et  pactis  in 
genere,  sees.  377-447 ;  De  interpretatione,  sees.  794—817 ;  De 
foederibus  &  sponsionibus,  sees.  1140-1156 ;  De  pace  et 
pactione  pacis,  sees.  1217-1235;  De  officiis  gentium  erga  se 
invicem  ac  inde  nascentibus  juribus,  sees.  1108-1124 ;  Pac- 
tum, sees.  1084,  1089,  1099,  1101,  1194. 
10-17080  JX2347.I5     1754 


36  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

186  Wolff,  Christian,  freiherr  von.     Institutions  du  droit  do  la  na- 

ture et  des  gens,  dans  lesquelles,  par  une  chaine  continue, 
on  deduit  de  la  nature  meine  de  1'homme,  toutes  ses  obli- 
gations &  tons  ses  droits. 
A  Leide:  E.  Luzac,  177 J.    6  v.    16°. 
Latin  and  French  <>n  opposite  pages. 

De  la  maniere  de  s'obliger  envers  un  autre,  on  des  promesses 
vV  ties  conventions  en  general,  sees.  .H77-447  ;  De  l'interpre- 
i. it  ion,  so.s.  794-817;  Des  alliances,  sees.  1140-1156;  De  la 
paix  &  des  traites  de  paix,  sees.  1217-1235;  Dos  devoirs  des 
nations  les  uncs  envers  les  autres,  &  des  droits  qui  en 
naissent,  sees.  1108-1124;  Conventions  ou  traites,  sees.  1084, 
L089,   1<»!)<),  1101,  1194. 

187  Jus  gentium  methodo  scientifica   pertractatvm,  in  qvo 

jus  gentium  naturale  ab  eo,  qvod  voluntarii,  pactitii  et 
consuetdinarii  est,  acevrate  distingvitvr. 

Halite  MiHjth  l>rr<ii<<i'\  pros/at  in  officina  libraria  Rengeriana. 
1749.  10  p.  L,  849,  [27]  p.   211fm. 

10-170S2  JX2347.J6     1749 

188  Woolsey,  Theodore  Dwight.     Introduction  to  the  study  of  in- 

ternational law,  designed  as  an  aid  in  teaching  and  in 
historical   studies.     Gth   ed.,   rev.   and   enl.   by   Theodore 
Salisbury  Woolsey. 
New  York,  C.  Scribner's  sons,  1901.    xix,  527  p.    21cm. 

Of  the  right  of  contract  and  especially  of  treaties:  p.  158-174; 

Language  used  in  treaties:  p.  200-262. 
Appendix   n:  List  of  the  most  important  treaties  since  the 
reformation,  with  a  hrief  statement  of  the  provisions:   p. 
[423] -501. 
4-4G18  JX2498.I6     1901 

189  Wright,  Quincy.     Legal  nature  of  treaties. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Oct.  1916,  v.  10: 
706-736. 

Treats  of  the  legal  nature  of  treaties  as   recognized  by  the 
leading  states  of  the  world,  subject  to  certain  limitations. 

JX1.A6.V.10 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER:   GENERAL  37 

190  Wright,  Quincy.     Treaties  and  the  constitutional  separation  of 

powers  in  the  United  States. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1918,  v.  12: 
6i-95. 

Footnote  references;  cases  cited. 

Concludes  "  that  the  principle  of  separation  of  powers  im- 
poses no  limitation  upon  the  treaty-making  power.  If  the 
subject  is  appropriate  for  treaty  negotiation,  consonant  with 
the  purposes  of  the  Constitution,  and  in  violation  of  none  of 
its  specific  prohibitions,  the  treaty,  if  ratified,  is  valid,  and 
all  other  departments  of  government, — the  legislative, 
executive,  and  judiciary,  are  bound  by  their  allegiance  to 
the  Constitution  to  perform  the  acts  necessary  to  give  it 
effect."     p.  93. 

JXl.A6,v.l2 

191  [Wurm,  C.  F.]     Die  Ratification  von  Staatsvertragen. 

Deutsche  Vierteljahrs  Schrift,  1845,  v.  8,1.  Heft:  163-239. 

AP30.D45.V.8 


11286*8 


TREATY- MAKING    POWER    IN    FOREIGN    STATES,    PAR- 
TICULARLY GREAT  BRITAIN 

L92  The  Alleged  power  of  the  crown  to  control  foreign  policy. 

Spectator,  Jan.  3,  1903,  v.  90:  5-6.  AP4.s7,v.90 

193  Amos,  Sheldon.     Fifty  years  of  the  English  constitution,  1830- 

1880. 
London:  Longmans,  Green,  and  co.,  1880.    xxxii,  $5  p. 

Practice  of  consulting  Parliament  in  reference  to  the  making 
of  treaties  and  the  declaration  of  war,  p.  387  et  seq. 
10-5758  JN216.A7 

194  Anson,  Sir  William  R.     The  law  and  customs  of  the  consti- 

tution,    v.  2.     Pt.  2.     The  crown.     3d  ed. 
Oxford,  At  th<  Clan  ndon  />/■<  **,  1908.    2  v. 

War,  peace  and  treaties:   pt.  2,  p.  102-112. 

JN118.A63,v.2,pt.2 

195  Bacon,  Arthur.     De  l'influence  du  federalisme  sur  ['institution 

des  chambres  hautes.     These  pour  le  doctorat. 
Toulouse:    V.   Riviere,   1899.    203  p.    8°.     (Universite  de 
Toulouse — Faculte  de  droit. 

"Traites     internationaux,"     p.     143-145;     "Ratification     des 

traites,"  p.  145-154;  Senat  americain,"  p.  172-195. 

196  Bagehot,  Walter.     The  English  constitution,  and  other  political 

essays.     Latest    rev.   ed. 
New   York,  D.  Appleton  tf-  company,  1903.     0,  [vii]-viii, 
468  p.    20Ym. 

Parliament  and  the  foreign  policy  of  the  government:  p.  .">  I    1". 
4-14805  JN125.B2     1903 

197  Blackstone,  Sir  William.     Commentaries  on  the  laws  of  Eng- 

land.    With  notes  [etc.]   by  William   Draper  Lewis. 
Philadelphia:  Rees  Welsh  and  company,  1897.    /,  vols.  4.0. 

The    king's     prerogative     in     making    treaties:    p.    230  231. 
(p.  257.) 

198  Bourgeois,  Ferdinand.     La  democratie  francaise  el   les  traites 

secret  -. 
Grand  n  vue,  Jan.  25,  1912,  v.  71:  296  308.        AP20.G7,v.7i 

38 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   FOREIGN   STATES  39 

199  Burgess,   John    William.    ^Political    science   and    comparative 

constitutional  law. 

Boston,  U.  S.  A.,  and  London,  Ginn  &  company,  1890-91. 
2  v.  23\cm.  (Systematic  series,  ed.  by  the  University 
faculty  of  political  science  in  Columbia  college) 

The  powers  of  the  Congress  of  the  United  States :  Legislation 
in  respect  to  foreign  relations :  v.  2,  p.  133-134 ;  Legisla- 
tion in  respect  to  foreign  commerce,  p.  134-137 ;  The  powers 
of  the  German  imperial  legislative :  Legislation  in  respect 
to  foreign  relations :  p.  168 ;  to  foreign  commerce :  p.  169 ; 
Control  by  the  British  Crown,  of  foreign  affairs :  p.  202 ; 
Negotiation  of  treaties  by  the  President  of  the  U.  S. :  p. 
248-249 ;  Diplomatic  powers  of  the  German  emperor :  p. 
276-277 ;  Diplomatic  powers  of  the  President  of  France :  p. 
293-295. 
4-3859/4  JC213.B95 

200  Butler,  Charles  Henry.     The  treaty  making  power  of  the  United 

States. 
New  York,  The  Banks  law  pub.  co.,  1902.    2  v.    24cm. 

"  The  treaty-making  power  as  an  attribute  of  sovereignty  and 
as     exercised     by     central     governments     of     confederated 
powers,"  v.  1,  pt.  2,  p.  191-234. 
2-7104  JK570.B85 

201  Cavalcanti,  Amaro.     Restrictive  clauses  in  international  arbi- 

tration treaties. 
American  journal  of  international  law,   Oct.   1914,  v.   8: 
723-737.  jxi.A6,v.8 

On  the  nature  and  extent  of  the  arbitration  treaties  existing 
between  Brazil  and  other  states,  European  and  American. 

202  Clunet,  Edouard.     Du  defaut  de  validite  de  plusieurs  traites 

diplomatiques  conclus  par  la  France  avec  les  puissances 
etrangeres. 
Journal  du  droit  international  pr'ive,  1880,  v.  7 :  5-55. 

JX6002.J5,v.7 

203  Courtney,  Leonard  Henry  Courtney,  1st  baron.    The  working 

constitution  of  the  United  Kingdom. 
New  York,  The  Macmillan  company /  London,  Macmillan 
&  co.,  ltd.,  1901.    viii,  383  p.    21cm. 

Treaties  made  by  the  Crown :  p.  348,  354-355 ;  Secret  treaties : 
p.  355-356. 
1-30967  JN223.C7 


40  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

204  Cox,  Homersham.    The  British  commonwealth:  or,  A  commen- 

ting on  the  institutions  and  principles  of  British  govern- 
ment. 
London,  Longman,   Brown,   Green,   and  Longmans,  1854. 
xxiv,  576  p.    10hcm. 

[nternational  government:  p.  469-515. 
9-31657  JN118.C6 

205  The  institutions  of  the  English  government;  being  an 

account  of  the  constitution,  powers,  and  procedure,  of  its 
legislative,  judicial,  and  administrative  departments. 

London.  11.  s,rcet,  1863.     xeii,  757  p.    22cm. 

Foreign  affairs:  p.  598-599. 
10-5433  JN118.C62 

20G  Crandall,  Samuel  Benjamin.  Treaties,  their  making  and  en- 
forcement. 
New.  York,  The  Columbia  university  press,  The  Macmillan 
company,  agents;  [etc.,  etc.]  1904.  255  p.  25cm. 
(Studies  in  history,  economics  and  public  law,  ed.  by 
the  faculty  of  political  science  of  Columbia  university, 
vol.  xxi,  no.  1) 

Foreign  slates:  p.  151-212. 

States  considerations  in  regard  to  the  treaty  making  power  in 
Great    Britain,    France,    Belgium,    the    Netherlands,    Italy, 
Germany,  and  Austria-Hungary. 
4-26897  JX4165.C8 

H31.C7,v.21 

207  Treaties,  their  making  and  enforcement.     (2d  ed.) 

Washington,  D.  C,  J.  Byrne  <&  company,  1916.     xxxii,  663 

p.    23\cm. 

Fart  II.  Foreign  states:  Great  Britain:  p.  liTii -300;  France: 
p.  301-314;  other  foreign  states:  Belgium,  Luxemburg,  The 
Netherlands,  Italy,  Germany,  Austria-Hungary,  Sweden.  Nor- 
way. Denmark,  Spain,  Portugal,  Switzerland,  Greece,  Balkan 
States,  Russia  and  Japan,  Turkey,  Mexico  and  other  Ameri- 
can republics,  Dependencies:  p.  315-340. 
16-6404  JX4165.C8     1916 

208  Dallas,  George  Mifflin.     A  series  of  letters  from  London  writ- 

ten during  the  years  1856,  '57,  '58,  '59,  and  '60.     Ed.  by 
his  daughter  Julia. 
Philadelphia,  J.  Ii.  Lippincott  c&  co.,  1869.    riii,  9-264.  ::.', 

p.     ,!■>),"". 

To  C.  J.  Ingersoll  on  the  question,  "  Is  there,  in  the  making  of 
leagues  or  treaties,  a  clearly  defined  line  between  the  pre- 
rogative of  the  Crown  and  the  power  of  Parliament?"    v. 
2,  p.   208  210. 
11-24455  E436.D14 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   FOREIGN   STATES  41 

209  Dauzat,  Albert.     Du  role  des  chambres  en  matiere  de  traites  in- 

ternationaux. 
Paris,  F.  Alcan,  1899.    2p.l,  219  p.    2^m. 

"  Bibliographie  "  :  p.  213-215. 

Introduction ;  1.  partie :  Questions  doctrinales.  Chap.  1. 
Modes  de  la  sanction  legislative ;  Chap.  2.  Extensions  et 
limitations  de  la  sanction  legislative ;  Chap.  3.  La  sanction 
legislative  au  point  de  vue  international ;  2.  partie :  Histoire 
de  la  constitution  anglaise ;  GSneralites ;  Chap.  1.  La  consti- 
tution anglaise  avant  1789 ;  Chap.  2.  La  constitution 
anglaise  au  XIX6  siecle ;  3.  partie :  Les  constitutions  de  la 
France ;  Generalites ;  Chap.  1,  L'ancienne  France ;  Chap.  2 
La  constituante;  Chap.  3.  La  convention  et  le  directoire; 
Chap.  4.  Le  consulat  et  l'empire ;  Chap.  5.  Les  deux  chartes ; 
Chap.  6.  La  seconde  r§publique ;  Chap.  7.  Le  second  empire ; 
Chap.  8.  La  constitution  de  1875;  4.  partie:  Etude  de 
quelques  constitutions  £trangeres ;  Generalites ;  Chap.  1, 
Les  Etats-Unis  de  l'Amerique  du  Nord ;  Chap.  2.  L'Espagne ; 
Chap.  3.  L'ltalie ;  Chap.  4.  L'Empire  Allemand ;  Biblio- 
graphie ;  Table  des  matieres. 
4-19603  JN2675.D24 

210  Demombynes,  Gabriel.     Les  constitutions  europeennes.    Parle- 

ments,  conseils  provinciaux  et  commimaux  et  organisation 
judiciaire  dans  les  divers  etats  de  PEurope.     2.  ed.  re- 
fondue  et  augm. 
Paris,  L.  Larose  et  Forcel,  1883.    2  v.-  22cm. 

V.  1 — Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  Sweden,  Norway,  Denmark, 
Belgium,  Netherlands,  Italy,  Spain,  Portugal,  Russia,  Fin- 
land, Rumania,  Servia,  Montenegro,  Turkey,  Bulgaria, 
Greece.  V.  2. — France,  Austria-Hungary,  Switzerland,  Ger- 
many. Considerations  relating  to  the  treaty-making  power 
included  in  the  discussions  of  the  constitutional  features  of 
the  different  governments. 
9-23608  JF32.D28 

211  Dodd,  Walter  Fairleigh.     Modern  constitutions;  a  collection  of 

the   fundamental   laws   of  twenty-two   of  the  most   im- 
portant countries  of  the  world,  with  historical  and  biblio- 
graphical notes. 
Chicago,   III.,    The    University    of    Chicago   press    [1912] 

2  v.     23cm. 

16-3129  JF11.D6     1912 

212  Dupriez,    Leon.      Les    ministres    dans    les    principaux    pays 

d'Europe  et  d'Amerique.    3.  ed. 
Paris,  J.  Rothschild,  1892-93.    2  v.    22™. 

"Traites-Allemagne,  v.  1,  p.  511,  528;  Angleterre,  v.  1,  p.  83; 

Belgique,  v.  1,  p.  234  ;Etats-Unis,  v.  2,  p.  108;  France,  v.  2, 

p.   378;  Italie,  v.  1,  p.  300;   Prusse,  v.  1,  p.  394;   Suisse, 

v.  2,  p.  229." 

1-27S26  JF331.D8 


42  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

213  Dupriez,    Leon.     T  > 1 1    mode   d'intervention   des  chambrcs   dans 

I'approbation  des  traites  internationaux  qui  contiennent 
des  derogations  aux  lois  du  pays. 
L',  vui  du  droit  public  et  de  la  .science  politique,  April-June, 
1005,  v.  22,  p.  431-436. 

Discusses  the  question  as  it  was  raised  in  the  Belgian  Senate 
by  M.  de  Lantsheere  who  defended  the  thesis  that  u  treaty 
of  the  kind  in  question  should  be  submitted  to  the  Chambers 
and  acted  on,  article  by  article,  as  in  ordinary  legislation. 

JAll.R5,v.22 

214  Esmein,  Adhemar.     Elements  de  droit  constitutional  frangais 

et  compare.     P>  ed.  rev.  par  Joseph  Barthelemy. 
Paris,  L.  Tcnin,  101 Jh     2  p.  I.,  \yii\-xxviii,  124-6  p.    22cm. 
Traites :  p,  756  et  seq. 
15-22558  JN2597.E82     1914 

215  Ewald,  Alexander  Charles.     The  crown  and  its  advisers;  or, 

Queen,  ministers,  Lords,  &  Commons. 
Edinburgh  and  London,  W.  Blackwood  and  sons,  1870.     3 
p.  I.,  [v]-vii,  [/],  222  p.     18V'". 

Treaties  and  alliances  with  foreign  States:  p.  44-45. 
10-5589  JN318.E8 

21G  Gneist,  Rudolf  .von.     Das  englische  Verwaltungsrecht  mit  Ein- 
schluss  des  Herres,  der  Gerichte  and  der  Kirche  geschicht- 
lich  und  systematisch. 
Berlin,  Julius  Springer,  1867.    2  vols.    8°. 

"  Der  Minister  der  auswiirtigen  Angelegenheiten,"  v.  2,  p.  912 
et  seq. 
10-5766 

217  Gorius,  Fr.     Das  Vertragsrecht  des  Deutschen  Reichs. 

Annalen  des  Deutschen  Reichs,  1874,  v.  7 :  750-772. 

H5.A6,v.7 

218  Gt.  Brit.     Foreign  office.     Treatment  of  international  questions 

by  parliaments  in  European  countries,  the  United  States, 
and  Japan. 
London.  Pub.  !'u  II.  M.  Stationery  off.,  printed  by  Harrison 
and  sons  [1912]    1  p.  L,  33  [1]  p.    33\™.     {Miscellane- 
ous Xo.  5,  1012) 

Parliament    Papers  by  command.    Cd.  6102. 
12-16131  JF477.G7 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   FOREIGN   STATES  43 

219  Hertslet,  Sir  Edward,  comp.    Treaties  and  tariffs  regulating  the 

trade  between  Great  Britain  and  foreign  nations;  and 
extracts  of  treaties  between  foreign  powers,  containing 
most-favoured-nation  clauses  applicable  to  Great  Britain. 
London,  Buttericorth's  [etc.]  1875-79.  6  v.  fold.  map. 
26cm. 

Contents.— v.   1.   Austria.— v.   2.   Turkey.— v.   3.   Italy. — v.   4. 
China. — v.  5.  Spain. — v.  6.  Japan. 
4-17S49  JX636     1875 

220  Laband,  Paul.     Le  droit  public  de  l'Empire  allemand.     Ed. 

franchise  rev.  et  mise  au  courant  de  la  derniere  legisla- 
tion par  l'auteur. 
Paris,  V.  Giard  &  E.  Brieve,  1900-04.    6  v.  %%\™.    (Biblio- 
theque  international e  de  droit  public) 

Les  traites  internationaux :  Definition  et  nature  juridique :  v.  2, 

p.  436-447;  Conclusion  des  traites  internationaux:  p.  447- 

483 ;    De   la   validity   des   traites   internationaux :    au   point 

de  vue    du  droit  public :  p.  484-504 ;  Foot-note  references. 

15-7227  JN3423.L3,v.2 

221  Lapradelle,  A.  de.     Le  Parlement  et  les  traites  d'alliance. 

Revue  du  droit  public  et  de  la  science  politique,  Oct -Dec, 
1904,  v.  21:843-845. 

On  the  Franco-Russian  alliance.  JAll.R5,v.21 

222  Lee,  Sidney.     The  prime  minister  and  the  crown. 

Spectator,  Jan.  3,  1903,  v.  90:  12-13.  AP4.S7,v.90 

223  Michon,  Louis.     Les  traites  internationaux  devant  les  chambres. 

Paris,  A.  Chevalier-Marescq  &  Cie,  1901.    3  p.  I.,  520  p. 
23cm. 

Reviews  the  history  of  the  role  played  by  the  assemblies  of 
France  in  the  treaty-making  power,  and  gives  an  exposition 
of  the  power  as  it  now  exists  under  the  French  constitution 
of  1875.  A  chapter  is  devoted  to  the  role  of  chambers  as 
to  treaties  in  foreign  constitutions,  under  four  heads, 
namely:  1.  Constitution  not  requiring  the  sanction  of  the 
legislative  power  for  the  conclusion  of  a  treaty  (England)  ; 
2.  Constitutions  requiring  the  sanction  of  the  legislative 
power  for  certain  treaties  (Belgium,  Italy,  Austria,  Ger- 
many, Spain,  Netherlands)  ;  3.  Constitutions  requiring  the 
sanction  of  the  legislative  power  for  all  treaties  (United 
States).  The  true  r61e  that  chambers  should  play  in  the 
treaty-making  power  is  the  subject  considered  in  the  fourth 
and  last  chapter. 
8-8752  JN2809.M6 


44  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

224  Moore,  "William  Harrison.     Act  of  state  in  English  law. 

London,  •/.  Murray,  1006.    xi,  178  p.,  1  1.    23rm. 

"The  execution  of  the  treaties",  ]>.  84-92;  "Aliens",  p.  93-99; 

"Direct  external  relations  of  state*."  p.  100-114;  "Civil 
discord  in  foreign  countries",  p.  Iir>-il9;  "Acts  under  the 
authority  of  a  foreign  sovereign",  p.  120-131 ;  "Treaties  ;is 
sources  <>t"  right",  p.  132-135;  "Treaties  in  relation  to  con- 
tracts jiikI  private  debts",  p.  136-138;  "Discharge  of  obliga- 
tions by  the  authority  of  a  foreign  sovereign",  p.  139-145; 
"Actions  by  foreign  sovereigns",  p.  14G-156;  "Succession  to 
state  rights  and  liabilities",  p.  157-178. 
7-1M75 

225  Moreau,  Felix  Pierre  Louis.     Precis  elementaire  de  droit  con- 

stitutionnel  (organisation  des  pouvoirs  publics  et  libertes 
publiques)     8.  ed.,  completement  rev. 
Paris,  L.  Tenin,  1917.    3  p.  I.,  627  p.    18cm. 

Traites.  p.  369  372. 
19-229  JN2597.M7    1917 

22G  Ottley,  Henry.  On  the  errors  and  mischiefs  of  modern  diplo- 
macy, as  based  upon  the  assumed  prerogative  of  the  crown 
in  matters  of  peace  and  war;  with  particular  reference 
to  the  treaty  of  Washington  of  1871,  and  the  negociations 
connected  with  it,  down  to  the  adjournment  of  the  Tri- 
bunal of  arbitration  on  the  28th  June. 
London,  Chapman  and  Hall,  1872.    viii,  188  p.    10cm. 

Denies  "the  so-called  prerogative  of  the  crown  to  regulate  at 

its  discretion,  under  the  advice  of  its  .Ministers  for  the  time 
being,  all  matters  of  peace  and  war,  and  other  international 
agreements  with  foreign  states." 
10-1G5S0  JX238.A7     1872h 

227  Pierre,  Eugene.     Traite  de  droit  politique  electoral  et  parlemen- 
taire.      3.  ed.  contenant  des  references  au  Supplement. 
Paris,  I m pi.  Motteros  et  Martinet,  1908.    xvi,  llfid,  \2\  p. 

25{"".  JN2791.P5     1908 

Supplement.     2.  ed.  entierement  refondue. 

Paris,  Librairies-imprimeries  reunis,  1910.    xxxix,  1049  p., 
1  I    %5\cm. 

Traites  Internationaux.  Comment  aegocies  et  ratifies,  autre- 
fois, par.  546;  aujourd'hui:  547;  A  I'Stranger:  548;  definition 
des  traites  soumis  n  la  ratification  des  Chambres:  549;  le 
Pouvoir  legislatif  a'a  pas  ],.  droil  de  lier  d'avance  le  Pouvoir 
executif:  550,  551  ;  deliberation  sur  les  traites,  863  et  suiv. ; 

reproducti I'un    traite   rejete:    70;    regies    speciales  A    la 

promulgation    des    traites:    5UU;    cas    d'arbltrage    diplo- 
matique: 02. 
12-25725  t;  JN2791.P6     1910 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN    FOREIGN   STATES  45 

228  Ratification  of   treaties;   methods   and   procedure   in   foreign 

countries  relative  to  the  ratification  of  treaties,  also  ex- 
tracts from  the  executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  relative  to 
proceedings  in  cases  of  treaties  rejected  by  the  Senate. 
Washington,   Govt.   print,   off.,  1919.     280  p.   incl.   forms. 
23cm.     ([U.  #.]    66th  Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  26) 

19-26500  JN4171.R3R3 

229  Robinet  de  Clery.     Des  conditions  de  validite  des  traites  diplo- 

matiques  dans  l'etat  actuel  de  notre  legislation. 

Journal  du  droit  international  prive,  1876,  v.  3:  343-31f9, 

U7-453. 

JX6002.J5,v.3 

230  Stephen,  Henry  John.     Mr.  Serjeant  Stephen's  New  commen- 

taries  on   the    laws    of    England    (partly    founded    on 
"  Blackstone.")      15th  ed.     Under  the  general  editorship 
of  Edward  Jenks. 
London,  Butterworth  d-  co.,  1908.     4  v.  fold.  tab.     22cm. 

The  King's  prerogative  to  make  treaties,  etc. :  v.  2,  p.  567-568. 
9-9362 

231  Todd,  Alpheus.    On  parliamentary  government  in  England :  its 

origin,  development,  and  practical  operation. 
London,  Longmans,  Green,  and  co.,  1867-69.    2  v.    22\cm. 

The  right  of  making  treaties :  v.  1,  p.  609-614. 
10-7253  JN508.T7 

232 Parliamentary  government  in  England :  its  origin,  develop- 
ment, and  practical  operation.     New  ed.,  abridged  and 
rev.  by  Spencer  Walpole. 
London,  S.  Low,  Mars  ton  &  company,  limited,  1892.      2  v. 
19\cm. 

Treaty  making  power :  v.  1,  p.  132-137. 
10-5481  JN121.T7 

233  Traill,  Henry  Duff.     Central  government.     Rev.  and  cor.  by 

Sir  Henry  Craik. 
London,  Macmillan  and  co.,  limited,  1908.    x,  165  p.    19\cm. 
{The  English  citizen:  his  rights  and  responsibilities.) 

Direction  and  control  of  foreign  affairs :  p.  74  et  seq. 
9-18926  JN421.T72 

234  Treaty-making  power  and  the  empire. 

Law  journal,  June  11,  1910,  v.  4^:  386. 

Effect  in  developing  an  imperial  constitution  in  Great  Britain. 


46  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

235  Twiss,    Sir    Travers.     On    the    treaty-making    power    of    the 
Crown:  "  Le  Parlement  Beige." 
Law  magazim    and  n  oiew,  May  1879,  l^th  ser.,  v.  4:  257- 

m. 

230  U.  S.  58th  Cong.,  3d  sess.,  1904-1905.  Senate.  Constitutional 
met  hods  of  making  and  ratifying  treaties  in  certain  for- 
eign countries,  and  also  list  of  arbitration  treaties  and 
conventions  submitted  to  and  acted  upon  by  the  Senate. 
February  14.  1905. — Presented  by  Mr.  Lodge  and  or- 
dered to  be  printed.  February  20,  1905. — Ordered  re- 
printed with  additions. 
[Washington,  GovH  print,  off.,  190-5]  9  p.  23cm.  (58th 
( 'ong.,  3d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  158) 

G-11S36  Serial  no.  4766 

237  1><  j>t.  of  state.     The  treaty-making  power  in  various 

countries.  A  collection  of  memoranda  concerning  nego- 
tiation, conclusion,  and  ratification  of  treaties  and  con- 
ventions, with  excerpts  from  fundamental  laws  of  vari- 
ous countries. 

Washington,  GovH  print,  off.,  1919.    89  p. 
19-26415 

238  Vogels,  Aloys.     Die  staatsrechtliche  Stellung  der  Bundesrats- 

bevollniachtigten. 
Tubingen,  J.  ('.  B.  Mohr   (P.  Si,  luck)    1911.     viii,  103  p. 
X!iYm.     ( Ablui niUungen   aus   dem   Stoats-,   verwaltungs- 
nitd  collar  ncht    .  .  .     [bd.'\  vn  [hft.]  5) 
"  Literaturverzeichnis  "  :  p.  vii-viii. 
11-12119  JN3638.V7 

239  Walpole,  Sir  Spencer.     Foreign  relations. 

London, MacmUlan and co.,  1882.    3 p.  I.,  162 p.    20cm.  {The 
English  citizen:  his  rights  and  responsibilities) 

8-18500  DA45.W3 

240  Zorn,  Ph.     Die  Deutschen  Staatsvertrage. 

Zeitschrift  fur  du  gesammU  Staatswissenschaft,  1880,  v.  36: 
1-39. 

H5.Z4,v.36 
GREAT  BRITAIN:   COLONIES 

211   Canada  and  the  treaty-making  power. 

Spectator,  J  an.  .'.  1904,  v  92:7,  AP4.s7,v.92 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN"   FOREIGN   STATES  47 

242  De  Sumichrast.     Independence  and  the  treaty  making  power. 

Canadian  magazine,  May,  1904,  v.  23:  26-31.      AP5.C2,v.23 

243  Hodgins,  Thomas.     Canada  and  the  treaty-making  power. 

Canadian  magazine,  Mar.  190 %  v.  22:  479-482. 

Formulates  a  claim  "  for  enlarged  treaty-making  powers  'sub- 
ject to  the  veto  of  the  Sovereign.'  "  AP5.C2,v.22 

244  Keith,  Arthur  Berriedale.     Foreign  policy  and  the  democracies 

of  the  empire. 
Society  of  comparative  legislation.    Journal,  Apr.  1918,  v. 
18:  47-57.  JA29.S7,v.l8 

245 Imperial  unity  and  the  dominions. 

Oxford,  Clarendon  press,  1916.     626  p.     23cm. 

Suggested  concession  of  treaty  power  to  Dominions :  p.  270- 
276. 
16-12260  JV1062.K35 

246  Responsible  government  in  the  dominions. 

Oxford,  The  Clarendon  press,  1912.     3  v.     22\cm. 

Treaty  relations :  v.  3,  p.  1101-1157. 
12-15473  JV1062.K4     1912 

247  Macdonnel,  John.     Dominions  and  treaty  making  powers. 

Law  times,  June  1,  8,  1918,  v.  145:  101-102,  116-117. 

248  Skelton,  O.  D.     Canada  and  the  most  favored  nation  treaties. 

Queen's  quarterly,  Jan.-Mar.  1912,  v.  19:  231-252. 

AP5.Q3,v.l9 

249  Smith,  Goldwin.     Can  Canada  make  her  own  treaties? 

Canadian  magazine,  Feb.  1904,  v.  22:  331S35. 

AP5.C2,v.22 

250  Stuart-Linton,  Charles  E.  T.     The  colonies  and  treaty  powers. 

Empire  review,  Feb.  1904,  v.  7 :  94-96.  daio.E5,v.7 

251  Todd,    Alpheus.      Parliamentary    government    in    the    British 

colonies.     2d  ed.,  edited  by  his  son. 
London  and  New  York,  Longmans,  Green,  and  co.,  1894- 
xx,  929  p.    23cm. 

Treaties,  affecting  Chinese  immigration,  p.  187-196 ;  affecting 
colonist  trade,  p.  228 ;  extension  of  treaty  privileges  to 
colonies,  p.  265.  See  also  "  Imperial  dominion  exercisable 
over  self-governing  colonies;  in  foreign  relations;  and 
through  the  operation  of  treaties,"  treaty-making  powers, 
etc.,  p.  247-300. 
9-32115  JV1062.T64 


48 


LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 


252  Tupper,  Sir  C.  ffibbert.     Treaty-making  powers  of  the  Do- 
minions. 

Society  of  comparative  legislation.     Journal  Jan    1917   v 
17:  5  18.  '     ' 

An  historical  review  of  the  development  of  the  treaty-making 
power  of  Canada. 

JA29.S7,v.l7 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 

I.-GENERAL  DISCUSSIONS  AND  COLLECTIONS 

253  Abbott,  Lyman.     The   power  of   the  government  to  make  a 

general  arbitration  treaty. 

(In    Lake    Mohonk    conference    on    international    arbitration, 
11th  report,  1905.     p.  68-71.     Lake  Mohonk,  1905.     22$°™.) 

JX1932.L3     1905 

254  Adams,  John  Quincy,  pres.  U.  S.    Memoirs  of  John  Quincy 

Adams,  comprising  portions  of  his  diary  from  1795  to 
1848.     Ed.  by  Charles  Francis  Adams. 
Philadelphia,  J.   B.   Lippincott    &    co.,    1874.-77.    12    v. 
fronts,  {v.  1,3,8)    25cm. 

The  President,  the  Senate,  and  the  Florida  treaty,  1821,  v.  5, 

page  285.     Also   "  the   disposition   of   the   President  ...  to 

consult    them    [i.    e.    the    Senate]    whenever    there   is   any 

plausible  Constitutional  motive  for  so  doing." 

4-20138  E377.A19 

255  Alger,  George  W.     The  states  and  national  treaties. 

Independent,  Apr.  29,  1909,  v.  66:  S90S93.       AP2.l53,v.66 

25G  America  and  arbitration. 

(In  The  Outlook,  London,  Feb.  18,  1905,  v.  15:  p.  215-216.) 

"The  fact  is  that  what  drove  the  Senate  to  act  as  it  did  in 

1897  and  again  last  Saturday  was,  beyond  everything  else, 

the  primal   instinct  of  self-preservation.     The  Constitution 

lodges  in  the  Senate  the  right  to  a  final  voice  in  the  conduct 

of   foreign    affairs;    all    treaties,    to    be   effective,    must   be 

ratified  by  a  two-thirds  majority  of  the  Senators  present. 

And   that   is  a  prerogative  which   the   Senate  has   not  the 

least  intention  of  relinquishing." 

AP4.08,v.l5 

257  Anderson,   Chandler   P.     The  extent   and   limitations   of   the 

treaty-making  power  under  the  Constitution. 
[New  York  Pub.  for  the  American  society  of  international 
law,  by  Baker,  Voorhis  &  co.,  1907]    \636\-670  p.   27™. 
Reprinted    from    the   American   journal   of   international    law 
for  July,  1907,  v.  1.  d.  636-670. 
10-15261  JX570.A6 

258  The  arbitration  treaties:  precedents;  a  chapter  of  history;  only 

a  word;  the  Senate. 

Outlook,  Feb.  25-Mar.  25,  1905,  v.  79:  472-475,  515-519, 

622-625,  672-675,  727-730.  AP2.08,v.79 

137190°— 20 1  49 


50  LIBRARY    OF    CONGRESS 

259  Bacon,  Augustus  < ).     The  treaty-making  power  of  the  President 

and  the  Senate. 
North  Ann  rican  n  vu  w,  Apr.  1906,  v.  182:  502   ~>12. 

AP2.N7,v.l82 

260  Baldwin,  Simeon  E.     Schooling  rights  under  our  treaty  with 

Japan. 
Columbia  law  n  vu  w,  Feb.  1907,  v.  7:85-92. 

201  Barrett,  James  T.     International  agreements  without  the  advice 
and  consenl  of  the  Senate. 
Yali  law  journal,  Nov.  1905,  v.  15:  18-27. 

262  Bascom,  John.     Growth  of  nationality  in  the  United  States;  a 
social  study. 
Nt  w  York  &  London.  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1899.     ix,  213  p. 

JO"". 

••  strife  between  departments:  Formation  of  treaties:"  p.  123- 
125. 
Jan.  is.  1900-11  E179.B29 

203  Bellot,  II.  II.  L.     Treaty-making  power  in  the  United  States 
and  the  growth  of  the  executive. 
Law  times,  Aug.  21,  1909,  v.  127:  384  386. 

20-1  Big"elow,  John.     Breaches  of  Anglo-American  treaties;  a  study 
in  history  and  diplomacy. 
N(  w  York,  Sturgis  <(■   Walton  company,  1917.     lp.  I.,  v-xi, 
2Jp8    p.     Hi  fold.  maps.      !!/}/'». 
Bibliography:  p.  233  236. 
17-11357  JX1428.G7B5 

205  Bikle,  Henry  Wolf.     The  constitutional  power  of  Congress  over 
the  territory  of  the  United  States. 
|  Philadi  Iphia,  .  1  ml  printing  co.,  1901]     x,  11-120  p.    21fm. 
(  Univi  rsity  of  Pt  nnsylvania.  Puhl  tent  ions  of  I  Jo   I><  part- 
mt  nt  of  law ) 

"  issued   as  a   supplemenl    to  the  American   law  register   Cor 

August,  1901." 
The  treaty-making  power  as  a  source  of  the  power  to  acquire 
territory  :  p.  16  18. 
1   23280  JK1081.B5 

20fl  Bird,  C.  B.     Righl  of  states  to  pass  local  laws  in  conflict  with 
foreign  powers. 
Cas(  and  comment,  Sept.  1917,  v.  24:  200-296. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  51 

207  Boyd,  James.  H.     Limitations  of  the  treaty-making  power  of 
the  president  of  the  United  States  with  the  concurrent 
power  of  the  Senate. 
Central  law  journal,  Mar.  <S\  15,  1918,  v.  86:  172-176,  188- 
1$\. 

268  Burgess,   John   William.      Political    science    and   comparative 

constitutional  law. 
Boston  and  London,  Ginn  d-  company,  1002.     2  v.     23\cm. 
(Systematic  series,  ed.  by  the  University  faculty  of  po- 
litical science  in  Columbia  college) 

"The  powers  of  the  Congress  of  the  United  States :  Legislation 
in  respect  to  foreign  relations,"  p.  133-134 ;  "  Legislation 
in  respect  to  foreign  commerce,"  p.  134-137. 
4-5470  JC213.B96 

269  Burr,   Charles   H.     The   treaty-making  power   of   the   United 

States  and  the  methods  of  its  enforcement  as  affecting  the 
police  powers  of  the  states. 
Philadelphia,  The  American  philosophical  society,  1912.  p. 
269-422.  %lf,\cm.  (Proceedings  of  the  American  philo- 
sophical society  held  at  Philadelphia  for  promoting  use- 
ful knowledge,    vol.  li.    no.  206) 

13-2004  JK570.B8 

Reviewed  in  American  political  science  review,  Aug.  1913,  v.  7: 
506-509. 

270  Butler,  Charles  Henry.     A  review  of  decisions  of  the  federal 

and  state  courts  in  cases  involving  the  relative  effect  of 
stipulations  in  treaties  between  the  United  States  and 
foreign  powers  and  laws  enacted  by  the  several  states; 
being  a  reprint  of  chapter  XI  of  the  Treaty-making 
power  of  the  United  States. 
New  York,  The  Banks  law  publishing  co.,  1907.  62  p. 
23cm. 

8-11197  JK570.B87 

271  The  treaty  making  power  of  the  United  States. 

New  York,  The  Banks  law  pub.  co.,  1902.    2  v.    24cm. 

Contents. — v.  1,  pt.  1.  The  United  States  is  a  nation,  pt. 
2.  Historical  review  of  the  treaty-making  power  of  the 
United  States. — v.  2,  pt.  3.  Judicial  decisions  affecting  the 
treaty-making  power  of  the  United  States,  its  extent  and 
application. 
2-7104  JK570.B85 

Reviewed  by  John  Bassett  Moore  in  New  York  Times  Satur- 
day review,  July  5,  1902,  v.  7:  p.  449-450. 


52  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

272  [Cadwalader,  John  L. )     Notes  upon  treaties  and  conventions 

concluded  between  the  United  States  and  foreign  powers 
since  May  1,  1870,  and  upon  the  construction  thereof, 
with  soi Mr  references  to  recent  construction  of  the  for- 
eign treaties  of  the  United  States,  and  to  late  judicial 
decisions  relating  thereto,  and  to  the  causes  of  abroga- 
tion of  some  of  the  same. 

(In  United  States.  Treaties,  ete.  Treaties  and  conventions 
concluded  between  the  United  States  of  America  and  other 
powers  since  May  1,  1S70.  Not  contained  in  Senate  execu- 
tive document  no.  36,  41st  Congress,  3d  session,  with  some 
notes  in  reference  thereto,  p.  1205-1229.  Washington,  1876. 
8°.)  JX236     1876 

273  Canada.     Dept.  of  external  affairs.     Treaties  and  agreements 

affecting  Canada  in  force  between  His  Majesty  and  the 
United    States  of  America,   with  subsidiary  documents, 
1814—191,5.     Comp.   under    the    direction    of    the    Eight 
Honourable  R.  L.  Borden. 
Ottawa,  J.  de  L.  facte,  1914.    SOI  p.    ?4\cm. 

14-2150;"  JX356     1914 

274  Chambrun,   Charles  Adolphe  do  Pineton,  marquis  de.     The 

executive  power  in  the  United  State's:  a  study  of  con- 
stitutional  law.     Tr.  from  the  original  French  by  Mrs. 
Madeleine  Vinton  Dahlgren. 
Lancaster,  Pa.,  Inquirer  printing  and  publishing  company, 
1874.    zvii,  19-288  p.    19™. 

Treaty-making  power  of  the  Senate:  p.  195-209. 
10-33591  JK516.C43 

275  Le   pouvoir  executif   aux   lttats-Unis,  etude   de   droit 

constitutional.  2.  ed.,  rev.,  cor.  et  augm.,  avec  preface 
de  M.  Pierre  de  Chambrun. 

Paris,  A.  Fontemoing,  1896.    2  p.  J.,  xvi,  336  p.,  1  I.    22\cm. 
(liibliotkeque  de  Vhistoire  du  droit  et  des  institutions) 

Le  Senat  Consid6r6  1 nne  conseil  ex6cutif:  p.  221-255. 

9-2:,,::77  JK516.C4     1896 

27G  Clancy,  Charles  Sunnier.     An  organic  conception  of  the  treat  v- 
making  power  vs.  state  rights  as  applicable  to  the  United 
Stale-. 
Michigan  law  review%  Nov,  1906,  v.  7:  19-62, 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  53 

277  Clayton,  J.  C.     A  new  view  of  the  deportation  cases  in  the  Su- 

preme  Court.     Is   Congress   empowered   to    abrogate   a 

treaty  ? 

New  Jersey  law  journal,  Oct.  1893,  v.  16:  £92-299. 

Cites  "  The  Federalist,"  nos.  64  and  75,  and  Taylor  v.  Morton, 
2  Curtis,  454.  In  opposition  to  the  view  taken  by  Justice 
Curtis,  an  argument  is  developed  to  show  that  "  Congress 
has  no  authority  to  enact  a  law  in  derogation  of  a  treaty." 

278  Cockes,  William  Archer.     The  supremacy  of  a  treaty  and  the 

sovereignty  of  a  state. 

Central  law  journal,  Nov.  29,  1878,  v.  7:  423-426. 

Review  of  the  decision  of  the  Supreme  Court  in  the  case  of 
the  United  States  v.  Forty-three  gallons  of  Whiskey, 
93  U.  S.,  188.  Cites:  Foster  and  Elam  v.  Neilson,  2  Pet, 
314 ;  United  States  v.  Holliday,  3  Wall.,  409. 

279  Coleman,  William  C.     The  treaty  power  and  its  relation  to 

state  laws. 

American  law  review,  Sept.-Oct.  1909,  v.  43:  641-666. 
American  legal  news,  Nov.  1909,  v.  20 :  784-794. 

280  Corwin,  Edward  Samuel.     The  doctrine  of  judicial  review,  its 

legal  and  historical  basis,  and  other  essays. 
Princeton,  Princeton  university  press,  1914.    vii  p.,  1  I., 
177  p.    21cm. 

Some  possibilities  in  the  way  of  treaty-making:  p.  161-171. 
14-19188  JK1541.C7 

281 National  supremacy;  treaty  power  vs.  state  power. 

New  York,  H.  Holt  and  company,  1913.     viii,  321  p.     19\cm. 

Reviewed  in  Nation,  Jan.  15,  1914.     v.  98:  61. 
American  historical  review,  Apr.  1914,  v.  19:  649-650;  Ameri- 
can political  science  review,  Aug.  1914,  v.  8 :  507-509. 
13-1S628  JK573.1913.C7 

282 The  President's  control  of  foreign  relations. 

Princeton,   Princeton   university   press,   1917.     vi,   216    p. 

21\cm. 

The  making,  enforcement  and  termination  of  treaties — Execu- 
tive agreements:  p.  84-125. 
17-29737  JK570.C0 

283  Treaty-making  power:  a  rejoinder. 

North  American  review,  June,  1914,  v.  199:  893-901. 

A  reply  to  an  article  by  Henry  St.  George  Tucker  in  the 
April  number.    See  no.  423  in  this  list. 

AP2.N7.V.199 


54  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

284  Crandall,  Samuel   Benjamin.     Treaties,  their  making  and  en- 

forcement. 
New  York,  The  Columbia  university/  jircs.s.  The  Macmillan 
company,  agents;  London,  I*,  s.  King  &  son,  1904.  ®55  p. 
,.'■'>'"'.  (Studies  in  history,  economics  and  public  law, 
ed.  hy  the  faculty  of  political  science  of  Colombia  uni- 
versity, vol.  xxi,  no.  1) 

"The  United  States":  p.  19-150. 
4-26897  JX4165.C8 

H31.C7,v.21 

285  Treaties,  their  making  and  enforcement.     (2d  ed.) 

Washington,  D.  C,  •/.  Byrne  c&  company,  I'd  It),    xxxii, 
663  p.    Jd\'"'. 

Contents. — Introduction;  Pt.  1.  The  United  States:  Div.  I. 
Prior  to  the  Constitution:  Prior  to  the  Articles  of  Confed- 
eration; Under  the  Articles  of  Confederation;  The  Federal 
convention;  Discussion  preceding  the  adoption  of  the  Con- 
stitution. Div.  II.  Under  the  Constitution:  I.  The  mak- 
ing: The  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate;  Powers  of  the 
President  ;  Agreements  reached  hy  the  executive  without 
the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate:  Agreements  reached 
by  the  executive  in  virtue  of  Acts  of  Congress;  Agreements 
entered  into  by  states  of  the  union.  II.  The  execution  or 
enforcement:  Operation  of  treaties  as  municipal  law; 
Treaties  involving  an  appropriation;  Treaties  involving  a 
modification  of  the  revenue  laws;  Treaties  for  the  acquir- 
ing and  cession  of  territory;  Legislation  to  give  effect  to 
Various  other  treaties;  Treaties  Involving  subjects  other- 
wise under  the  control  of  the  individual  states;  Jurisdic- 
tion of  federal  courts;  Pt.  II.  Foreign  states.  Pt.  III. 
The  operation  of  treaties  as  between  states:  Date  of  taking 
effect:  Determination  of  disputed  interpretations  of 
treaties;  Aids  in  the  interpretation  of  treaties;  The  Ameri- 
can construction  of  the  Most-favored-nat  ion  clause;  Ter- 
mination of  treaties.  Appendix  I.  A  digest  of  decisions  of 
American  courts  construing  treaties  arranged  by  countries 
and  treaties;  Appendix  II.  Forms.  Index. 
16-6404  JX4165.C8     1916 

Reviewed  hy  Charles  Henry  Butler  in  American  journal  of 
international   law,   v.   10:   675-676.  JXl.A6,v.lO 

286  Croswell,  Simon  Greenleaf.     The  treaty-making  power  under 

the   Constitution. 

Ann  rican  law  review,  July-Aug.  1886,  v.  20: 513-527. 

Upholds  the  validity  of  commercial  treaties.  Reviews  the 
history  of  the  clauses  in  the  Constitution  respecting 
treaties  and  commerce;  Citing  Wayne,  J.  in  Oldtield  V. 
Marriott.  LO  How.,  14G  in  the  regulation  of  trade  by  Con- 
gress  and    cites   in   defence  of  the  view  "that    the   treaty- 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  55 

making  power  confided  to  the  President  and  Senate  covers 
commercial  treaties,"  the  following  cases  and  references: 
Taney,  C.  J.  in  Holmes  v.  Jennison,  14  Pet.  519,  United 
States  r.  Forty-three  Gallons,  93  U.  S.,  196,  Story  on  Const., 
sec.  1508;  Taylor  v.  Morton,  2  Curtis,  454  (Tariff  of  1842 
5  Stat,  at  L.,  54S)  ;  Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Pet.  314;  Scott  v. 
Sandford,  19  How.,  629;  Ropes  v.  Clinch.  8  Blatehf.  C.  C. 
304 ;  Bartram  v.  Robertson,  15  Fed.  Rep.  112,  212 ;  Edge  v. 
Robertson,  18  Fed.  Rep.,  135. 

287  Cullom,  S.  M.     The  treaty-making  power. 

North  American  review,  Mar.  1905,  v.  ISO:  335-31^6. 

Upholds  the  constitutional  right  of  the  Senate  to  make  reci- 
procity treaties.  AP2.N7.V.180 

288  Currey,  John.     State  v.  Treaty  rights. 

Lawyer  and  hanker,  Feb.  1913,  v.  6:  6-16. 
Chicago  legal  news,  Feb.  22,  1913,  v.  45:226-228. 

289  dishing,    Caleb.     Droit   d'aubaine.     The   government   of   the 

United  States  has  constitutional  power  to  enter  into  treaty 
stipulations  with  foreign  governments,  for  the  purpose  of 
restricting  or  abolishing  the  property  disabilities  of  aliens 
or  their  heirs  in  the  several  States.    Feb.  26,  1857. 

(In  U.  S.  Dept.  of  justice.  Official  opinions  of  the  Attorneys 
general,  v.  8,  comp.  by  C.  Cushing,  p.  411-418.  Washing- 
ton, 1858.) 

290  D.,  A.  J.     The  treaty-making  power.     Can  the  President  and 

Senate  set  aside  the  law  and  establish  free-trade  ? 
American  economist,  Feb.  7,  1902,  v.  29:  62-63. 

HC101.A5,v.29 

291  [Davis,  J.  C.  Bancroft.]    Notes  upon  the  foreign  treaties  of  the 

United  States;  with  some  references  to  negotiations  pre- 
ceding them ;  to  the  executive,  legislative,  or  judicial  con- 
struction of  them ;  and  to  the  causes  of  the  abrogation  of 
some  of  them. 

(In  U.  S.  Treaties,  etc.  Treaties  and  conventions  con- 
cluded between  the  United  States  of  America  and  other 
powers,  since  July  4,  1776.  Rev.  ed.,  p.  927-1082.  Wash- 
ington, 1873.)  JX236  1873 
(Also  appears  as  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  36,  41st  Cong.,  3d  sess. 
(Serial  no.  1441).  Some  incomplete  copies  of  the  first  edi- 
tion of  this  compilation,  without  the  notes  and  indexes,  got 
into  circulation.  The  notes  and  indexes  were  also  issued  in 
separate  form.) 
The  treaty-making  power,  p.  931-944 ;  Constructions  by  the 
attorneys-general  and  courts  of  the  United  States,  p.  941- 
942 ;  Discussions  in  Congress  of  the  treaty  power  under  the 
Constitution,  p.  942-944. 


56  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

292  [Davis,  J.  C.  Bancroft.]     Xotes  upon  the  foreign  treaties  of 

the  United  States;  with  some  references  to  negotiations 
preceding  them;  to  the  executive,  legislative,  or  judicial 
construction  of  them ;  and  to  the  causes  of  the  abrogation 
of  some  of  them. 

(In  V.  S.  Treaties,  etc.  Treaties  and  conventions  concluded 
between  the  United  States  of  America  and  other  powers 
since  July  4,  177G,  p.  1217-140G.     Washington,  18S9.) 

JX236     1889 
(Also  appears  as  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  47,  48th  Cong.,  2d  sess.) 

Serial  no.  2262 
Discussion  of  the  treaty-making  power  in  Introductory  note, 
p.  1219-1230;  Constructions  by  the  attorneys-general  and 
courts  of  the  United  States,  p.  1227-1229;  Discussions  in 
Congress  of  the  treaty  power  under  the  Constitution,  p. 
1229-1230. 

293  Treaties  of  the  United  States. 

(In  Lalor,  John  J.  ed.  Cyclopaedia  of  political  science,  politi- 
cal economy,  and  of  the  political  history  of  the  United 
States,  v.  3,  p.  944-949.     New  York,  1899.     8°.) 

H41.L22,v.3 

294  Devlin,  Robert  Thomas.     The  treaty  power  under  the  Constitu- 

tion of  the  United  States.  Commentaries  on  the  treaty 
clauses  of  the  Constitution ;  construction  of  treaties ;  extent 
of  treaty-making  power;  conflict  between  treaties  and 
acts  of  Congress,  state  constitutions  and  statutes;  inter- 
national extradition;  acquisition  of  territory;  ambassa- 
dors, consuls  and  foreign  judgments:  naturalization  and 
expatriation;  responsibility  of  government  for  mob  vio- 
lence, and  claims  against  governments.  With  appendices 
containing  regulations  of  Department  of  state  relative  to 
extradition  of  fugitives  from  justice,  a  list  of  the  treaties 
in  force,  with  the  international  conventions  and  acts  to 
which  the  United  States  is  a  party,  and  a  chronological 
list  of  treaties. 
San  Francisco,  Bancroft-Whitney  company,  1908.  hex,  864 
p.    23\cm. 

8-2052!)  JK570.D5 

295  Displacement  of  state  laws  by  treaties. 

Columbia  law  review,  Bee.  191 4,  v.  1J+:  067-669. 

Note  in  re  D'Adamo's  estate,  (1914)  212  N.  Y.  214,  regarding 
a  citizen  of  Sweden  dying  intestate  Holds  that  the  treaty 
is  supreme  law  of  the  land. 

296  Duwalt,  G.  W.     The  treaties  of  the  United  States  and  alien 

land  laws  of  Illinois  and  other  states  of  the  Union. 
Central  law  journal,  Sept.  11.  1896,  v.  1$:  211- 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  57 

297  E.  Unconstitutional  treaties.     To  D.  Art.  II  of  the  twentieth 

no.  of  the  Jurist.    Have  the  courts  of  the  United  States 
the  power  to  declare  an  article  of  a  treaty  unconstitu- 
tional and  therefore  null  and  void? 
American  jurist,  Apr.  1834,  v.  11 :  805-308. 

..."  the  nature  of  treaties,  the  interests  involved,  the 
emergencies  that  frequently  arise,  and  good  faith  between 
nations,  all  require  that  they  should  be  paramount  to  all 
other  laws." 

298  Eliot,  Edward  C.     The  treaty-making  power,  with  reference  to 

the  reserved  power  of  the  states. 
Case  and  comment,  July,  1913,  v.  20:  77-83. 

299  Elliot,  Jonathan,  comp.    The  American  diplomatic  code,  em- 

bracing a  collection  of  treaties  and  conventions  between 
the  United  States  and  foreign  powers :  from  1778  to  1834. 
With  an  abstract  of  important  judicial  decisions,  on 
points  connected  with  our  foreign  relations.  Also,  A 
concise  diplomatic  manual,  containing  a  summary  of  the 
law  of  nations,  from  the  works  of  Wicquefort,  Martens, 
Kent,  Vattel,  Ward,  Story,  &c.  &c. 
Washington,  Printed  by  J.  Elliot,  jun.,  183 %  2  v.  23\™. 
10-15057  JX231.E6 

300 Diplomatic  code  of  the  United  States  of  America :  em- 
bracing a  collection  of  treaties  and  conventions  between 
the  United  States  and  foreign  powers,  from  the  year  1778 
to  1827. 
Washington,  Printed  by  J.  Elliot,  junior,  1827.  2  p.  I., 
\xxi\-xxv,  [26]-6G8  p.     21fm. 

9-10564  JX231.E58 

301  Elliott,  Charles  B.     The  treaty-making  power. 

Forum,  July,  1899,  v.  27:  592-601  AP2.A8,v.27 

302  Evarts,  William  M.     The  revenue  bill.     Speech  in  the  Senate, 

Sept.  8,  1890. 
Congressional  record,  51st  Congress,  1st  session,  v.  21,  pt. 
10:  9882-9883. 

On  the  reciprocity  feature  of  the  McKinley  law  "  Can  Sena- 
tors offer  an  argument  that,  under  our  Constitution,  this 
demission  by  Congress  and  this  vesting  it  in  the  President 
is  not  placing  in  him  the  power  to  make  a  treaty,  or  a 
quasi-treaty,  or  an  arrangement  in  that  nature,  without 
the  Senate;  or  to  raise  revenue  or  remit  it  without  the 
action  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  with  which  that 
power  under  the  Constitution  must  originate"?  page  9882. 

Jll.Fv5,v.21,pt.lO 


58  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

303  Fairlie,  John  A.     The  administrative  powers  of  the  President. 

Part  II.     Special  administrative  powers. 
Michigan  law  r>  vit  w,  Jan.  1904,  v.  2:21+7-259. 

Foreign  relations,  p.  L'47-2.~>0. 

304  The  Federalist.     The  Federalist:  a  collection  of  essays,  writ- 

ten in  favor  of  the  new  Constitution,  as  agreed  upon  by 
the  Fcederal  convention.  September  IT,  1787.  Reprinted 
from  the  original  text.  Under  the  editorial  supervision 
of  Henry  B.  Dawson. 
X,  w  York,  Scrlbner,  Armstrong,  and  co.,  1876.  Ivi,  61~>  p. 
21Ym. 

7-10708  JK154     1876 

305  The  Federalist;  a  commentary  on  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States,  by  Alexander  Hamilton,  James  Madi- 
son, and  John  Jay.  Ed.,  with  notes,  illustrative  docu- 
ments, and   a  copious  index,  by  Paul  Leicester  Ford. 

X>  w  York,  II.  Holt  and  company,  1898.  Ixxvii,  793  p. 
20\cm. 

9-21570  JK154     1898 

306  The  Federalist,  a  commentary  on  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States;  being  a  collection  of  essays  written  in 
support  of  the  Constitution  agreed  upon  September  17, 
17^7.  by  the  Federal  convention,  reprinted  from  the  origi- 
nal text  of  Alexander  Hamilton,  John  Jay  and  James 
Madison;  ed.  by  Henry  Cabot  Lodge. 

New  York  ((•  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1902.  aiv,  586  p. 
21cm. 

Bibliography  :  p.  xxxv-xlii. 
4-15626  JK154     1902 

The  Library  of  Congress  also  has  other  editions. 

307  Fish,  Carl  Russell.     American  diplomacy.     3d  ed.,  rev. 

Ni  w  York,  II.  Holt  and  company,  1919.  xi,  551  p.  maps 
(.;  doublt  )  21rm.  (American  historical  series.  General 
editor:  (J.  II.  Ilaskins) 

See   Index    under  Treaties:   p.   547-548. 
19-8551  JX1407.F5     1919 

308  Fleming,    William    Henry.     Address   before   the   Georgia    bar 

association  at  Warm  Springs,  Ga.,  on  June  3,  1909.     The 
tn  at  \  making-power  of  the  President  and  Senate:  how 
affected  by  the  powers  delegated  to  Congress,  and  by  the 
powers  reserved  to  the  states. 
[n.  p.]  1909.     IS  p.    2-3cm. 

"  From  the  Augusta  chronicle,  Sunday,  June  6,  1909." 
12-20753  JK573.1909.F6 

Also    in     Georgia     bar     association.     Proceedings,     1909,     p. 
183-2(17. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED  STATES  59 

309  Flood,  E.  C.     Treaties  and  state  laws. 

Lawyer  and  banker,  June  1917,  v.  10: 181-196. 
Central  law  journal,  June  15,  1917,  v.  84'  434-44%- 

310  Fort,  John  Franklin.     Treaty  power  under  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States. 
New  Jersey  law  journal,  Mar.  1912,  v.  35:  68-76. 

311  Foster,  John  W.    The  reciprocity  treaties  and  the  Senate. 

Independent,  Dec.  6,  1900,  v.  52:  2897-2899.      AP2.l53,v.52 

312  The  treaty-making;  power  under  the  Constitution. 

Yale  law  journal,  Dec.  1901,  v.  11:69-79. 

313  Gallatin,  Albert.     The  writings  of  Albert  Gallatin.     Ed.  by 

Henry  Adams. 
Philadelphia  [etc.]  J.  B.  Lippincott  &  co.,  1879.    3  v.    fold, 
tables.    25cm. 

Gallatin  to  John  Forsyth,  on  treaties  to  which  effect  was 
given  by  legislative  act,  v.  1,  p.  684-687;  Gallatin  to  D.  D. 
Field  on  the  constitutional  character  of  the  resolution  for 
annexing  Texas  by  a  legislative  act,  v.  2,  p.  605-610; 
Gallatin  to  Edward  Everett  on  the  debate  in  the  French 
Chambers  on  the  Convention  of  1831,  v.  2,  p.  478-501. 
See  also  index  under  "  Treaties." 
9-4592  E338.G16 

314  Graydon,  William.     An  abridgment  of  the  laws  of  the  United 

States.  Or,  A  complete  digest  of  all  such  acts  of  Con- 
gress as  concern  the  United  States  at  large.  To  which  is 
added,  an  appendix,  containing,  all  existing  treaties,  the 
Declaration  of  independence,  the  Articles  of  confedera- 
tion, the  rules  and  articles  for  the  government  of  the 
army,  and  the  ordinance  for  the  government  of  the  Terri- 
tory north-west  of  the  Ohio. 
Harrisburgh,  (Penn.),  Printed  by  John  Wyeth,  1803.  liii, 
[3],  476,  163,  [17]  p.    21  Vm. 

17-16659 

315  Green    bag.      [Editorial.]      The    treaty    power    and    "state 

rights  ". 
Green  bag,  Oct.  1913,  v.  25:  451-451 

316  Gregory,  Charles  Noble.     Federal  treaties  and  state  laws. 

Michigan  law  review,  Nov.  1907,  v.  6:  25-43. 

317  Gulick,  S.  L.,  and  others.    Eesident  aliens  and  treaty  obliga- 

tions; discussion. 
Academy  of  political  science.    Proceedings,  July,  1917,  v.  7 : 
576-594.  H31.A4,v.7 


60  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

318  H.,  S.  R.    The  treaty-making  power  of  the  President. 

Spectator,  Mar.  29,  1919,  v.  122:  391.  AP4.S7,v.l22 

319  Hall,  J.  P.     State  interference  with  the  enforcement  of  treaties. 

Acadt  my  of  political  science.    Proceedings,  July,  1917,  v. 
; :  548-657.  H3i.A4,v.7 

320  Hamilton,  Alexander.     Letters  of  Pacificus  and  Helvidins  on 

the   proclamation   of   neutrality   of   1793,   by  Alexander 
Hamilton,  (Pacificus.)  and  James  Madison,  (Helvidius,) 
to  which  is  prefixed  the  proclamation. 
Washington,  J.  and  G.  S.  Gideon,  1845.    102  p.    22cm. 

Includes   discussions    of   the   treaty-making   power.      See   es- 
pecially letters  of  Helvidius. 
9-6122  E312.H21 

321  The  treaty-making  power  of  the  Executive. 

The  Federalist,  no  75,  Lodge's  ed.  JK154    1902 

The  Federalist,  no.  74,  Dawson's  ed.  JK154    1876 

The  Library  of  Congress  has  other  editions. 

322  The  works  of  Alexander  Hamilton,  ed.  by  Henry  Cabot 

Lodge.    New  York  c6  London,  G.  P.  Putnam }s  so ?is,  1885- 
80.    9  v.  front,     {port.)     23\cm. 

Confederation  of  the  United  States  defective  in  the  treaty- 
making  power,  v.  1,  p.  293-294 ;  Proposed  clauses  as  to  the 
treaty-making  power,  v.  1,  p.  332,  338,  342,  348,  351;  "  Pho- 
cion"  on  breaches  of  treaty,  v.  3,  p.  481;  Force  of  treaties 
under  political  changes,  v.  4,  p.  29 ;  Power  of  executive  to 
make  treaties,  v.  4,  p.  139;  Commercial  treaty  with  France, 
etc.,  "  No  Jacobin,"  v.  4,  p.  198-229 ;  Defence  of  Mr.  Jay's 
treaty,  "  Caniillus,"  v.  4,  p.  369-524,  v.  5,  p.  3-332 ;  Message 
from  Washington  to  Congress,  in  reply  to  a  call  for  papers 
relating  to  the  treaty  with  Great  Britain,  v.  7,  p.  118-137; 
Power  of  the  House,  of  Representatives  in  case  of  a  treaty 
discussed  in  letters  to  Washington,  William  Smith,  Rufus 
King  and  Oliver  Wolcott,  v.  8,  p.  381-395.  See  also  The 
Federalist,  v.  9  of  Lodge's  ed.  of  Hamilton's  works. 
9-4588  E302.H23 

323  Same.     [Federal  ed.] 

New  York  and  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons.  1904.    12  v. 
13  port.  (incl.  fronts.)     24\cm. 

"  Bibliography  of  the  'Federalist'";  v.  11,  p.  xxxi-xl. 
See  General  index  in  vol.  10. 

lo   1536  E302.H242 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  61 

324  Hamilton,  Alexander.    Treaty  making  power  of  the  executive. 

National  reporter,  v.  5,  Feb.  22,  1919,  p.  1. 

325  Hayden,   R.      States'   rights   doctrine   and   the  treaty-making 

power. 
American  historical  review,  Apr.  1917,  v.  22: 566-585. 

E171.A57,v.22 

326  Hill,  David  Jayne.     Present  problems  in  foreign  policy. 

New  York  and  London,  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1919. 
xii  p.,  1  l,  360,  [1]  p.    19±cm. 

Contains  chapter  on  The  treaty-making  power  under  the  Con- 
stitution of  the  United  States. 
19-9943  JX1975.H6 

327  Two  lectures  on  the  revised  covenant  of  the  League  of 

nations.  Lecture.  I.  The  corporate  character  of  the  League 
of  nations.  Lecture  IT.  The  treaty-making  power  under 
the  Constitution  of  the  United  States.  Delivered  before 
George  Washington  university,  Apr.  28,  29,  1919. 

George    Washington    University.    Bulletin,   Mar.   1919,   v. 
18:  3-35. 

328  Hill,  Mabel,  comp.    Liberty  documents,  with  contemporary  ex- 

position and  critical  comments  drawn  from  various  writ- 
ers.   Edited,  with  an  introduction,  by  A.  B.  Hart. 

New  York,  London  [etc.]  Longmans,  Green,  and  co.,  1901. 
xxviii,  458  p.    8°. 

Power  in  foreign  relations  in  the  instrument  of  government, 
1G53,  p.  86 ;  in  the  articles  of  confederation,  p.  207,  209 ;  in 
the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  p.  255,  256;  Alliances 
to  be  avoided  (Washington's  Farewell  address)  p.  301,  303; 
Policy  of  the  United  States  in  Foreign  relations,  p.  300-305, 
822-326,  401  (Washington's  Farewell  Address,  Monroe  doc- 
trine, Olney  in  Atlantic  Monthly,  1900). 
1-21806  JF107.H5 

329  Hoist,  Hermann  Eduard  von.     The  constitutional  and  political 

history  of  the  United  States. 
Chicago,  Callahan  and  company,  1881-92.    8  v.    23rm. 

Rights  of  Congress  concerning  treaties,  v.  3,   p.  54,   55,   167 

et  seq.     Power  in  the  House  of  Representatives  regarding 

treaties,  v.  5,  p.  7,  8.     See  also  on  the  subject  of  treaties, 

v.  1.  p.  131,  363,  437. 

10-22032  E183.H76 


62  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

330  Hunt,  Gaillard.     The  treaty-making  power. 

Nation,  June  20,  1912,  v.  9%:  612.  AP2.N2,v.94 

Includes  information  concerning  a  memorandum  l>y  Madison  in 
regard  to  the  right  of  the  House  to  participate  In  the  mak- 
ing of  treaties. 

331  Hyde,  Charles  Cheney.    Agreements  of  the  United  States  other 

than  treaties. 
Green  hag.  Apr.  1905,  v.  17:  229-238. 

"It  is  the  purpose  of  the  writer  to  show  under  what  circum- 
stances our  government  has  deemed  it  not  unconstitutional, 
and  therefore  lawful,  to  enter  into  international  compacts 
which  have  not  been  submitted  to  the  Senate  for  approval, 
and  to  ascertain  what  has  been  the  actual  scope  of  the  exer- 
cise of  the  agreement-making  power  of  the  President  as 
distinct  from  the  treaty-making  power  which  is  shared  by 
the  Senate." 

Appended  is  a  list  of  international  arbitration  agreements 
other  than  treaties  negotiated  in  behalf  of  the  United  States. 

332  Notes  on  the  extradition  treaties  of  the  United  States. 

American  journal  of   international  Jaw.  July,  1914,   v.  8: 

487-514.  JXl.A6,v.8 

833  State    interference    with  the   enforcement   of   treaties: 

some  means  of  prevention. 

Acadi  my  of  political  science.  Proceedings,  July,  1917,  v.  7 : 

558-56%..  H31.A4,v.7 

334  Imberg,  Kurt  Eduard.     Die  Schiedsgerichtsvertriige  der  Verei- 

nigten   Staaten  von  Nordamerika  bis  zur  ersten  Haager 
Friedenskonferenz. 
Zeit  serif  t  fur  Vblkerrecht,  1913,  v.  7:272-285;  554.-569. 

JX5.Z5,v.7 

335  Jay,  John.     The  correspondence  and  public  papers  of  John  Jay. 

Ed.  by  Henry  P.  Johnston. 
Neir   York,  London,  G.  P.  Putnam' }s  sons   [1890-93]   4  v- 
23Vm. 

<  m  the  treaty-making  power,  (Federalist  papers,  no.  G3),  v.  3, 
p.  285  294. 
12-4G15  E302.J42 

336  Treaty  making  power  of  the  Senate.     March  7,  1788. 

The  Federalist,  no.  64  (Lodge's  edition).  JK154    1902 

The  Federalist,  no.  03  (Dawson's  edition).  JK154    1876 

The  Library  of  Congress  has  other  editions. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  63 

337  Jefferson,  Thomas,  pres.  U.  S.  The  writings  of  Thomas  Jef- 
ferson :  being  his  autobiography,  correspendence,  reports, 
messages,  addresses,  and  other  writings,  official  and  pri- 
vate. Pub.  by  the  order  of  the  Joint  committee  of  Con- 
gress on  the  library,  from  the  original  manuscripts,  de- 
posited in  the  Department  of  state.  With  explanatory 
notes  ...  by  the  editor,  H.  A.  Washington. 
Washington,  Taylor  <&  Maury,  1853-5  ^.  9  v.  front,  (port.) 
4  fold,  facsims.    Z3\cm. 

6-7150  E302.J464 

Treaties    under    the    Confederation,    v.    1,    p.    55-60,    62-67, 
349-352,  358-361,  370-374,  457-459,  460,  538-540,  557;  v.  9, 
p.  286;  The  expediency  of  making  short  treaties,  v.  3,  p. 
165;     Instructions    to    the    ministers    plenipotentiary    ap- 
pointed to  negotiate  treaties  of  commerce  with  the  European 
nations,  May  7,  1784,  v.  9,  p.  226-230;   Considerations  re- 
specting the  treaty  of  peace  with  Great  Britain,  May  29, 
1792,  v.  3,   p.  365-428;   Treaties  paramount  to  state  laws, 
v.  3,  p.  399-406;  Considerations  respecting  the  treaties  with 
France,  v.  4,  p.  31-51;  Opinion,  April  28,  1793,  on  French 
treaties,   v.   7,   p.   611-623;   Cession   of  Louisiana,   v.   4,   p. 
498-507;   v.  8,  p.  24;   Power  of  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives   over    treaties,    v.    4,    p.    124,    125,    134-139;    v.    9,    p. 
106-107,    114-115,    181,    190-191;    The    legislature    the    only 
power  to  control  a  treaty,  v.  4.  p.  244;  Policy  in  treaties, 
v.   4,   p.   26S,  414-415,  552-553;    v.   5,   p.   443-444;    v.   6,   p. 
453-454;   Limitations  on  the  treaty-making  power,  v.  4,   p. 
506-507;   Treaty    with   the   Creeks,   v.   6,   p.   557-560;    v.   7, 
p.  504-506 ;  Treaties  of  commerce,  v.  6,  p.  453^54 ;  v.  7,  p. 
436-437 ;  Delegation  of  the  treaty-power  by  a  state  govern- 
ment   to    the    general    government,    v.    7,    p.    467-469;    Ne- 
gotiations   with    Spain    to    secure    the    free    navigation    of 
the    Mississippi,    v.    7,    p.    568-592;    Most    favored    nation 
principle,     v.     7,    p.     583,    587;     Considerations     respecting 
treaties,     from     Jefferson's     "Manual,"     v.     9,     p.     80-82; 
Advice  of   the    Senate   necessary    to   confirm   a   treaty,    but 
not  to  reiect  it,  v.  7,  p.  135;  Jay  treaty,  v.  4,  p.  120-122, 
124-127,  131,  134-139,  148,  465-466;  v.  9,  p.  186-187,  190- 
191;    Whether    the    natural    domain    can    be    alienated    by 
treaty,  v.  9,  p.  135,  136-138;   Effect  of  French  Revolution 
on  treaties  with  France,  v.  9,  p.  142-143;  Fidelity  of  United 
States  to  treaties,  v.  9,  p.  236-239. 


64  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

338  Jefferson,  Thomas,  pn  s.  U.  S.     The  writings  of  Thomas  Jeffer- 
son;  collected  and  ed.  by  Paul  Leicester  Ford. 
New  York  [etc.]  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1892-99.    10  v.  2S\cm. 
2-5666  E302.J466 

Debate  in  Congress,  June  8,  1770,  and  arguments  of  J.  Adams, 
Lee,  Wythe,  and  others,  as  to  independence,  and  treating 
with  European  powers,  v.  1,  p.  21,  23;  Treaties  under  the 
Confederation,  v.  1,  p.  77-84,  86-94;  v.  4,  p.  54-59,  79-82, 
Ml  IK.  198-201;  Instructions  to  the  ministers  plenipo- 
tentiary appointed  to  negotiate  treaties  of  commerce  with 
the  European  nations.  May  7,  1784,  v.  3,  p.  4S9-493  ;  Con- 
siderations. .May  29,  1792,  respecting  the  treaty  of  peace  with 
Great  Britain,  v.  6,  p.  7-0!):  Conversation  with  Mr.  Ham- 
mond, on  the  British  treaty.  June  3,  1792,  v.  1,  p.  193-198; 
Treaties  paramount  to  state  laws,  v.  6,  p.  41-47 ;  Delega- 
tion of  the  treaty-power  by  a  state  government  to  the  gen- 
eral government,  v.  5,  p.  165-167;  The  expediency  of  mak- 
ing short  treaties,  v.  5,  p.  196 ;  Treaty  with  the  Creeks,  v.  5, 
p.  215-216;  Negotiations  with  Spain  to  secure  the  free  navi- 
gation of  the  Mississippi,  v.  5,  p.  407-408,  460-481;  Report 
in  convention  with  Spain,  v.  5,  p.  481-485;  Project  of  a 
convention  with  the  Spanish  provinces,  v.  5,  p.  485-487; 
Most  favored  nation  principle,  v.  4,  p.  19-20;  v.  5,  473-476; 
Considerations,  Jan.  18,  1791,  on  the  French  treaties,  v.  5, 
p.  266-273;  Opinion,  April  28,  1793,  on  the  French  treaties, 
v.  6,  p.  219-231;  Considerations,  Aug.  16,  1793,  respecting 
the  treaties  with  France,  v.  6,  p.  371-393 ;  Power  of  the 
House  of  Representatives  over  treaties,  v.  1,  p.  183-1S4, 
190-192,  26S-2G!),  277-_,7S ;  v.  7,  p.  40,  41,  67-72 ;  The  legis- 
lature the  only  power  to  control  a  treaty,  v.  7,  p.  260;  Pol- 
icy in  treaties,  v.  7,  p.  328;  v.  8,  p.  97-99;  v.  9,  p.  512-513; 
Cession  of  Louisiana,  v.  8,  p.  241-249,  261-263,  268-269; 
Treaties  of  commerce,  v.  9,  p.  512-513;  v.  10,  p.  383-384; 
Advice  of  the  Senate  necessary  to  confirm  a  treaty,  but  not 
to  reject  it,  v.  10,  p.  142;  Jay  treaty,  v.  1,  p.  273-274, 
277-278;  v.  7,  p.  27-33,  37-38,  40-42,  44,  58-59,  62,  67-72; 
v.  8,  p.  212 ;  View  of  John  Marshall,  v.  7,  p.  37 ;  Whether  the 
national  domain  can  be  alienated  by  treaty,  v.  1,  p.  219-220; 
Effect  of  French  revolution  on  treaties  with  France,  v.  1, 
p.  226-227;  Fidelity  of  the  United  States  to  treaties,  v.  4, 
p.  122-125. 

330  —  Same.    New  York  and  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons, 

1904-06.     12  v.    fronts  (ports.)  fold,  map,  plans,  facsims. 
(//.//•/  fold.)  2JiVm. 

6-15404  E302.J472 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  65 

340  Jefferson,  Thomas,  pres.  U.  S.    The  writings  of  Thomas  Jeffer- 
son.   Monticello  ed.,  containing  his  Autobiography,  Notes 
on  Virginia,  parliamentary  manual,  official  papers,  mes- 
sages and  addresses,  and  other  writings,  official  and  pri- 
vate, now  collected  and  published  in  their  entirety  for  -the 
first  time,  including  all  of  the  original  manuscripts,  de- 
posited in  the  Department  of  state  and  published  in  1853 
by  order  of  the  joint  committee  of  Congress;  with  numer- 
ous illustrations  and  a  comprehensive  analytical  index. 
Andrew    A.    Lipscomb. ..editor-in-chief.      Albert    Ellery 
Bergh,  managing  editor. 
Washington,    D.    C .,    Issued    under    the    auspices    of    the 
Thomas    Jefferson    memorial    association    of    the    United 
States  1904-05.     20  v.     fronts.,  plates,  ports.,  fold,  map, 
facsims.  {part  fold.)     22\cm. 

"A  contribution   to  bibliography  of  Thomas  Jefferson,   com- 
piled by  Richard  Holland  Johnston":  v.  20   (iv,  73  p.) 
4-18791  E302.J471 

340a  Same.    Washington,  D.  C,  Issued  under  the  auspices 

of  the  Thomas  Jefferson  memorial  association  of  the 
United  States,  1905.  20  v.  in  10.  fronts.,  plates,  ports., 
facsims.  (part  fold.)     22\cm. 

8-30595  E302.J474 

341  The  Jeffersonian  cyclopedia;  a  comprehensive  collec- 
tion of  the  views  of  Thomas  Jefferson  classified  and  ar- 
ranged in  alphabetical  order  under  nine  thousand  titles 
relating  to  government,  politics  (law,  education,  political 
economy,  finance,  science,  art,  literature,  religious  free- 
dom, morals,  etc. ;  ed.  by  John  P.  Foley. 

New  York  and  London,  Funk  &  W agnails  company,  1900. 
4  p.  I,  [xiii\-xxii,  [2],  1009  p.    front.,  plates,  ports.    25\cm. 
Quotations  from  Jefferson's  writings  on  treaties,  with  refer- 
ences to  the  sources,  and  including  discussions  of  the  treaty- 
making  power,  p.  874-886 ;  Jay  treaty,  p.  436-438. 
0-^337  JK113.J4 

342  A  manual  of  parliamentary  practice:  for  the  use  of 

the  Senate  of  the  United  States.  2d  ed.  With  the  last 
additions  of  the  author. 

Washington,    William   Cooper;  and  by  Joseph  Milligan, 
Georgetown,  1812.    188  p.    13cm. 

Treaties,  sec.  52,  p.  168-174. 
1-1294  JK1091     1812 

137190°— 20 5 


66  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

343  Jeze,  Gaston.     Du   role  des  chambres  dans  l'approbation   on 

l'execution  des  traites  internationaux  d'apres  la  Consti- 
tution des  £tats-Unis  de  l'Amerique  du  Xord. 
Ri  vin   du  droit  public  et  de  hi  sciena   politique  en  France 
it  a  Vetranger.    July-Sept.,  1904,  v.  21:  455-614- 

JAll.R5,v.21 

344  Jones,  Francois  Stewart.     Treaties  and  treaty-making. 

Political  science  quarU  ////,  Sept.  1897,  v.  12: 420-449- 

Describes  the  procedure  in  formation  of  treaties,  and  gives 
some  account  of  the  treaty-making  prerogative  in  various 
countries  particularly  in  the  United  States.  Gives  examples 
of  the  exercise  of  powers  vested  in  the  President  and  Senate 
respecting  ratification  of  treaties. 

Hl.P8,v.l2 

345  Kasson,  John  Adam.     The  evolution  of  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States  of  America  and  History  of  the  Monroe 
doctrine. 

Boston   and  Xeir   York.  Houf/hton.  Mifflin  and  company, 
1904.     xvlll,  273,  [1]  p.     front.,  port.     21cm. 

Treaties  and  their  force,  p.   140-161. 
4-33896  JK116.K3 

346  Reciprocity ;  the  benefits  that  will  accrue  to  this  country  by 

the  confirmation  of  the  treaties  now  pending  in  the  United 
States  Senate. 

[Chicago,  Rogers  and  Wells  printers,  1901]    4b->  [4]  ?-•>  1  ^ 
19cm. 

"  Delivered  before  the  Illinois  manufacturers'  association  at 
Chicago,  October  24,  1901." 

Discusses  among  other  topics,  "Are  reciprocity  treaties  war- 
ranted by  our  Constitution,"  "  Their  relation  to  the  most- 
favored-nation  clause,"  "The  Congressional  reciprocity  of 
1890  and  1897,"  etc. 

Mr.   Kasson's  conclusion   is  "  that  reciprocal  commercial  con- 
ventions, duly  ratified,  nfay  make  concessions  of  duties,  as 
well  as  of  other  commercial  favors  and  privileges;  and  that 
they  will  remain  in  force  until  repealed  by  Congress." 
9-26020  HF1731.K3 

347  Kellogg,  Frank  B.     Treaty  making  power. 

(/»  American  bar  association.     Report,  1913.     Baltimore,  1913. 

L':Ucm.     P-  331-359.) 
Also  printed  in  Chicago  legal  news,  Oct.  11,  1913,  v.  46:  75-76, 

78-80;    Ohio    law    bulletin,    Oct.    20,    1913,    v.    58:    401-414. 

Summary  printed  in  American   Legal  news  Sept.  1913,  v.  24: 

23-24;    Washington    law    reporter,    Sept.    12,    1913,    v.    41: 

590-591. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  67 

348  Kuhn,  Arthur  K.     The  treaty-making  power  and  the  reserved 

sovereignty  of  the  states. 
Columbia  law  review,  Mar.  1907,  v.  7: 172-185. 

"  From  the  very  nature  of  our  government,  the  treaty-making 
power  nfust  reside  centrally  or  nowhere.  If  there  be  a 
limitation  upon  the  power  of  the  President  and  Senate  to 
enter  into  a  particular  treaty,  the  power  of  the  entire  nation 
has  been  so  much  cut  down."     p.  184. 

349  Lawrence,  William.     The  treaty  power  under  the  Constitu- 

tion of  the  United  States. 
[Washington,  D.  C,  1871-1875.]    4  pts.  in  1  vol    8°. 

A  made  up  volume  with  inserted  manuscript  title-page  and 
preface,  the  latter  reading: 

"  The  following  papers  were  written  in  form  of  arguments 
for  the  purposes  therein  indicated.  In  them  will  be  found, 
to  some  extent,  a  discussion  of  the  Treaty  Power  under 
the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  with  a  reference  to 
many  authorities  and  official  documents  which  may  be 
found  useful  in  the  investigation  of  the  subject. 

"  The  reader  is  also  referred  to  the  case  of  Wood  vs.  The 
M.  K.  and  T.  Railway  Co.,  11  Kansas  Reports  323,  and 
Holden  vs.  Joy,  17  Wallace  Reports  11. 

"  W.  L." 

Included  are  the  following:  Peter  J.  Holden,  appellant,  vs. 
James  Joy,  Supreme  Court  of  the  United  States,  December 
term,  1871 ;  Argument  of  William  Lawrence,  on  behalf  of 
citizens  of  Kansas,  against  the  claims  of  the  Missouri, 
Kansas  and  Texas  railroad  company  and  the  Leavenworth, 
Lawrence  and  Galveston  railroad  company,  to  any  part 
of  the  Osage  lands  in  Kansas,  and  in  favor  of  the  claims  of 
settlers  thereon;  The  Leavenworth,  Lawrence  and  Gal- 
veston railroad  company,  appellant,  vs.  the  United  States, 
Supreme  Court  of  the  United  States,  October  term,  1874; 
The  Leavenworth,  Lawrence,  and  Galveston  Railroad  com- 
pany, and  the  Farmers'  Loan  and  Trust  Company,  appel- 
lants, vs.  the  United  States,  Supreme  Court  of  the  United 
States,   October  term,  1875. 

850  [Lawrence,    William    Beach.     Treaties    and    the    legislative 
authority  of  Congress.] 

(In  Wheaton,  Henry.  Elements  of  international  law.  2d 
annotated  ed.  by  William  Beach  Lawrence,  p.  458-^60 
Boston,  1863.  8°.) 
A  note  touching  on  the  debates  in  Congress  in  1796  and  1816 
on  the  treaties  with  Great  Britain  and  on  the  debates  dur- 
ing the  session  1853-1854  on  the  appropriations  required 
for  the  convention  then  recently  entered  into  by  the  Presi- 
dent and  Senate  with  Mexico.  Public  treaties.  The 
authority  required  to  declare  a  treaty  no  longer  operative 
and  the  convention  of  1831  with  France  are  also  discussed. 

JX2495.E3     1863 


68  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

351  Leake,  Walter.     The  limitations  upon  the  treaty-making  power. 

Virginia  law  registi  r.  July,  1915,  n.  s.  v.  15:  72-75. 

352  Lewis,  William  Draper.     Treaty  powers:  protection  of  treaty 

rights  by  federal  government. 
American  academy  of  political  and  social  scienet  .    Annals, 
Sept.  1909,  v.  s'',:  313  328.  Hl.A4,v.34 

353  [Lincoln,  Enoch]     The  decision  of  the  King  of  the  Netherlands 

considered  in  reference  to  the  rights  of  the  United  States 
and  of  the  state  of  Maine. 
Portland:  Printed  by  Thomas  Todd,  1831.    35  p.    8°. 

"Treaty-making  power."   p.   13-17.     "the  United  States  have 

n institutional  power  to  deprive  a  state  of  a  portion  of 

her  territory  and  without  her  consent  cede  that  territory  to 
ii   foreign  power." 

354  Littlefield,  Charles  E.     Constitutional  aspect  of  the  arbitration 

treaties. 

(In  Lake  Mohonk  conference  on  international  arbitration, 
11th  report,  190o.     p.  71-79,  Lake  Mohonk,  1905.     22icm.) 

JX1932.L3     1905 

355  Lodge,  Henry  Cabot.     The  Senate. 

Saibjier's  magazine,  Nov.  1903,  v.  3!+:  541-550.    AP2.S4,v.34 

Includes  a  summary  of  the  development  of  the  treaty-making 
power. 

356  The  Senate  of  the  United  States. 

(In    Ms   A   frontier   town    and    other   essays,    p.    56-85.     New 

York,  1906.     21 cm.) 
Treaty-making  power,  p.  79-80  E173.L79 

357  The  treaty-making  powers  of  the  Senate. 

Scribner's  magazine,  Jan.  1902,  v.  31:  33-1$.        AP2.S4,v.3i 

Reprinted  in  the  author's  "A  fighting  frigate,  and  other  essays 
and  addresses,"  N.  Y.,  1902,  and  also  as  Senate  doc.  no. 
104,  57th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  (Serial  no.  42P>0).  Senator  Lodge 
sets  forth  his  conclusions  as  follows: 

"The  results  of  the  preceding  inquiry  can  be  easily  sum- 
marized.  Practice  and  precedent,  the  action  of  the  Senate 
and  of  the  Presidents,  and  the  decision  of  the  Supreme 
Court  show  that  the  power  of  the  Senate  in  the 
making  of  treaties  lias  always  been  held,  as  the  Con- 
stitution Intended,  to  be  equal  to  and  coordinate  with 
that  of  the  President,  except  in  the  initiation  of  a  nego- 
tiation, which  can  of  necessity  only  be  undertaken  by  the 
President  alone.  The  Senate  has  the  right  to  recommend 
entering  upon  a  negotiation;  or  the  reverse;  but  the  right 
it  lias  wisely  refrained  exercising,  except  upon  rare  occa- 
sions.    The   Senate  lias  the  right   to  amend,   and   this  right 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  69 

it  has  always  exercised  largely  and  freely.  It  is  also  clear 
that  any  action  taken  by  the  Senate  is  a  part  of  the 
negotiation,  just  as  much  so  as  the  action  of  the  President 
through  the  Secretary  of  State.  In  other  words,  the  action 
of  the  Senate  upon  a  treaty  is  not  merely  to  give  sanction 
to  the  treaty,  but  is  an  integral  part  of  the  treaty-making, 
and  may  be  taken  at  any  stage  of  a  negotiation." 

358  I/Oughbridge,  William.     [The  rights,  the  powers,  and  the  con- 

stitutional prerogatives  of  the  House  of  Representatives. 
Speeches  on  the  House  bill  making  an  appropriation  of 
money  to  carry  into  effect  the  treaty  with  Russia  of 
March  30,  1867.] 
Congressional  Globe,  Ifith  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  part  4,  June  30, 
1868,  p.  3621-3625;  part  5,  July  23,  1868,  p.  4393-4394. 

359  Low,  A.  M.     The  oligarchy  of  the  Senate. 

North  American  review,  Feb.  1902,  v.  174;  231-244. 

Discusses  the  Senate's  exercise  of  power  over  treaty  making. 

AP2.N7,v.l74 

860    The  usurped  powers  of  the  Senate. 

American  political  science  review,  Nov.  1906,  v.  1:1-16. 

JAl.A6,v.l 

361  Lyman,    Theodore.     The    diplomacy    of    the    United    States. 

Being  an  account  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country, 
from  the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778,  to  the  present 
time.     2d  ed. — with  additions. 
Boston,  Wells  and  Lilly,  1828.    2  v.    23cm. 

Commercial    convention    of    1818    with    Great    Britain,    v.    2, 

p.  76-118;  Convention  of  navigation  and  commerce  of  1822 

with  France,  p.  170-190;  Colonial  trade  with  Great  Britain, 

p.  310-334. 

4-20773  JX1412.L9    1828 

362  McCall,  S.  W.     The  power  of  the  Senate. 

Atlantic  monthly,  Oct.  1903,  v.  92:433-442. 

"  The  expansion  of  the  power  of  the  Senate  in  an  undemocratic 
as  well  as  an  unconstitutional  direction  is  also  seen  in  the 
growing  tendency  to  pass  laws,  and  especially  taxation  laws, 
by  treaty,"  page  441. 

AP2.A8,v.92 

363  Macfarland,  H.  B.  F.     The  arbitration  treaties  laid  before  the 

Senate  last  winter. 

(In  Lake  Mohonk  conference  on  international  arbitration. 
Report  1905,  p.  58-64.     Mohonk  Lake,  1905.) 

JX1932.L3    1905 


70  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

364  Maclay,  William.     Journal  of  William  Maclay,  United  States 

senator  Erom  Pennsylvania,  1789-1791.    Ed.  by  Edgar  S. 
Maclay. 
New  York,  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1890.   xiv  p.,  /  L,  Jf.38 
p.    front,    (port.)    21\cm. 

The  President  in  the  Senate  chamber  and  early  procedure  In 
the  consideration  of  treaties  illustrated  in  the  consideration 
of  certain  Indian  treaties:  p.  128-133. 
9  26607  JK1036    1789d 

365  Sketches  of  debate  in  the  first  Senate  of  the  United 

State-,  in  1789-90-91.    Ed.  by  George  W.  Harris. 

Harrisbw ■■(/.  L.  S.  Hart,  printer,  \C18S0]  ccvii,  257  p.  front, 
{port.)    2S\cm. 

The  President  in  the  Senate  chamber  and  early  procedure  in 
the  consideration  of  treaties  illustrated  in  the  consideration 
of  certain  Indian  treaties:  p.  122-126. 
A13-1073  JK1036    1791 

366  Madison,  James,  pres.  U.  S.     Letters  and  other  writings  of 

James  Madison.    Published  by  order  of  Congress. 
Philadelphia,  J.   B.   Lippincott  d-   co.,  1865.     4  v.  front, 
(port.)   2Jrn. 

Discussions  on  treaties  and  the  treaty-making  power  in  all 
four  volumes.  See  especially,  Letter  to  Edmund  Fendleton, 
July  2,  1791,  v.  1.  p.  523  526;  Helvidius  in  answer  to 
Pacificus,  v.  1,  p.  607-654;  Letters  to  Jefferson  on  the  Jay 
treaty,  Dec.  27,  1795,  Jan.  31,  March  13,  April  4,  April  11, 
April  is  and  May  1,  1796.  v.  2,  p.  69-70,  75-76,  88-91,  04-95, 
99-KM>:  Letters  to  James  Monroe,  on  the  Jay  treaty,  Jan. 
2G.  May  14.  1790,  v.  2,  p.  73,  101-102;  Amendment  proposed 
by  Virginia,  requiring  the  consent  of  the  House  of  Represen- 
tatives to  treaties,  v.  2,  p.  82-83;  "Treaties,"  v.  2,  p.  260-288, 
(in  "A  memoir,  containing  an  examination  of  the  Rritish 
doctrine,  which  subjects  to  capture  a  neutral  trade  not  open 
in  time  of  peace"):  '•Remarks  on  an  extract  from  Hamil- 
ton's report,  published  in  the  Richmond  Enquirer,"  v.  3,  p. 
515;  Letter  to  George  Tucker,  July  0.  1833,  v.  A,  p.  303; 
Letter  to  Edward  Coles,  Oct.  15,  1834,  v.  4,  p.  370. 
9-321  50  E313.H22 

367  Letters  of  Helvidius;   written  in  reply  to  Pacificus,  on 

the    President's   proclamation   of   neutrality.      Published 
originally  in  the  year  1793. 

Philadelphia:  Printed  by  Samuel  11.  Smith,  no.  118,  Chest- 
nut stret  t,  1796.   48  p.  .::  m. 

U  32150  E313.H22 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  71 

368  Madison,  James,  pre*.  U.  S.  The  papers  of  James  Madison, 
purchased  by  order  of  Congress;  being  his  correspondence 
and  reports  of  debates  during  the  Congress  of  the  con- 
federation, and  his  reports  of  debates  in  the  Federal  con- 
vention; now  published  from  the  original  manuscripts, 
deposited  in  the  Department  of  state,  by  direction  of  the 
Joint  library  committee  of  Congress,  under  the  superin- 
tendence of  Henry  D.  Gilpin. 
Washington,  Langtree  &  O'Sullivan,  1840.  3  v.  facsims. 
%lfm. 

See  especially  Madison's  letter  to  Edmund  Randolph,  May, 
1783  dealing  largely  with  commercial  treaties,  v.  1,  p. 
533-538,  the  discussion  of  Jay's  report  on  the  treaty  of 
peace,  1787,  v.  2,  p.  595-597,  the  operation  of  treaties  on  the 
States  under  the  Confederation,  v.  2,  p.  595.  616,  635,  639, 
658  712  729  and  some  portions  of  the  debates  on  the  Fed- 
eral convention  of  1787  as  have  to  do  with  the  treaty- 
making  power,  references  to  which  are  to  be  found  in  the 
index,  v.  3.  p.  ccxxxiii-ccxxxiv. 
6-17045  JK111'M2 

369  An  examination  of  the  British  doctrine,  which  subjects 

to  capture  a  neutral  trade,  not  open  in  time  of  peace. 

[Philadelphia?    1806?]    1  p.  I,  6~m  V-    **"- 
Treaties:  p.  43-78. 

-m  ,-opm.  JX5316.M26 

10-1 <  356 

370  The  writings  of  James  Madison,  comprising  his  public 

papers  and  his  private  correspondence,  including  numer- 
ous letters  and  documents  now  for  the  first  time  printed. 
Ed.  by  Gaillard  Hunt. 

New  York  [etc.]  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1900-10.    9  v.    front 
(port.)  illus.,  6  facsim.  {partly  fold.)    %3\cm. 

1-20807  E302.M22 

371  Marshall,  John.     John  Marshall,  complete  constitutional  de- 

cisions, ed.  with  annotations  historical,  critical  and  legal, 
bv  John  M.  Dillon. 
Chicago,   Callaghan  &   co.,  1903,  xi,   [1],  799  p.     front. 
Neto  York  [etc.]  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1900-10.    9  v.,    front, 
(port.)  2  fold,  facsim.    Ucm- 

Constitutional  power  of  the  United  States  to  acquire  territory 
by  conquest  or  treaty,  American  Insurance  company  v.  Can- 
ter, p.  586-603.  Various  treaties  with  the  Indians,  p.  688,  703, 
704  706,  710,  711,  713;  Treaty  of  Holston,  p.  688,  711,  713; 
Treaty  of  Hopewell,  p.  688,  706.  710;  Cherokee  Nation  v. 
Georgia,  p.  655-679;  Worcester  v.  Georgia,  p.  680-723. 
3_32779  JK181.M32    1903 


72  LIBRAEY  OF   CONGRESS 

372  May  the  United  States  protect  immigrants? 

Outlook,  May  29,  1909,  v.  92:251.  AP2.08,v.92 

373  Meier,  Ernst.     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertriigen. 

Leipzig,  Dunch  r  &  Ilumblot,  1871)..    xiii,  368  p.    23rm. 

Die  Vereinigten  Staaten  von  Nordamerika :  p.  163-211. 

"Thai  a  treaty  cannot  invade  the  constitutional  prerogatives 
of  the  legislature  is  thus  illustrated  by  a  German  author, 
who  has  given  to  the  subject  a  degree  of  elaborate  and 
extended  exposition  which  it  lias  received  from  no  writer 
in  our  own  tongue.  "Congress  has  under  the  Constitution 
the  righl  to  lay  taxes  and  Imposts,  as  well  as  to  regulate  for- 
eign trade,  but  the  President  and  Senate,  if  the  "  treaty- 
making  power  "'  be  regarded  as  absolute,  would  be  able  to 
evade  this  limitation  by  adopting  treaties  which  would  com- 
pel Congress  to  destroy  its  whole  tariff  system.  According 
to  the  Constitution,  Congress  has  the  right  to  determine 
questions  of  naturalization,  of  patents,  and  of  copyright. 
Yet,  according  to  the  view  here  contested,  the  President 
and  the  Senate,  by  a  treaty,  could  on  these  important  ques- 
tions utterly  destroy  the  legislative  capacity  of  the  House 
of  Representatives  .  .  .  Congress  would  cease  to  be  the  law- 
making power  as  is  prescribed  by  the  Constitution;  the  law- 
making power  would  be  the  President  and  the  Senate.     Such 

a  < dition  would  become  the  more  dangerous  from  the  fact 

that  treaties  so  adopted,  being  on  this  particular  hypothesis 
superior  to  legislation,  would  continue  in  force  until  super- 
seded by  other  treaties.  Not  only,  therefore,  would  a  Con- 
gress consisting  of  two  houses  be  made  to  give  way  to  an 
oligarchy  of  President  and  Senate,  but  the  decrees  of  this 
Oligarchy,  when  once  made,  could  only  be  changed  by  con- 
currence of  President  and  of  Senatorial  majority  of  two- 
thirds."  Cited  in  Wharton,  Francis.  "A  digest  of  the  in- 
ternational law  of  the  United  States,"  Washington.  1SS6. 
v.  2,  p.  26-27. 

2— 18652  JX4171.T5M4 

374  Michon,  Louis.     Les  traites  internationaux  devant  les  chambres. 

Paris,  A.  Ohevalii  r-Marescq  &  cie,  1901.  S  p.  1.,  520  p.  23cm. 

The    treaty-making    power    in    the    United    States:    p.    14-15, 
I  Id  465. 
S-8752  JN2809.M6 

375  Mikell,  William  E.     The  extent  of  the  treaty-making  power  of 

the  President  ami  senate  of  the  United  State-. 
University  of  Pennsylvania  hur  ,-,  <■;,,/-  and  American  law 
n  gistt  r.  Apr.  Mag.  1909,  v.  57:^35-458;  528-662. 

37G  Miller,  Shackelford.     Treaty-making  power. 

American  law  review,  July-Aug.,  1907,  c.  ltl :  527-5 1{9. 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  73 

377  Miyakawa,  Masuji.     Powers  of  the  American  people,  Congress, 

President,  and  courts  (according  to  the  evolution  of  con- 
stitutional construction) .    2d  cd.,  completely  rev.  through- 
out with  extensive  additions. 
New  York,  The  Baker  &  Taylor  co.,  1908.   xlv  p.,  1  I.,  $1  p. 
23\cm. 

Treaty :  p.  239-266. 
8-24433  JK246.M64 

378  Moody,  William  H.     Constitutional  powers  of  the  Senate:  a 

reply. 
North  American  review,  Mar.  1902,  v.  11 %:  386-39 %. 

A  rejoinder  to  the  article  by  A.  Maurice  Low,  in  the  North 

American  review  for  Feb.  1902. 
Treaty-making  power,  p.  388-389.  AP2.N7.V.174 

879  Moore,  John  Bassett.  History  and  digest  of  the  international 
arbitrations  to  which  the  United  States  has  been  a  party, 
together  with  appendices  containing  the  treaties  relating 
to  such  arbitrations,  and  historical  and  legal  notes. 
Washington,  Gov't  print,  off.,  1898.  G  v.  fold,  maps,  facsim. 
23cm. 

"  List  of  authorities  "  :  v.  1,  p.  lxxxiii-xcviii. 
4-3795  JX1987.A2 

380  Report  on  extradition,  with  returns  of  all  cases  from 

August  9,  1842,  to  January  1,  1890,  and  an  index. 

Washington,  Gov't  print,  off.,  1890.   239  p.    29cm. 

JX4302.1890.M72 

381  Treaties  and  executive  agreements. 

Political  science  quarterly,  Sept.  1905,  v.  20:  385-1,20. 

1.  Question  as  to  general  arbitration  treaties.  2.  The  terms 
"  treaty,"  "  convention,"  "  protocol."  3.  Examples  of  purely 
executive  agreements.  Jf.  Arguments  under  acts  of  Con- 
gress: (1)  Postal  "treaties;"  (2)  Reciprocity  agree- 
ments; (3)  Discriminating  duties,  copyrights,  and  trade 
marks;  (4)  Indian  treaties.  5.  The  modus  vivendi.  6.  The 
settlement  of  preliminary  claims:  (1)  By  treaty;  (2)  By 
executive  agreement ;  (3)  Arbitrations  under  executive  agree- 
ments.    7.  Executive  enforcement  of  statutes  and  treaties. 

HI.P8,v.20 
JK573.1905.M6 

382  Morey,   William   Carey.     The   treaty-making   power   and   the 

legislative  authority  of  the  states. 
Rochester,  N.    Y.,   The    Genesee   press    [etc.   1909]    10  p. 
23cm.     (Post  express  specials,  series  B — no.  1) 

9-18869  JK573._1909.M6 


74  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

383  Morgan,  John  T.     Relations  with  Greal  liritain  and  Canada. 

(In  Congressional  record,  50th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  v.  19,  pt  9, 
Sept.  L8,  1888,  p.  8672  8674;  Sept.  25,  1888,  p.  8913-8920.) 

Senate  held  to  have  become  aggressive  "in  Its  endeavor  to 
control  by  resolutions  and  through  the  action  of  committees 
the  whole  diplomatic  relations  between  the  United  States 
and  foreign  powers." 

Jll.R5,v.l9,pt.9 

384  Morrill,  Justin  S.     Reciprocity  treaties. 

(I>i  Appleton's  annual  cyclopaedia  and  register  of  important 
events  of  the  year  1885,  p.  238-241.  New  York,  1886. 
25icm.) 

Substance  of  his  speech  delivered  in  the  United  States  Senate, 
Jan.  7,   1885. 

AE5.A7     1885 

385  Reciprocity  treaty  with  Canada.    Speech  in  the  Senate 

of  the  United  States,  February  3,  1875. 

Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1875.    22  p.  8°. 

"  Constitutional  objections,"  p.  8-12. 

386  Reciprocity  treaties,  so-called.     Speech  in  the  Senate, 

Jan.  7.  1885. 

(In  Congressional  record,  48th  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  16,  pt.  1, 
p.  506  513.) 

Denies  the  constitutionality  of  treaties  of  reciprocity,  and  in 
support  of  position  taken,  adduces  arguments  from  the  ad- 
verse reports  of  Choate  and  Archer  on  the  Zollvereiu  treaty 
of  1844. 

Jll.R5,v.l6,pt.l 

387  Morris,  Heman  W.     The  powers  of  Congress  over  treaties. 

{In  New  York  state  bar  association.  Proceedings.  1903. 
Albany,  1903.     24cm.     v.  26;  p.  95-115.) 

Same.      American    law    review,    May-June,    1903,    v. 

37:368-379. 

The  treaty-making  power  is  considered  both  on  the  historical 
and  the  legal  side  and  the  opinion  is  stated,  in  conclusion, 
"that  a  treaty  will  never  be  made  by  this  government  or 
in  any  rate  carried  into  effect,  SO  as  to  subvert  an  act  of 
Congress,  until  it  shall  have  received,  in  some  manner,  Un- 
sanction of  that  body:  thai  the  courts  will  never  be  called 
on  to  determine  the  force  and  effect  of  such  a  treaty 
upon  existing  laws,  and  thai  the  danger  of  a  clash  between 
the  treaty-making  power  and  the  legislative  branch  of  the 
general  government,  while  always  present  in  theory,  is  to 
all  intents  and  purposes  nonexistent" 


TKEATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  75 

388  Nelson,     Henry    Loomis.      Chamberlain's    tripartite    under- 

standing. 

Harper's  weekly,  Dec.  30,  1899,  v.  43:  1315-1316. 
'  In  discussing  "  whatever  understanding  there  may  be  be- 
between  this  country  and  Germany  and  Great  Britain," 
the  author  holds  that  the  tendency  of  American  diplomacy 
will  be  "  to  avoid  treaties  more  and  more,  and  to  work 
through  what  Mr.  Chamberlain  has  called  an  understand- 
ing." Tbe  Senate  is  made  responsible  for  difficulties  of 
treaty-making. 

AP2.H32,v.43 

389  A  mistake  of  the  fathers. 

Harper's  weekly,  June,  22,  1901,  v.  45:  623. 
Holds  that  "  the   Senate's  power  of   ratification  must  be  set 
down  as  one  of  the  mistakes  of  the  fathers." 

AP2.H32,v.45 

390  The  weakness  of  the  executive  power  in  democracy. 

Harper's  new  monthly  magazine,  Jan.  1899,  v.  98:  210- 

2JS.  AP2.H3.V.98 

"American  diplomacy,"  Mr.  Nelson  states,  "  has  often  seen  its 
triumphs  mined  by  the  intervention  of  Congress." 

391  The  obligation  of  treaty  stipulations.     The  Chinese  empire 

and  the  United  States. 

Washington  law  reporter,  Feb.  17,  1879,  v.  7:  52-53. 

392  [Ogden,  Rollo.]     The  graveyard  of  good  treaties. 

Nation,  Mar.  15,  1900,  v.  70:  199-200.  AP2.N2,v.70 

On    the    "  obscurantist    and    obstructionist    attitude    of    the 
Senate." 

393  [ ]    The  paralysis  of  the  treaty-making  power. 

Nation,  Dec.  20,  1900,  v.  71:  481-482.  AP2.N2,v.71 

Senate  regarded  as  "  the  great  assassin  of  treaties." 

394  Paine,  Robert  Treat.     What  ought  to  be  done  with  the  arbitra- 

tion treaties? 

(In  Lake  Mohonk  conference  on  international  arbitration,  11th 
report,  1905,  p.  79-81.     Lake  Mohonk,  1905.     22icm.) 

JX1932.L3     1905 

395  Patterson,  Christopher  Stuart.     The  constitutionality  of  the 

reciprocity  clause  of  the  McKinley  tariff  act. 
American  law  register  and  review,  Feb.,  1892,  v.  31   [2d 
ser.,  vol.  5],  p.  65-75. 
Cites  numerous  cases. 


76  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

396  Pierce,  Franklin.     Federal  usurpation. 

N<  w    York,  D.  Appleton  and  company,  190S.  xx,  $7  p. 

gjcm 

"This  book  is  a  plea  for  the  sacredness  of  the  Constitution 

of  the  I'nited  States." 
"  Treaty  power  and  state  rights,"  p.  241-265. 
8-4.;  ts  JK311.P5 

397  Powers  of  the  states — treaty-making  power. 

Yah   Jaw  journal,  Jan.,  1918,  v.  27:  406-407. 
.Mi  Henry  County  v.  Brady  (N.  D.) 

398  Putney,  Albert  H.     The  police  power  of  the  states  as  restricted 

by  the  federal  constitution. 
Case  and  comment,  Oct.,  1913,  v.  20:  310-315. 

399  Randolph,  Carman  Fitz.     The  law  and  policy  of  annexation, 

with  special  reference  to  the  Philippines,  together  with 
observations  on  the  status  of  Cuba. 
New  York,  Longmans,  Green,  &  co.,  1901.    xi,  226  p.     2Ym. 

Treaties   of  annexation,    p.   4-7,    59,    148;    The    making   of   a 

treaty,  p.  13,147;  Construction  of  treaties,  p.  16-20  ;  Treaties 

subordinate  to  the  Constitution,  p.  17;   Ratification  of  the 

Treaty  of  Paris,  p.  22. 

1  ::<c,-_r,  JX4088.R3 

400  A  review  of  the  question.  In  whom  has  the  constitution  vested 

the  treaty  power?  With  incidental  illustrations;  and  a 
short  discussion  of  the  right  of  the  House  to  call  on  the 
president,  in  a  late  instance,  for  certain  papers.  By  a 
senator  of  the  United  States. 
PhiladrlpJiia:  Printed  hy  Samuel  Harrison  Smith,  no.  118y 
Chestnutstreet,  1796.    35  p.    21cm. 

5   L7059  JK573.1796.R5 

401  Robinson,  Chalfant.     A  history  of  two  reciprocity  treaties:  the 

treaty  with  Canada  in  1854.  the  treaty  with  the  Hawaiian 
Islands  in  l*7r>.  with  a  chapter  on  the  treaty-making 
power  of  the  House  of  representatives. 
[N(  w  Hav<  n.  Conn.,  Tin  Tutth  .  Morehouse  <£•  Taylor  press, 
1904]  ■'■'"  /'•  f'dd.  map,  fold,  tab.,  diagrs.  {1  fold.) 
23Vm. 

Bibliographies:  p.  7S-82,  157-1G0,  17G. 
5    H966  HF1732.A1R5 

402  -  The  treaty-making  power  of  the  House  of  Representa- 

tive-. 
Yah   /<  '■/>  "•.  .\n<i.  190$,  e.  12:  191-203.  Hi.Y2,v.i2 

Bibliography  \>.  203. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  77 

403  Rogers,  Henry  Wade.    The  treaty-making  power. 

American  bar  association.  Report  of  the  sixteenth  annual 
meeting  .  .  .  1893,  p.  243-269.   Philadelphia,  1893.     8°. 

Am.  Ins.  Co.  v.  Canter,  1  Peters,  511,  542.  Limitations  of 
Congress  in  enacting  laws,  Marbury  v.  Madison,  1  Cranch 
'  137.  Case  of  a  treaty  contrary  to  the  laws  of  the  British 
Constitution.  The  Parlement  Beige,  L.  R.,  4  P.  D.,  154. 
Power  to  declare  treaties  void,  Ware  v.  Hylton,  3  Dallas, 
199,  237. 

Cases  cited:  A  treaty  which  should  invade  in  any  way  the 
reserved  rights  of  the  States  would  be  unconstitutional,  Pre- 
vost  v.  Guneau,  19  How.  7.  The  government  of  the  Union 
"possesses  the  power  of  acquiring  territory  either  by  con- 
quest or  treaty,"  Marshall,  C.  J. 

404  Ruttimann,  Johann  Jakob.     Das  nordamerikanische  Bundes- 

staatsrecht  verglichen  mit  den  politischen  Einrichtungen 

der  Schweiz. 

Zurich,  Orell  Fiissli  und  corny.,  1867-1872.    2  v.  in  1.    22\™. 

"  Die  Vertretung  der  Union  gegeniiber  dem  Auslande,"  Th.  1, 

p.  291-303.     "  Die  Ordnung  der  aussern  Angelegenheiten," 

Th.  2.     Abth.  1,  p.  1-29.     "Die  Ordnung  des  Handels  mit 

dem  Auslande,"  Th.  2,  Abth.  1,  p.  13-24. 

CA 10-3714  JK295.R8 

405  Schuyler,  Eugene.     American  diplomacy  and  the  furtherance 

of  commerce. 
New  York:  Charles  Scribner's  sons,  1886.  xiv,  469  p.  8°. 
Treaty  power  in  the  Senate  and  House,  p.  22. 
Commercial  treaties,  p.  421-457. 

JX1407.S3 

406  The  Senate  and  the  treaties. 

Nation,  May  30,  1872,  v.  lp  348-349.  AP2.N2,v.l4 

On  "complications  between  the  Senate  and  the  Executive" 
which  "affect  foreign  nations  and  bring  discredit  on  us  in 
our  international  relations."  The  "  Reverdy-Johnson  treaty," 
the  "  Danish-Island  treaty,"  and  the  "  Washington  treaty  " 
used  as  "three  striking  illustrations  of  the  inconveniences 
of  our  mode  of  dealing  with  foreign  affairs." 

407  The  Senate  as  treaty-maker. 

Nation,  Jan.  30,  1902,  v.  74:  84-85.  AP2.N2,v.74 

A  criticism  of  Senator  Lodge's  article  in  Scribner's  magazine 

for  Jan.,  1902,  on  "  The  treaty-making  powers  of  the  Senate." 


78  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

408  Spear,  Samuel  T.     The  conflict  of  treaties  and  laws. 

Albany  law  journal,  Sept.  18,  1880,  v.  22:  22i 

Authorities  quoted:  Writings  of  Madison,  vol.  1,  page  ."24. 
Works  of  Hamilton,  vol.  7,  page  512.  Rawle  on  the  Con- 
stitution, page  56.  Attorney-Gen.  Crittenden,  5  Op.  Att.- 
Gen.,  345.  Attorney*  Jen.  Cushlng,  G  (>i>.  Att.-Gen.,  29:5.  At- 
torney-Gen. Ackerman,  13  Op.  Att.-Gen.,  357.  Chancellor 
Kent  "overstates  the  matter"  in  Com.  (3d  ed.),  vol.  1, 
page  166. 
Cases  cited:  The  United  States  v.  The  Schooner  Peggy,  1 
Cranch,  103;  Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Pet.,  253;  The  Clinton 
Bridge,  1  Wool.,  150;  Ropes  et  al.  v.  Clinch,  8  Blatchf.,  304; 
Taylor  et  al.  v.  Morton,  2  Curtis  454;  The  Cherokee  Tobacco 
case,  11  Wall,  616. 

409  Congress  and  the  treaty  power. 

Albany  law  journal,  Aug.  U,  1880,  v.  22:  126-129. 

Chancellor  Kent  on  a  treaty  requiring  the  payment  of  money: 
Kent's  Com.  (3d  ed.)  vol.  1,  pp.  165,  166;  On  the  obligatory 
nature  of  a  treaty  with  respect  to  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives:   id.  page  286.     ("  On  the  President.") 

Chancellor  Kent  holds  (1)  That  every  treaty  made  by  the 
President  of  the  United  States  with  the  consent  and  ap- 
proval of  the  Senate,  is,  ipso  facto,  a  supreme  law  of  the 
land;  (2)  That  if  any  legislative  action  on  the  part  of 
Congress  is  necessary,  it  is  the  duty  of  Congress  to  supply 
this  legislation.  In  regard  to  the  matter  involved  in  both 
of  these  propositions,  see  McLean,  Mr.  J.,  in  Turner  v. 
American  Baptist  Missionary  Union,  5  McLean,  344.  View 
opposite  to  that  held  by  Chancellor  Kent. 

Compare  also  the  following:  Marshall,  C.  .T.,  in  Foster  v. 
Neilson,  l>  Pet,  253,  referred  to  and  reaffirmed  in  the  United 
States  v.  Arredondo  6  Pet.,  691,  and  again  reaffirmed  in  the 
X'nited  States  v.  Perecheman,  7  Pet.,  51.  Oppose  the  view  of 
Chancellor  Kent.  See  also,  The  Matter  of  Metzger,  1  Barb., 
248,  in  which  Judge  Edmonds  repeats  the  opinion  stated 
by  Chief  Justice  Marshall.  Judge  Edmonds's  decision  ren- 
dered in  1847,  was  followed  by  an  act  of  Congress  in  1848, 
"Giving  effect  to  certain  treaty  stipulations  between  this 
and  foreign  governments  for  the  apprehension  and  de- 
livering up  of  certain  offenders,"  9  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  302. 

Qualification  to  the  treaty  making  power  given  in  Law- 
rence's Wheaton,  page  457. 

1816.  Debate  in  the  Senate  on  the  treaty  making  power. 
Senator  Macon  of  North  Carolina,  in  Benton's  Abridge- 
ment, vol.  5,  page  456.  Senator  Campbell,  of  Tennessee, 
id.  page  458.  Ulpian:  "lb'  who  contracts  with  another 
knows  or  ought  to  know  his  condition." 

Treaty  making  power  can  not  subvert  the  Constitution: — 
Story's  Const.     §1508. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  79 

Power  to  annul  and  abolish  a  treaty  belongs  to  Congress. 
Congress,  in  1798,  abolished  all  existing  treaties  between 
the  United  States  and  France.     1  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  578. 

Legal  omnipotence  of  treaties,  as  Blackstone  held  the  doc- 
trine, is  not  compatible  with  the  distribution  of  powers 
made  by  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  and  does 
not  accord  with  the  modern  practice  .of  Great  Britain  in 
making  treaties. 

See  Todd's  Treatise  upon  Parliamentary  Government  in  Eng- 
land, vol.  1,  page  610,  on  the  power  of  Parliament  in  the 
matter  of  treaty  making.  Refers  to  any  proposition  that 
may  be  made  to  change  existing  tariffs,  etc. 

410  Spear,  Samuel  T.     The  legal  operation  of  treaties. 

Albany  law  journal,  Sept.  11,  1880,  v.  22:  206-210. 

Treaties  of  the  United  States  are  part  of  "the  supreme  law 
of  the  land." 

(1)  Treaties  are  equal  in  rank  to  the  laws  of  Congress.  Courts 
must  take  notice  of  them :  Story,  J.,  in  Martin  v.  Hunter's 
Lessee,  1  Wheat.,  304.  Rank  of  treaties:  Marshall,  C.  J., 
The  United  States  v.  The  Schooner  Peggy,  1  Cranch,  103; 
Marshall,  C.  J.,  Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Pet.,  253. 

(2)  This  judicial  notice  extends  to  treaties  which  preceded 
the  adoption  of  the  Constitution  as  well  as  those  made  since 
its  adoption,  and  also  to  treaties  with  the  Indian  tribes, 
as  well  as  to  those  with  foreign  nations:  Chase,  Mr.  J.,  in 
Ware  v.  Hylton,  3  Dall.,  199;  Marshall,  C.  .T.,  Worcester  v. 
The  State  of  Georgia,  6  Pet.,  515 ;  McLean,  Mr.  J.,  Turner  v. 
The  American  Baptist  Missionary  Union,  5  McLean,  344. 

(3)  "Cases  in  law  and  equity"  arising  under  treaties  of  the 
United  States  are  such,  and  such  only,  as  involve  rights  that 
directly  grow  out  of  or  are  directly  protected  by  these 
treaties :  Marshall,  C.  J.,  in  Owings  v.  Norwood's  Lessee, 
5  Cranch,  344;  Henderson  v.  Tennessee,  10  How.  311;  Gill 
v.  Oliver's  Executors,  II  id.  529;  and  Verden  v.  Coleman, 
1  Black,  472. 

(4)  The  construction  of  treaties,  considered  as  laws  affecting 
rights  as  between  individuals  is  exclusively  a  judicial  func- 
tion:  Grier,  Mr.  J.,  in  Wilson  v.  Wall,  6  Wall.,  83;  Story, 
Mr.  J.,  The  Amiable  Isabella,  6  Wheat.,  1;  Daniel,  Mr.  J., 
United  States  v.  D'Auterive,  10  How.  609;  Story,  Mr.  J., 
The  United  States  v.  The  Armistad,  15  Pet.,  518. 

(5)  Rights  of  property  acquired  and  vested  under  treaties  are 
not  divested  by  their  termination  even  by  war:  Washing- 
ton, Mr.  J.,  in  The  Society  v.  New  Haven,  8  Wheat.,  464; 
Meade  v.  The  United  States,  2  Ct.  of  CI.  224. 

(6)  Treaties,  regarded  simply  as  contracts  between  the  gov- 
ernments making  them,  take  effect  at  and  from  the  date  of 
their  signature,  unless  they  otherwise  stipulate ;  but  consid- 
ered as  laws  affecting  the  rights  of  citizens  of  the  United 
States,  they  do  not  take  effect  until  ratified  and  proclaimed : 
Davis  v.  The  Police  Jury  of  Concordia,  9  How.  280;  The 


80  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

United  States  v.  Arredondo,  6  Pet,  691;  Haver  v.  Taker, 
0  Wall.,  32. 
(7 1  The  competency  of  the  contracting  parties  to  make  a 
treaty  is  not  a  question  into  which  courts  can  inquire  as  a 
condition  precedent  to  regarding  it  as  a  law:  Taney,  C.  J., 
in  Doe  v.  Braden,  10  How.,  635;  Fellows  v.  Blacksmith, 
151   How.,  366. 

(8)  Treaties  that  require  no  legislation  on  the  part  of  Con- 
gress to  carry  them  into  effect  have  the  character  of 
supreme  laws  when  ratified  and  proclaimed;  but  if  they 
require  such  legislation  for  their  execution,  then  they  are 
not  a  rule  for  courts  until  the  necessary  legislation  has 
been  supplied  :  Marshall,  C.  J.,  in  Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Pet., 
253;  McLean,  Mr.  J.,  in  Turner  v.  The  American  Baptist 
Missionary  Union,  5  McLean,  344. 

(9)  Treaties  of  the  United  States  abrogate  all  provisions  in 
State  Constitutions  or  laws  in  conflict  therewith:  Ware  v. 
Hylton,  3  Dall.,  199.  Sec  8  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  80; 
Owings  v.  Norwood's  Lessee,  5  Cranch,  344;  Fairfax's  v. 
Devisee  v.  Hunter's  Lessee,  7  id.  603 ;  Gordon's  Lessee  v. 
Halliday,  1  Wash.,  291 ;  and  Fisher  v.  Harden,  1  Paine,  55. 
Duty  of  state  judges  to  regard  the  treaties  of  the  United 
States  as  supreme  laws  and  the  same  duty  is  devolved  on 
the  National  judiciary. 

(1<»)  The  constitutional  validity  of  treaties,  considered  as 
municipal  laws,  is  a  question  which  courts,  with  proper 
cases  before  them,  are  authorized  to  consider  and  deter- 
mine: Marbury  v.  Madison,  1  Cranch,  137  (The  Consti- 
tution itself  is  in  all  cases  the  paramount  authority,  and 
no  law  in  conflict  with  the  Constitution  can  bind  any 
court,  whether  State  or  National.)  Doe  v.  Braden,  16 
How.,  03.");  The  Cherokee  Tobacco  Case,  11  Wall.,  616. 
In  this  connection,  see  also  Sec.  709  of  the  Revised  Statutes 
of  the  United  states. 

411  Spear,  Samuel  T.     The  treaty  power. 

Albany  law  journal,  Aug.  7,  1880,  vol.  22:  107-109. 

Power  to  make  treaties,  Art.  2,  sec.  2  of  the  Constitution, 
interpreted:  By  Taney,  C.  J.,  Holmes  v.  Jennison,  14  Pet., 
540;  by  Story,  J.,  Story's  Const.,  §150S.  Treaties  must  be 
consistent  with  the  several  provisions  of  the  Constitution: 
Story's  <'onst.,  §1508;  Miller,  J.,  The  Loan  Association  v. 
Toprk,,,  L'(i  Wall.,  655;  People  v.  Gerke,  5  Cal.,  3S1 ;  Pierce 
v.  State,  L5  X.  II..  :::'.<;.  Some  treaties  are  self-operative. 
They  art  directly,  proprio  >i<)<>n\-  Marshall.  <\  J.,  Foster  v. 
Neilson,  2  Pet.,  253;  [redell,  .1..  Ware  ,-.  Bylton,  3  Dall., 
199.  Some  treaties  are  not  self-operative.  They  require 
legislative  action  in  order  to  carry  them  into  effect.  Hence 
they  are  contracts  in  futiiro.  A  stipulation  for  the  pay- 
ment of  money  t<>  a  foreign  nation  presents  a  rase  of  this 
kind.    See  Constitution,  Art.  l,  sec.  9,  in  this  connection. 

Two   th ies   as   to   the   obligation   to   make   appropriations: 

(1)    Treaty   being   tin;  supreme  law  of  the  land,   Congress 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN  THE   UNITED  STATES  81 

has  no  discretion  in  the  matter;  (2)  Treaty  not  complete, 
when  appropriation  is  involved,  until  Congress  has  ren- 
dered it  so  by  appropriation.  Debates  on  conflicting  the- 
ories : 

(1)  Jay  treaty,  1196.  Debate  continued  daily  7th  of  March 
'  to  the  7th  of  April.  See  the  resolution,  Benton's  Abridge- 
ment, vol.  1,  page  696. 

(O)  commercial  treaty  between  the  United  States  and  Great 
Britain.  Ratified,  Dec.  22,  1815:  8  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large, 
22S.  Debates  in  the  House  of  Representatives,  in  1816. 
See  Benton's  Abridgement,  vol.  5,  pp.  446-546.  Also,  3  U.  S. 
Stat,  at  Large,  255.    Same  ground  covered  as  in  the  debate 

of  1796. 

(3)  18U.  President  Tyler.  Treaty  negotiated  with  Prussia 
and  the  other  states  of  the  Germanic  Association  of  Cus- 
toms and  Commerce.  Rejected  by  the  Senate.  Adverse 
report  of  the  Senate  Committee  on  Foreign  Relations 
through    Senator    Choate.      Control    of    trade    belongs    to 

Congress. 

(4)  1875  President  Grant.  Commercial  treaty  negotiated 
with  Hawaii.  19th  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  625.  Congress, 
Au"  15  1876,  passed  an  act  to  give  effect  to  the  con- 
vention. '  19th  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  200.  Discussion  in  the 
House  on  the  relation  of  Congress  to  the  treaty  power.  In 
1876,  by  virtue  of  the  fifth  article  of  the  treaty,  there  was 
really  no  necessity  for  the  discussion  of  the  constitutional 
question.  This  article  provided  that  the  treaty  should  not 
take  effect  until  a  law  to  carry  it  into  operation  had  been 
passed  by  the  Congress  of  the  United  States. 

412  Stidham,  Mrs.  Clara  Hannah    (Kerr).     The  origin  and  de- 
velopment of  the  United  States  Senate. 
Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  Andrus  &  Church,  1895.  vi,  197  p.  Hem. 

"  List  of  works  cited  "  :  p.  181-184. 

Treaties,  plan  of  Hamilton  for,  p.  7 ;  proposal  to  give  to  the 
Senate  the  power  to  negotiate,  p.  8 ;  power  to  negotiate  given 
to  the  President  and  two-thirds  of  the  Senate,  p.  8 ;  rule  im- 
posing secrecy  on,  p.  99;  removal  of  injunction  of  secrecy 
from,  p.  101,  135-158;  secrecy  on  treaties,  p.  135;  manner 
of  framing,  p.  136-140 ;  consultation  of  the  Senate  prior  to 
the  negotiation  of,  p.  139-143 ;  appointment  of  special  agents 
to  negotiate,  p.  143-144 ;  influence  of  the  Senate  in  the  nego- 
tiation of,  p.  144-145,  153 ;  abrogation  of,  p.  146-147 ;  share 
of  the  House  in,  p.  148-151;  157-158;  repeal  of  laws  by 
stipulations  of  a  treaty,  p.  151 ;  acquisition  of  territory  by, 
p.  151-155;  previous  appropriations  for  the  negotiation  of 
a  treaty,  p.  152-153 ;  commercial  regulations  in,  p.  155-157 ; 
with  the  Indians,  considered  in  open  session,  p.  136;  rati- 
fication of  Indian,  p.  139-140;  share  of  House  in  Indian, 
n  148-149 ;  law  forbidding  the  negotiation  of  Indian,  p.  149. 
8-31787  JK1166.S82 

137190°— 20 6 


82  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

413  Story,  Joseph.     Life  and  letters  of  Joseph  Story.     Edited  by 

his  son,  William  W.  Story. 
Boston:  diaries  G.  LitiU.    and  James  Broicn,  1851.    2  v. 
front,   {port.).  8°. 

Power  of  coding  territory  by  treaty,  v.  2,  p.  2S6-2S9. 

414  Taylor,  Hannis.     The  growth  of  Hague  ideals. 

American  laio  review,  J  an -Feb.,  1906,  v.  40:  1-8. 

Discusses  the  treaty-making  power  as  regards  arbitration. 
Argues  the  right  of  the  President,  by  and  with  the  advice 
and  consent  of  the  Senate,  to  make  such  a  treaty. 

415  Teller,  Henry  M.     Power  of  Congress  over  treaties. 

(In  Congressional  record,  60th  Cong.  1st  sess.,  v.  42,  pt.  7: 
6461-0463. ) 

A  brief  with  regard  to  the  power  of  Congress  to  abrogate  trea- 
ties by  an  act  inconsistent  with  the  treaty.  "  That  Con- 
gress can  repeal  a  treaty  with  a  foreign  power  by  an  act 
can  not  be  questioned,  considering  the  many  decisions  of 
cases  to  that  effect." 

Jll.R5,v.42,pt.7 

416  Thompson,  B.  M.     The  power  of  the  Senate  to  amend  a  treaty. 

Michigan  law  review,  Apr.,  1905,  v.  3: 427-441. 

"The  Constitution  gives  the  President  power  to  make  treaties 
by  and  witli  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate.  The 
President  has  the  right  to  have  the  very  treaty  made  by 
him  approved  or  rejected.  When  the  Senate  amends  no 
action  is  taken  upon  the  treaty  in  the  form  submitted  and 
the  Constitution  is  thereby  violated  in  spirit  if  not  in  the 
letter.  In  assuming  to  amend  a  treaty,  the  Senate  exer- 
cises a  power  pot  delegated  to  the  Senate  and  expressly 
conferred  upon  the  President." 

417  Treaties  by  government  with  Indians  within  State  boundaries. 

Albany  law  journal,  Dec.  9, 1876,  v.  14-' 393-394- 

418  Treaties  in  the  House. 

Nation,  Dec.  18,  1884,  v.  39:516-517. 

on  the  commercial  treaty  question  then  pending. 

AP2.N2,v.39 

419  Treaty-making  power. 

A  im  rican  t  conomist,  Feb.  14, 1902,  v.  29:  75. 

HC101.A5,v.29 

420  The  treaty-making-  power. 

Sjh  rtator,  Dec.  29,  1900,  v.  85:959-960.  AP4.S7,v.85 

Contrasts  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  United  States  and 
France,  with  a  verdict  in  favor  of  France. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN   THE  UNITED  STATES 


83 


421  Treaty  tariffs. 

Protectionist,  Apr.,  1902,  v.  13: 673-682.         HFl750.P8,v,l3 
An  editorial  on  Senator  Cullom's  speech  of  Jan.  29,  1902. 

422  Tucker,  Henry  St.  George.     Limitations  on  the  treaty-making 

power  under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States. 

Boston,  Little,  Brown,  and  company,  1915.    xxi,  U4,  p.    2^cm. 

15-8092  JK570.T8 

Reviewed  in  American  political  science  review,  Aug.  1915,  v. 

9:  595-598.  JA1.A6.V.9 

423  . The    treaty-making     power    under    the    Constitution. 

Article  on  the  treaty-making  power  under  the  Constitu- 
tion of  the  United  States. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911,.    11  p.    m™.     (U.  S. 
63d  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  539) 

14-30592  JK573.1914.T7 

Also  published  in  North  American  review,  Apr.  1914,  v.  199: 

560-572.  AP2.N7,v.l99 

424  The  treaty   making  power  under  the  constitution  of 

the  Confederate  states  of  America. 

Virginia  law  review,  May,  1911,,  v.  1:  596-603. 

425  U.  S.     Bureau  of  statistics  {Treasury  dept.)     Reciprocity  trea- 

ties and  agreements  between  the  United  States  and  for- 
eign countries  since  1850.     (From  the  Summary  of  com- 
merce and  finance  for  Sept.  1901). 
[Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1901.]    Hi,  939-968  p. 

426  Reciprocity     treaties     and     agreements     between     the 

United  States  and  foreign  countries  since  1850. 

{In  U.  S.  Bureau  of  statistics  (Treasury  dept.)  Monthly 
summary  of  commerce  and  finance  of  the  United  States, 
Aug.,  1904,  p.  525-558.)  HF105.A5 

427 Congress.    House.  Bills  for  raising  revenue.  Report  [from] 

the  committee  of  conference  on  the  part  of  the  House, 
charged  with  the  duty  of  conferring  with  the  confer- 
ence committee  appointed  by  the  Senate  to  consider  the 
question  of  privilege  raised  by  the  resolution  of  the 
House  adopted  January  27,  1871,  in  reference  to  Senate 
bill  (S.  1083)  "to  repeal  so  much  of  the  act  approved  July 
14,  1870.  entitled  'An  act  to  reduce  internal  taxes,  and 
for  other  purposes,'  as  continues  the  income  tax  after 


84  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

the  31st  day  of  December,  Anno  Domini  1869."    Feb.  27, 
1871. 
[Washington,   1871]     13  p.   23cm.      (4.1st   Cong.,  3d  sess. 

House.    Report  'i.i.)  Serial  no.  1464 

"The  Senate  conferees  submitted  a  number  of  citations  of 
laws  originating  in  the  Senate,  which  they  claimed  as 
precedents  favoring  the  action  of  the  Senate  on  the  bill, 
which  is  the  subject  of  the  present   difference. 

"The  commttee  have  carefully  examined  these  precedents, 
and  do  not  see  in  them  any  argument  to  sustain  the 
Semite  views.  They  seem  to  be,  generally,  bills  intended 
to  carry  out,  in  good  faith,  treaty  stipulations  and  com- 
mercial regulations  arising  under  treaties  with  foreign 
countries.  It  is  true  that  two  of  the  acts  cited  reduced 
existing  rates  of  duty,  which  reduction  was  acquiesced  in 
by  the  House  without  raising  the  question  of  power.  But 
it  seems  to  your  committee  that  one  or  two  instances  of 
waiver  cannot  be  considered  as  a  surrender,  on  the  part 
of  the  House,  of  a  great  constitutional  privilege,"  p.  10. 

"  It  seems  clear  to  your  committee,  therefore,  that  the 
only  way  to  preserve,  in  its  fullness,  the  power  to  originate 
bills  for  raising  revenue,  is  to  insist  upon  the  right  of 
the  House  to  originate  all  bills  relating  directly  to  the 
revenue,  whether  imposing  or  remitting  taxes;  that  the 
House  should,  in  the  first  instance,  be  the  judge  of  the 
manner,  the  measure,  and  the  time  of  such  impositions 
or  remissions."  p.  12. 

428  U.  S.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on  foreign  affairs.     The 
treaty-making  power.     Report  (H.  Res.  132)   relating  to 
the  treaty-making  power.     Feb.  14,  1881. 
[  Washington,  1881.]   4  V-  ®3cm-    {40th  Cong.,  3d  sess.,  House. 

Rept.  2,!'>.)  Serial  no.  1982 

"This  resolution  affirms  that  the  treaty-making  power  of  the 
United  States  '  does  not  extend  to  treaties  which  affect  the 
revenue,  or  require  the  appropriation  of  money  to  execute 
them ;  but  that  in  such  cases  the  consent  of  the  law-making 
power  of  the  Government  is  required,  which  includes,  as 
one  of  its  branches,  the  House  of  Representatives  .  .  .  The 
resolution  under  consideration — House  joint  resolution 
132 — affirms  a  proposition  which,  under  existing  constitu- 
tional provisions,  can  nol  be  sustained.  Your  committee 
therefore  recommend  that  the  same  be  not  adopted." 
Minority  report  accompanying. 

429 Reciprocity  treaty  between  United  States 

and  British  provinces.  Report  [from]  the  committee  on 
foreign  a  Hairs,  to  whom  was  referred  the  joint  resolution 
for  the  appointment  of  commissioners  to  ascertain  and  re- 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  85 

port  a  basis  for  a  reciprocity  treaty  between  the  United 
States  and  the  British  provinces.     April  23,  1880. 
[Washington,  1880.]    5  p.  23cm.    (46th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  House. 
Report  1127.)  Serial  no.  1937 

"  It  is  unnecessary  to  discuss  here  the  question  of  whether 
a  commercial  treaty  can  be  made,  as  such,  not  only  because 
this  is  simply  a  resolution  of  information,  but  because  no 
one  has  ever  disputed  that  a  treaty  affecting  the  tariff  could 
be  made  by  the  President  and  Senate,  if  the  House  of  Rep- 
resentatives consented  thereto.  Furthermore,  all  discus- 
sions of  treaty  powers  of  the  different  branches  of  the  gov- 
ernment and  all  questions  of  treaties  may  be  avoided  be- 
cause if  any  reciprocal  trade  can  be  established  with  Can- 
ada it  could  be  established  either  by  a  treaty  with  the  con- 
sent of  the  House  or  by  mutual  law  in  the  nature  of  a  tariff 
law  fixing  the  terms  of  interchange  of  commodities  between 
the  two  countries." 

430 Reciprocity  treaty  between  the  United 

States  and  the  British  provinces.     Views  of  the  minority. 
June  7,  1880. 
{Washington,  1880.]      20  p.     23cm.      (46th  Cong.,  2d  sess., 
House  Report  1127,  pt.  2.) 

"  This  House  ought,  therefore,  to  insist  that  any  scheme  of 
commercial  intercourse  with  other  nations  involving  cus- 
toms dues  should  be  initiated,  or  at  all  events  thoroughly 
discussed  and  agreed  to,  by  itself.  They  should  be  fixed, 
not  by  treaty,  but  by  bill." 

431  North   German   Confederation  treaty. 

Report  as  to  giving  notice  to  the  North  German  Confed- 
eration to  terminate  the  treaty  of  February  22,  1868  (com- 
monly known  as  the  naturalization  treaty),  Feb.  17,  1885. 
{Washington,  1885.]  7  p.  23cm.  (48th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  House 
Report  2590.)  Serial  no.  2328 

432 Committee   on   the   judiciary.      Power  of  the 

President  to  negotiate  treaties  with  foreign  governments. 

Eeport  [by  J.  R.  Tucker]  Mar.  3,  1885. 

[Washington,  1885.]     20  p.  23cm.     (48th  Cong.,  2d  sess., 

House.    Rept.  2680.)  Ser.  no.  2330 

On  Jan.  15,  1884,  the  House  agreed  to  a  resolution  directing 

the  Judiciary  committee  "to  report  to  the  House  whether 

the  President,  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the 

Senate,  can  negotiate  treaties  with  foreign  governments  by 

wyhich  the  duties  levied  by  Congress  on  importations  can  be 

changed  or  abrogated. 

At   this  time  the  reciprocity  treaty   with  Mexico,   concluded 

Jan.  20,  1883,  was  pending,  and  when  the  Judiciary  com- 


86  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

mittee  reported  .Mar.  3,  L885,  a  treaty  with  Spain  for  re- 
ciprocity with  Cuba  and  Porto  Rico  had  been  concluded  Nov. 
18,  1SS4,  and  a  reciprocity  treaty  with  the  Dominican  Re- 
public, I  >ec.  4,  1S84,  while  a  treaty  had  been  concluded 
with  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  Dec.  6,  1884,  extending  the  re- 
ciprocity treaty  of  1875  for  a  further  term  of  seven  years. 
The  report  of  the  Conmfittee  reads  in  conclusion :  "  Your  com- 
mittee have  thus  considered  the  question  on  the  true  in- 
terpretation of  the  language  of  the  Constitution;  upon  the 
construction  of  the  Government  itself;  on  the  historic  de- 
velopment of  the  Constitution  from  its  British  original 
through  the  Articles  of  Confederation  to  its  present  form; 
on  analogy  to  the  British  prototype ;  on  precedents  and  the 
authority;  and  have  come  to  the  conclusion  expressed  in 
the  following  resolution,  which,  though  the  discussion  has 
taken  a  wider  range,  is  confined  to  the  question  submitted 
by  the  resolution  referred  to  the  committee:  'Resolved, 
That  the  President,  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent 
of  the  Senate,  can  not  negotiate  treaties  with  foreign  Gov- 
ernments by  which  the  duties  levied  by  Congress  can  be 
changed  or  abrogated,  and  such  treaties  to  be  operative  as 
law  must  have  the  sanction  of  an  act  of  Congress.' " 

433  U.  S.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on  ways  and  means.    Re- 

port concerning  reciprocity  and  commercial  treaties. 
Washington,  GovH.  print,  off.,  1896.     6^3  p.  23\™.     (5£th 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    House.    Rept.   2263)        Serial  no.  3466 

Constitutionality    of    reciprocity    legislation,    p.    17-19.     Ab- 
stract of  the  decision  of  the   Supreme  Court  on  the  con- 
stitutionality of  the  reciprocity  section  of  the  tariff  act  of 
1890,  p.  18-19. 
8-28587  HF1731.A5     1896 

434  Congress.  Senate.  Precedents  relating  to  the  privi- 
leges of  the  Senate  of  the  United  States.  Comp.  by 
George  P.  Fnrber,  clerk  to  the  Committee  on  privileges 
and  elections. 

"Washington,  GovH.  print,  off.,  1893.    350  p.    23\cm.     (52d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.     Mis.  doc.  68) 

Secret   sessions   for   the  consideration   of  treaties   and   confi- 
dential communications:  p.  6-10;  Right  to  demand  papers 
in  the  executive  files:  p.  232-272. 
7-4615  JK1170.A4 

435 Committee  on  foreign  relations.     Compilation 

of   reports    of    Committee.     1789-1901,    First   Congress, 
first  session,  to  Fifty-sixth  Congress,  second  session. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1909.    8  v.    pi.,  maps,  plans, 
diagr.    23cm.     (56th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  no. 
231,  pts  1-8) 

Treaties  in  all  volumes;  Reciprocity  treaties  in  v.  5  and  8. 
2-10168  JX234.A2 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES.  87 

436  U.  S. — Congress.     Senate.     Committee    on    foreign    relations. 
Jurisdiction  of  the  Senate  to  act  upon  reciprocity  treaties. 
Report  from  the  committee  on  foreign  relations.      Dec. 
15,  1902. 
[Washington,  1902.]    3  p.   23cm.    (57th  Cong.,  2d  sess.   Sen- 
ate Doc.  47.)  Serial  no.  4420 
A  subcommittee  of  the  committee  on  foreign  relations  made 
the  recommendation,  which  was  adopted  by  the  full  com- 
mittee, that  without  reference  to  the  merits  thereof,  each 
of  the  reciprocity  treaties  under  consideration  be  amended 
by  the  insertion  of  the  following  additional  provision,  "  This 
treaty  shall  not  take  effect  until  the  same  shall  have  been 
approved  by  the  Congress." 

437 38th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    The  Congressional  Globe. 

Washington:  C  ongressional  Globe  office,  1865.    2pts.  4°- 

During  the  second  session  of  the  thirty-eighth  congress  a  joint 
resolution  was  passed  authorizing  the  President  to  termi- 
nate the  Canadian  reciprocity  treaty  and  to  appoint  commis- 
sioners to  negotiate  a  new  treaty.  During  the  discussion 
of  the  subject  in  the  Senate,  Mr.  Collamer  (p.  209-210)  held 
that  the  Canadian  treaty  was  in  conflict  with  the  revenue- 
raising  clause  of  the  Constitution,  and  Mr.  Howe  (p.  211- 
212)  took  issue  with  this  view. 

438 46th   Cong.,  2d   sess.     Congressional    record,   vol.    10, 

[Pt.l.] 

Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1880.    4°- 

The  House  Jan.  26,  1880,  adopted  the  following  resolution  in- 
troduced by  Mr.  Kelley :  "  Resolved,  That  it  is  the  sense  of 
this  House  that  the  negotiation  by  the  executive  department 
of  the  Government  cf  a  commercial  treaty  whereby  the  rates 
of  duty  to  be  imposed  on  foreign  commodities  entering  the 
United  States  for  consumption  should  be  fixed  would,  in 
view  of  the  provision  of  section  7  of  article  1  of  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,  be  an  infraction  of  the  Con- 
stitution and  an  invasion  of  one  of  the  highest  prerogatives 
of  the  House  of  Representatives,"  p.  394-395,  532. 

JKll.R5,v.l0,  pt.l 

439  60th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  1907-1908.   Senate.   Power  of  Con- 
gress over  treaties  .  .  .    Extracts  from  briefs. 

[Washington,  Gov't  print,  off.,  1908]     7  p.    23cm.     (60th 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate,  Doc.  487.)  Serial  no.  5266 

8-35476  JK1081.A5     1908 


88  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

440  TJ.  S.     Dept.  of  state.     Digest   of  the   published  opinions  of 

the  attorneys-general,  and  of  the  leading  decisions  of  the 
federal    courts,    with    reference    to    international    law, 
treaties,  and  kindred  subjects.    Rev.  ed. 
Washington,    Govt,    print,    off.,   1877.     vii,   290   p.    23cm. 
{'i)th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Sen-ate.    Ex.  doc.  1^6) 

Pref.  signed:  John  L.  Cadwalader,  Department  of  state. 
Treaties:  p.  'S21-S6A ;  Treaties  with  particular  states:  p.  235- 
264. 
0-7613  JX237.A48    1877 

441  —     The  diplomatic  correspondence  of  the  American 

revolution:  being  the  letters  of  Benjamin  Franklin,  Silas 
Deane,  John  Adams,  John  Jay.  Arthur  Lee,  William  Lee, 
Ralph  Izard,  Francis  Dana.  William  Carmichael,  Henry 
Laurens,  John  Laurens,  M.  de  Lafayette,  M.  Dumas,  and 
others,  concerning  the  foreign  relations  of  the  United 
State-  during  the  whole  revolution;  together  with  the  let- 
ters in  reply  from  the  secret  committee  of  Congress,  and 
the  secretary  of  foreign  affairs.  Also,  the  entire  corre- 
spondence of  the  French  ministers,  Gerard  and  Luzerne, 
with  Congress.  Pub.  under  the  direction  of  the  President 
of  the  United  States,  from  the  original  manuscripts  in  the 
Department  of  state,  conformably  to  a  resolution  of  Con- 
gress, of  March  27th,  1818.    Ed.  by  Jared  Sparks. 

Boston,  N.  Hale  and  Gray  &  Bowen;  New  York,  G.  &  C.  & 
n.CarviJJ;  \<  (<>.,  etc."]  1829-30.    12  v.    21\™. 

5-18.".17  E249.TJ581 

442 The  diplomatic  correspondence  of  the  Ameri- 
can revolution.     Ed.  by  Jared  Sparks.     New  ed. 
Washington,  J.  C.  Rives,  1857.   6  v.   23\cm. 

The   same   correspondence,    with    Sparks'    omissions   supplied, 

was    published    under    direction    of    Congress    by    Francis 

Wharton  as  "The  revolutionary  diplomatic  correspondence 

of  the  United  States,"  Washington,  1889. 

11  -11013  E249.TJ582 

443 The    revolutionary    diplomatic    correspondence 

of  the  United  States.  Ed.  under  direction  of  Congress 
by  Francis  Wharton,  with  preliminary  index,  and  notes 
historical  and  legal.  Pub.  in  conformity  with  act  of 
Congress  of  August  13,  1888. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1889.  6  v.  2!fm.  (50th  Cong., 
1st  sess.     House.    Mis.  doc.  603) 

Published  as  a  supplement  n>  Wharton's  Digest  of  the  inter- 
national  law  of  the  United   States,  taken  from  documents 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  89 

issued  by  presidents  and  secretaries  of  state  [etc.]     Wash- 
ington, 1886. 

Correspondence  from  the  records  of  the  Department  of  state, 
from  family  archives  and  from  published  memoirs.  De- 
signed to  correct,  complete  and  enlarge  the  Diplomatic  cor- 
respondence of  the  American  revolution,  Boston,  1829-1830, 
published  by  .Tared  Sparks  under  direction  of  Congress. 

"A  brief  sketch  of  the  life  of  Francis  Wharton.  By  John 
Bassett  Moore  "  :  v.  1,  p.  xi-xxvii. 

See  Index  under  Treaties;  Treaty  of  Commerce;   Treaty  of 
peace,  v.  6,  p.  992. 
5-17851  E249.U583 

444  U.  S.  Dept.  of  state.  Foreign  trade  and  treaty  regulations. 
Letter  from  the  acting  secretary  of  the  Treasury,  trans- 
mitting a  copy  of  a  communication  from  the  secretary  of 
state,  submitting  an  estimate  of  appropriation  for  ex- 
penses in  connection  with  foreign  trade  and  treaty  regu- 
lations. 
{Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1909 f]  4  p.  23cm.  {61st 
Cong.,  2d  sess.    House.    Doc.  258.) 

10-35240  HF3029.A5    1909a 

445 Laws,  statutes,  etc.     Indian  affiairs.     Laws  and  trea- 
ties.    Comp.   and  ed.  by  Charles  J.  Kappler. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1903-13.   3  v.    29\cm. 

Vol.  i-ii  :  57th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     Senate.     Doc.  452  ;  vol.  in :  62d 

Cong.,  2d  sess.     Senate.     Doc.  719. 
Contents. — i.   Statutes,  executive  orders,  proclamations,  and 
statistics    of    tribes.      Comp.    to    December    1,   1902.  —  n. 
Treaties. — in.  Laws.     Comp.   to  December  1,  1913. 
3-13067  E93.TJ6995 

446  Tariff  commission.     Reciprocity  and  commercial  trea- 
ties. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1919.     535  p.    incl.    tables, 
diagrs.    (1  fold.)    25cm. 

"  The  commission  has  had  the  services,  among  others,  of  Stan- 
ley K.  Hornbeck,  Jacob  Viner,  Clive  Day,  and  Walter  B. 
Palmer,  in  the  preparation  of  this  report." — "  Foreword," 
p.  5. 
19-26329  HF1731.A5     1919a 

447 Summary  of  the  report  on  reciprocity  and  com- 
mercial treaties  with  conclusions  and  recommendations  of 
the  commission. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1919.    46  p.    23cm. 

19-26285  HF1731.A5     1919 


90  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

148  U.   S.     Treaties,   etc.     A   compilation   of   all   the   treaties  be- 
tween the  United  State-  and  the  Indian  tribes,  now  in 
force  as  laws.     Prepared  under  the  provisions  of  the  act 
of  Congress,  approved  March  3,  1873. 
Washington,  Curt,  print,  off.,  1873.    1075  p.    28cm. 
Treaties  arranged  alphabetically  by  tribes. 
9  3113  E95.U545 

1  lit  -  —     Compilation    of    treaties    in    force.      Prepared 

under  act  of  July  7.  L898. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1809.    xviii,  779  p.   23cm. 

Comp.  by  Henry  L.  Bryan,  and  pub.  under  the  direction  of  the 

Committee  on  foreign   relations,   United   States  Senate. 
Issued  also  as  House  doc.  276,  55th  Cong.,  3d  sess. 
1   9605  JX236    1899 

450  —  Compilation    of    treaties    in   force.     Prepared 

under  resolution  of  the  Senate,  of  February  11,  1904. 
Washingto-n,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1904.    996  p.    23\™.     (58th 
Cong.,  .'<!  sess.     Senate.     Doc.  no.  318.) 

Revised  ed.     Prepared  under  the  direction  of  the  Committee 
on  foreign  relations,  United  States  Senate,  by  William  M. 
Mai  Icy. 
5    L9323  JX236     1904 

451   —     List  of  arbitration  treaties  and  conventions  sub- 
mitted to  and  acted  upon  by  the  United  States  Senate. 

Washington    [Govt,  print,  off.]   1912.    7  p.    23\cm.     (62d 
Con;/..  2d  sess.    Senate.     Doc.  373) 

12-35341  JX1987.A4     1912 

452  —     Treaties  and  conventions  concluded  between  the 

United  States  of  America  and  other  powers,  since  July  4, 
L776.  With  notes  showing  what  treaties  or  parts  of  trea- 
ties have  been  abrogated,  and  decisions  thereupon. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1871.     912  p.  23cm.      (J^lst 
Cong.,  3d  sess.    Senate.    Ex.  doc.  36.) 
[ncomplete;  without  the  notes. 
9  9S31  JX236    1871 

153  —     Treaties  and  conventions  concluded  between  the 

United  States  of  America  and  other  powers,  since  July  1, 
1770.  R<  v.  ed.  Containing  notes,  with  references  to  ne- 
gotiations  preceding  the  several  treaties,  to  the  executive, 
legislative,  or  judicial  construction  of  them,  and  to  the 
causes  of  the  abrogation  of  some  of  them;  an  appendix 
showing  the  treaties  concluded  subsequently  to  those  con- 
tained in  the  text,  and  a  correction  of  errors  and  omis- 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  91 

sions ;  a  chronological  list  of  treaties ;  an  analytical  index ; 
and  a  synoptical  index. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1873.    1167  p.,  1  I.    %2\cm. 
Preface  signed :  J.  C.  Bancroft  Davis,  Department  of  state. 
►  "The   original   edition  .  .  .  was  printed   as   Senate   executive 
document,  no.  36,  Forty-first  Congress,  third  session." 
(Some  incomplete  copies  of  the  first  edition  of  the  compilation, 
got  into  circulation.     The  notes  and  indexes  were  also  is- 
sued in  separate  form)     Contains  notes  by  J.  C.  Bancroft 
Davis.    Discussion  on  the  treaty-making  power  in  Introduc- 
tory note,  p.  931-944.     Constructions  by  the  attorneys-gen- 
eral and  courts  of  the  United  States,  p.  941-942;   Discus- 
sions in  Congress  of  the  treaty  power  under  the  Constitu- 
tion, p.  942-944. 
11-33794  JX236     1873 

454  IT.  S.  Treaties,  etc.  Treaties  and  conventions  concluded  be- 
tween the  United  States  of  America  and  other  powers 
since  May  1,  1870.  Not  contained  in  Senate  executive 
document  no.  36,  41st  Congress,  3d  session,  with  some 
notes  in  reference  thereto. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1876.    1  p.  I.,  p.  [1085]-13%l 

%3cm. 

Pref.  signed :  John  L.  Cadwalader,  Department  of  state. 
"  Notes  upon  treaties  and  conventions  concluded  between  the 
United  States  and  foreign  powers  since  May  1,  1870,  and 
upon  the  construction  thereof,  with  some  references  to  re- 
cent constructions  of  the  foreign  treaties  of  the  United 
States,  and  to  late  judicial  decisions  relating  thereto,  and  to 
the  causes  of  abrogation  of  some  of  the  same,"  p.  1205-1229. 
10-16571  JX236     1876 

455 Treaties  and  conventions  concluded  between  the 

United  States  of  America  and  other  powers  since  July 
4,  1776 ;  containing  notes,  with  references  to  negotiations 
preceding  the  several  treaties,  to  the  executive,  legisla- 
tive, or  judicial  construction  of  them,  and  to  the  causes 
of  the  abrogation  of  some  of  them ;  a  chronological  list  of 
treaties ;  and  an  analytical  index. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  188,9.  xiii,  11^4  p.  23cm. 
(48th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  4-7) 

Compiled  by  John  H.  Haswell  for  the  Department  of  state. 
The  notes  by  Mr.  Davis,  as  given  in  the  earlier  edition  of  this 
compilation  are  likewise  given  in  this  work,  while  addi- 
tional notes  given  are  placed  in  brackets.  Discussion  of  the 
treaty-making  power  in  Introductory  note,  p.  1219-1230 ; 
Constructions  by  the  attorneys-general  and  courts  of  the 
United  States,  p.  1227-1229 ;  Discussions  in  Congress  of  the 
treaty  power  under  the  Constitution,  p.  1229-1230.  The 
text  of  the  treaties  of  the  United  States  is  also  printed  in 
the  U.  S.  Statutes  at  Large. 
4-3S56  JX236    1889 


92  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

150  TJ.  S.  Treaties,  etc.  Treaties  and  conventions  concluded  be- 
tween the  United  States  of  America  and  other  powers. 
Supplementary  to  the  Department  of  state  publication 
of  1889. 
[Washington]  Navy  </<  jxniinent,  Bureau  of  equipment, 
1897.     iv,  [328]  p.    23'-'". 

Various  paging. 

Treaties  and   conventions  dating  from  Dec.  5,  18S5  to  Jan. 
13,  1S97. 
11-3432G  JX236     1897 

457 Treaties,  conventions,  international  acts,  pro- 
tocols and  agreements  between  the  United  States  of 
America  and  other  powers.  177G-1909.  Conip.  by  Wil- 
liam M.  Malloy  under  resolution  of  the  Senate  of  Janu- 
ary 18,  1909  (Res.  no.  252,  Sixtieth  Congress,  second  ses- 
session )  ... 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  of.,  1910.  2  v.  23\cm.  {61st  Cong., 
2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  357) 

Prepared  under  the  direction  of  the  Committee  on  foreign  re- 
lations, United  States  Senate. 

The  Department  of  state  cooperated  with  the  compiler  in  the 
preparation  of  this  compilation. 

Supplement,  1913,  to  Senate  document  no.  357, 

Sixty-first    Congress,  second  session,  comp.   by   Garfield 
Charles,     vol.  in. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1913.  t  181,  xiv,  183-4.43,  viii 
p.    23cm.     (62d  Cong.,  3d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  1063) 

Contents. — pt.   i.  Conventions   in   force. — pt.   n.   Conventions 
not  in  force. 
10-357G3  JX236    1910 

Serial  no.  5646,  5647 

458 Treaties  between  the  United  States  of  America 

and  the  several  Indian  tribes,  from  1778  to  1837:  with  a 
copious  table  of  contents.  Compiled  and  printed  by  the 
direction,  and  under  the  supervision,  of  the  commissioner 
of  Indian  affairs. 
Washington,  D.  C,  Langtree  and  CPSullivan,  1837.  1  p.  I., 
[v]-lxxxiii,  699  p.     23\cm. 

8-20225  E95.U556 

459  Viallate,  Achille.     Le  president  Roosevelt  et  le  senat  ameri- 
cain. 
/.'<  >'ue  politique  et  litteraire  {Revue  oleue)  Feb.  25,  1905,  5. 

8er.,  V.  3:243-245.  AP20.R64,5.  ser,v.3 

Considerations  regarding  the  arbitration  treaties  and  the 
treat;  with  Santo  Domingo. 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  93 

460  Virginia  law  register.     [Editorial.]     Can  an  unconstitutional 

law  be  made  constitutional  by  a  treaty?     Migratory  bird 
law. 
Virginia  law  register,  Aug.  1018,  n.  s.  v.  J/,:  305-307. 

461  Webster,  Daniel.     [Letter  to  Mr.  Everett,  Nov.  25.  1842.] 

{In  Curtis,  George  Ticknor.     Life  of  Daniel  Webster,  v.  2,  p. 

173-175.     New  York,  1870.     23rm.) 
Commercial  treaties,  p.  174.  E340.W4C92,v.2 

461a  Wells,  William  V.     The  life  and  public  services  of  Samuel 
Adams  .  .  . 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  co.,  1866.    3  v.  fronts,  facsim. 

Conflict  between  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  President  and 
Senate  and  the  authority  of  the  House,  v.  3,  p.  355-356. 
13-14097  E302.6.A2W42 

462  Wheeler,  Everett  P.     The  treaty-making  power  of  the  govern- 

ment of  the  United  States  in  its  international  aspects. 
Yale  law  journal,  Jan.,  1908,  v.  17:  151-161. 

Considers  the  limits  to  the  treaty-making  power  and  also  the 
duty  of  Congress  in  reference  to  the  enforcement  of  the 
provisions  of  a  treaty. 

463  Whitney,  Edward  B.     The  reciprocity  acts  of  1890 — Are  they 

constitutional  ? 
American  register  and  law  review,  Mar.,  1892,  v.  31,   {2d 
ser.  v.  5): 173-188. 

The  two  acts  in  question :  Food  act  of  August  19,  1890.  §5 ; 
McKinley  Tariff  Act  of  October  1,  1890.  §3.  Constitution- 
ality of  second  decided  after  writing  of  this  article,  Feb. 
29,  1S92.  (Boyd,  Sutton  &  co.  v.  U.  S. ;  H.  Herrman  Stern- 
bach  &  co.,  v.  U.  S.,  argued  November,  1891.)  Reciprocity 
and  retaliation  between  different  States  of  the  Union.  See 
"  Commercial  retaliation  between  the  States.,"  Am.  Law 
Rev.  Feb.,  1885;  Fire  Association  v.  New  York,  119  U.  S., 
110.  Constitution  not  violated  when  a  statute  expressly  or 
impliedly  repeals  a  treaty,  Chinese  exclusion  case.  130  U. 
S.,  581;  Whitney  v.  Robertson,  124  U.  S.,  190;  Head  Money 
cases,  112  U.  S.,  580,  599.  Laying  of  a  tax  is  a  legislative 
act,  New  Orleans  water  works  v.  Louisiana  sugar  co.,  125 
U.  S.,  18,  31.  The  power  to  exclude  involves  the  power  to 
Impose  license  fees,  and  that  is  the  power  to  tax,  Hamilton 
v.  Dillin,  21  Wall,  73.  The  legislative  power  cannot  be  dele- 
gated, Wayman  v.  Southard,  10  Wheat.  1,  42-3;  Bank  of 
U.  S.  v.  Halstead,  id.  51,  61 ;  In  re  Rahrer,  140  U.  S.,  545, 
560;  People's  R.  R.  v.  Memphis  R.  R.,  10  WTall,  38,  50. 
Referendum  has  even  been  denied,  Barto  v.  Himrod,  8  N.  Y., 


94  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 


483.  This  has  been  allowed  however,  while  the  right  of 
delegation  to  a  subagent  has  been  denied,  Locke's  Appeal, 
72  Pa.  St.,  491 ;  Cooley  Const.  Lim.  Gth  ed.,  p.  140-4G.  Ex- 
ceptions to  rule,  as  municipal  local  self-government,  Paul  v. 
Gloucester  County,  50  N.  J.  Law,  585.  Or,  as  power  of 
detail  to  be  worked  out  by  the  judiciary  or  executive.  Way- 
man  v.  Southard,  10  Wheat.,  1,  42-3;  In  re  Griner,  16  Wis., 
423.  Delegation  of  power  to  the  President,  Paine,  J.,  In  re 
Oliver,  17  Wis.,  681.  Delegation  of  power  to  the  Courts, 
Marshall,  C.  J.,  in  Wayman  v.  Southard,  10  Wheat.  1.  42. 
McKinley  act  defended  first,  on  authority  of  the  brig.4«rortt, 
7  Cranch,  3G2 ;  secondly,  on  statutory  precedent.  Presi- 
dent's power  under  the  non-importation  acts  not  legislative, 
but  judicial,  Martin  v.  Mott,  12  Wheat.,  19;  Murray's 
Lessee  v.  Hoboken  Land  and  Improvement  co.,  18  How., 
272,  280.  Usage  in  constitutional  interpretation,  Cooley  v. 
Board  of  Wardens,  315 ;  Prigg  v.  Pennsylvania,  16  Pet.,  621 ; 
Lithographic  co.  v.  Sarony  111  U.  S.  53,  57;  The  Lama,  114 
U.  S.,  411.  Power  to  President  under  embargo  acts.  Annals 
of  Congress,  April  19,  1808,  p.  2,  230 ;  Id.,  April  14,  1808,  p. 

2.  144;  Id.  Dec.  21,  1808,  p.  295;  April  19,  1808,  p.  2,  216; 
hi.  Dec.  21,  1808,  p.  259;  Jan.  7,  1809,  p.  315;  Annals  of 
Congress,  April  13.  1S0S,  p.  2.  124-5;  April  18,  1808,  p.  2, 
212;  April  14,  1S08.  p.  2,  129-30;  April  19,  1808,  p.  2,  200-2; 
A) nil  i::.  1S0S,  p.  2141-4  [?].  See  also  Annals  of  Congress, 
Dec.  1808;  Jan.  1S09,  p.  245-319;  Congr.  Record,  Sept.  S, 
1890,  p.  9,  882.  (Remarks  by  Senator  Evarts.)  See  also 
Acts  of  June  19,  1886;  Canadian  Retaliation  Act  of  Mai*ch 

3,  1887.  (Paul  v.  Gloucester  co.,  50  N.  J.  Law,  585,  600.) 
Senator  Evarts  questions  constitutionality  of  the  McKinley 
bill,  Cong.  Rec.  Sept.  8-9,  1S90,  p.  9882,  9906.  "Can  Con- 
gress invest  the  President  with  its  full  powers,"  etc.? 
Paine,  J.,  In  re  Oliver,  17  Wis.,  681 ;  Marshall,  C.  J.,  in 
Wayman  v.  Southard.  10  Wheat.,  1 ;  U.  S.  v.  Lee,  106.  U.  S., 
196,  209;  Prize  cases,  2  Black,  635,  GG8-70;  Luther  v.  Bor- 
den, 7  How.,  1,  43 ;  Mr.  Justice  Story,  in  Martin  v.  Mott,  12 
Wheat..  19;  Act  of  July  13,  1861;  Hamilton  v.  Dillin,  21 
Wall,  73;  Act  of  March  3,  1S63 ;  U.  S.  v.  Klein.  1.",  Wall. 
128;  Bark  Grapeshot,  9  Wall.  129;  Cross  v.  Harrison,  1G 
How.,  164:  Leitensderfer  r.  Webb.  20  How.,  176;  /■>  parte 
Milligan,  4  Wall,  1  :  Acts  of  March  3,  1866,  R.  S.,  §  2,494; 
Food  act  of  August  19.  1890,  §  4;  Wood  on  Nnisances, 
SS  66-7;  Chief  Justice  Marshall  in  Cohens  v.  Virginia,  6 
Wheat.,  2G4.  "It  is  no  answer  that  such  a  power  may  be 
abused  for  there  is  no  power  which  is  not  susceptible  of 
abuse,  Mr.  Justice  Story,  in  Martin  r.  Mott,  12  Wheat.,  1!>. 
President  Adams's  ad  in  excess  of  the  powers  granted  him 
by  the  Xon  intercourse  Act  of  1799  pronounced  void,  Little 
v.  Barreme,  2  Cranch,  170. 


TKEATY- MAKING  POWER  IN  THE   UNITED  STATES  95 

464  Willson,  Beckles.     The  new  America;  a  study  of  the  imperial 

republic. 
London,  Chapman  &  Hall,  1903.    vii  p.,  1  I.,  268  p.    23cm. 
The  new  diplomacy  :  p.  70-85.     Includes  a  discussion  of  the 
relations  between  the  President  and  Senate  as  to  the  treaty- 
making  powers. 
3-9966  E168.W736 

465  Wilson,  Woodrow,  pres.  U.  S.     Congressional  government;  a 

study  in  American  politics. 
Boston  and  New  York,  Houghton  Mifflin  company  [1913?] 
xvi  p.,  It,  3U  p.,  11.    18cm. 

Semi-executive  powers  of  the  Senate  in  regard  to  the  foreign 
policy  of  the  government:  p.  49  et  seq.,  232  et  seq. 
15-16732  JK1061.W766    1913 

466  Woodburn,  James  Albert.     American  politics.    The  American 

republic  and  its  government;  an  analysis  of  the  govern- 
ment of  the  United  States,  with  a  consideration  of  its 
fundamental  principles  and  of  its  relations  to  the  states 
and  territories.  2d  rev.,  ed. 
New  York  and  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1916.  v,  398 
p.  diagr.    22cm. 

Treaty-making  power :  p.  159-164. 
17-26185  JK246.W88     1916 

467  and  Thomas  Francis  Moran.     The  citizen  and  the  re- 
public; a  text-book  in  government. 

New  York,  Chicago,  Longmans,  Green  and  co.  [c1918]  2 
p.  1.,  iii-viii,  398,  ix-xlvi,  p.,  1  I.  front,  illus.,  plates, 
facsims.,  diagrs.    20\cm. 

Treaty-making  power :  p.  246-248. 
18-23061  JK274.W8 

468  Woolsey,  Theodore  S.     Treaty-making  under  the  United  States 

Constitution. 
Journal  of  social  science,  Dec,  1902,  no.  4-0:  83-95. 

Discusses  the  prerogative  of  the  Senate  of  "  advice  and  con- 
sent," and  also  the  issues  raised  when  there  is  a  divergence 
of  view  between  the  Senate  and  House  as  to  the  treaty- 
making  power,  reference  being  made  to  the  Jay  treaty  of 
1794,  the  treaties  relating  to  the  Louisiana  purchase,  the 
Gadsen  purchase  and  the  Alaska  purchase,  the  treaties  of 
reciprocity  with  Great  Britain  (1875)  and  the  French 
treaty  of  1831. 

Hl.J7,no.40 


96  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

409  Wyse,  Francis.  America,  its  realities  and  resources:  compris- 
ing important  details  connected  with  the  present  social, 
political,  agricultural,  commercial,  and  financial  state  of 
the  country,  its  laws  and  customs,  together  with  a  review 
of  the  policy  of  the  United  States  that  led  to  the  war  of 
L812,  and  peace  of  1814 — the  "right  of  search,"  the  Texas 
and  Oregon  questions,  etc.,  etc. 
London,  T.  C.  Newly,  184-6.    3  v.    22™. 

Considerations  regarding  extradition  by  treaty:  v.  1,   p.  169 
<t  seq. 
4-4913  E165.W98 

II.  UNDER  THE  CONFEDERATION. 

470  Adams,  John,  pres.  U.  S.     The  -works  of  John  Adams,  second 

president  of  the  United  States:  with  a  life  of  the  author, 
notes  and  illustrations,  by  his  grandson  Charles  Francis 
Adams     ... 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company  [etc.]  1850-56  [y.  1,  '56] 
10  v.     fronts,  plates,  ports.,  facsims.  {part  fold.)     22\rm. 

Remarks  by  George  Wythe,  in  Congress,  Feb.  16,  1776,  on 
inviting  foreign  nations  to  make  treaties  of  commerce,  and 
affirming  "we  must  declare  ourselves  a  free  people,"  v.  2, 
p.  486;  Adams's  opinion  that  "independence,  confederation, 
and  negotiations  with  foreign  powers,  particularly  France, 
ought  to  go  band  in  band.  "  p.  503.  Considerations  regard- 
ing a  treaty  with  France,  p.  503-5U6.  510;  Plan  of  treaty, 
p.  516-517. 
8-19755 

471  Albany  plan  of  union.     July  10,  1754. 

(In  Macdonald,  William.  Select  charters  and  other  documents 
illustrative  of  American  history,  1606-1775,  p.  253-257.  New 
York,  1899.     20icm.) 

"That  the  President  General  with  the  advice  of  the  Grand 
Council,  hold  or  direct  all  Indian  Treaties  in  which  the 
general  interest  of  the  Colonys  may  be  concerned,"  p.  256. 

E173.M131 

47-2  Bancroft,  George.  History  of  the  Unit  oil  States  of  America, 
from  the  discovery  of  the  continent.  The  author's  last 
revision.    Vol.  iv. 

A<  w    York:  I).  Appleton  and   company,   1888.     xvi,  lf.52 
p.  22'"'. 

Adoption  of  Wythe's  resolution  "That  the  colonies  have  a 
right  to  contract  alliances  with  foreign  powers ;  "  p.  335-336. 

E178.B2275,v.4 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN  THE   UNITED  STATES  97 

473  Butler,    Charles    Henry.     The    treaty-making    power    of    the 

United  States. 
New  York,  The  Banks  law  pub.  co.,  1902.    2  v.    &£COT. 

Treaties,  and  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  United  States 
'    as  exercised  prior  to  and  under  the  Confederation :   v.  1, 
p.  235-284. 
2-7104  JK570.B85 

474  Crandall,  Samuel  Benjamin.     Treaties,  their  making  and  en- 

forcement.    (2d  ed.) 
Washington,  D.  C,  J.  Byrne  &  company,  1916.     xxxii,  663 
p.    %3\cm. 

Prior  to  the  Articles  of  Confederation:  p.  19-23;     Under  the 
Articles  of  Confederation:  p.  24-A2. 
16-6404  JX4165.C8     1916 

475  Fisher,  Sydney  George.     The  evolution  of  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States,  showing  that  it  is  a  development  of  pro- 
gressive history  and  not  an  isolated  document  struck  off 
at  a  given  time  or  an  imitation  of  English  or  Dutch  forms 
of  government. 
Philadelphia,  J.  B.  Lippincott  company,  1897.  %  p.  I.,  3-398 
p.    19\cm. 

Treaty-making  power,  p.  306-307 ;  Clauses  quoted  from  Frank- 
lin's plan  of  1754,  Hutchinson's  plan  of  1754,  Franklin's  Arti- 
cles of  Confederation,  1775,  South  Carolina  Constitution  of 
1776,  the  Articles  of  Confederation,  1778,  Drayton's  Articles 
of  Confederation,  1778,  Pinckney's  plan,  17S7,  and  from  the 
Federal  Constitution. 
9-18342  JK37.F6 

476  Franklin,    Benjamin.     The    complete    works    of    Benjamin 

Franklin.    Comp.  and  ed.  by  John  Bigelow. 
New  York  and  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1887-88.    10 

v.    fronts,    plates.    23\cm. 

Plan  of  union  for  the  colonies:  Duty  and  power  of  the  gov- 
ernor-general and  grand  council :  To  order  all  Indian  treaties, 
v.  2,  p.  346;  Plan  of  union  adopted  by  the  convention  at 
Albany,  with  the  reasons  and  motives  for  each  article  of  the 
plan  :  Power  of  president-general  and  grand  council ;  treaties 
of  peace  and  war,  v.  2,  p.  365-366;  Articles  of  Confedera- 
tion and  perpetual  union,  proposed  in  General  Congress, 
July  21,  1775,  "  That  the  power  and  duty  of  the  Congress 
shall  extend  to  the  determining  on  war  and  peace;  the  en- 
tering into  alliances,"  etc.,  v.  5,  p.  550;  Notification  to  the 
French  minister  of  foreign  affairs  by  the  Commissioners  of 
Congress  of  their  appointment,  v.  6,  p.  42-43.  The  com- 
munication to  the  French  minister  of  foreign  affairs,  Count 
de  Vergennes,  (v.  6,  p.  42^3)  is  also  printed  in  "Papers 
relating  to  the  foreign  relations  of  the  United  States,"  1877, 
p.  154-155. 
7-18932  E302.F838 

137190°— 20 7 


98  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

477  Franklin,  Benjamin.     The  writings  of  Benjamin  Franklin;  col- 

lected  and   ihI..  with   a  life  and   introduction,  by   Albert 
Henry  Smyth. 
X,  w   York,  The  Macmillan  company  •  London,  Macmillam 
&  <■<>..  ltd.,  1905-07.     10  v.  front*.,  ill  us.,  plates,  ports., 
facsims.,  diagrs.  %S\cm. 

5-35396  E302.F84 

478  Hutchinson,  Thomas.     Plan  of  union  .  .  .     [Dec.  2G,  1754.] 

(In  Frothingham,  Richard.  The  rise  of  the  republic  of  the 
United   States.  10th  ed.,  p.  613-616.     Boston,  1910.    21cm.) 

"That  the  President,  by  the  advice  of  the  Council,  may  hold 
and  manage  all  Indian  treaties  in  which  the  general  in- 
terest or  welfare  of  the  colonies  may  be  concerned,"  etc. 
p.  014. 

E210.F96 

479  [Jay,    John.]      [Circular   letter   to   the   states   on  the   binding 

nature  of  treaties.     April  13,  1787.] 

(In  U.  S.     Continental  congress.     Journal,  v.    12,    p.    45-52. 

[Philadelphia,]     1787.    22cm.)  JT0.Al,v.l2 

Also  given  in  Rawle's  "  View  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 

States  of  America,"  2d  ed.,  p.  316~323.     Philadelphia,  1829. 

JK216.R25 

484a  Tucker,  Henry  St.  George.  Limitations  on  the  treaty-making 
Jefferson:  being  his  autobiography,  correspondence,  re- 
ports, messages,  addresses,  and  other  writings,  official 
and  private.  Pub.  by  the  order  of  the  Joint  committee 
of  Congress  on  the  library,  from  the  original  manu- 
scripts, deposited  in  the  Department  of  state.  With  ex- 
planatory notes  ...  by  the  editor.  H.  A.  Washington. 
Washington,  Taylor  &  Maury,  1853-54.  9  v.  front,  (port.) 
4  fold,  facsims.    %8\cm. 

Treaties    under    the    Confederation,    v.    1,    p.    55-60,    62-67, 

349-352,    358-361,    370-374,    457-459,    460,    538-540,    557;    v. 

9,  p.  286;  Treaties  paramount  to  state  laws,  v.  3,  p.  399-406. 

6-7150  E302.J464 

481  The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson;  collected  and  ed. 

by  Paul  Leicester  Ford. 

A.  w  York  [etc.']  G.  /'.  Putnam's  sons,  1892-99.    10  v.  23V"1. 

Debate  In  Congress,  June  8,  1770.  and  arguments  of  J.  Adams, 

Lee,  Wythe,  ami   others,  as  tn   Independence  and  treating 

with  European  powers:  v.  i,  p.  21-23;  Treaties  under  the 

Confederation,  v.  1,  p.  77  84,  86  94,  v.  4.  p.  54-59,  79-82,  141- 

111.    198  -HI;    Treaties    paramount    to    state    laws,   v.    6,   p. 

41    47. 

2-.r.c,r,<;  E302.J466 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IX   THE   UNITED   STATES  99 

482  Madison,  James.     [Letter]   to  Edmund  Randolph.     Philadel- 

phia. May  — .  1783. 

(In  The  papers  of  James  Madison,  v.  1,  p.  533-538.     Washing- 
ton, 1840.     24cm.) 
Largely  on  commercial  treaties. 

JKlll.M2,v.l 

483  Miller,  Samuel  Freeman.     Lectures  on  the  Constitution  of  the 

United  States. 
New  York  and  Albany,  Banks  and  brothers,  1893.     xxi,  765 
p.     24cm. 

Treaties  negotiated  by  the  Continental  Congress :   p.  48-55 ; 
The  consular  convention  with  France  a  construction  of  the 
treaty-making  power :  p.  55. 
2-19694  JK241.M66 

484  South  Carolina.     Constitution.     1776. 

(In  Poore,  B.  P.  The  federal  and  state  constitution,  Colonial 
charters,  and  other  organic  laws  of  the  United  States,  2d 
ed.  v.  2.  p.  1615-1620.     Washington,  1878.     29$cm.) 

xxvi.  That  the  president  and  commander-in-chief  shall  have 
no  power  to  make  war  or  peace,  or  enter  into  any  final 
treaty,  without  the  consent  of  the  general  assembly  and 
legislative  council :  p.  1619. 

JK18      1878,v.2 

484a  Tucker,  Henry  St.  George.    Limitations  on  the  treaty-making 
power  under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States. 
Boston,   Little,   Brown,  and   company,   1915.     xxi,   444  V- 
24\cm. 

The   Treaty   power   under   the  Articles   of   Confederation   as 
strong  as  under  the  Constitution.     The  chief  difference  be- 
ing that  under  the  former  there  was  no  judicial  tribunal  to 
enforce  treaties :  p.  56-72. 
15-8092  JK570.T8 

485  U.  S.     Continental  congress.    Articles  of  confederation — 1777. 

(In  Preston,  H.  W.  ed.  Documents  illustrative  of  American 
history,  1606-1863,  with  introductions  and  references,  p. 
218-231.  New  York,  1886.  23cm.) 
"Article  ix.  The  United  States  in  Congress  assembled,  shall 
have  the  sole  and  exclusive  right  and  power  of  determining 
on  peace  and  war,  except  in  the  cases  mentioned  in  the  sixth 
article  —  of  sending  and  receiving  ambassadors  —  entering 
into  treaties  and  alliances,  provided  that  no  treaty  of  com- 
merce shall  be  made  whereby  the  legislative  power  of  the 
respective  States  shall  be  restrained  from  imposing  such 
imposts  and  duties  on  foreigners,  as  their  own  people  are 
subjected  to,  or  from  prohibiting  the  exportation  or  importa- 
tion of  any  species  of  goods  or  commodities  whatsoever" 
etc.,  p.  223-224.  E173.P93 


100  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

486  U.  S.     Continental  congress.     Journal  of  the  United  States  in 
Congress  assembled :  containing  the  proceedings  from  the 
sixth  day  of  November,  1786,  to  the  fifth  day  of  No- 
vember, 1787.     Vol.  xii. 
{Philadelphia    M,  DCC,  LX XXVII.    255  [9]  p.  22cm. 

Resolutions  affirming  the  binding  nature  of  treaties  made  by 
Congress  on  the  states :  p.  32-33 ;  Draught  of  a  letter  by  the 
secretary  for  foreign  affairs  (Mr.  Jay)  to  accompany  the 
resolutions :  p.  45-52 ;  Treaties  containing  the  most  favored 
nation  clause,  and  request  to  the  Commonwealth  of  Vir- 
ginia:  p.  206-207.  JA10.Al,v.l2 

487 Journals  of  Congress :  containing  their  proceed- 
ings from   September  5,   1774,  to    [November   3,   1788] 
Published  by  authority.    Volume  i.  [ — xiii.] 
From  FolweWs  press.    Philadelphia,    1800-01,    13  v.    21- 
22cm. 

15-14439  JA10.A2 

The  Library  of  Congress  has  other  editions. 

488 Secret  journals  of  the  acts  and  proceedings  of 

Congress,  from  the  first  meeting  thereof  to  the  dissolution 
of  the  Confederation,  by  the  adoption  of  the  Constitution 
of  the  United  States.  Pub.  under  the  direction  of  the 
President  of  the  United  States,  conformably  to  resolution 
of  Congress  of  March  27,  1818,  and  April  21,  1820. 
Boston,  T.  B.  Wait,  1820-21.    j.  v.    22\™. 

Contents. — v.  1.  Domestick  affairs.     History  of  the  Confed- 
eration.— v.  2—4.  Foreign  affairs. 
11-2S751  J10.A35 

489  Dept.    of    state.     The    diplomatic    correspondence    of 

the  United  States  of  America,  from  the  signing  of  the 
definitive  treaty  of  peace,  10th  September,  1783,  to  the 
adoption  of  the  Constitution,  March  4,  1789.  Being  the 
letters  of  the  presidents  of  Congress,  the  secretary  for  for- 
eign affairs — American  ministers  at  foreign  courts,  for- 
eign ministers  near  Congress — reports  of  committees  of 
Congress,  and  reports  of  the  secretary  for  foreign  affairs 
on  various  letters  and  communications;  together  with 
letters  from  individuals  on  public  affairs.  Pub.  under 
the  direction  of  the  secretary  of  state,  from  the  original 
manuscripts  in  the  Department  of  state,  conformably  to 
an  act  of  Congress,  approved  May  5,  1832. 
'Washington,  Printed  by  F.  P.  Blair,  1833-34.     7  v.    2Ujm. 

10-9018  JX233.A2 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN   THE   UNITED  STATES  101 

III.  AS  CONSIDERED   IN  THE  FEDERAL  CONVENTION  AND   EUROPE 
BEFORE  THE  ADOPTION  OF  THE  CONSTITUTION 

490  Butler,-  Charles    Henry.    The    treaty-making    power    of    the 

United  States. 
New  fork,  The  Banks  law  pub.  co.,  1902.    2  v.    21fm. 

Proceedings  of  the  Constitutional  Convention  of  1787  relating 
to  treaties  and  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  Federal  gov- 
ernment, v.  1,  part  2,  p.  285-338.  Proceedings  of  the  Consti- 
tutional Conventions  of  the  several  states,  in  so  far  as  they 
relate  to  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  national  govern- 
ment, p.  339-370. 

The  treaty-making  powers  as  a  factor  in  the  great  national 
debate  of  1787-8,  p.  371-392. 
2-7104  JK570.B85 

491  ■    Treaties,  their  making  and  enforcement.     (2d  ed.) 

Washington,  D.  C,  J.  Byrne  <&  company,  1916.    xxxii,  663 

p.    23\cm. 

The  Federal  convention:  p.  43-52;  Discussion  preceding  the 
adoption  of  the  Constitution :  p.  53-66. 
16-6404  JX4165.C8     1916 

492  Elliot,  Jonathan,  ed.    The  debates  in  the  several  state  conven- 

tions on  the  adoption  of  the  federal  Constitution,  as  recom- 
mended by  the  general  convention  at  Philadelphia,  in 
1787.  Together  with  the  Journal  of  the  federal  conven- 
tion, Luther  Martin's  letter,  Yates's  minutes,  Congres- 
sional opinions,  Virginia  and  Kentucky  resolutions  of  '98- 
'99,  and  other  illustrations  of  the  Constitution  ...  2d 
ed.,  with  considerable  additions.  Collected  and  rev.  from 
contemporary  publications.  Pub.  under  the  sanction  of 
Congress. 
Philadelphia,  J.  B.  Lippincott  company,  1896.   5  v.    24cm. 

Vol.  5  has  title:  Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  federal  Con- 
stitution, in  the  convention  held  at  Philadelphia,  in  1787; 
with  a  diary  of  the  debates  of  the  Congress  of  the  Confed- 
eration ;  as  reported  by  James  Madison  .  .  .  Rev.  and  newly 
arranged  by  Jonathan  Elliot  .  .  .  Vol.  v.  Supplementary  to 
Elliot's  Debates  .  .  . 

Reprint  of  edition  of  1836-45. 
12-14217  JK141     1836b 

493  Ellsworth,  Oliver.    The  landholder.     (Oliver  Ellsworth),  in 

the  Connecticut  Courant. 

(In  Scott,  E.  H.,  ed.    The  Federalist  and  other  Constitutional 

papers,  v.  2,  p.  566-603.    Chicago,  1894.    250In.) 
As  to  dangers  from  the  treaty  power,  p.  578. 

JK154    1894 


102  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

4D4  Ellsworth,  Oliver.     The  letters  of  a  landholder.     Written  by 

Oliver  Ellsworth,  and  printed  in  the  Connecticut  Courant 

and  the  American  Mercury.  November,  1787-Maivh.  1788. 

i  in  Ford,  Paul  Leicester,  ed.     Essays  on  the  Constitution  of 

the  United  States,  p.  L35  202.     Brooklyn,  1892.    24icm.) 
As  to  the  dangers  from  the  treaty  power,  p.  1G5. 

JK171.F72 

495  The  Federalist.     1787-1788.     Xo.  64,  by  Jay.  is  on  the  treaty- 

making  power  of  the  Senate;  and  no.  75,  by  Hamilton, 
on  the  treaty-making  power  of  the  President.  For  other 
observations  on  the  treaty-making  power,  see  edition  with 
index. 

Numerous  editions  of  "The  Federalist"  are  noted  in  Paul 
Leicester  Ford's  "Bibliography  of  the  Constitution"  printed 
in  George  Ticknor  Curtis's  "Constitutional  Bistory  of  the 
United  States,"  v.  2, p.  708  766.  New  York,  1896.  Editionsis- 
sued  since  those  given  in  Ford's  list  are  those  of  Charlottes- 
ville, Ya.,  189."),  abridged  by  Win.  A.  Falconer  ;  New  York.  189S, 
ed.  by  Paul  Leicester  Ford  ;  and  Washington,  1901,  with  an 
introduction  by  K.  <;.  Bourne;  New  York,  1901,  with  a  spe- 
cial introduction  by  Goldwin  Smith;  New  York.  1902,  ed.  by 
Henry  Cabol  I. "due.  French  ed.,  by  Gaston  Je/.e,  Paris,  1902 ; 
and  Selections,  ed.  with  an  introduction  by  William  Bennett 
Munro,  Cambridge,  1914. 

496  Hamilton,    Alexander.     Constitution   of   governments   by    the 

people  of  the  United  State-  of  America.  First  draught 
of  Hamilton.  1787. 

(In  The  Works  of  Alexander  Hamilton,  ed.  by  Henry  Cabot 
Lodge,  v.  1,  p.  334-353.     New  York  &  London,  1SS5.     23*cm.) 

E302.H23,v.l 

"The  Semite  shall  exclusively  have  the  power  of  declaring 
war.  No  treaty  shall  be  made  without  their  advice  and 
consent,"  etc.  page  33S ;  "All  treaties,  conventions,  and  agree- 
ments with  foreign  nations  shall  he  made  by  him,  [the 
President  |  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the 
Senate,"  p.  342;  "The  laws  of  the  United  States  and  the 
treaties  winch  have  been  made  under  the  articles  of  the 
Confederation,  and  which  shall  be  made  under  this  Consti- 
tution, shall  be  the  supreme  law  of  the  land,  and  shall  he 
so  construed  by  the  courts  of  the  several  States,"  p.  348; 
"All  treaties,  contracts,  and  engagements  of  the  United 
States  of  America,  under  the  Articles  of  Confederation  and 
Perpetual  Union,  shall  have  equal  validity  under  this  Con- 
stitution," p.  •"'>]  :  "No  State  shall  enter  Into  a  treaty,  alli- 
ance, or  contract  with  another,  or  with  a  foreign  power, 
without  the  consent  of  the  United  States,"  p.  351. 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE    UNITED   STATES  103 

497  Hamilton,  Alexander.     Propositions  for  a  constitution  of  gov- 

ernment. 

(In    The    Works    of   Alexander    Hamilton,    edited    by    Henry 
Cabot  Lodge,  v.  1,  p.  331-333.     New  York  &  London,  1885. 
.     23*cm.) 

"The  Governor  ...  to  have,  with  the  advice  and  approbation 
of  the  Senate,  the  power  of  making  all  treaties,"  etc.,  p.  332 ; 
"  The  Senator  to  have  the  sole  power  of  declaring  tear — the 
power  of  advising  and  approving  all  treaties,"  etc.,  p.  332. 

E302.H23,v.l 

498  [Iredell,  James.]     Answers  to  Mr.  Mason's  objections  to  the 

new  constitution  recommended  by  the  late  convention  at 
Philadelphia.     By  Marcus. 

(In  McRee,  Griffith  J.  Life  and  correspondence  of  James 
Iredell,  v.  2,  p.  1S6-215.     New  York,  185S.     23*cm.) 

Treaty-making  power,  p.  202-203 ;  Treaties  of  commerce,  p. 
205-206. 

Iredell's  "  Answers  to  Mr.  Mason's  objections "  is  also  re- 
printed in  Paul  Leicester  Ford's  "  Pamphlets  on  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,"  p.  333-370  (JK171.F71),  and 
in  E.  H.  Scott's  "  The  Federalist  and  other  constitutional 
papers"  v.  2,  p.  SS5-917   (JK154     1894). 

E302.6.I7M17 

499  [Lee,  Richard  Henry.]     Observations  leading  to  a  fair  examina- 

tion of  the  system  of  government,  proposed  by  the  late 
convention;  and  to  several  essential  and  necessary  altera- 
tions in  it.  In  a  number  of  letters  from  the  Federal 
Farmer  to  the  Republican. 
[New  York] :  Printed  [by  Thomas  Greenleaf]  in  the  year 
1787.    40  p.    12°. 

Reprinted  in  Paul  Leicester  Ford's  "  Pamphlets  on  the  Con- 
stitution of  the  United  States,"  p.  277-325  (JK171.F71),  and 
in  E.  H.  Scott's  "  The  Federalist  and  other  constitutional 
papers,"  v.  2,  p.  S39-880   (JK154     1S94). 
Treaties,  p.  29-30,  34. 

500  [ ]     An  additional  number  of  letters  from  the  Federal 

farmer  to  the  Republican;  leading  to  a  fair  examination 
of  the  system  of  government,  proposed  by  the  late  con- 
vention; to  several  essential  and  necessary  alterations  in 
it;  and  calculated  to  illustrate  and  support  the  princi- 
ples and  positions  laid  down  in  the  preceding  letters. 
[n.  p.~]  Printed  in  the  year  1788.  1  p.  I.,  p.  [xliii\-xliv , 
[4-5]-181.    17cm. 

On  the  treaty-making  power,  p.  98-100 ;  Argument  that  "  the 
legislature    has    a    proper    control    over    the   president    and 
senate  in  settling  commercial  treaties,"  p.  99-100. 
10-14724  JK146.L4 


104  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

501  Madison,  James.     Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  Federal  Con- 

stitution in  the  convention  held  at  Philadelphia,  in  1787; 
with  a  diary  of  the  debates  of  the  Congress  of  the  Con- 
federation ;  . . .  Revised  and  newly  arranged  by  Jona- 
than Elliot.  Complete  in  one  volume.  Vol.  v.  Supple- 
mentary to  Elliot's  Debates.  Published  under  the  sanction 
of  Congress. 
Washington:  Printed  for  the  editor,  181+5.    xxii,  61+.1  p. 

U\cm> 

See  index  under  "  Treaty." 

JK141     1836,v.5 

502  The    papers    of    James    Madison,  .  .  .  now    published 

from  the  original  manuscripts,  deposited  in  the  Depart- 
ment of  State,  by  direction  of  the  joint  library  commit- 
tee of  Congress,  under  the  superintendence  of  Henry  D. 
Gilpin. 

Washington:  Langtree  &  CSullivan,  181+0.    3  v.    Facsimi- 
les.   21+cm. 

See  index,  v.  3,  under  "Treaty." 

JK111.M2 

503  Massachusetts.     Convention,  1788.     Debates,  resolutions  and 

other  proceedings,  of  the  convention  of  the  commonwealth 
of  Massachusetts  convened  at  Boston,  on  the  9th  of  Janu- 
ary, 1788,  and  continued  until  the  7th  of  February  fol- 
lowing, for  the  purpose  of  assenting  to  and  ratifying  the 
Constitution  recommended  by  the  Grand  Federal  Con- 
vention.   Together  with  the  yeas  and  nays  on  the  decision 
of  the  grand  question.     To  which  the  Federal  Constitu- 
tion is  prefixed. 
Boston,  Adams  and  Nourse,  1788.    219  p.     19cm. 
Treaties:  p.  107,  113,  156. 
9-21475  JK161.M4     1788 

504 Same. 

Boston,  W.  White,  printer  to  the  commonwealth,  1856.    vii 
p.,  4  l,  U%  V-   ncm. 

3-3147  JK161.M4      1856 

505  New  York  {State)  Convention,  1788.  The  debates  and  pro- 
ceedings of  the  Convention  of  the  state  of  New- York, 
assembled  at  Poughkeepsie,  on  the  17th  June,  1788.  To 
deliberate  and  decide  on  the  form  of  federal  government 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER  IN   THE   UNITED  STATES  105 

recommended  by  the  General  convention  at  Philadelphia, 
on  the  17th  September,  1787.    Taken  in  shorthand. 
New-York,  Printed  and  sold  by  F.  Childs,  1788.    1  p.  I.,  ii, 
\syiu  V-  21cm- 

'Amendment  proposed,  "  Resolved,  as  the  opinion  of  this  com- 
mittee, that  no  treaty  ought  to  operate  so  as  to  alter  the 
constitution  of  any  state;  nor  ought  any  commercial  treaty 
to  operate  so  as  to  abrogate  any  law  of  the  United  States, " 
p.  140. 
A  reprint  has  been  issued  with  title :  The  debates  and  pro- 
ceedings of  the  constitutional  convention  of  the  state  of 
New  York  .  .  .  Published  by  the  Vassar  brothers  institute. 
Poughkeepsie,  N.  Y.,  1905. 
5-35342  JK161.N7    1905 

506  Patterson,  William.     [Plan  of  government.     June  15,  1787.] 

[In  Madison,  James.  Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  federal 
constitution,  p.  191-193.  Washington,  1845.  24cm.  (Elliot's 
debates,  v.  5.)] 

Resolutions  favoring  a  revision,  correction  and  enlargement  of 
the  Articles  of  Confederation. 

JK141     1836,v.5 

507  Pennsylvania.     Historical  society.     Pennsylvania  and  the  fed- 

eral Constitution,  1787-1788.  Ed.  by  John  Bach  Mc- 
Master  and  Frederick  D.  Stone. 
[Philadelphia]  Pub.  for  the  subscribers  by  the  HistoHcal 
society  of  Pennsylvania  [Lancaster,  Inquirer  printing  and 
publishing  co.,  printers']  1888.  viii,  80S  p.  15  port.  (incl. 
front.)  %5\cm. 

Treaties  of  commerce  by  the  old  Congress,  p.  455 ;  how  af- 
fected by  laws  of  the  United  States  and  constitutions  of 
states,  p.  463;  objections  to  the  power  of  the  president  and 
senate  in  making  treaties,  p.  476 ;  amendment  proposed  re- 
garding treaties,  p.  564. 
7-8550  JK161.P4      1888 

508  Pinckney,  Charles.-   Plan  of  a  federal  constitution.    May  29, 

1787. 

(In  Madison,  James.  Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  federal 
Constitution,  p.  129-132.  Washington,  1845.  24cm.  (El- 
liot's debates,  v.  5.)  JK141    1836,v.5 

"Art.  vn. — The  Senate  shall  have  the  sole  and  exclusive  power 
to  declare  war,  and  to  make  treaties,  and  to  appoint  am- 
bassadors and  other  ministers  to  foreign  nations,  and  judges 
of  the  supreme  court,"  p.  131. 

See  Jameson,  J.  F.  "  Studies  in  the  history  of  the  Federal  con- 
vention of  1787,"  reprinted  from  the  Annual  Report  of  the 
American  Historical  Association  for  1902,  v.  1,  p.  87-167, 
for  discussions  of  the  authenticity  of  the  text  of  the  Pinck« 
ney  plan. 


106  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

50!>  [Rainsay>  David.]     An  address  to  the  freemen  of  South-Caro- 
lina, on  the  subject  of  the  Federal  Constitution,  proposed 
by  the  convention,  which  met  in  Philadelphia,  May  1787. 
Charleston:  Printed  by  Bowen  and  co.,  [1787 ?~\  s.'  p.    16°. 

Defense  of  the  treaty-making  clause,  p.  7-8. 

Ramsay's  address  is  reprinted  in  Paul  Leicester  Ford's  "  Pam- 
phlets on  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,"  p.  371-380, 
(JK171.F71)  and  in  E.  H.  Scott's  "The  Federalist  and 
other  constitutional  papers,"  v.  2,  p.  918-924.  (JK154 
1894). 

510  Randolph,  Edmund.     [Plan  of  government.     May  29,  1787.] 

(///  Madison,  James.  Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  federal 
constitution,  p.  127-128.  Washington,  1845.  24cm.  (El- 
liot's debates,  v.  5.)  JK141     1836,v.5 

No  clause  on  the  treaty-making  power  in  particular.  The  na- 
tional legislature  should  be  empowered  with  the  legislative 
rights  vested  in  Congress  by  the  Confederation  and  have  the 
authority  to  negative  any  laws  passed  by  the  several  states 
contravening  any  treaty  subsisting  under  the  authority  of 
the  Union.  A  national  executive  should  be  instituted  and 
have,  besides  a  general  authority  to  execute  the  national 
laws,  the  executive  rights  vested  in  Congress  by  the  Con- 
federation. 

511  Richardson,  Hamilton  P.     The  journal  of  the  federal  conven- 

tion of  17s7  analyzed;  the  acts  and  proceedings  thereof 
compared;  and  their  precedents  cited;  in  evidence  .  .  . 
that  .  .  .  Congress  have  general  power  to  provide  for  the 
common  defense  and  general  welfare  of  the  United  States; 
direct  taxes  are  taxes  direct  to  the  several  states  .  .  .  and 
the  limits  of  the  Union  are  coextensive  with  the  bounds 
of  America. 
San  Francisco,  The  Murdoch-  press,  1899.    244  P-   8°. 

Dec.  7, 99-91  JK146.R52 

512  Rowland,  Kate  Mason.     The  life  of  George  Mason,  1725-1792, 

including  his  speeches,  public  papers,  and  correspondence; 
with  an  introduction  by  General  Fitzhugh  Lee. 
X,  w  York,  London.  <! .  /'.  Putnam's  sons,  1892.    2  v.     front. 
(port.)     2  facsim.     2-i\r:\ 

Treaties,  treaty-making  power,  v.  2.  p.  4*).  L05,  tun,  FIT,  148, 
155,  L69,  229,  li4."»,  -i;i,  ivsp.  :;s.-,,  :;ss,  :>,su,   nil,   til.    113,    130 
132,  134,   no.   149,  450,  152. 

Mason's  "Objections  to  this  constitution  of  government,"  v.  2, 
p.  ::s7  390,  which  include  his  objection  to  the  grant  of  the 
treaty-making  power,  is  also  printed  in  Paul  Leicester  Ford's 

"Pamphlets   on    the   Constitution    of    the    United    States,"    p. 
327  332,  and   in    E.    II.   Scott's   "The  Federalist   and  other 
constitutional    papers,"  v.  2,   p.   881-884. 
12-36679  E302.6.M45R8 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE    UNITED   STATES  107 

513  Spear,  Samuel  T.     Treaties  and  the  federal  convention. 

Albany  law  journal,  -July  10,  1880,  v.  22:  25-28. 

Study  based  largely  on  the  reports  of  the  Federal  Convention 
in  the  Madison  Papers.  Constitution,  Art.  1,  sec.  10.  deny- 
ing the  right  to  make  treaties  to  the  States.  See  Story's 
Constitution,   §   1403. 

Same  i.  e.  Story's  §  1403,  the  matter  of  compacts  between 
States ;  also,  Holmes  v.  Jennison.  14  Pet.,  540,  and  the 
People  v.  Curtis,  59  N.  Y.,  321.  Ability  of  Congress  to 
guarantee  its  own  stipulations.  Story's  Const.  §  1838. 
Treaties  as  a  part  of  "  the  supreme  law  of  the  land  "  are 
placed  under  the  cognizance  of  the  judicial  power  of  the 
United  States.  Sec.  25,  of  the  Judiciary  act  of  Sept.  24, 
1789,  1  U.  S.  Stat,  at  Large,  73.  Rev.  Stat,  of  the  U.  S.,  sec. 
709. 

514  U.  S.     Bureau  of  rolls  and  library.     Documentary  history  of 

the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  of  America,  1786- 
1870.     Derived  from  records,  manuscripts,  and  rolls  de- 
posited in  the  Bureau  of  rolls  and  library  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  state. 
Washington,  Department  of  state,  180 %-1905 ' .    5  v.    Sl\cm. 

Vol.  in  has  an  appendix  (not  included  in  the  original  edition) 

"Additional  notes  by  Madison   for  the   introduction   to   his 

notes  of  debates  in  the  Federal  convention  " :  p.  796a~796o ; 

also,  a  "  Special  index  " :  p.  797-904. 

2-101G4/5  JK111.A52 

515  Constitutional  convention,  1787.  Journal,  acts  and  pro- 
ceedings of  the  convention,  assembled  at  Philadelphia. 
Monday,  May  11,  and  dissolved  Monday,  September  17, 
1787,  which  formed  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States. 

Boston,  T.  B.  Wait,  1819.     510  p.     22hcm. 

Published  under  the  direction  of  the  President  of  the  United 
States,  conformably  to  a  resolution  of  Congress  of  March 
27,  1818. 
9-21623  JK141     1819 

516 Journal    of   the    Federal    convention,   kept   by 

James  Madison.     Reprinted  from  the  ed.  of  1810,  which 
was  published  under  direction  of  the  United  States  gov- 
ernment from  the  original  manuscripts.     A  complete  in- 
dex specially  adapted  to  this  ed,  is  added.    Ed.  by  E.  H. 
Scott. 
Chicago,  Scott,  Foresman  and  co.,  1898.    2  v.    25cm. 
See  Index  under  Treaties. 
1-9289  JK141     1898 


108  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

617  XJ.  S.  Constitutional  convention,  1787.  The  journal  of  the  de- 
bates in  the  convention  which  framed  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States.  May-September,  1787,  as  recorded  by 
James  Madison;  ed.  by  Gaillard  Hunt. 
New  York  and  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1908,  2  v. 
5  facsim.  (2  fold.)     21cm. 

8-20180  JK141     1908 

618 The  records  of  the  Federal  convention  of  1787, 

ed.  by  Max  Farrand. 

New  Haven,  Yale  university  press,  1911.    3  v.    26cm. 

For  discussions  of  Treaty-making  power  see  Index  by  clauses 
of  Constitution,  Art.  II,  Sec.  2,  clause  2:  p.  643-644. 
11-5506  JK141     1911 

619 Report  of  the  committee  of  detail.     Aug.  6,  1787. 

(In  Madison,  James.  Debates  on  the  adoption  of  the  Federal 
Constitution,  p.  376-381.  Washington,  1845,  24cm.  (Elliot's 
debates,  v.  5.) 

"Art.  ix.— Sec.  1,  The  Senate  of  the  United  States  shall  have 
power  to  make  treaties,  and  to  appoint  ambassadors,  and 
judges  of  the  supreme  court."    p.  379. 

"Art.  xtt. — No  state  shall  .  .  .  enter  into  any  treaty,  al- 
liance, or  confederation;  nor  grant  any  title  of  nobility": 
P-  381.  JK141     1836,v.5 

520 Secret  proceedings  and  debates  of  the  convention 

assembled  at  Philadelphia,  in  the  year  1787.  for  the  purpose 
of  forming  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  of 
America.  From  the  notes  taken  by  the  late  Robert  Yates. 
M' ashing  ton,  Printed  for  G.  Templeman,  1836.  308  p. 
23cm. 

First  published  in  1821. 
9-21547  JK141     1836b 

521 Same. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off..  WOO.     208  p.     23cm.     (00th 
Conn.,  lil  sess.     Senate.     Doc.  728) 

9-35422  JK141     1909 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  109 

522  Virginia.  Convention,  1788.  Debates  and  other  proceedings 
of  the  Convention  of  Virginia,  convened  at  Richmond,  on 
Monday  the  2d  day  of  June,  1788,  for  the  purpose  of  de- 
liberating on  the  Constitution  recommended  by  the  grand 
Fe'deral  convention.  To  which  is  prefixed,  the  federal 
Constitution. 
Petersburg :  Printed,  by  Hunter  and  Prentis,  m,dgc,lxxxviii 
[i.  e.  1788]-89.     3  v.  in  1.     %lcm. 

Treaty-making  clause  considered,  v.  3,  p.  80-95 ;  Proposed 
amendment  regarding  the  treaty-making  power,  v.  3,  p.  222. 
The  nature  of  the  treaty-making  power  is  also  considered  in 
the  discussion  of  the  navigation  of  the  Mississippi,  which 
runs  through  the  last  part  of  v.  1  and  the  greater  part  of 
v.  2. 
7-7114  JK161.V8    1788a 

523 Same.    Taken  in  short  hand,  by  David  Robert- 
son of  Petersburg.     2d  ed. 
Richmond:  Printed  at  the  Enquirer's  press,  for  Ritchie  d? 
Worsley  and  Augustine  Davis,  1805.    viii,  1^77  p.  21%cm. 

See  p.  104-105,  354-367,  474 ;  also,  the  discussion  of  the  navi- 
gation  of  the  Mississippi,   p.   115-261. 

JK161.V8     1805 

524  ["Webster,  Noah]     An  examination  into  the  leading  principles 

of  the  Federal  constitution  proposed  by  the  late  Conven- 
tion .  .  .  with  answers  to  the  principal  objections  that  have 
been  raised  against  the  system. 
Philadelphia:  printed  and  sold  by  Prichard  <&  Hall,  1787. 
65  p. 

Discussion  of  the  constitution  and  powers  of  the  Senate,  p. 

16-21. 
Also  printed  in  Paul  L.  Ford's  "  Pamphlets  on  the  Constitution 
of  the  United  States,"  p.  25-65.    Brooklyn,  N.  Y.,  1888. 

JK171.F71 

IV.   AS   CONSIDERED   IN   WRITINGS   ON   THE   CONSTITUTION 

525  Ames,  Herman  V.     The  proposed  amendments  to  the  Constitu- 

tion of  the  United  States  during  the  first  century  of  its 
history. 

(In  American  historical  association.     Annual  report  for  the 
year  1896.     v.  2,  Washington,  1897.     8°.) 

•*  Foreign  affiairs — the  treaty-making  power,"  p.  267-269,  308, 
309,  310,  319,  323,  413,  414. 

E172.A60    1896,v.2 


110  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

526  Baker,    Andrew    J.      Annotated    Constitution    of    the    United 

State-. 

Chicago,  Callaghan   and   company,   1891,     Ixxxvii,  279  p. 

■•  i 

Treaties  and  the  treaty  power:  p.  58,  115-117,  133,  17.'?,  174. 
2-9008  JK241.B16 

527  Boutwell,    George    Sewall.     The    Constitution    of   the    United 

States  at  the  end  of  the  first  century. 
Boston,  I>.  C.  Heath  &  <<>..  is!).',,     xviii,  J,12  />.  21cm. 

Treaties:  p.  2SG-296,  352,  354,  Mil. 
9  21537  JK241.B77 

528  Bryant,    Edwin    Eustace.      The    Constitution    of    the    United 

States,  with  notes  of  the  decisions  of  the  Supreme  court 
thereon,  from  the  organization  of  the  court  till  October, 
11)00. 
Madison,   Wis,,  The  Democrat  printing  company,  1901.     x, 
4J8  p.  fflcm. 

Treaties  and  the  treaty  power:   p.  58,    115-117,  133,  173,  174. 
1-31152  JK241.B9 

529  Bryce,  James  Bryce,  viscount.     The  American  commonwealth. 

New    ed.,    completely    rev.    throughout,    with    additional 
chapters. 
New  York,  The  Macmillan  com  pang,  1910.   2  v.   21cm. 

Treaties,  see  Index. 
10-26933  JK246.B9    1910 

530  Calhoun,  John  C.     A  disquisition  on  government  and  a  dis- 

course on  the  constitution  and  government  of  the  United 
States.    Ed.  by  Richard  K.  Cralle. 
Charleston,  S.  C:   Walker  and  James,  1851.    viii,  J/,06  p. 

23<>".      [His    Work*.  V.  1.) 

Treaty-making  power;  p.  201  et  seq. 

E338.C13,v.l 

531  Corwin,  Edward  Samuel.     The  doctrine  of  judicial  review,  its 

legal  and  historical  basis,  ami  other  essays  . 
Princeton^  Princeton  university  press/  [etc.,  etc."]  1914.    r,i 

p..  i  /..  /;;  p.  ,iirm. 

"Seme  possibilities  in  the  way  of  treaty-making:"  p.  101-171. 
14-19188  JK1541.C7 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  111 

532  Coxe,   Brinton.     An  essay  on  judicial  power  and  unconstitu- 

tional legislation,  being  a  commentary  on  parts  of  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States. 
Philadelphia,  Kay  and  brother,  1893.   xvi,  415  p.   23\cm. 

'Influence  of  the  treaty  of  peace  with  Great  Britain  on  the  Con- 
stitution of  the  United  States,  p.  274-284;  Of  the  origin  of 
the  doctrine  that  a  treaty  may  be  part  of  the  law  of  the 
land  of  a  state,  p.  284-285;  Of  the  meaning  of  the  words, 
"  the  law  of  the  land,"  in  the  first  resolution  and  the  federal 
letter  of  Congress,  p.  287-290;  The  treaty  of  peace  with 
Great  Britain  a  part  of  the  law  of  the  land,  p.  289-290; 
The  federal  letter  of  Congress,  April  13,  1787,  p.  387-395. 
9-235S3  JK1541.C8 

533  Curtis,  George  Ticknor.     Constitutional  history  of  the  United 

States  from  their  declaration  of  independence  to  the  close 

of  the  civil  war. 
New  York,  Harper  &  brothers,  1889-96.     2  v.     front,     (v.  2, 
•     port.)    23\cm. 

Treaties  and  the  treaty-making  power :  v.  1,  p.  219,  422,  457, 
463,  465,  468,  553,  554,  579,  581,  589,  596. 
5-29962  JK116.C85 

534  Duer,  William  Alexander.     A  course  of  lectures  on  the  consti- 

tutional   jurisprudence    of    the    United    States.     2d    ed., 
rev.,  enl. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company,  I860,     xxii  p.,  1  Z., 
545  p.     20cm. 

The  powers  to  make  treaties,  etc.  p.  227-238. 
12-13111  JK211.D8 

535  Outlines    of    the    constitutional    jurisprudence    of   the 

United  States. 

New-York,  Collins  and  Hannay,  1833.    xxiii,   [25]-249  p. 

18cm. 

Treaties :  p.  65-66,  135-141,  193. 
9-21742  JK221.D85 

536  Farrar,  Timothy.     Manual  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 

States  of  America. 
Boston,   Little,  Brown,   and  company,  1867.    xii,  532  p. 
23cm. 

Treaty-making  power:  p.  333,  447-451. 
9-21633  JK246.F24 


112  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

537  Hare,  John  Inncs  Clark.     American  constitutional  law. 

Boston,  Little,  Brown,  and  company,  1889.    2  v.     2)+\cm. 

Regulation  of  commerce,  p.  427  et  seq;  Power  to  make  treaties, 

p.  15,  171 ;  Power  to  regulate  commerce  may  be  exercised  by 

treaty,  p.   435.     Law  contrary   to  a   treaty  binding  on  the 

courts,  p.  439,  502. 

9-21642  JK241.H28 

538  Harrison,  Benjamin,  pres.  U.  S.     This  country  of  ours. 

New   York,  C.  Scribner>8  sons,  1897.    3  p.   I.,   [iii]-xxiv, 
360  p.    19cm. 

Treaty-making  power:  p.  134-136;  Participation  of  House  in 
treaties :  p.  136-141.     See  also  p.  121-123,  250,  281,  284. 
4-3S66  JK424.H3 

539  Hart,  Albert  Bushnell.     Introduction  to  the  study  of  federal 

government. 
Boston,    Ginn    &    company,    1891.    x,    11-200    p.    23\cm. 
{Harvard  historical  ?nonographs,  no.  2) 

Treaties  as  basis  of  federation:  p.  15,  17,  19;  Foreign  powers: 
p.   165-166. 
5-1610  JC353.H24 

540  Hoist,  Hermann  Eduard  von.     The  constitutional  law  of  the 

United  States  of  America.    Authorized  ed.    Tr.  by  Alfred 
Bishop  Mason. 

Chicago,  III.,  Gallaghan  &  company,  1887.    v  p.,  1  I.,  369  p. 

24C''H. 

Treaty-power,  p.  200  et  seq. 

President  before  negotiating  a  treaty  may  ask  the  Senate  for 
advice ;  his  right  to  do  so  has  never  been  disputed,  p.  201 ; 
Treaty-power  cannot  be  unlimited,  p.  202 ;  A  law  can  be  re- 
pealed by  a  treaty  (Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Peters,  253)  as  well 
as  a  treaty  by  a  law,  p.  202  (The  Cherokee  Tobacco,  11  Wal- 
lace, 616)  ;  If  a  treaty  and  a  law  are  in  opposition,  their 
respective  dates  must  decide  whether  the  one  or  the  other  is 
to  be  regarded  as  repealed,  p.  202  (Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Pe- 
ters, 253,  314;  Doe  v.  Braden,  16  Howard,  635)  ;  Relation 
between  the  treaty -power  and  the  legislative-power,  p.  203- 
204;  Commercial  treaties,  p.  204-205;  When  stipulations  in 
a  treaty  are  of  11x>  nature  of  a  contract,  the  contract  must 
be  fulfilled  by  the  action  of  the  legislature  (or  executive), 
p.  205-206  (Foster  v.  Neilson,  2  Peters,  253). 
9-21111  JK31.H75 


TREATY-MAKING   POWER   IN"   THE   UNITED   STATES  113 

541  Kent,  James.     Commentaries  on  American  law.     12th  ed.    Ed. 

by  O.  W.  Holmes,  jr.     14th  ed.     Ed.  by  John  M.  Gould. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown,  and  company,  1896.     4  *>.     21lkcm. 

Part  i.  Of  the  law  of  nations:  Treaties  of  peace:  p.  165-177 

'     (200-211);    Of   territories   ceded    or   acquired:    p.    177-179 

(211-214)  ;   Part  n.  Of  the  government  and   constitutional 

jurisprudence    of    the    United    States ;    The    treaty-making 

power,  p.  284-2S7,   (34G-350). 

2-20193 

542  McClain,  Emlin.     A  selection  of  cases  on  constitutional  law. 

Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company,  1900.     xxxi,  1080  p. 
%lfm. 

The  powers  of  the  executive:   Sec.  II.  Treaties:   p.  581-590. 
Cases  cited:  Haver  v.  Yaker,  9  Wallace,  32  (1869).     The  Peo- 
ple,  ex   rel.     The   Attorney-General    v.    Gerke,    5   Cal.     381 
(1855).     Head  money  cases,  112  U.  S.,  580,   (1884). 
May  17.  1900-69  JK240.M12 

543  Same.     2d  ed. 

Boston,  Little,  Brown,  and  company,  1909.     xli,  1297  p. 
21±¥m. 

9-27928  JK265.M3 

544  Miller,  Samuel  Freeman.     Lectures  on  the  Constitution  of  the 

United  States. 
Neio   York  and  Albany,  Banks  and  brothers,  1893.    xxi, 
765  p.    21fm. 

Treaties  negotiated  hy  the  Continental  Congress  :  p.  48-55  ;  The 
consular  convention  with  France  a  construction  of  the  treaty- 
making  power :  p.  55 ;  Power  to  make  treaties :  p.  167-168, 
214-216,  375,  578-579 ;  Treaties  providing  for  payment  of 
moneys :  p.  181-184  ;  Principal  treaties  reviewed  :  p.  220-226 ; 
Commercial  treaties :  p.  225-226 ;  Cases  arising  under 
treaties:  p.  321-325. 
2-19694  JK241.M66 

545  Noailles,  Jules  Charles  Victurnien  due  de.     Cent  ans  de  re- 

publique  aux  Etats-Unis. 

Paris,  0.  Levy,  1886-89.    2  v.    23cm. 

Attributions  executives  du  Senat :  v.  1,  p.  361-391. 
2-16065  JK246.N74 

546  Paschal,  George  Washington.     The  Constitution  of  the  United 

States   defined   and  carefully   annotated.     With   an   ap- 
pendix, supplement,  and  index  thereto.     [3d  ed.] 
Washington,  D.  C .,  W.  H.  Morrison,  1882.     xx,  xxa^xxc, 
\xxi\-lxxii,  61tlf.  p.     21cm. 

Treaties:  p.  373-374,  393,  412,  463-464. 
2-14916  JK241.P27     1882 

137190°— 20 8 


114  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

547  Patterson,   Christopher   Stuart.     The  United  States   and   the 

States  under  the  Constitution.     2d  ed.,  with  notes  and 

references  to  additional  authorities,  by  Robert  P.  Reeder. 

Philadelphia,  T.  &  J .  U*.  Johnson  &  co.,  1904-.    xli,  SJfl  p. 

$4cm. 

Supremacy  of  treaties:  p.  238-239. 
4-31001  JK314.P3    1904 

548  Pomeroy,  John  Norton.     An  introduction  to  the  constitutional 

law  of  the  United  States.     Especially  designed  for  stu- 
dents, general  and  professional.    9th  ed.,  rev.  and  enl.,  by 
Edmund  H.  Bennett. 
Boston  and  New  York,  Houghton,  Mifflin  and  company, 
1886.    xxxviii,  709  p.    23cm. 

President's  power  to  make  treaties :  p.  118 ;  Acquisition  of  ter- 
ritory by  treaties:  p.  396-39S;  The  power  of  the  President 
to  manage  the  foreign  and  international  relations  of  the 
United  States:  p.  563-572;  Cases  arising  under  treaties: 
p.  631-632. 

"  The  Constitution  places  no  express  limits  whatever  upon 
the  subjects,  conditions,  or  contents  of  treaties.  The  Presi- 
dent shall  have  power  to  make  treaties.  .  .  .  Congress, 
having  no  power  over  them,  can  not  abrogate  or  modify 
them.  In  general,  therefore,  the  President,  with  the  consent 
of  the  Senate,  may  enter  into  any  species  of  treaty  known  in 
the  intercourse  of  nations,  any  species  known  to  the  inter- 
national law.  The  genus  '  treaties '  includes  all  the  usual 
kinds  and  sorts  "  :  p.  566. 
9-21072  JK241.P78     1886 

549  Rawle,  William.     A  view  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 

States  of  America.     2d  ed. 
Philadelphia,  P.  H.  Nicldin,  1829.     viii,  [9]-349  p.    24cm. 

Of  the  treaty  making  power:  p.  63-76,  316-324. 
9-25931  JK216.R25 

550  Sergeant,  Thomas.     Constitutional  law.    Being  a  collection  of 

points  arising  upon  the  Constitution  and  jurisprudence  of 
the  United  States,  which  have  been  settled,  by  judicial 
decision  and  practice. 
Philadelphia,  A.  Small,  1822.     2  p.  I.,   [iii]^viii,   [9]-415, 
[1]  p.     23hcm. 

Treaties  and  treaty-making  power,  etc.:  p.  53,  149,  328,  391, 
395-400. 
16-12958  JK1521.S4     1822 

551  So, n<.    2d.  ed. .with  additions  and  improvements. 

Philadelphia.  P.  II.  Nicldin  and  T.  Johnson,  1830.    2  p.  I., 

xi,U0/>.     2}"\ 

35  23571  JK1521.S4    1830 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  115 

552  Story,    Joseph.     Commentaries    on    the    Constitution    of    the 

United  States :  with  a  preliminary  review  of  the  constitu- 
tional history  of  the  colonies  and  states  before  the  adop- 
tion of  the  Constitution,  5th  ed.,  by  Melville  M.  Bigelow. 
Boston,   Little,  Brown,   and   company,   1905,   1891.    #   v. 

Treaties :  v.  1,  p.  13-15,  187-188,  193 ;  v.  2,  p.  225-226,  275-278, 
450,  603-612. 
8-27554  JK211.S72 

553  Sutherland,  George.     Constitutional  power  and  world  affairs. 

New  York,  Columbia  university  press,  1919.  mi,  W%  p. 
20cm.  {Columbia  university  lectures  .  .  .  George  Blu- 
menthal  foundation,  1918) 

The  treaty -making  power — General:  p.  116-140;  The  treaty- 
making  power — How  far  limited:  p.  141-165. 
19^440  JK306.S7 

554  Sutherland,  William  Angus.     Notes  on  the  Constitution  of  the 

United  States,  showing  the  construction  and  operation  of 
the  constitution  as  determined  by  the  federal  Supreme 
court  and  containing  references  to  illustrative  cases  from 
the  inferior  federal  courts  and  state  courts. 
San  Francisco,  Bancroft-Whitney  company,  1904.  %v,  973 
p.      23¥m. 

Treaties :  p.  239-240,  481-484,  517,  612-614. 
4-21695  JK241.S96 

555  Thayer,  James  Bradley.     Cases  on  constitutional  law.      With 

notes. 
Cambridge  [Mass.]  C.  ~W.  Sever  and  company,  1895.    #  v. 
%5\cm. 

Treaty-making  power:  p.  87-88.     Great  scope  of  the  treaty- 
making  power :  p.  373  n. 
6-5685  JK241.T37 

556  Thorpe,   Francis  Newton.    The  constitutional  history  of  the 

United  States.     1765-1895. 
Chicago,  Callaghan  &  company,  1901.    3  v.    maps.    ^2\cm. 

Authority  of  a  treaty :  v.  2,  p.  343. 
Feb.  28, 1901-98  JK3 1 .  T6 


116  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

557  Tiffany,   Joel.     A  treatise  on  government,   and   constitutional 

law;  being  an  inquiry  into  the  source  and  limitation  of 
governmental     authority,     according    to   the    American 
theory. 
Albany,  W.  0.  Little,  1867.    vi  p.,  1  I,,  [9]-398,  \3]-179  p. 
24cm. 

Defects  of  confederation  in  respect  to  treaties:  p.  93;  Power 

to  make   treaties  under  the  Constitution:   p.   344;   Subject 

of    treaties    discussed:    p.     344-34S ;     Practice     in     making 

treaties:   p.  346-348. 

9-2i<;::'.i  JK241.T56 

558  Tucker,  Henry  St.  George.     Limitations  on  the  treaty-making 

power  under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown,   and    company,   1915.    xxi,   444  V- 
%4\™. 

15-8092  JK570.T8 

559  Tucker,    John    Randolph.      The    Constitution    of    the    United 

States.     A  critical  discussion  of  its  genesis,  development, 
and  interpretation.     Ed.  by  Henry  St.  George  Tucker. 
Chicago,  Callaghan  &  co.,  1899.     2  v.     ;l'fem. 

Treaties,   etc.:   p.   37C>,   720-732,  822;   Emphasis   placed   on   the 
limitations    of   the    treaty-making   power. 
99-2353  JK241.T9 

560  Tucker,  St.  George.     View  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 

States. 

(In  Blackstone's  commentaries  .  .  .  By  St.  George  Tucker, 

v.  1,  p.  140-377.     Philadelphia,  1803.) 
Treaty-making  power:  p.  253,  264,  309,  332-336,  373. 

561  Watson,    David    Kemper.      The    Constitution    of    the    United 

States,  its  history,  application  and  construction. 
Chicago,  Callaghan  &  company,  1910.     2  v.     24\cm. 
Treaty  making  power:  p.  2,  p.  948-907. 
10-19949  JK268.W3 

562  Whiting-,  William.     War  powers  under  the  Constitution  of  the 

United  States.     43d  ed. 
Boston,  Lee  and  Shepard;  New    )'<>rk.  Lee,  Shepard  and 

Dillingham,  1871.    xxviii,  695  p.    £3 

Treaties    modifying    the    law    of   nations:    p.    340  352;    How 
aliens  are  affected  by  treaties  of  commerce:  p.  352-354. 
I)  23595  JK560.W7     1871 


TREATY-MAKING  POWER   IN   THE   UNITED   STATES  117 

663  Willoughby,  Westel  Woodbury.     The  constitutional  law  of  the 
United  States. 
New    York,  Baker,Voorh'tsde  company, 1910.    2  v.    2^cm. 

See  chap.  34-35. 
10-25891  JK268.W6 

564  Wilson,  James,  and  Thomas  M'Kean.  Commentaries  on  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States  of  America,  with  that 
Constitution  prefixed,  in  which  are  unfolded,  the  princi- 
ples of  free  government,  and  the  superior  advantages  of 
republicanism  demonstrated.  The  whole  extracted  from 
debates,  pub.  in  Philadelphia  by  T.  Lloyd. 
London,  Printed  for  J.  Dehrett,  1792.  1  p.  I.,  [5]-147,  [2] 
p.     20\cm. 

Wilson  on  treaties:  p.  96,  111-113. 
9-21071  JK171.W7 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES 

1778— FRANCE 

565  Depew,  Chauncey  M.     Our  first  treaty  with  France. 

National  review,  May,  1912,  v.  36:  150-156.       AP4.N25,v.36 

566  Lyman,    Theodore.      The    diplomacy    of    the    United    States. 

Being  an  account  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country, 
from  the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778,  to  the  present 
time.     2d  ed. — with  additions. 
Boston,  Wells  and  Lilly,  1828.    2  v.    2Scm. 

Treaties  of  amity  and  commerce  and  of  alliance  of  1778,  with 
France :  v.  1,  p.  22-69,  352-353. 
4-20773  JX1412.L9     1828 

567  Raynal,    Guillaume    Thomas    Frangois.      The    revolution    of 

America.     New  ed. 
Edinburgh,  1783.     vi  p.,  1  I.,  191  p.     18cm. 

Appendices :   no.   1.     Treaty  of  friendship  and  commerce  be- 
tween  the  court   of   Versailles   and   the   United    States   of 
America,  signed  Feb.  6,  1778. 
2-3699  E211.R27 

568  Trescot,  William  Henry.     The  diplomatic  history  of  the  ad- 

ministrations of  Washington  and  Adams,  1789-1801. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company,  1857.     x,  [2],  283  p. 

21cm. 

Treaties  with  France  declared  void :  p.  194. 
7-3221  E312.T79 

569  U.  S.     Congress.     Abridgment  of  the  Debates  of  Congress,  from 

1789  to  1856.  From  Gales  and  Seatons'  Annals  of  Con- 
gress; from  their  Register  of  debates;  and  from  the  of- 
ficial reported  debates,  by  John  C.  Rives.  By  the  author 
of  the  Thirty  years'  view  [Thomas  Hart  Benton]. 
Ni  ir  York  [etc.]  D.  Appleton  and  company  [etc."\  1857-61. 
16  v.    26cm. 

Abrogation  uf  French  treaties:  v.  2,  p.  310-316. 
15-87U1  J15.B4,v.2 

118 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  119 

570  U.  S.     5th  Congress.    The  debates  and  proceedings  in  the  Con- 
gress of  the  United  States.     May  15,  1797,  to  March  3, 
1799,  inclusive. 
Washington:  Gales  and  Seaton,  1851.    3  vols.    8°.    {Annals 
of  Congress,  vols.  7-9.) 

Abrogation  of  French  treaties,  col.  586,  587,  588,  602,  2035, 

2037,  2063,  2116,  2127,  2132,  3754. 
Discussed  and  action  taken  in  1798.  Among  those  who  dis- 
cussed the  matter  in  the  House  were  Sewall,  Nicholas,  Dana, 
Otis,  Bayard,  Kittera,  Gordon,  S.  Smith,  Gallatin  and 
Edmond. 
"  An  act  to  declare  the  treaties  heretofore  concluded  with 
France,  no  longer  obligatory  on  the  United  States."  Ap- 
proved July  7,  1798,  col.  3754. 

571 5th  Congress,  2d  session.    [Report  by  Mr.  Goodhue  from 

the  Committee  on  foreign  relations,  recommending  the 
abrogation  of  the  French  treaties.]    June  21,  1798. 

{In  U.  S.  56th  Congress,  2d  session.  Senate  doc.  no.  231. 
Compilation  of  reports  of  the  Committee  on  foreign  relations, 
part  8,  p.  10-11.    Washington,  1901.    23cm.) 

JX234.A2.V.8 

1790— CREEK  INDIANS 

572  B.     [Communication  on  the  treaty  of  1790  with  the  Creeks.] 

Daily  National  Intelligencer,  Washington,  Feb.  23,  1816, 
page  2. 

See  Jefferson's  Works,  ed.  by  H.  A.  Washington,  v.  6,  p.  557- 
560,  for  comment  on  this  communication  and  a  discussion  of 
Jefferson's  views. 

573  Jackson,  Mrs.  Helen  Maria  (Fiske)  Hunt.     A  century  of  dis- 

honor; a  sketch  of  the  United  States  government's  deal- 
ings with  some  of  the  Indian  tribes;  by  Helen  Jackson 
(H.  H.)     New  ed.,  enl.  by  the  addition  of  the  report  of 
the  needs  of  the  mission  Indians  of  California. 
Boston,  Roberts  brothers,  1885.    as,  514  p.    19cm. 

2-15270  E93.J13 

574  Jefferson,  Thomas.    The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson:  .  .  . 

With  explanatory  notes,  tables  of  contents,  and  a  copious 
index  to  each  volume,  as  well  as  a  general  index  to  the 
whole,  by  the  editor  H.  A.  Washington.     [Vols.  6  and  7] 
Washington,  D.  C,  Taylor  &  Maury,  1854.   ®  v.   23\cm. 

On  the  treaty  with  the  Creeks,  v.  6,  p.  557-560 ;  "  Opinion 
in  regard  to  the  continuance  of  the  monopoly  of  the  com- 


120  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

meree  of  the  Crock  nation,  enjoyed  by  Col.  McGillivray, 
July  120.  1790,"  v.  7,  p.  504-506. 
Jefferson  afterwards  qualified  the  statement  made  in  this  opin- 
ion as  to  the  treaty-making  power.  See  note,  p.  505;  also 
Washington's  Jefferson,  v.  4.  p.  134-135,  407,  500;  and  Story 
On  the  Constitution,  5th  ed.,  v.  2,  p.  609. 
0-71 50  E302.J464,v.6,7 

575  Jefferson,  Thomas.     The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  col- 

lected and  ed.  by  Paul.  Leicester  Ford.     [Vol.  5.] 
Nt  w    York,    G.    P.    Putnam's   sons,   1895.     sexviii,   515   p. 
2B\cm. 

"  Opinion  in  regard  to  the  continuance  of  the  monopoly  of 
the  commerce  of  the  Creek  nation,  enjoyed  by  Col.  McGilli- 
vray, July  29,  1790,"  p.  215-216.  For  later  views  on  the 
treaty-making  power,  scr  note  1,  p.  216;  also,  Ford's  Jeffer- 
son, v.  7.  p.  07-0K  ;  Washington's  Jefferson,  v.  4,  p.  134,  497, 
500 ;  and  Story  On  the  Constitution.  5th  ed.  v.  2,  p.  609. 
2-5666  E302.J466,v.5 

576  Marshall,  John.     The  life  of  George  Washington  .  .  .     Com- 

piled   under  the  inspection   of  the  honourable   Bushrod 
Washington,  from  original  paper-  bequeathed  to  him  by 
his  deceased  relative.     2d  ed..  rev. 
Philadelphia.  James   Crissy,  1832.    2  v.     front.    22\cm. 

Treaty  with  the  Creek  Indians,  allowing  the  free  importation 
of  goods  through  the  United   States,  v.  2,  p.  192-193.  and 
note  iv,  v.  2,  pt.  2,  p.  4. 
15-1321  E312.M35 

577  Story,    Joseph.      Commentaries    on    the    Constitution    of    the 

United  States:  with  a  preliminary  review  of  the  constitu- 
tional history  of  the  colonies  and  states  before  the  adop- 
tion of  the  Constitution.  5th  ed.,  by  Melville  M.  Bigelow. 
Boston.  Little.  Brown,  and  company,  1905,  1891.  2  v. 
21fcm. 

Note  on  the  treaty  with  the  Creek  Indians,  v.  2,  p.  609. 
8-27554  JK211.S72 

578  IT.  S.     1st  Congress.     The  debates  and  proceedings  in  the  Con- 

gress of  the  United  States.    Vol.  I.  comprising  (with  vol. 
II)    the  period  from  March  3,  1789,  to  March  3,  1791, 
inclusive. 
Washington:    Gales   and   Seat  on,   1834.     4°.      {Annals   of 
Congress,  v.  1.) 

Bill  providing  for  the  expenses  attending  negotiations  for 
treaties  with  the  Creeks,  etc.,  considered  in  the  House,  col. 
G98-703;  Bill  in  the  Senate,  col.  62-64.     Message  from  the 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT   TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  121 

President  of  the  United  States,  on  the  treaty  with  the 
Creeks,  eol.  1024-1025.  Secret  article  relating  to  the  free 
importation  of  goods,  col.  1025.  Execution  of  secret  article, 
col.  1025. 

579  Washington,  George.     The  writings  of  George  Washington; 

.  .  .  with  a  life  of  the  author,  notes,  and  illustrations. 
By  Jared  Sparks.     Volume  XII. 
Boston,  John  B.  Russell,  1837.     viii,  592,  (1)  p.     26cm. 

Message  to  the  Senate;  on  a  treaty  with  the  Creek  Indians, 
August  4,  1790,  p.  84-85.  Message  to  the  Senate;  on  a 
treaty  with  the  Creek  Indians,  August  7th,  1790,  p.  86-87. 
These  messages  are  also  printed  in  American  State  Papers, 
Indian  affairs,  v.  1,  p.  80,  81,  (the  treaty,  p.  81-82)  ;  and 
in  the  Journal  of  the  executive  proceedings  of  the  Senate, 
v.  1,  p.  55-56,  58.  (ratification  of  the  treaty,  p.  61-62.) 
5-14201  E312.7.1834,v.l2 

580  The    writings    of   George   Washington,    collected    and 

edited  by  Worthington  Chauncey  Ford.     Vol.  11,  1785- 
1790. 

New  York  and  London:  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1891.     xxi, 

(j),  510  p.  mcm. 

Treaty  with  the  Creek  Indians,  p.  421-424,  495. 
2-5665  E312.7.1889,v.ll 

1794— GREAT  BRITAIN   (JAY  TREATY) 

581  Adams,  John.     The  works  of  John  Adams,  second  president  of 

the  United  States:  with  a  life  of  the  author;  notes  and 
illustrations,  by  his  grandson  Charles  Francis  Adams. 
Boston:  Little,  Brown  and  co.  1850-1856.     10  v.    22\cm. 

The  treaty  with  Great  Britain,  negotiated  by  Mr.  Jay,  v.  1, 
p.  471,  477,  4S1,  v.  9,  p.  18,  27,  36,  40,  74,  138. 
8-19755  E302.A26 

582  The  American  remembrancer;  or,  An  impartial  collection  of 

essays,  resolves,  speeches,  &c.  relative,  or  having  affinity, 
to  the  treaty  with  Great  Britain. 
Philadelphia,    Printed    by    H.    Tuchniss,    for    M.    Carey, 
1795-[96]     3  v.,   21\™. 

Together  with  the  discussions  of  the  expediency  of  the  Jay 
treaty  are  occasional  observations  on  the  constitutional 
limitations  on  the  treaty-making  power.  Included  in  the 
collection  are  speeches  and  essays  by  Charles  Pinckney, 
Hamilton  [Camillus],  Mathew  Carey  [Caius].  R.  R.  Liv- 
ingston [Cato],  and  others. 
9-757  E311.A48 


122  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

583  Ames,  Fisher.     The  speech  of  Mr.  Ames,  in  the  House  of  repre- 

sentatives of  the  United  States,  when  in  committee  of  the 
whole,  on  Thursday,  April  28,  1796,  in  support  of  the  fol- 
lowing motion :  Resolved,  That  it  is  expedient  to  pass  the 
laws  necessary  to  carry  into  effect  the  treaty  lately  con- 
cluded between  the  United  States  and  the  king  of  Great 
Britain. 
Philadelphia,  Printed  by  J.  Fenno,  1796.   2  p.  I.,  59  p.   22\cm. 

6-7513  E314.A51 

584  Same.     [2  ed.] 

Boston,  Printed  by  J  no.  <('•  J.  N.  Russell;  sold  by  them;  and 
by  William  P.  Blake  [1796]     52  p.     23hcm. 

16-25949  E314.A5 

585  Same. 

(In  his  Works.  With  a  selection  from  his  speeches  and  cor- 
respondence. Ed.  by  his  son,  Seth  Ames,  v.  2,  p.  37-71. 
Boston  1S54.     24cm.) 

E302.A52,v.2 

586  Same. 

(In  American  oratory,  p.  94-121.    Philadelphia,  1836.    8°.) 

587  Same. 

(In  Johnston,  Alexander.  British  orations,  [vol.  1]  p.  112-130. 
New  York,  1896.     18£cm.) 

E173.J73,v.l 

Also  given  in  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House  of  Representa- 
tives. Debates,  part  2.  Upon  the  subject  of  the  British 
treaty,  p.  308-334.     Philadelphia,  1796.    21£cm. 

JK573.1796.A5 

588  Butler,   Pierce.     Letter   to  Madison.     Philadelphia,   June   12, 

1795.  Acnowledging  a  letter.  Reading  of  the  [British] 
treaty  in  the  Senate.  Sends  Madison  a  part  of  the  docu- 
ment to  read  and  send  to  Jefferson  and  to  not  com- 
municate it  further.  A  few  copies  only  printed.  Its 
constitutionality  questioned.  Its  ratification  problem- 
atical.    3  p.  4°. 

Ms.  Department  of  State. 

589  [Cobbett,  William.]     A  little  plain  English,  addressed  to  the 

people  of  the  United  States,  on  the  treaty  negociated  with 
Lis  Britannic  Majesty,  and  on  the  conduct  of  the  President 
relative  thereto;  in  answer  to  "The  letters  of  Frank- 
lin/'    With  a  supplement,  containing  an  account  of  the 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     123 

turbulent  and  factious  proceedings  of  the  opposers  of  the 
treaty.    By  Peter  Porcupine  [pseud.'] 
Philadelphia,  printed:  London,  Reprinted :  for  F.  and  C. 
Bimngton,  1795.    8,  111  p.    21\cm. 

8-8359  E311.F835 

590  Same. 

Philadelphia,  T.  Bradford,  1795.    8,  111  p.    %2\™. 

8-8361  E311.F834 

591  The  political  censor,  or  monthly  review  of  the  most 

interesting  political  occurrences,  relative  to  the  United 
States  of  America.  By  Peter  Porcupine  [pseud.]  [April 
and  May,  1796] 

Philadelphia:  Printed  for  Benjamin  Da-vies,  1796.     2  nos. 
22\cm. 

The  April  and  May  numbers  contain  reports  of  the  debate  in 
the  House  of  Representatives  on  the  Jay  treaty,  and  com- 
ments by  Cobbett.     See  p.  73-195. 

E311.C66 

592  Conway,  Moncure  Daniel.     Omitted  chapters  of  historj'-  dis- 

closed in  the  life  and  papers  of  Edmund  Randolph,  gov- 
ernor of  Virginia;  first  attorney-general  United  States, 
secretary  of  state. 
New  York  &  London,  G.  P.  Putnam'' s  sons,  1888.     vi,  401  p. 
front,  (port.)  pi.,  tab.  24\cm. 

British  treaty:  p.  220-221,  227,  233,  246,  248,  253,  255,  260, 
264,  292,  341,  354. 
12-31573  E302.6.R18C7 

593  [Dallas,  Alexander  James]     Features  of  Mr.  Jay's  treaty. 

(In  Gt.  Brit.    Treaties,  etc.,  1760-1S20   (George  III)     Treaty 
of  amity,  commerce,  and  navigation,  between  His  Britannic 
Majesty,  and  the  United  States  of  America.    .    .     .    Phila- 
delphia, 1795.     21$cm.     p.   109-151) 
10-227  E314.G781 

594  [ ]     Features  of  Mr.  Jay's  treaty.    To  which  is  annexed 

a  View  of  the  commerce  of  the  United  States,  as  it  stands 
at  present,  and  as  it  is  fixed  by  Mr.  Jay's  treaty. 
Philadelphia,  Printed  by  Lang  &  U stick,  for  Mathew  Carey, 
1795.    51  p.    20\™. 

[Bailey  pamphlets,  v.  9,  no.  1] 
[Duane  pamphlets,  v.  16,  no.  4] 
12-28262  AC901.D8    vol.16 


124  LIBRARY   OF   COXGRESS 

595  Dallas,  Alexander  James.  Features  of  Mr.  Jay's  treaty.  To 
which  is  annexed  a  View  of  the  commerce  of  the  United 
State-,  as  it  stands  at  present,  and  as  it  is  iixed  by  Mr. 
Jay's  treaty. 

tin   Life  and  writings  of  Alexander  James  Dallas,  p.  160  210. 

Philadelphia,  1871.    23icm.) 
"The  British  treaty  and  the  constitution  of  the  United  States 
are  at  war  with  each  other,"  p.  183  et  seq. 

E302.D14D2 

59G  Elliot,  Jonathan.     The  debates  in  the  several  state  conventions, 
on  the  adoption  of  the  Federal  Constitution,  as  recom- 
mended by  the  general  convention  at  Philadelphia  in  1787. 
Vol.  4.  2cl  ed.,  with  considerable  additions. 
Wash ington :  Prin ted  for  the  editor,  1836.     xii,  639  p.     .<?  >rn. 

"Treaty-making   power. —  (Jay's   treaty.),"   p.   435-438.     Dis- 
cussions in  the  House  of  Representatives. 

JK141.1836,v.4 

597  Ellsworth,  Oliver.     Letter  to  Honorable  Mr.  Trumbull.    Dated 

Philadelphia,  March  13,  1796.  Grant  of  the  treaty-mak- 
ing power.  Effect  of  treaties.  Conflict  of  a  treaty  with 
existing  laws.  etc.  Treaty  and  statute-making  power  both 
essential  to  regulate  commerce  with  foreign  nations  and 
the  two  powers  are  reconcilable.  The  claim  of  the  House 
of  Representatives  to  participate  in  or  control  the  treaty- 
making  power  is  as  unwarranted  as  it  is  dangerous.  The 
obligation  to  appropriate  money  in  the  case  of  the  pend- 
ing treat}r  is  indispensable.     9  p. 

Ms.  Library  of  Congress.     Letters  to  Washington.     Vol.  117. 
Miscellaneous. 

598  Franklin,  pseud.     Letters  of  Franklin  on  the  conduct  of  the 

executive,  and  the  treaty  negociated,  by  the  chief  justice 
of  the  United  States,  with  the  court  of  Great-Britain. 
Philadelphia,  Printed  by  E.  Oswald,  1795.    56  p.  m\cm. 
Originally   published    in   the   Independent  gazetteer. 
11-24291  E314.F83 

599  Gallatin,    Albert.     On    the    British   treaty — House   of    Repre- 

sentatives, April  26,  1790. 

(In  Johnston,  Alexander.   American  orations,    [vol.  11    p.  84- 
111.     New    York,    189G.     18Jcm.)  E173.J73.V.1 

Also  given  in  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  House.     Debates,  pr.  2. 
■»  Upon  the  subject  of  the  British  treaty,  p.  252-271.     Phila- 

delphia, 17!)G.     21}cm. 

JK373.1796.A5 

600 Same. 

(In    Moore.    Frank.     American    eloquence,   v.   2,   p.    133-143. 
New    York,   1SG2.     2'^m.) 

E302.1.M82 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT   TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  125 

601  Gallatin,  Albert.     [On  the  constitutional  power  of  the  House 

with  respect  to  treaties.     March  7,  9,  -21  and  31,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
'treaties,   p.   13-15,   44-55,  326-348,   367,   Philadelphia,   1796. 

2irm.) 

JK573.1796.A5 

602  [Letter]  to  John  Forsyth,  Jan.  31,  1816. 

(In  The  Writings  of  Albert  Gallatin,  ed.  by  Henry  Adams, 
v.   1,    p.   684-6S7.     Philadelphia,   1879.    25cm.) 

A  review  of  treaties  to  which  effect  was  given  by  legislative 
act.     Dwells  especially  on  the  Jay  treaty. 

E338.G16.V.1 

603  Gibbs,  George.     Memoirs  of  the  administrations  of  Washing- 

ton and  John  Adams,  ed.  from  the  papers  of  Oliver  Wol- 
cott,  secretary  of  the  Treasury. 
New  York,  Printed  for  the  subscribers  [W.  Van  Norden, 
printer]   1846.     2   v.   front,    {port.)     23rm. 

The  Jay  treaty:  v.  1,  p.  307-319. 
5-36490  E311.G44 

601  Giles,  William  B.     [On  the  constitutional  power  of  the  House 
with  respect  to  treaties.    March  7,  11,  and  31,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
treaties,    p.    6,    83-97,    364,    365,    369.     Philadelphia,    1796. 

2irm.) 

JK573.1796.A5 

605  Gt.  Brit.     Treaties,  etc.,  1760-1820   {George  III)      Treaty  of 

amity,  commerce,  and  navigation,  between  His  Britan- 
nick  Majesty  and  the  United  States  of  America,  signed  at 
London,  the  19th  of  November,  1794.  Published  by 
authority. 
Quebec,  Printed  by  command  of  the  governor  by  W.  Von- 
denvelden,  1796.  45  p.  24\cm.  (In  Gt.  Brit.  Laws, 
statutes,  etc.  A  collection  of  the  acts  .  .  .  relative  to 
Canada.     Quebec,  1800) 

"Explanatory  article";  p.  [41]-45. 
6-10401 

606  Griswold,  Roger.     [On  the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House 

with  respect  to  treaties.     March  10,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
treaties,  p.  56-63.     Philadelphia,  1796.    21£cm-) 

JK573.1796.A5 


126  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

GOT  [Hamilton,  Alexander]     Defence  of  Mr.  Jay's  treaty. 

(In  The  American  remembrancer.  Philadelphia.  1795-[96] 
21  rm.  v.  1.  p.  47-9S,  174-199.  253-287;  v.  2,  p.  1S-34, 
176-199;  v.  3,  p.  15-G3,  153-216,  238-275) 

Caption   title. 

In  38  parts;  signed:  Camillas. 

No.  1-22  pub.  separately,  New  York.  1795,  under  title:  A  de- 
fence of  the  treaty  of  amity,  commerce,  and  navigation,  en- 
tered into  between  the  United  States  of  America  &  Great 
Britain  .  .  .     139  p.  E314.H21 

"  Printed  originally  in  the  Minerva.  The  joint  work  of  Ham- 
ilton, King,  and  Jay." — P.  L.  Ford,  Bibl.  Hamiltoniana, 
18S6,  p.  47.  On  the  same  page  may  be  found  also  a  state- 
ment of  the  part  taken  by  each  writer  in  the  composition 
of  the  work. 
9-759  E311.A4S 

G08  ■ The  works  of  Alexander  Hamilton,  ed.  by  Henry  Cabot 

Lodge. 
New  York  &  London:  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1885-86.  9  v. 
£3icm. 

Defence  of  Mr.  Jay's  treaty.  "  Camillus,"  v.  4,  p.  309-524,  v.  5, 
p.  3-332;  Message  from  Washington  to  Congress,  in  reply  to 
a  call  for  papers  relating  to  the  treaty  with  Great  Britain, 
v.  7.  p.  11S-137  :  Power  of  the  House  of  Representatives  in 
case  of  a  treaty  discussed  in  letters  to  Washington,  William 
Smith,  Rufus  King,  and  Oliver  Wolcott,  v.  S,  p.  381-395. 
9-4588  E302.H23 

G09  Hunt,  Charles  Havens.     Life  of  Edward  Livingston. 

A'  w   York,  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1864-     xxiv,  4h%  p. 
incl.  front,     port.    23cm. 

Livingston  on  the  treaty-making  power:  p.  68  et  seq. 
13-14393  E302.6.L78H92 

610  Jefferson,  Thomas.     The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  .  .  . 
With  explanatory  notes.  .  .  .  by  the  ed.  H.  A.  Washing- 
ton.    Vol.  4. 
Washington,  D.  C,  Taylor  &  Maury,  1854.     vii,  (7),  597 
p.     23  \rm. 

Power  of  the  House  of  Representatives  in  treaties  discussed, 
p.   124,   125,   134   139;  Accuracy  of  the  President's  recollec- 
tion challenged,  p.  13G.     See  also  p.  120-122,  126,  127,  131, 
148,  465-46G;  and  v.  9,  p.  1SG-187,  lint  191. 
('  7150  E302.J464,v.4 

Gil The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  collected  and  ed.  by 

Paid  Leicester  Ford.    Vol.  7.     1795-1801. 
Nt  "'  York.  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1896.    xxv,  (1), 
501  p.     23\cm. 

Power  of  the  House  of  Representatives  over  treaties  dis- 
cussed, p.  40,  41,  59,  67-72;  Abstract  of  arguments  used  by 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  127 

John  Marshall,  p.  36-37 ;  Accuracy  of  the  President's  recol- 
lection challenged,  p.  70.     See  also,  p.  27-33,  38-42,  44,  58, 
62 ;  v.  1,  p.  273-274,  277-278,  and  v.  8,  p.  212. 
2-5666  E302.J466,v.7 

612  The  Jeffersonian  cyclopedia.  A  comprehensive  collec- 
tion of  the  views  of  Thomas  Jefferson  .  .  .  Ed.  by  John 
P.  Foley. 

New  York  and  London,  Funk  &  Wagnalls  company,  1900. 
xxii,  (2) ,  1009  p.     plates,     ports.    %5\cm. 

"  Jay  treaty,"  p.  436-438. 
0-4337  JK113.J4 

613  King,   Rufus.     The  life  and  correspondence  of  Rufus  King, 

comprising  his  letters,  private  and  official,  his  public  docu- 
ments, and  his  speeches.     Ed.  by  his  grandson  Charles 
R.  King. 
New  York,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1891^-1900.    6  v.    6  front, 
(v.  1-5:  ports.)     23\cm. 

See  on  Jay  treaty  in  the  House  of  Representatives:  v.  2,  p. 
39-43. 
C-246  E302.K54 

614  Lee,    Charles.     Attorney-general   to    Washington.      March   26, 

1796.  Expresses  the  opinion  that  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives has  not  the  right,  under  the  constitution,  to  de- 
mand and  obtain  the  papers  on  the  Jay  treaty  described 
in  its  resolution  of  March  24  without  the  consent  of  the 
President.    6  p. 

MS.  Library  of  Congress.  Letters  to  Washington,  vol.  117. 
Miscellaneous. 

615 Attorney  general  to  Washington.    March  29,  1796.    Has 

examined  the  journals  of  the  House  of  Representatives 
and  has  not  met  with  any  act  of  Washington's  adminis- 
tration that  contradicts  the  President's  opinion  relative  to 
the  right  of  the  House  to  participate  in  making  trea- 
ties.   1  p. 

MS.  Library  of  Congress.  Letters  to  Washington.  Vol.  117. 
Miscellaneous. 

616  Livingston,  Edward.  [On  the  constitutional  power  of  the 
House  with  respect  to  treaties,  March  7,  and  18,  1798.] 

(In  U.  S.  5th  Cong.  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
treaties,  p.  3,  4-5,  221-236.    Philadelphia,  1796.     2L}cm.) 

JK373.1796.A5 


128  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

617  [Livingston,  Robert  R.]     Observations  on  Mr.  Jay's  treaty. 

(In  The  American  remembrancer.  Philadelphia,  1795-[96] 
214cm.  v.  1.  p.  114-122,  147-174,  219-252;  v.  2,  p.  3-13;  v. 
3,  p.  63-07) 

Caption  title. 

In  16  parts ;  signed  :  <  Jato. 

Also  pub.  separately,  Now  York,  1795,  under  title:  Examina- 
tion of  the  treaty  of  amity,  commerce,  and  navigation,  be- 
tween the  rnited  Stales  and  Croat   Britain   .   .  . 

"The  authorship  of  this  pamphlet  has  been  ascribed  to  Hamil- 
ton, and  to  William  Smith:  but  in  a  letter  to  James  Monroe, 
Mr.  Livingston  states  that  he  has  replied  to  Camillus  'over 
my  old  signature — Cato.'  "• — P.  L.  Ford,  Bibl.  Hamiltoniana, 
1886,  p.  47. 
9-758  E311.A48 

618  Lyman,    Theodore.      The    diplomacy    of    the    United    States 

Being  an  account  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country, 
from  the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778  to  the  present 
time.     2d  ed. — with  additions. 
Boston,  Wells  and  Lilly,  1828.    2  v.    23cm. 

Treaty  of  1794  with  Great  Britain,  v.  1,  p.  154-208. 
4-2077?  JX1412.L9     1828 

610  McHenry,  James.  Secretary  of  war  to  Washington.  March 
26,  1796.  The  House  has  no  right  to  make  the  call  for 
papers  on  the  Jay  treaty  in  the  naked  form  it  appears  in. 
To  give  or  to  hold  the  papers  is  a  question  of  expediency. 
Form  of  answer  to  the  House  suggested,  setting  forth 
theory  of  treaty-making  power.     9  p. 

MS.  Library  of  Congress.  Letters  to  Washington.  Vol.  117. 
Miscellaneous. 

620  McMaster,  John  Bach.     A  history  of  the  people  of  the  United 

States,  from  the  Revolution  to  the  Civil  War.     Vol.  II. 
New  Toil-:  D.  Appleton  and  coin  pony,  [1900?  Copyright, 
1885.']     (2),xx,0oG  p.     fold.  map.    2?\cm. 

The  British  treaty  of  1794,  p.  189-307. 

E301.M16,v.2 

621  Madison,   James.      Letters    and    other    writings  .  .  .     Vol.    II. 

1791-1815. 
Philadelphia:  •/.  B.   Lippincott  d-  co.,  186-5.     xxxvii,  (1), 
017  p.     .'/"". 

Letters  to  Jefferson,  Dec.  L3  and  27,  17a",  Jan.  10  and  31, 
Feb.  29,  March  6  ami  L3,  April  4.  11.  is  and  23,  May  1,  9, 
ami  22,  L796,  )>.  63,  69-72,  75-76,  85  91,  94  95,  98-101, 
103-104;  Letters  to  .lam.--  Monroe,  Dec.  20,  17(.C>.  .Ian.  26, 
Feb.  J'--.  April  18,  May  II,  p.  c,|  67,  73,  82-83,  96-98,  101- 
102;  Letter  to  Edmund  Pendleton,  Feb.  7,  L796,  p.  77-78. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     129 

"  There  seem  at  present  strong  reasons  to  conclude  that  a 
majority  will  be  firm  in  the  doctrine  that  the  House  has  a 
Constitutional  right  to  refuse  to  pass  laws  for  executing  a 
Treaty,  and  that  the  Treaty  power  is  limited  by  the  enumer- 
ated powers." — Letter  to  Jefferson,  March  13,  1796,  p.  88. 

Exception  taken  to  the  President's  refusal  to  transmit  the 
papers  relating  to  the  Jay  treaty,  p.  89-90,  94. 
6-24330  E302.M18,v.a 

622  Madison,  James.     [On  the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House 

with  respect  to  treaties.     March  7,  10,  Apr.  6,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
treaties,  p.  15-16,  69-77,  375-385.  Philadelphia,  1796. 
2Ucm.)  JK573.1796.A5 

623  Marshall,  John.     The  life  of  George  Washington  .  .  .     Com- 

piled under  the  inspection  of  the  honourable  Bushrod 
Washington,    from    original   papers  bequeathed   to   him 
by  his  deceased  relative.     2d  ed.,  revised  and  corrected 
by  the  author. 
Philadelphia,  James  Crissy,  1832.    2  v.    22\cm. 

Debates  in  the  House  of  Representatives  on  the  Jay  treaty 
and  the  treaty -making  power,  v.  2,  p.  377-3S5. 
15-1321  E312.M35 

624  Meier,  Ernst,     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertragen. 

Leipzig,  Duncker  &  Humblot,  1874-.    xiii,  368  p.    23cm. 
Der  Handelsvertrag  mit  England ;   1794 :  p.  173-177. 
2-18652  JX4171.T5M4 

625  Muhlenberg-,    Frederick   Augustus.      [Report   on   the   treaty- 

making  power.] 

(In  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  [reprinted  ed.] 
4th  Congress,  1st  session,  April  7,  1796,  page  499.  Wash- 
ington, 1826.     S°.) 

626  Pickering1,   Timothy.     Secretary   of   State   to   the   President. 

March  29,  1796.  Letter  of  transmittal  to  the  President. 
1  page.  Accompanying  papers  as  follows:  Draught  of 
proposed  answer  to  the  House  of  Representatives,  with 
respect  to  its  call  for  the  papers  relating  to  the  negotia- 
tions with  Great  Britain,  and  in  discussion  of  the  treaty- 
making  power.  9  p.  Result  of  an  examination  of  Mr. 
Livingston's  speech  on  calling  for  the  papers  on  the  Jay 
treaty.    4  p. 

Ms.  Library  of  Congress.     Letters  to  Washington.     Vol.  117. 
Miscellaneous. 
137190°— 20 9 


130  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

627  Pitkin,  Timothy.     A  political  and  civil  history  of  the  United 

Mates  of  America,  from  the  year  1763  to  the  close  of  the 
administration  of  President  Washington,  in  March,  1797. 
New   Haven,  II.   Howe  and  Durrie  d-  Peck,   1828.    2  v. 
front,  {port.)     22\cm. 

The  Jay  treaty:  v.  2,  p.  442-478. 
2  5355  E302.1.P682 

628  Randolph,  Edmund.     The  British  treaty,  1795. 

American  historical  n  view,  Apr.  1907,  v.  12:  587-599. 

Documents  as  follows:  Randolph  to  the  President,  June  25, 
L795;  Memorandum  of  facts  to  be  recorded,  June  27,  1795; 
Memorandum;  Randolph  to  the  President,  July  12.  1895. 
The  Qrsl  three  documents  are  in  the  Library  of  Congress, 
in  Randolph's  handwriting;  the  fourth  is  from  a  copy  In 
the  Department  of  State,  Transcripts,  XXII,  184-201. 

E171.A57,v.l2 

629  [Opinion,  as  secretary  of  state,  on  the  constitutionality 

and  expediency  of  empowering  Mr.  Jay  to  conclude  a 
treaty  of  commerce  with  Great  Britain.  Submitted  May 
6,  1794.] 

(In  Conway,  Moncure  D.  Omitted  chapters  of  history  dis- 
closed in  the  life  and  papers  of  Edmund  Randolph,  p.  220- 
221.     New  York,  1888.     24Acm.)  E302.6.R18C7 

Holds  that  (1)  "to  permit  such  a  treaty  to  be  signed  by  Mr. 
Jay.  and  transmitted  Cor  ratification,  is  to  abridge  the  power 
of  the  senate  to  judge  of  its  merits;"  (2)  "if  he  be  per- 
mitted to  sign  a  treaty  of  commerce,  no  form  of  expression 
can  be  devised  to  be  inserted  in  it  which  will  not  be  tanta- 
mount to  a  stipulation  to  ratify;"  and  (3),  while  the  people 
of  the  United  States  desire  a  treaty,  "  no  man  can  under- 
take to  say  that  they  would  be  contented  with  one  or  two 
articles  only"  as  proposed  by  the  secretaries  of  the  Treasury 
and  War  Department. 

This  opinion  is  also  printed  in  the  Works  of  Alexander  Hamil- 
ton, ed.  by  J.  C.  Hamilton,  v.  4,  p.  549-550,  New  York,  1851. 
The  original  ms.  is  in  vol.  117.  Letters  to  Washington. 
Miscellaneous.    Library  of  Congress. 

630  [ 1     A  vindication  of  Mr.  Randolph's  resignation. 

Philadelphia,  Printed  by  8.  II.  Smith.  1795.    103  p.    21rm. 
The  British  treaty  :  p.  H7-98. 
9  8130  E311.R2 

631  Rankin,  Roberi    Ream.     The  treaty  of  amity,  commerce,  and 

navigation  between  Great  Britain  and  the  United  States, 
1794. 

(In   California.     University.     University  of  California  chroni- 
cle.    Berkeley,    1907.    28cm.    vol.    IX,   no.   2   suppl.    April, 
L907.     100  p.  Incl.  map.) 
Bibliography:  p.  88  90. 
14-9191  E314.B2 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN   RESPECT   TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  131 

632  Schouler,  James.     History  of  the  United  States  of  America, 

under  the  Constitution.     Rev.  ed.     Vol.  1.     1783-1801. 
New  York,  Dodd,  Mead  &  company,  \1891i\    xix,  (1),  54-1 
p.    Folded  map.    21\cm. 

E301.S372,v.l 
The  Jay  treaty,  p.  304-329. 

633  Sedgwick,    Theodore.     On    the   constitutional    powers   of   the 

House  with  respect  to  treaties.     [March  11  and  31,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     House.     Debates,  pt.  1.     Upon 

the    constitutional    powers    of   the   House,    with    respect   to 

treaties,   p.   97-114,   364,   3G6.     Philadelphia,   1796.     2Ucm.) 

JK573.1796.A5 

634  Treaty  of  amity,  commerce,  and  navigation,  between  His  Bri- 

tannic Majesty  and  the  United  States  of  America,  con- 
ditionally ratified  by  the  Senate  of  the  United  States,  at 
Philadelphia,  June  24,  1795.  To  which  is  annexed,  a 
copious  index. 
Philadelphia:  Printed  by  Henry  Tuckniss  for  Mathew 
Carey,  1795.    283  p.    16°. 

Same.  2d  ed.     Philadelphia:  Printed  by  Lang  &  TJs- 

tick,  for  Mathew  Carey,  1795.    190  p.    8°. 

Deals    more   with   the   expediency    of   the   treaty    than   with 
constitutional    considerations. 

635  Trescot,  William  Henry.     The  diplomatic  history  of  the  admin- 

istrations of  Washington  and  Adams,  1789-1801. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company,  1857.    x,  [2],  283  p. 

Negotiations  and  treaty  with  England :  p.  63-128. 
7_3221  E312.T79 

636  TJ.  S.     Congress.    Abridgment  of  the  Debates  of  Congress,  from 

1789  to  1856.     .     .     .     [Thomas  Hart  Benton] 
New    York,   D.   Appleton   and  company,   1857-61.    16   v. 
£6cm. 

The  treaty  with  Great  Britain,  v.  1,  p.  639-702 ;  Execution  of 
the  treaty  p.  702-754 ;  Message  of  the  president  declining  to 
send  papers,  p.  692-693. 
15-8704  J15.B4,v.l 

637  4th  Cong.  1st  sess.     The  debates  and  proceedings  in 

the    Congress    of    the    United    States.     .    .    .     Dec.    7, 
1795  to  June  1,  1796,  inclusive. 

Washington:  Gales  and  Sea-ton,  1849.    26cm.     (Annals  of 
Congress,  v.  5.) 

Treaty  with  Great  Britain,  col.  426-783.     See  also  col.  969, 
976  etc.,  for  the  debate  on  carrying  the  treaty  into  effect. 

J11.A5.V.5 


132  LIBRAE  Y   OF   CONGRESS 

638  U.  S.     4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  1795-1796.     House.     Debates  in  the 

House  of  representatives  of  the  United   States,  during 
the  first  session  of  the  Fourth  Congress. 
Philadelphia,  Printed  for  B.  F.  Bache,  by  Bioren  &  Ma- 
dan,  1796.    2  v.  in  1.    21\<=m. 

Contents. — pt.  1.  Upon  the  constitutional  powers  of  the 
House,  with  respect  to  treaties. — pt.  2.  Upon  the  subject 
of  the  British  treaty. 

The  debates  were  edited  by  Bache. 

"The  discussions  .  .  .  occupied  the  best  parts  of  March 
and  April,  1796.  They  were  divided  Into  two  distinct  de- 
bates, each  consuming  about  a  month.  The  first  began  on 
a  preliminary  resolution  offered  by  Mr.  Livingston,  calling 
on  the  president  to  lay  before  the  House  a  copy  of  the  in- 
structions to  Mr.  Jay,  together  with  the  correspondence  and 
other  documents  relative  to  the  treaty,  excepting  such  as 
any  existing  negotiation  might  render  improper  to  be  dis- 
closed, and  continued  after  that  resolution  had  passed  and 
the  President  had  refused  to  comply  with  it,  upon  further 
resolutions  brought  forward  by  Mr.  Blount  of  North  Caro- 
lina, protesting  against  the  refusal.  The  second  was  upon 
a  resolution  making  the  appropriation  for  carrying  the  treaty 
into  effect. 

"These  two  debates  brought  out  all  the  intellect  and  all  the 
eloquence  of  the  House.  ...  A  large  number  of  ora- 
tors, whose  names  oblivion  has  since  overcome,  vied  in 
wisdom,  temper  and  eloquence  with  such  men  as  James 
Madison,  William  B.  Giles,  Theodore  Sedgwick,  and  Fisher 
Ames.  The  celebrated  Bostonian  delivered,  on  this  occa- 
sion, what  is  known  as  his  greatest  speech.     .     .     . 

"The  members  took  sides  at  once,  [after  Mr.  Livingston  had 
brought  forward  his  resolution,]  and  spoke  alternately,  for 
and  against  the  resolution,  from  the  7th  till  the  24th  of 
March.  Gallatin,  Madison,  and  Giles  were  among  the 
earliest  and  most  strenuous  supporters  of  the  resolution; 
Sedgwick,  and  John  Williams  of  New  York,  were  conspicu- 
ous in  opposition  to  it."  .  .  .  — Hunt's  Life  of  Edward 
Livingston,  p.  67-69. 
9-26624  JK573.1796.A5 

639  Washington,  George.     The  writings  of  George  Washington; 

.  .  .  With   a   life   of  the  author,  notes  and  illustrations. 
By  Jared  Sparks.     [Vols.  XI  and  XII. "J 

Boston:  Russell,  Shot  tuck,  and  Williams,  [etc.]  1836-1837. 
£  v.     £6rm. 

The  British  treaty,  v.  11,  p.  31,  32,  42,  13,  1 1,  46,  IT.  r,o,  57, 
58,  71,  104,  481;  v.  12,  p.  58,  66,  211,  212,  213,  214;  Papers 
called  for  by  the  House  of  Representatives,  v.  11,  p.  115, 
121,  122,  123;  Message  to  the  Bouse  of  Representatives, 
March  BOth,  1790,  v.  12,  p.  L12-116. 
&-14'_'<»l  E312.7.1834,v.ll,12 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  133 

640  Washington,  George.     Writings  .  .  .  collected  and  edited  by 

Worthington  Chauncey  Ford.     Vol.  13.     1794-1798. 
New  York  and  London:  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1892.    xx, 
501  p.    23¥m. 

Message  to  the  House  of  Representatives  refusing  to  send 
the  papers  relating  to  the  Jay  treaty,  p.  177-180.  See 
also,  on  the  Jay  treaty,  p.  59,  153,  176,  188  and  208. 

The  message  from  Washington,  refusing  to  send  the  papers 
relating  to  the  Jay  treaty  to  the  House  of  Representatives 
is  also  printed  in  the  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representa- 
tives, 4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  p.  292-296;  in  American  State 
Papers,  Foreign  relations,  v.  1,  p.  550-551 ;  Waites'  State 
Papers  and  Publiek  Documents,  v.  2,  p.  102-105;  and  else- 
where. See  also  Lodge's  edition  of  Hamilton's  Works,  v.  7, 
p.  118-137. 
2-5665  E312.7.1889,v.l3 

641  Williams,  John.     [On  the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House 

with  respect  to  treaties.     March  21,  and  31,  1796.] 

(In  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  House.  Debates,  pt.  1.  Upon 
the  constitutional  powers  of  the  House,  with  respect  to 
treaties,  p.  236-246,  365-366.    Philadelphia,  1796.     21*cm.) 

JK373.1796.A5 

642  [Wolcott,  Oliver.]    To  the  president.    March  26, 1796.    [On  the 

right   of  the  House   of  Representatives   to   judge  of   a 
treaty,  etc.] 

(In  Gibbs,  George.  Memoirs  of  the  administrations  of  Wash- 
ington and  John  Adams,  v.  1,  p.  310-317.  New  York,  1S46. 
23cm.)  E311.G44 

1795— ALGIERS 

643  Jefferson,  Thomas.     The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson:  .  .  . 

With  explanatory  notes,  ...  by  the  editor  H.  A.  Wash- 
ington.    [Vols.  4  and  9] 
Washington,  Taylor  &  Maury,  1854-    2  v.    23\cm. 

The  treaty  with  Algiers  and  the  rights  of  the  House,  v.  4, 
p.  136-139 ;  v.  9,  p.  106-107,  114-115. 
6-7150  E302.J464,v.4,9 

644  The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  collected  and  edited 

by  Paul  Leicester  Ford.     [Vols.  1  and  7.] 

New  York,  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1892-1896.    2  v. 

23\™\ 

The  treaty  with  Algiers  and  the  rights  of  the  House,  v.  1, 
p.  183-184,  190-192;  v.  7,  p.  70-72. 
2-5CG6  E302.J466,v.l,7 


134  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

645  Lyman,  Theodore.     The  diplomacy  of  the  United  States.    Being 

an  account  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country,  from 

the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778,  to  the  present  time. 

2d  ed. — with  additions. 

Boston,  Wells  and  Lilly,  1S28.    2  v.    2J'»>. 

Algiers:  v.  2,  p.  352-380. 
4-20773  JX1412.L9     1828 

646  Trescot,  "William  Henry.     The  diplomatic  history  of  the  admin- 

istrations of  Washington  and  Adams,  1789-1801. 
Boston,  Little,  Brown  and  company,  18-57.    x,  [2],  283  p. 

21'"'. 

Relations  with  Algiers:  p.  208-274. 
7-3221  E312.T79 

647  U.  S.  4th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  Senate.     Algiers.     Report  from  the 

Committee  to  whom  was  referred  the  President's  mes- 
sage .  .  .  relative  to  our  affairs  with  the  Dey  and  regency 
of  Algiers.    Jan.  16,  1797. 

(In  American  §tate  papers.  Foreign  relations,  v.  1,  p.  538. 
Washington,  1832.)  J33 

On  the  provision  necessary  to  make  the  treaty  with  Algiers 
effective,  hi  V.  S.  Annals  of  Cm  tgross  (dales  &  Seaton)  v.  6, 
col.  1670-1671,1763-1767,1787,2245-2246;  Message  from  the 
President,  with  accompanying  papers  on  the  situation  of 
affairs  with  the  Dey  and  regency  of  Algiers,  Jan.  9,  1707,  v. 
6,  COl.  22:;.")  2245.  Ads  of  appropriation,  v.  G,  cols.  2S99.  2953. 
The  message  from  the  President  and  the  accompanying  pa- 
pers, referred  to  him,  are  also  given  in  American  state 
papers.     Foreign  relations,  v.  1,  p.  553-558.  J33 

648  Wharton,  Francis,  ed.     A  digest  of  the  international  law  of  the 

United  States.     2d  ed. 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1887.    3  v.    23\cm. 

Treaty  with  Algiers,  v.  2,  p.  79-80. 
10-6949  JX237.W5     1887,v.2 

1795— SPAIN 

6-49  Lyman,  Theodore.     The  diplomacy  of  the  United  States.    Being 
an  accounl  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country,  from 
Hie  f i  1st  treaty  with  France,  in  177s,  to  the  present  time. 
2d  ed.     with  addition-. 
Boston.  Wells  and  Lilly,  1828.    :  v.    Z3cm. 
Treaty  of  1795  with  Spain:  v.  1,  p.  21m  282. 
4-20773  JX1412.L9     1828 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT   TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  135 

650  Madison,  James.     Letters  and  other  writings.     Published  by 

order  of  Congress.    Vol.  2.     1794-1815. 
Philadelphia:  J.  B.  Lippincott  &  co.,  1865.     xxxvii,   {!), 
617  p.    24cm. 

Constitutionality  of  the   Spanish   treaty,   etc.     p.   73,   82,   85, 
86-87,  94. 
6-24330  E302.M18,v.2 

651  U.  S.  Ifth  Cong.    The  debates  and  proceedings  in  the  Congress 

of  the  United  States.     [Comprising  the  period  from  De- 
cember 7,  1795,  to  March  3,  1797,  inclusive.] 
Washington:  Gales  and  Seaton,  1849.    2  v.    26cm.     {Annals 
of  Congress,  v.  5,  6.) 

Act  for  making  the  Spanish  treaty  effective,  Annals,  v.  5,  cols. 
73,  74,  80,  S21,  940,  951,  976,  1025,  1094-1095,  1299;  Docu- 
ments, etc.,  relative  to  the  treaty,  v.  6,  cols.  2524-2560 ;  Copy 
of  the  treaty,  v.  6,  cols.  2561-2568 ;  Text  of  the  act  of  appro- 
priation, v.  6,  col.  2899. 

Jll.A5,v.5,6 

652  4th  Cong.,  1st  sess.    The  debates  and  proceedings  in  the 

Congress  of  the  United  States.     [Comprising  the  period 
from  December  7,  1795,  to  March  3,  1797,  inclusive.] 

Washington:  Gales  and  Seaton,  1840.    2  v.    26cm.    {Annals 
of  Congress,  v.  5,6.) 

Appropriation  to  carry  the  treaty  with  Algiers  into  effect, 
Annals,  v.  5,  cols.  80,  784-785,  940-969,  975-976,  1140;  v.  6, 
cols.  1570-1571. 

Jll.A5,v.5,6 
1803— FRANCE   (TREATY   OF  PARIS) 

653  Adams,  Henry.     History  of  the  United  States  of  America,  dur- 

ing the  first  administration  of  Thomas  Jefferson. 
New  York,  C.  Scribner's  sons,  1889.    2  v.    double  maps. 
19cm.    [His  History  of  the  United  States  of  America,    v. 
1-2] 

The  Louisiana  treaty :  v.  2,  p.  25-115. 
7-32890  E301.A21 

654  Barbe-Marbois,  Francois,  marquis  de.     The  history  of  Loui- 

siana, particularly  of  the  cession  of  that  colony  to  the 
United  States  of  America;  with  an  introductory  essay 
on  the  Constitution  and  government  of  the  United  States.- 
Tr.  from  the  French  by  an  American  citizen. 
Philadelphia,  Carey  &  Lea,  1830.  xviii  p.,  1  I.,  [17~\~455, 
[1]  p.    22\cm. 

W.  B.  Lawrence,  translator. 

Constitutional  considerations :  p.  322-325. 

"  The  President,  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate, 
concludes  treaties  which  are  declared  by  the  constitution  to 


136  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

be  the  supreme  law  of  the  land ;  but  where  an  appropriation 
of  money  is  required,  it  is  necessary  to  pass  an  act  of  Con- 
press,  in  which  the  House  of  Representatives  must  of  course 
concur.  In  such  cases,  however,  it  has  been  supposed  that 
the  national  faith  is  pledged  to  enact  the  laws  proper  to 
carry  the  treaties  Into  effect." — Translator's  note,  p.  825. 
1-8732  F369.B24 

655  Cession  of  Louisiana.     The  various  legislative  acts  to  complete 

the  cession  of  Louisiana  occasioned  debates  in  which  the 
treaty  making  power  was  discussed.  A  resolution  was  in- 
troduced in  the  House  of  Representatives,  Jan.  4,  1803, 
asking  for  "  copies  of  such  oflicial  documents  as  have  been 
received  by  this  Government,"  and  was  discussed  by  John 
Randolph,  Roger  Griswold,  Calvin  Goddard,  Samuel  W. 
Dana,  Benjamin  Huger. 

(In  U.  S.  Annals  of  Congress  (Gales  &  Seaton),  v.  12,  col.  312, 
314-324,  325-338,  352-368.) 

Jll.A5,v.l2 

656  A  resolution  was  introduced  in  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives, Oct.  24,  1803.  asking  for  "  a  copy  of  the  treaty 
between  the  French  Republic  and  Spain.*'  with  copies  of 
such  other  documents,  (ending  to  ascertain  whether,  the 
United  State-  have  acquired  any  title  to  the  province  of 
Louisiana.  This  was  discussed  by  Roger  Griswold,  John 
Randolph.  Calvin  Goddard,  John  Smilie,  Joseph  H. 
Nicholson,  &  Samuel  L.  Mitchell. 

{In   U.   S.  Annals  of  Congress,    (Gales  &  Seaton),  v.  13  col. 
385   11!'.) 

Jll.A5,v.l3 

657  The  bill  for  carrying  into  effect  the  treaty  by  appro- 
priation of  thirteen  millions  was  discussed  in  the  House. 
Oct.  1803,  by  John  Randolph.  Roger  Griswold,  Samuel  D. 
Purviance,  James  Elliot,  Samuel  Thatcher.  Caesar  A. 
Rodney.  Samuel   L.   .Mitchell,  and  Joseph  H.  Nicholson. 

(/»  U.  s.  Annuls  of  Congress,   (Gales  &  Seaton),  v.   13,  col. 
432    189,  497  515,  545  549.) 

Jll.A5,v.l3 

658  The  bill  passed  by  the  House,  Oct.  26,  1803,  appropri- 
ating $13,000,000  for  the  purpose  of  carrying  into  effect 
the  Louisiana  treaty,  was  discussed  in  the  Senate.  Nov. 
1803,  by  Samuel  White,  William  Hill  Wells.  George 
Jackson,  Roberl  Wright.  Timothy  Pickering.  Jonathan 
Dayton,  .John  Taylor,  Uriah  Tracy,  John  Breckenridge, 
AYilsou  Carey  Nicholas,  and  William  Cocke. 

(///    I'.   S.   Annals  of  Congress,    (Gales  >S:    Seaton),   v.    13,  col. 
35  74.) 

Jll.A5,v.l3 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  137 

659  Cooley,  Thomas  Mclntyre.     The  acquisition  of  Louisiana. 

Indianapolis,  The  Bow  en-Merrill  company,  1887.  [63]-93 
p.  24\cm.  {Indiana  historical  society.  Publications,  vol. 
ii,  no  3) 

'An   address   delivered  before  the   Indiana   historical   society, 
February  16,  1887.     Originally  issued  as  no.  3  of  the  Indi- 
ana historical  society  pamphlets. 
5-5635  F521.I41 

660  Edwards,  P.  L.     Congress  and  the  Constitution.    Precedent  of 

the  Louisiana  purchase. 
Albany  law  journal,  Apr.  1902,  v.  64 :  112-124. 

661  Elliot,  Jonathan.     The  debates  in  the  several  state  conventions, 

on  the  adoption  of  the  Federal  Constitution,  as  recom- 
mended by  the  general  convention  at  Philadelphia,  in 
1787.     Vol.  4,  2d  ed.,  with  considerable  additions. 
Washington:  Printed  for  the  editor,  1836.    xii,  639p.  24cm. 

"  Louisiana    treaty,"   p.   448-451.    Discussions   in   the   House 
of  Representatives. 

JK141     1836,v.4 

662  Jefferson,  Thomas.     The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson:  .  .  . 

With  explanatory  notes,  ...  by  the  ed.  H.  A.  Washington. 
[V.  4,  8.] 
Washington,  Taylor  &  Maury,  1854,.    %  v-    23\cm. 

Constitutionality  of  the  acquisition  of  Louisiana,  discussed 
in  letters  to  Breckinridge,  Madison,  Lincoln,  and  Nicholas, 
v.  4,  p.  498-507.  Appended  to  the  letter  to  Madison  (Aug. 
25,  1803)  is  a  proposed  amendment  to  the  Constitution  for 
the  acquisition  of  Louisiana  and  Florida.  Cession  of 
Louisiana  discussed  in  Jefferson's  third  annual  message, 
v.  8,  p.  24. 
6-7150  E302.J464,v.4.8 

663 The  writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson  collected  and  ed.  by 

Paul  Leicester  Ford.     Vol.  8,  1801-1806. 

New  York,  London,  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1897.     xxiv,  501). 
p.    23\cm. 

Letter  to  John  Dickinson,  Aug.  9,  1803,  touching  on  the  con- 
stitutional   difficulties    in    the    way    of    the    acquisition    of 
Louisiana,  p.  261-263.     Acquisition  discussed  in  Jefferson's 
third  annual  message,  p.  268-269. 
2-5666  E302.J466,v.8 

664 [Letter]  to  Gallatin.     Aug.  23,  1803. 

(In  The  writings  of  Albert  Gallatin,  ed.  by  Henry  Adams,  v. 

1,   p.  144-145.     Philadelphia,   1879.     25cm.) 
Gives  proposed   amendments  to   the  Constitution   for  the  ac- 
quisition of  Louisiana  and  Florida. 

E338.G16,v.l 


138  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

665  Lyman,  Theodore.     The  diplomacy  of  the  United  States.     Be- 

ing  an  account  of  the  foreign  relations  of  the  country 
from  the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778,  to  the  present 
time.     2d  ed.  with  additions. 

Boston:  Writs  and  Lilly,  1828.     2  v.    23™. 

Cession  of  Louisiana,  v.  1,  p.  367— 405 ;  Claim  under  eighth 
article   of  treaty    of  Louisiana,    v.   2,   p.    177-190. 

JK1412.L9     1828 

666  McMaster,  John  Bach.     A  history  of  the  people  of  the  United 

States,  from  the  Revolution  to  the  Civil  War.     Vol.  III. 
New    York:  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1802.     (2),  xvii, 
{l),584p.    22Vm. 

Jefferson's  proposals  to  amend  the  Constitution  regarding 
Louisiana,  p.  1-3 ;  Debate  on  right  to  call  for  treaty  papers, 
p.  3-6;  Arguments  by  Griswold  against  the  constitutionality 
of  the  treaty  with  France,  p.  6-8 ;  Pickering's  "partner- 
ship" theory,  p.  8-9;  Constitutional  principles  settled,  p.  9. 

E301.M16,v.3 

667  Meier,  Ernst.     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertragen. 

L<  ipzig,  Duncher  &  Humblot,  187 J+.    xiii,  368  p.    23cm. 

Der  Vertrag  mit  Frankreich  iiber  die  Abtretung  von  Louisiana 
von  30  April  1803:  p.  178. 
2-18652  JX4171.T5M4 

668  Miller,  Samuel  Freeman.     Lectures  on  the  Constitution  of  the 

United  States. 
New  York  and  Albany:  Banks  and  brothers,  1893.     xxi, 
765  p.    2//'\ 

"The  acquisition  of  Louisiana,"  p.  128-132. 
2-19694  JK241.M66 

669  Nicholas,  W.  C.     Letter  to  Jefferson.     Warren,  Sept.  3,  1803. 

On  the  power  of  the  Government  to  acquire  territory  and 
admit  new  states.    4  p.    4°. 

Ms.    Department  of  State.    Series  2,  v.  63,  no.  47. 

670  Schouler,  James.     History  of  the  United  States  of  America, 

under  the  Constitution.     Rev.  ed.     Vol.  2.     1801-1817. 
New    York,   Dodd,   Mead  &   company,    [1894]     xvii,    (1), 
627  p.    21\rm. 

"The  Louisiana   purchase,"  p.  49-59. 

E301.S372,v.2 

671  Sparks,  Jared.     The  life  of  Gouverneur  Morris,  with  selections 

from  his  correspondence  and  miscellaneous  papers     .  .  . 
Boston:  Gray  <(■  Bowen,  1832.    3  v.    23cm. 

Morris  on  the  acquisition  of  Louisiana,  v.  3,  p.  183,  185,  203. 

E302.6.M7S7 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT   TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  139 

672  Story,    Joseph.      Commentaries    on    the    Constitution    of    the 

United  States — with  a  preliminary  review  of  the  consti- 
tutional  history   of   the   colonies   and   states   before   the 
adoption  of  the  Constitution.     5th  ed.,  by  Melville  M. 
Bigelow. 
Boston,   Little,   Brown,   and   company,   1005,   1801.    2   v. 

Purchase   of    Louisiana,    v.    1,    p.    17,   386 ;    v.    2,   p.    172-175, 
199-200. 
S-27554  JK211.S72 

673  U.  S.     Congress.     Abridgment  of  the  Debates  of  Congress,  from 

1789  to  1856  .  .  .  [Thomas  Hart  Benton] 
New  York,  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1857-61.     16v.     26cm. 

Louisiana  treaty  in  the  Senate :  v.  3,  p.  9-20 ;  in  the  House : 
p.  52-57,  Gl-72. 
15-8701  J15.B4,v.3 

674  8th  Cong.    The  debates  and  proceedings  in  the  Congress 

of  the  United  States.  October  17,  1803,  to  March  3,  1805, 
inclusive. 

Washington:  Gales  and  Seaton,  1852.     26cm.     (Annals  of 
Congress,  v.  13.) 

The  Louisiana  treaty,  in  the  Senate,  cols.  31-73,  105-106,  213; 
In  the  House,  cols.  3S2-420,  432-189,  497-515,  545-550.  Con- 
stitutional principles  involved  are  considered  in  the  general 
range  of  the  discussion. 

Jll.A5,v.l3 

675  8th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     Message,  transmitting  conventions 

with  France  for  the  cession  of  Louisiana,  and  the  liquida- 
tion of  certain  claims  of  American  citizens ;  together  with 
documents  connected  therewith.    Oct.  21,  1803. 

(In  American  state  papers.  Foreign  relations,  v.  2,  p.  506-583. 
Washington,  1832.     F°.)  j33 

676  Dept  of  state.    State  papers  and  correspondence  bearing 

upon  the  purchase  of  the  territory  of  Louisiana. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1003.     200  p.     23cm.     {57th 
Cong.,  2d  sess.     House.     Doc.  no.  431) 

3-15294  E333.U55 

677  Treaties,  etc.,  1801-1800  (Jefferson) .    Message  from  the. 

President  of  the  United  States,  inclosing  a  treaty  and  con- 
ventions, entered  into  and  ratified  by  the  United  States  of 
America  and  the  French  republic,  relative  to  the  cession  of 
Louisana.  22d  October,  1803.  Read  and  referred  to  a 
committee  of  the  whole  House  on  Monday  next. 

{Washington,  1803.]    18  p.    22cm, 

11-27276  E333.U563 


140  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

G78  TJ.  S.     Treaties,  etc.,  1801-1809  {Jefferson).    Treaty  and  con- 
ventions, entered  into  and  ratified  by  the  United  States 
of  America  and  the  French  republic  relative  to  the  cession 
of  Louisiana. 
[Washington?  1803]     16  p.    21i/m. 

5-4559  E333.U56 

679  Webster,    Sidney.     Two   treaties   of  Paris   and   the   Supreme 
court. 
New  York  and  London,  Harper  &  brother,  1901.   2  p.  L,  132, 
[1]  p.     19y»\ 

1-26558  JV568.1901.W4 

1815— GREAT  BRITAIN 

G80  Calhoun,  John  C.  Speech  on  the  bill  to  regulate  the  commerce 
between  the  United  States  and  Great  Britain,  according 
t<»  the  convention  of  the  3d  of  July,  1815;  delivered  in  the 
House  of  Representatives,  January  9th,  1816. 

(In   Ms  Works,  v.  2,  p.  123-135.     New  York,  1856.     23cm.) 

E337.8.C136,v.2 
An  argument  as  to  the  limits  of  the  treaty-making  power. 
"Whatever,  then,  concerns  our  foreign  relations;  whatever 
requires  the  consent  of  another  nation,  belongs  to  the  treaty- 
making  power,  and  can  only  he  regulated  by  it:  and  it  is 
competent  to  regulate  all  such  subjects,  provided  [and  here 
are  its  true  limits]  such  regulations  are  not  inconsistent 
with  the  constitution.  IT  so,  they  arc  void.  No  treaty  can 
alter  the  fabric  of  our  government,  nor  can  it  do  that 
which  the  constitution  has  expressly  forbidden  to  be  done; 
nor  can  it  do  that  differently  which  is  directed  to  be  done 
in  a  given  mode— all  other  modes  being  prohibited."  ...  p. 
132-1:;::. 

681  Elliot,  Jonathan.     The  debates  in  the  several  state  conventions, 

on  the  adoption  of  the  Federal  Constitution,  as  recom- 
mended  by  the  general    convention   at  Philadelphia,  in 
1787.    Vol.  4,  2d  ed..  with  considerable  additions. 
Washington:  Printed  for  the  editor,  1836.     xii,  639  p.    21fm. 
"  On  the  commercial  treaty  with  Great  Britain,"  p.  462^167. 
Discussions  in  the  House  of  Representatives. 

JK141     1836,v.4 

682  Lyman,    Theodore.      The    diplomacy    of    the    United    States. 

Being  an  account  of  the   foreign  relations  of  the  country 

from  the  first  treaty  with  France,  in  1778,  to  the  present 

time.     2d   ed.   with   additions. 

Boston:   Wells  and  Lilly,  1828.    2  v.    23cm. 

Commercial   convention  of  1815   with   Great  Britain,  v.  2,   p. 
59  7.1. 

4-20773  JX1412.L9     1828 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  141 

683.  Meier,  Ernst.     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertragen. 

"  Leipzig,  Duncker  &  Humblot,  1871    xiii,  368  p.    23™. 
See  p.  179-180. 
2-18652  JX4171.T5M4 

684  Pinkney,  William.     Speech  ...  on  the  treaty-making  power, 

delivered  in  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United 
States,  January  10,  1816. 

(In  American  oratory,  p.  303-319.     Philadelphia,  1836.     8°.) 

685  Same. 

(In  Wheaton  Henry.  Some  account  of  the  life,  writings,  and 
speeches  of  William  Pinkney,  p.  517-549.  New  York,  1826. 
2Ucm.) 

On  the  British  convention  of  1815. 

E302.P65 

686  Same. 

(In  Pinkney,  William.     The  life  of  William  Pinkney,  by  his 

nephew,  p.  337-361.     New  York,  1853.     23icm.) 

1  E302.6.P6P6 

687  U.  S.     Congress.     Abridgment  of  the  Debates  of  Congress,  from 

1789  to  1856.     By  [Thomas  Hart  Benton] 
New  York  D.  Appleton  and  company,  1857-61.    16  v.    26™. 

Commerce  with  Great  Britain. 
Treaty-making  power:  v.  5,  p.  446-460,  492-546. 
15-8704  J15.B4,v.3 

688  nth  Cong.,  1st  sess.    The  debates  and  proceedings  in 

the  Congress  of  the  United  States  .  .  .  Dec.  4,  1815,  to 
April  30,  1816,  inclusive. 
Washington:    Gales   &    Seaton,   1851    26™.     (Annals    of 
Congress,  v.  29.)  JU.A5,v.29 

Bill  concerning  the  convention  to  regulate  the  commerce  be- 
tween the  territories  of  the  United   States   and   His  Bri- 
tannic Majesty,  reported  in  the  Senate,  cols.  36-37;  passed, 
col    40;   in  House,  col.  546;  Laid  on  the  table,  col.  608; 
Twice  read  and  referred  to  a  committee  of  the  whole,  cols. 
719-7^0  •  Passed  by  the  House  with  amendments,  col.  898; 
Returned  to  Senate  from  House,  with  amendments,  and  re- 
ferred  col.  126 ;  Senate  disagrees  to  amendments,  cols.  130- 
131  •  Conference  asked  and  agreed  upon,  cols.  134,  136,  960, 
979-    Reports    of   Senate   managers,    cols.   160-161;    Report 
of  House  managers,  cols.  1018-1023;   House  recedes,  cols. 
1057-1058.     House  bill   to  regulate   commerce,   twice   read, 
cols  419-420 ;  Discussed  by  House  and  laid  on  the  table,  col. 
471  •  Ordered  to  a  third  reading,  col.  545 ;  Read  a  third  time 
and' passed,  col.  674;  in  Senate,  cols.  43,  44,  45,  46-89;  Fails 
of  a  third  reading,  col.  89;  Message    to    House,    col.    <19. 


142  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

Message  from  the  President  transmitting  proclamation, 
cols.  29.  402.  Copy  of  the  British  convention,  together  with 
papers  and  documents,  cols.  1477-1506.  Discussion  of 
treaty-making  power,  etc.,  in  Senate,  by  Mr.  James  Barbour, 
cols.  46-57;  by  Fromentin,  cols.  57-65;  by  Mr.  Roberts,  cols. 
65-74;  by  Mr.  Macon,  cols.  74-79;  by  Mr.  Campbell,  cols. 
79-S9.  Discussions  in  the  Bouse,  by  Mr.  Forsyth,  cols. 
473-47S,  593-594,  605,  652-671;  by  Mr.  Philip  P.  Barbour, 
cols.  47S-482;  by  Mr.  Gold,  coVs.  482-485,  594;  by  Mr.  Bop- 
kinson,  cols.  485-489,  639-651;  by  Mr.  Gaston,  cols.  489- 
492;  by  Mr.  Throop,  cols.  492  494;  by  Mr.  Gholson,  cols. 
522-525;  by  Mr.  Calhoun,  cols.  526  533,  cor.;  by  Mr.  Ran- 
dolph, cols.  533-538,  579-59(1.  591  ;  by  Mr.  King,  cols.  538- 
539;  by  Mr.  Mills,  cols.  539-542;  by  Mr.  Reynolds,  cols.  542- 
543;  by  Mr.  Hardin,  cols.  513-545;  by  Mr.  Easton,  cols.  540- 
554;  by  Mr.  Cuthbert,  cols.  554-557;  by  Mr.  Tucker,  cols. 
557-564;  by  Mr.  Pinkney,  cols.  504-579.  590-591;  by  Mr. 
Pickering,  cols.  594-595,  612-010;  by  Mr.  Root,  col.  595;  by 
Mr.  Robertson,  cols.  595-599;  by  Mr.  Wright,  cols.  599-G04; 
by  Mr.  Lowndes,  cols.  004-605;  by  Mr.  Hanson,  cols.  005- 
608;  by  Mr.  Stanford,  cols.  008-011;  by  Mr.  Taylor,  cols. 
610-023 ;  by  Mr.  Wilde,  cols.  023-631 ;  by  Mr.  Sheffey,  cols. 
631-639;  by  Mr.  Buger,  cols.  072-074;  by  Mr.  Lyon,  cols. 
884-897. 

689  U.  S.  l.'fth  Cong.,  1st  sess.  Report  from  the  conferees  of  the 
Senate,  upon  the  bill  entitled  "  An  act  concerning  the  con- 
vention to  regulate  the  commerce  between  the  territories 
of  the  United  States  and  his  Britannic  majesty.  Febru- 
ary 27,  1816.  3  p.  8°.  (14th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  Ex.  doc. 
no.  54.) 

"  Tbe  conferees  of  the  Senate  did  not  contest,  but  admitted 
tbe  doctrine,  that  of  treaties  made  in  pursuance  of  the 
Constitution,  some  may  not,  and  that  others  may  call  for 
legislative  provisions  to  secure  their  execution,  which  pro- 
vision Congress,  in  all  such  cases,  is  bound  to  make.  But 
they  did  contend  that  the  convention  under  consideration 
requires  no  such  legislative  provisions,  because  it  does  no 
more  than  suspend  the  alien  disability  of  British  subjects 
in  commercial  affairs,  in  return  for  the  like  suspension  in 
favour  of  American  citizens;  that  such  matter  of  alien 
disability  falls  within  the  peculiar  province  of  the  treaty- 
power  to  adjust;  that  it  cannot  be  securely  adjusted  in  any 
other  way,  and  that  a  treaty  duly  made,  and  adjusting 
the  same,  is  conclusive,  and  by  its  own  authority  suspends 
or  removes  antecedent  laws  that  are  contrary  to  its  pro- 
visions."    Report  presented  by  Rufus  King. 

690 Report  of  the  committee  appointed  on  the  part 

of  the  House  of  Representatives  to  confer  with  the  com- 
mittee on  the  part  of  the  Senate,  on  the  disagreeing  votes 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     143 

of  the  two  Houses,  upon  the  bill,  concerning  the  conven- 
tion to  regulate  the  commerce  between  the  Territories  of 
the  United  States,  and  his  Britannic  majesty.  February 
19,  1816.  9  p.  8°.  (14th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  Ex.  doc.  no. 
52.) 

"They  are  persuaded,  that  the  House  of  Representatives 
does  not  assert,  the  pretension  that  no  treaty  can  be  made 
without  their  assent;  nor  do  they  contend  that  in  all  cases 
legislative  aid  is  indispensably  necessary,  either  to  give 
validity  to  a  treaty,  or  to  carry  it  into  execution.  On  the 
contrary,  they  are  believed  to  admit,  that  to  some,  nay 
many  treaties,  no  legislative  sanction  is  required,  no  legis- 
lative aid  is  necessary.  ..."  For  if,  as  has  been  stated, 
the  House  of  Representatives  contend  that  their  aid  is 
only  in  some  cases  necessary,  and  if  the  Senate  admit 
that  in  some  cases  it  is  necessary,  the  inference  is  irresist- 
ible, that  the  only  question  in  each  case  that  presents  itself, 
is  whether  it  be  one  of  the  cases  in  which  legislative  pro- 
vision is  requisite  for  preserving  the  national  faith,  or  not." 
Report  presented  by  John  Forsyth. 

1817— GREAT  BRITAIN 

691  Boutell,  Henry  Sherman.     Is  the  Rush-Bagot  convention  im- 

mortal ? 
North  American  review,  /Sept.  1901,  v.  173:  331-348. 

AP2.N7,v.l73 

692  [Naval  armament  upon  the  Great  Lakes.    Remarks  in 

the  House  of  Representatives,  Jan.  24,  1901] 

(In  Congressional  record,  56th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  34,  pt.  2, 
Jan.  24,  1901,  p.  1392-1408.) 

Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2 
Pp.  1393-140S  contain  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  9,  52d  Cong.,  2d  sess. 

Serial  no.  3055 

693  Callahan,   James   Morton.    The   neutrality   of   the  American 

lakes  and  Anglo-American  relations. 
Baltimore,  The  Johns  Hopkins  press,  1898.     199  p.    24cm. 
(Johns  Hopkins  university  studies  in  historical  and  po- 
litical science  .  .  .    series  xvi,  no.  1-4) 

Agreement  of  1817:  p.  59-90.  H31.J6 

1-10120  JX1423.C3 

694  The  northern  lake  frontier  during  the  civil  war. 

(I)i  American  historical  association.  Annual  report  for  the 
year  1896,  v.  1,  p.  335-359.     Washington,  1897.     8°.) 

Substantially  reproduced  in  the  author's  work,  "  The  neu- 
trality of  the  American  lakes  and  Anglo-American  rela- 
tions," 1898. 

E172.A60    1896,  v.l 


144  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

G95  [Foster,  John  Watson]     Limitation  of  armament  on  the  Great 
Lakes. 
Washington^  D.  C,  The  Endowment,  1911+.     1  p.  I.,  vii,  57 
p.     %lf,\cm.     {Carnegie  endowment  for  international  peace. 
Division  of  international  law.     Pamphlet  no.  2) 

"  Report  of  the  Honorable  John  W.  Foster,  secretary  of  state, 
in  response  to  Senate  resolution  of  April  11,  1892,  relative 
to  the  agreement  [April  28-29,  1817]  between  the  United 
States  ;ind  Great  Britain  concerning  the  naval  forces  to  be 
maintained  on  the  Great  Lakes." 
"Transmitted  to  the  Senate,  Dec.  7,  1892,  by  President  Har- 
rison, and  printed  in  Sen.  Ex.  doc,  no.  9,  52d  Cong.,  2d  sess." 
14-20283  JX1906.A3    no.2 

JX1423.F7 

696  Hunt,  Harry  E.     Attacking  the  Rush-Bagot  treaty. 

Independent,  Apr.  28,  1910,  v.  68:  911-913. 

AP2.I53,v.68 

697  Levermore,    Charles    Herbert.      The    Anglo-American    agree- 

ment of  1817  for  disarmament  on  the  Great  Lakes. 
Boston,     World    peace    foundation,    1914-.     28    p.    20\cm. 
(World  peace  foundation.    Pamphlet  series  .  .  .  vol.  iv, 
no.  Jf) 

14-177  17  JX1908.U5    vol.4,no.4 

698  Mann,  James   R.     [Naval  armament  upon   the   Great  Lakes. 

Remarks  in  the  House  of  Representatives,  Jan.  24,  1901.] 

(In   Congressional  record,  5Gth  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  34,  pt.  2, 
p.  1392.) 

Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2 

699  Scammell,  E.  H.     The  Rush-Bagot  agreement  of  1817. 

Ontario  historical  society.     Papers,  1915,  v.  13:  58-66. 

F1056.058,v.l3 

700  Smith,  William   Alden.      [Naval   armament   upon    the   Great 

Lakes.  Remarks  in  the  House  of  Representatives.  Jan. 
24,  1901.1 

(In  Congressional  record,  5Gth  Cong.  2d  sess.  v.  34,  pt.  2,  p. 
1391-1392.) 

Jll.R5,v.34,pt.2 

701  Sumner,  Charles.     Termination  of  treaties  by  notice.    Remarks 

in  the  Senate,  on  a  joint  resolution  to  terminate  the  treaty 
of  L81T  regulating  the  naval  force  on  the  Lakes,  January 
18,  I  B65. 

(In  his  Works,  vol.  9.  p.  201-205,  Boston,  1874.     8°) 

E415.6.S93,v.9 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  145 

702  U.  S.     15th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     Great  Britain — Naval  armament  on 

the  lakes.  Communicated  to  the  Senate,  April  6,  1818. 
[Message  from  President  Monroe,  with  accompanying 
papers.] 

(In   American  state  papers.     Foreign  relations,  v.  4,  p.  202- 

207.     Washington.  1834.  F°.) 
Comprises,  besides  the  President's  message,  the  correspondence 

between  the  United  States  and  Great  Britain  with  respect  to 

the  naval  armament  of  the  two  governments  on  the  lakes. 

and  the  stipulations  agreed  upon  by  the  two  parties. 

J33 

703  38th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     The  Congressional  Globe. 

Washington:  Congressional  Globe  office,  1864.    4  V^8'    b°- 

House  joint  resolution  no.  91  "  in  relation  to  the  treaty  of 
1817,"  introduced  in  House,  p.  2909,  and  passed  by  that 
body,  p.  3084 ;  Received  in  the  Senate,  p.  3086,  and  referred 
to  the  committee  on  foreign  relations,  p.  3088. 

Subject  of  naval  force  on  the  lakes  discussed  in  connection 
with  the  proposed  abrogation  of  the  Canadian  reciprocity 
treaty,  pp.  2481-2483. 

704  38th  Cong.,  2d  sess.     The  Congressional  Globe. 

Washington:  The  Congressional  Globe  office,  1865.    2  pts. 

Senate  resolution  calling  for  information  on  the  arrangement 
relating  to  the  naval  force  on  the  lakes,  p.  44 ;  House  joint 
resolution  no.  91  reported  in  the  Senate,  with  amendment, 
p.  292 ;  Discussed  by  Messrs.  Davis,  Sumner,  Johnson,  Wil- 
son, Saulsbury,  Farwell,  p.  311-315;  Passed,  p.  315;  Re- 
ceived in  House,  from  Senate,  p.  337 ;  Referred  to  com- 
mittee on  foreign  affairs,  p.  348 ;  House  concurs  in  Senate 
amendment,  p.  596;  Resolution  signed  by  the  President, 
p.  688.  The  text  of  the  resolution  is  given  in  United  States 
Statutes  at  Large,  v.  13,  p.  568. 

705  Deft,  of  state.    Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 

States,  communicating,  in  answer  to  a  resolution  of  the 
Senate  of  the  15th  of  December,  1864,  a  report  from  the 
secretary  of  state,  relative  to  an  arrangement  between  the 
United  States  and  Great  Britain,  relating  to  the  naval  force 
to  be  maintained  upon  the  American  lakes.     Jan.  9,  1865. 

[Washington,  1865.]      1  p.     23cm.      (38th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  6.)  Serial  no.  1209 

Makes  reference  to  American  State  Papers,  Foreign  rela- 
tions, v.  4,  p.  202-207. 

137190°—  20 10 


146  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

TOG  U.  S.  Dept.  of  .state.  Me— age  from  the  President  of  the 
United  States,  in  response  to  Senate  resolution  of  April 
11,  1892,  relative  to  the  agreement  between  t  he  United 
States  and  Great  Britain  concerning  the  naval  forces  to 
be  maintained  on  the  great  lakes.  Dec.  7,  1892. 
{Washington,  1892].  59  p.  23cm.  (52d  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  9.)  Serial  no.  3055 

Known  as  Adee's  report. 
A  report  by  the  Secretary  of  State,  John  W.  Foster,  on  the 
Senate  resolution  "that  the  Secretary  of  State  be,  and  he  is 
hereby,  directed  to  inform  the  Senate  whether  the  agree- 
ment entered  into  between  the  United  States  and  Great 
Britain  in  the  year  eighteen  hundred  and  seventeen,  cov- 
ering the  question  of  the  naval  force  to  be  maintained  by 
the  two  governments  on  the  Great  Lakes  of  the  United 
Slates,  is  now  held  to  be  in  force  by  the  Department  of 
Siate,  and  what,  if  any.  action  has  been  taken  by  our  Gov- 
ernment to  revive  or  put  in  force  the  terms  of  said  agree- 
ment, and  if  so,  under  what  authority  or  action  on  the 
part  of  our  Government  such  agreement  has  been  held  to  be 
in  force  since  the  giving  of  the  required  formal  notice  by 
the  President  to  Great  Britain  in  December,  eighteen  hun- 
dred and  sixty-four,  of  a  desire  on  the  part  of  the  United 
Stales  to  annul  said  agreement  at  the  expiration  of  the 
six  months  from*  the  date  of  said  formal  notice,  and  the 
ratification  of  said  notice  by  the  act  of  Congress  of  Feb- 
ruary ninth,  eighteen  hundred  and  sixty-five." 
Gives  a  history  of  the  agreement  of  1S17  from  the  outset,  and 
of  the  circumstances  which  prompted  the  steps  in  1865  to 
terminate  it  and  afterwards  to  withdraw  the  notice  of 
termination.  Papers  and  correspondence  on  the  subject  are 
appended,  including  the  note  of  Mr.  Seward,  dated  Aug.  5, 
1864,  in  reply  to  Lord  Lyons,  on  the  motion  in  Congress  to 
abrogate  the  arrangement  of  1817. 

707 Papers  relating  to  foreign  affairs.  [1864.  pt.  2; 

1865,  pts.  1  and  2.] 
Washington:  Government  printing  office,  1865-1866.    3  v. 
23cm. 

Also  appear  as  House  ex.  doc.  no.  1,  pt.  2.  3Sth  Cong.,  2d 
sess.,  Eouse  ex.  doc.  no.  1,  pts.  1,  2,  39th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

Correspondence  relating  to  armed  vessels  on  the  great  lakes. 
1864,  pt.  2,  p.  329,  338,  340,  343,  344,  595,  668,  715,  716,  717, 
729,  739;  L865,  pt.  1,  p.  5,  164,  184,  L97;  L865,  pt.  2,  p.  17.  IS, 
43,  174,  175,  192,  195,  196.  Arrangement  of  1817  remains  in 
In  force,  1S65,  pt.  2.  p.  192. 

For  note  Of  Mr.  Seward,  dated  Aug.  5,  1864,  iii  reply  to  Lord 
Lyons,  on  the  motion  in  Congress  to  abrogate  the  arrange- 
ment of  1817,  see  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  9,  52d  Cong.,  2d  sess., 
p.  43. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  147 

708  U.   S.  Navy  deft.    War  steamers — Northwestern  lakes.     Let- 

ter from  the  secretary  of  the  navy,  transmitting  the  in- 
formation required  by  the  resolution  of  the  12th  instant, 
in  relation  to  the  construction  of  steamers  or  other  ves- 
sels for  the  defence  of  the  northwestern  lakes.  April  20, 
1842. 
[Washington,  18J$.]  2  p.  23cm.  (27th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
House  Ex.  doc.  no.  199.)  Serial  no.  404 

Reports  that  communications  of  value,  though  not  entirely 
conclusive,  have  been  received  on  the  construction  of 
steamers  on  the  northwestern  lakes,  under  the  appropriation 
of  Sept.  9,  1841. 

709  President.    Message  of  the  President  of  the  United 

States  at  the  commencement  of  the  first  session,  of  the  fif- 
teenth congress.  Communicated  to  Congress,  December 
2,  1817. 

(In  American  state  papers.  Foreign  relations,  v.  4,  p.  129- 
132.     Washington,  1834.     F°.) 

Notes,  among  other  things,  the  conclusion  of  the  arrange- 
ment for  the  reduction  of  the  naval  forces  on  the  lakes,  and 
gives  provisions  of  the  arrangement. 

J33 

710 Message    from    the    President   of   the    United 

States,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the  Senate  in 
relation  to  the  military  and  naval  preparations  of  the 
British  authorities  on  the  northern  frontier  of  the  United 
States.  June  29,  1840. 
[Washington,  1840.~]  4.  p.  23cm.  (26th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
/Senate  Doc.  no.  592.)  Serial  no  361 

See  also  House  ex.  doc.  no.  245,  26th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

Serial  no  369 

711 British  naval  armament  on  the  lakes.    Message 

from  the  President  of  the  United  States,  transmitting 
the  information  required  by  the  resolution  of  the  House 
of  Eepresentatives  of  the  9th  instant,  relative  to  the 
present  British  naval  armament  on  the  lakes,  &c,  &c. 
March  28,  1840. 
[Washington,  1840.]  4  p.  23cm.  (26th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
House  Ex.  doc.  no.  245.)  Serial  no.  366 

The  resolution  of  the  House  requested  the  President  to  com- 
municate to  that  body  "  if  compatible  with  the  public 
service,  whether  the  Government  of  Great  Britain  had  ex- 
pressed to  the  Government  of  the  United  States  a  desire  to 
annul  the  arrangement  entered  into  between  the  two  Gov- 


148  LIBRARY   OF    CONGRESS 

erninents,  in  the  month  of  April,  1S17,  respecting  the  naval 
force  to  be  maintained  upon  the  American  lakes;  and,  if 
said  arrangement  he  not  annulled,  whether  there  has  been 
any  violation  of  the  same  by  the  authorities  of  Great 
Britain." 

712  IT.  S.  President.  Military  preparation — Northeastern  frontier. 
Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States,  trans- 
mitting the  information  required  by  the  resolution  of  the 
House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States  of  the  6th 
of  April  last,  respecting  the  military  preparation  of 
Great  Britain  on  the  northern  and  northeastern  frontier 
of  the  United  States,  &c.  June  29,  1840. 
[Washington,  1840.]  4  V-  ^rm-  {%6th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
House  Ex.  doc.  no.  2.'/j.)  Serial  no.  369 

Also  notes  the  naval  armaments  on  the  Great  Lakes.  (See 
Senate  doc.  no.  592,  2Gth  Cong.,  1st  sess.) 

713 Naval   force  on   the  lakes.     Message  from  the 

President  of  the  United  States,  in  reply  to  the  resolution 
of  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  9th  of  March  last, 
respecting  the  arrangement  entered  into  with  the  govern- 
ment of  Great  Britain  upon  the  subject  of  the  naval  force 
to  be  maintained  upon  the  American  lakes.  &c.  June 
29,  1840. 
[  Washington,  18Jt0.~\  3  p.  %Bcm.  (26th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
IIun.se  Ex.  doc.  no.  2^6.)  Serial  no.  369 

Contains  the  report  of  the  major  general  commanding  the 
army,  giving  the  replies  of  several  officers  who  had  been 
written  to  on  the  subject. 

714 Message  to  the  two  houses  of  Congress  at  the 

commencement  of  the  second  session  of  the  thirty-eighth 
Congress.    Dec.  6,  1861. 

(/»  C.  S.  38th  Cong.,  2d  sess.  House.  Ex.  doc.  no.  1,  pt.  1, 
>'•  i"14-)  Serial  no.  1216 

.  .  .  "  it  has  been  thoughl  proper  to  give  notice  that  after  the 
expiration  of  six  months,  the  period  conditionally  stipulated 
in  the  existing  arrangement  with  Great  Britain,  the  United 
States  must  hold  themselves  .-it  liberty  to  increase  their 
naval  armament  upon  the  lakes,  If  they  shall  find  th;it  pro- 
( eeding  necessary,"  p.  5. 

715  Waultrin,  Rene.  fitats-Unis  d'Amcrique  el  Grande  Bretagne — 
Le  traite  Rush  Bagot,  (1817),  concernant  le  nombre  des 
batiments  armes  a  entretenir  sur  les  Grands-Lacs,  et  son 
application. 

Ri  >■'!'    generah    d<    droit    inU  mational   public,   Sept.-Oct. 

J.''//,  v.  18:683  586,  jx3.R56,v.is 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     149 

71G  Wehberg,  Hans.     Les  traites  sur  la  limitation  des  armements. 
Revue  politique  Internationale,  no.  29,  October,  1917. 

Section  I. — Grande  Bretagne  et  Etats-Unis;  Traite  de  Rush- 
Bagot,  28  avril  1S27. 

717  Wild,  Robert.     The  Rush-Bagot  convention. 

(In  State  bar  association  of  Wisconsin.     Report,  1915.     Mil- 
waukee, 1916.     23§on'.     p.  100-111.) 

1818— GREAT  BRITAIN 

718  Anderson,  Chandler  P.     The  final  outcome  of  the  fisheries  ar- 

bitration. 
American  journal  of  international   law,  Jan.  1913,  v.   7: 
1-16.  JX1.A6.V.7 

719  Hodgins,  Thomas.     The  prerogative  right  of  revoking  treaty 

privileges  to  alien  subjects. 
Canadian  law  times,  Feb.  1909,  v.  29:  105-129. 

720 Same.    2d  ed. 

Toronto,  The  Carswell  company,  limited  [etc.]  1909.    27  p. 
inch  map.    22\cm. 

"  From  the  Nineteenth  century  and  after." 
12-18177  JX238.N69     1909 

Reviewed  by  Amos  S.  Hershey  in  American  journal  of  inter- 
national law,  v.  4,  1910:  770. 

721  McGrath,  P.  T.     The  Atlantic  fisheries  dispute. 

American  review  of  reviews,  June,  1910,  v.  41  •'  718-724. 

AP2.R4,v.41 

722  The  Newfoundland  fishery  dispute. 

North  American  review,  Dec.  7, 1906,  v.  183:  1134-1143. 

AP2.N7,v.l83 

723  Morine,  Alfred  B.     Newfoundland  and  her  fishing  rights. 

Canada  law  journal,  Dec,  1906,  v.  42:  737-741. 

On  the  dispute  between  Newfoundland,  England  and  the 
United  States  as  to  fisheries  under  the  treaty  of  1818.  Shows 
that  Newfoundland  places  a  narrow  interpretation  on  the 
words  of  the  treaty  and  holds  that  "  the  colonial  government 
should  maintain  the  spirit  of  Imperial  promises  even  at  great 
sacrifice." 

724 The  Newfoundland  fisheries'  dispute. 

Canadian  law  review,  Nov.  1906,  v.  5:  414~4^- 


150  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

725  U.  S.      Congress.     Senate.      Committee   on   foreign   relations. 

Mr.  Edmunds,  .  .  .  Report  (executive  no.  3)  on  the  treaty 
(Ex.  M.)  between  the  United  States  and  Great  Britain, 
concerning  the  interpretation  of  the  convention  of  Octo- 
ber 20,  1818,  signed  at  Washington,  February  15,  1888; 
which  together  with  the  view  of  the  minority  on  the  same 
subject,  submitted  by  Mr.  Morgan,  was  ordered  to  be 
printed  in  confidence  for  the  use  of  the  Senate.  May  7, 
1888. 
[Washington.  1SS8.]  165  p.  23cm.  (50th  Cong.  1st  sess. 
/Senate.    Misc.  doc.  no.  109.)  Serial  no.  2517 

Incorporated  is  a  protest  (page  36)  against  the  claim  "  that 
the  Senate,  without  whose  advice  and  consent  no  treaty  can 
be  concluded,  has  no  right  to  be  informed,  confidentially,  of 
the  course  of  negotiations  and  discussions  and  the  various 
propositions  and  arguments  pro  and  con  arising  in  the 
negotiation  of  a  treaty."  The  minority  discuss  the  objection 
(page  39)  that  the  treaty  of  February  15,  1S88  was  "nego- 
tiated and  signed  by  persons  who  were  not  duly  empowered, 
under  the  Constitution  and  laws  of  the  United  States,  to 
conduct  and  conclude  a  treaty,"  and  with  reference  to  the 
fact  that  two  of  the  plenipotentiaries  concerned  had  acted 
without  a  confirmation  by  the  Senate,  give,  on  pp.  110-134, 
"  a  statement  of  the  persons  employed  by  the  United  States, 
in  conducting  negotiations,  since  1789,"  of  whom  "  the  whole 
number  of  persons  appointed  or  recognized  by  the  Presi- 
dent, without  the  concurrence  or  advice  of  the  Senate  or 
the  express  authority  of  Congress,  as  agents  to  conduct  nego- 
tiations and  conclude  treaties  is  four  hundred  and  thirty- 
eight,"  (page  103) 

1819— SPAIN 

726  Clay,  Henry.     On  the  Spanish  treaty.     In  the  House  of  Repre- 

sentatives, April  3,  1820. 

(In  his  Speeches,  ed.  by  Calvin  Colton,  v.  1,  p.  205-217.    New 

York,  1857.) 
"  Has   the   House  of  Representatives  a   right   to   express   its 

opinion  upon  the  arrangement  made  In  that  treaty?"     p.  211 

et  seq. 

727  Onis,  Luis  de.     Memoir  upon  the  negotiations  between  Spain 

and  the  United  States  of  America,  which  led  to  the  treaty 
of  1819.  With  a  statistical  notice  of  that  country.  Ac- 
companied with  an  appendix,  containing  important  docu- 
ments for  the  better  illustration  of  the  subject.  Tr.  from 
the  Spanish,  with  notes,  by  Tobias  Watkins. 
Baltimore,  V .  Lucas,  jimr.,  1821.    152  p.    20\cm. 

11-27007  F314.0585 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  151 

728  Onis,  Luis  de.     Memoria  sobre  las  negociaciones  entre  Espana  y 

los  Estados-Unidos  de  America,  que  dieron  motivo  al 
tratado  de  1819.  Con  una  noticia  sobre  la  estadistica  de 
aquel  pais.  Acompana  un  Apendice,  que  contiene  docu- 
mentos  importantes  para  mayor  ilustracion  del  asunto. 
Madrid,  Impr.  de  D.  M.  de  Burgos,  1820.  2  v.  fold.  map. 
%7cm. 

9-25896  F314.058 

1826— DENMARK 

729  [Gushing,  Caleb.]     Claim  of  the  U.  States  on  Denmark. 

Boston  monthly  magazine,  Jan.,  1826,  v.  1:  p.  393-403. 

AP2.B81,v.l 

730  [McDermott,  Hugh  Farrar]     Letters  on  the  Sound-dues-ques- 

tion,    i-vii. 
New  York,  G.  B.  Teubner,  printer,  1855.    vi,  73,   [i]  p. 
22\cm. 

Signed:  "Pax." 
9-349S0  HE386.S7M2 

731  Schuyler,  Eugene.     American  diplomacy  and  the  furtherance 

of  commerce. 
New  York,  C.  Scribner's  sons,  1886.    xiv,  469  p.    21\™. 
The  Sound  dues:  p.  306-316. 
10-16533  JX1407.S3 

732  Sumner,  Charles.    The  abrogation  of  treaties.    Speeches  in  the 

Senate,  March  6  and  May  8,  1856. 

(In  his  Works,     v.  4,  p.  98-120.     Boston,  1871.     20icm.) 

E415.6.S93,v.4 

■ Same. 

(In  Charles  Sumner,  His  complete  works,  Statesman  ed.  v.  5, 
p.  98-120.     Boston,  1900.     23cm.)  E415.6.S95,v.5 

On  the  abrogation  of  the  Danish  convention  of  April  26,  1826. 
Maintains  that  the  power  of  abrogation  belongs  to  the  law- 
making power  and  is  to  be  exercised  only  by  act  of  Congress. 

733  TJ.  S.     34th  Cong.    1st  and  2d  sess.    The  Congressional  Globe. 

[vol.  32.] 
Washington:  Printed  at  the  office  of  John  G.  Rives,  1856. 

3  pts.    4°- 

Resolution  in  the  Senate  relating  to  the  sufficiency  of  the 
notice  for  the  termination  of  the  treaty  with  Denmark,  of 
April  26,  1826,  concerning  the  Danish  Sound  dues,  p.  528, 
599,  826,  1003,  1132,  1173,  1202,  1203,  1700.  Remarks  were 
made  by  Messrs.  Bayard,  Benjamin,  Brodhead,  Cass,  Clay- 
ton, Collamer,  Crittenden,  Fessenden,  Foot,  fllile,  Johnson, 
Jones  of  Iowa,  Mallory,  Mason,  Seward,  Stuart,  Sumner, 
Toombs,  Toucey,  Wade,  and  Weller. 


152  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

734  TJ.  S.     Congress.      Senate.     Committee    on    foreign    relations. 

[Report  .  .  .  on  the  Senate  resolution,  ''Resolved,  That  the 
Committee  on  Foreign  Relations  be  directed  to  consider 
the  expediency  of  sonic  act  of  legislation,  having  the  con- 
currence of  both  houses  of  Congress,  by  which  the  treaty 
with  Denmark,  regulating  the  payment  of  Sound  dues, 
may  be  effectively  abrogated,  in  conformity  with  the  re- 
quirements of  the  Constitution,  under  which  every  treaty 
is  a  part  of  'the  supreme  law  of  the  land,'  and  in  con- 
formity with  the  practice  of  the  government  in  such  cases; 
ami  especially  to  consider  whether  there  be  any  defect  in 
the  notice  which  has  been  given,  which  such  legislation 
may  be  necessary  to  remedy."]  April  7,  185G. 
Senate.     Report  no.  97.)  Serial  no.  836 

"And  whether  it  be  competent,  or  not,  to  the  President  and 
Senate,  as  the  treaty  making  power  to  abrogate  treaties 
where  no  such  right  is  reserved,  (a  question  not  neces- 
sary to  be  brought  into  discussion  here.)  the  committee  en- 
tertain no  doubt  that  where  the  right  to  terminate  a  treaty 
at  discretion  is  reserved  in  the  treaty  itself,  such  discretion 
resides  in  the  President  and  Senate,"  p.  4. 

The  committee  recommended  the  adoption  of  the  following 
resolution:  "Resolved,  That  the  notice  which  has  been  given 
by  the  President  to  Denmark,  pursuant  to  the  resolution  of 
the  Senate  of  March  3,  1855,  to  terminate  the  treaty  with 
that  power  of  the  26th  of  April,  in  the  year  1826,  is  suf- 
ficient to  cause  such  treaty  to  terminate  and  be  annulled  to 
all  intents  whatsoever,  pursuant  to  the  eleventh  article 
thereof;  and  that  no  other  or  further  act  of  legislation  is 
necessary,  to  put  an  end  to  said  treaty,  as  part  of  the  law 
of  the  land,"  p.  8. 

735  Dept.  of  state.     Sound  dues  upon  American  commerce 

to  the  Baltic.  Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 
States,  transmitting  correspondence  in  relation  to  the 
imposition  of  "  Sound  dues  "  upon  our  commerce  to  the 
Baltic.     June  13,  1854. 

[Washington,  185b.~]     61   p.   23cm.     {33d  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

Home.      Ex.  dor.  Il0.  108.)  Serial  no.  726 

736  Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States,  trans- 
mitting a  copy  <>f  a  convention  between  the  United  State-, 
and  His  Majesty  the  king  of  Denmark  for  the  discon- 
tinuance  of   the   Sound   due-.     Jan.    14.    1858. 

[Washington,   1858.]     3  p.    28™,     {30th   Cong.,   1st  sess. 

Si  note.      Ex.  doc.  no.  28.)  Serial  no.  924 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  153 

737  U.  S.     Dept.  of  state.     Sound  dues.    Letter  from  the  Secretary 

of  state  enclosing  letters  calling  attention  to  the  necessity 
of  an  appropriation  to  meet  the  interest  on  the  sum  stipu- 
lated to  be  paid  to  Denmark  for  the  discontinuance  of 
the  Sound   dues.     Jan.  21,  1858. 
[Washington,  1858.]     2  p.    23em.     {35th   Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House.      Ex.  doc.  no.  36.)  Serial  no.  955 

738  Webster,  Daniel.    Sound  dues  at  Elsinore,  and  the  German  Zoll- 

Verein.     Mr.  Webster  to  the  President  of  the  United  States. 
May  24,  1841. 

(In  his  Works,  v.  6,  p.  406-414.    Boston,  1854.    22icm.) 

E337.8.W24      1854,v.6 

.    Same. 

(In  his  Writings  and  speeches.     National  ed.,  v.  12,  p.  80-88. 
Boston,  1903.     25cm.)  E337.8.W24      1903,v.l2 

Briefly  states  the  history  and  facts  relating  to  the  sound  dues 
at  Elsinore  in  order  that,  if  it  be  deemed  expedient, 
"  instructions  may  be  given  to  the  representative  of  the  United 
States  at  Denmark,  to  enter  into  friendly  negotiations  with 
that  government,  with  a  view  of  securing  to  the  commerce 
of  the  United  States  a  full  participation." 

1831— FRANCE 

739  The  Annual  register,  or  a  view  of  the  history,  politics,  and 

literature,  of  the  year  1834. 
London,   Printed   for   Baldwin   and   Cradock,   1835.     viii, 
4?1,  (1),400,  Up.    %3"\ 

Bill  for  satisfying  the  claims  of  the  United  States  against 
France  rejected  by  the  Chamber  of  Deputies,  pt.  1,  p.  357- 
361.  D2.A7    1834 

740  Everett,  Edward.     Eemarks  on  the   French   question,   in  the 

House  of  representatives  ...  on  the  7th  of  February  and 

2d  of  March,  1835.     With  the  reports  of  the  majority  and 

minority  of  the  Committee  of  foreign  affairs,  on  the  same 

subject. 
Boston,  Nathan  Hale,  1835.    31  p.  24cm. 

10-16829  JX238.F75     1835g 

741  Meier,  Ernst,     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertragen. 

Leipzig,  Duncher  &  Humblot,  1874.     viii,  368  p.     23cm. 

See  p.  179-180. 
2-18652  JX4171.T5M4 


154  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

742  Treaties  in  the  House. 

Nation,  Dec.  18, 188b,  v.  39: 516-517.  AP2.N2,v.39 

Includes  citation  from  a  letter  by  Wheaton  on  the  French 
treaty. 

743  U.  S.     Congress.     Report  of  the  commissioners  under  the  act 

to  carry  into  effect  the  late  treaty  with  France,  with  a 

statement  of  the  claims  examined  by  them.     June  7,  1834. 

[Washington,  183 If.']      91   p.     23cm.     23d  Gong.,  1st  sess. 

Senate.     Doc.   Jfl7.)  Serial  no.  242 

744  23d  Cong.,  2d  sess.     Register  of  debates  in  Congress. 

Vol.  II. 

Washington:  Gales  and  Seaton,  1835.    2  pts.     4°. 

Relations  with  France  discussed  in  the  Senate,  cols.  45,  104- 
108. 

Discussed  in  the  House,  cols.  763-778,  795-796,  1129,  1515-1524, 
1531-1565,  1570-1634,  Remarks  by  Mr.  Clayton,  cols.  764-769, 
775-776, 1595-1599 ;  Mr.  Claiborne,  cols.  769-771 ;  Mr.  Wayne, 
cols.  772-774;  Mr.  Archer,  cols.  774-775,  1537-1545;  Mr.  R. 
M.  Johnson,  cols.  776-777;  Mr.  J.  Q.  Adams,  cols.  1532-1537, 
1622-1630;  Mr.  Pickens,  cols.  1545-1554;  Mr.  Bouldin,  cols. 
1554-1558 ;  Mr.  Cambreleng,  cols.  1531-1532,  1558-1561 ;  Mr. 
Burses,  cols.  1561-1562;  Mr.  Coulter,  cols.  1562-1565;  Mr. 
E.  Everett,  cols.  1571-1577;  Mr.  Allen,  cols.  1577-1590;  Mr. 
Love,  col.  1590;  Mr.  Moore,  cols.  1590-1594;  Mr.  Sutherland, 
cols.  1594-1595 ;  Mr.  Robertson,  cols,  1600-1606 ;  Mr.  Binney, 
cols.  1606-1615 ;  Mr.  Schley,  cols.  1615-1617 ;  Mr.  Watmough, 
cols.  1618-1619;  Mr.  Beardsley,  cols.  1620-1621;  Mr.  Hardin, 
cols.  1030-1631;  Mr.  Chilton,  cols.  1631-1632. 

The  resolutions  adopted  by  the  House  (see  cols.  1633-1634) 
read  as  follows : 

"  Resolved,  That,  in  the  opinion  of  this  House,  the  treaty  of 
the  4th  of  July,  1831,  should  be  maintained,  and  its  execu- 
tion insisted  on. 

"Resolved,  That  the  Committee  on  Foreign  Affairs  be  dis- 
charged from  the  further  consideration  of  so  much  of  the 
President's  message  as  relates  to  commercial  restrictions, 
or  to  reprisals  on  the  commerce  of  France. 

"  Resolved,  That  preparation  ought  to  me  made  to  meet  any 
emergency  growing  out  of  our  relations  with  France." 

Papers,  documents  and  correspondence  on  relations  with 
France  are  given  in  the  Appendix,  (in  pt.  2)  p.  2-5,  108- 
144,  104-109,  177-185,  208-219,  271-277. 

715  Congress.  House.  Committee  on  foreign  affairs.  Re- 
lations with  France.  Report  [from]  the  Committee  on 
foreign  affairs,  to  which  was  referred  so  much  of  the 
President's   message   as  concerns  our  political   relations 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  155 

with  France,  and  the  correspondence  between  the  minis- 
ters of  the  two  governments.    Feb.  27, 1835. 
[Washington,  1835.']     21   p.     23cm.     {23d  Gong.,  2d  sess. 
House  Reft.  no.  133.)  Serial  no.  276 

Includes  resolutions  submitted  to  the  House  by  the  majority 
of  the  Committee,  views  of  the  minority  of  the  committee, 
and  resolutions  offered  by  Mr.  Adams  as  follows: 

1.  "Resolved,  That  the  rights  of  the  citizens  of  the  United 
States  to  indemnity  from  the  Government  of  France,  stipu- 
lated by  the  treaty  concluded  at  Paris  on  the  4th  of  July, 
1831,  ought,  in  no  event,  to  be  sacrificed,  abandoned,  or  im- 
paired, by  any  consent  or  acquiescence  of  the  Government  of 
the  United  States. 

2.  "  Resolved,  That  if  it  be,  in  the  opinion  of  the  President  of 
the  United  States,  compatible  with  the  honor  and  interest 
of  the  United  States,  during  the  interval,  until  the  next  ses- 
sion of  Congress,  to  resume  the  negotiations  between  the 
United  States  and  France,  he  be  requested  so  to  do. 

3.  "Resolved,  That  no  legislative  measure  of  a  hostile  char- 
acter or  tendency  towards  the  French  nation  is  necessary  or 
expedient  at  this  time." 

746  Senate.    Committee  on  foreign  relations.    Report  [by 

Mr.  Clay]  from  the  committee  on  foreign  relations,  March 
3,  1835. 

[Washington,  1835."]    4  p.    23cm.    (23d  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Sen- 
ate.   DOC.  no.  150.)  Serial  no.  269 
On  the  President's  message  of  Feb.  25,  1835. 

747  Dept.  of  state.     Relations  with  France.    Message  from 

the  President  of  the  United  States,  transmitting  copies 
of  letters  received  from  Mr.  Livingston  since  the  date  of 
his  message  of  the  6th  instant,  with  his  instructions  and 
correspondence  with  the  French  government.  Feb.  25, 
1835. 

[Washington,  1835.]     U  p.     23™.     (23d   Cong.,  2d  sess. 

House  Ex.  doc.  no.  174.)  Serial  no.  274 

Also  printed  as  Senate  doc.  no.  145,  23d  Cong.,  2d  sess. 

Serial  no.  269 

743 Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the  Senate,  transmitting 

certain  documents  relating  to  the  state  of  affairs  with 

France.    Feb.  15,  1836. 

[Washington,  1836.]     89  p.    23cm.     (2kth  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

Senate.     Doc.  no.  161.)  Serial  no-  289 

Discussion  in  the  Chamber  of  Peers  respecting  the  convention 

of  1831,  p.  4-26. 


1  5G  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

749  IT.  S.     Dept  of  state.     Relations  with   France,  and  duties  on 

silk-  and  wines.  Message  from  the  President  of  the 
United  States,  transmitting  reports  from  the  secretary  of 
state,  secretary  of  the  treasury;  the  former  relating  to  the 
relations  with  France,  and  the  latter  to  duties  on  wines 
and  silks  imported  since  4th  July.  1831.  Feb.  18,  1836. 
[Washington,  1836.]     121  p.    23™.     {24th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

H0US(    Ex.  doc.  110.  117.)  Serial  no.   289 

750 President.     Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 

States,  to  the  two  houses  of  Congress,  at  the  commence- 
ment of  the  second  session  of  the  twenty-third  Congress. 
Dec.  2,  1834. 

[  Washington,  1834.]     543  p.     Fold,   diagr.     23cm.     (23d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.    House  Ex.  doc.  no.  2.)  serial  no.  286 

Affairs  with  France,  p.  6-12. 

Appended  (p.  39.3-543)  is  a  translation  from  the  Paris  Mom- 
mar,  by  order  of  the  Secretary  of  State  of  the  United  States, 
of  the  "  Proceedings  and  discussions  in  the  French  Chamher 
of  Deputies,  on  the  subject  of  the  treaty  between  France 
and  the  United  States,  which  was  signed  at  Paris  <>n  the 
4th  of  July.  1831,  and  the  ratifications  of  which  were  ex- 
changed at  Washington  on  the  2d  of  February,  1832;  from 
the  first  presentation  of  the  treaty,  on  the  6th  of  April,  1833, 
to  the  refusal  to  carry  it  into  effect  on  the  2d  of  April,  1834." 

751  French  treaty.     Message  from  the  President 

of  the  United  States,  in  relation  to  the  late  treaty  with 
France.    Feb.  G.  1835. 

[Washington,  1835.]     5  p.    23cm.      (23d    Cong.,    2d    sess. 

House  Ex.  doc.  no.  136.)  Serial  no.  274 

752  Wharton,  Francis.     A  digest  of  the  international  law  of  the 

the  United  States.     2d  ed. 
Washington:  Govt,  print,  off .,  1887 .    3  v.    23\cm. 

Refusal  of  the  French  Chamber  to  make  the  appropriations, 
v.  1,  p.  36,  v.  3,  p.  88-97.  JX237.W5     1887 

1832— RUSSIA 

753  American  Jewish  year  book.     The  passport  question  in  Con- 

gas: reprint  from  the  American  Jewish  year  book  5670. 
[Philadelphia,  Tin  Jewish  publication  society  of  America, 
1909?]     cover-title,  p.  [21]-43.    19™. 

14-10834  JX4253.E8A6 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  157 

754  American  Jewish  year  book.     The  passport  question;  reprint 

from  the  American  Jewish  year  book  5672. 
New  York,  The  American  Jewish  committee,  101 1,     cover- 
title,-  a,  no  p.   i9cm. 

16-24683  JX4253.R8A63 

755  Egert,    B.    P.     The   conflict    between    the   United    States   and 

Russia. 
8t.  Petersburg,  1012.    50  p.    %lcm. 

14-17900  JX1428.R8E45 

756  Henriques,  H.  S.  Q.     The  Russian  passport  system;  religious 

disabilities  of  foreigners. 
Law  magazine  and  review,  May,  1014,  v.  SO:  320-326. 

757  L'incident    russo-americain   relatif    aux    passeports    des   Juifs 

russes  emigres  et  naturalises  aux  Etats-Unis. 
Journal  clu  droit  international  prive,  1012,  v.  39:  150-168. 

JX6002.J5,v.39 

758  Kuhn,  Arthur  Kline.     International  law  and  the  discrimina- 

tions practiced  by  Russia  under  the  Treaty  of  1832. 
[Washington,  D.  C,  Press  of  B.  S.  Adams,  1911]     10  p. 

23cm. 

"  Prepared    by    request   for   the   Board   of  delegates   on   civil 
rights  of  the  Union  of  American  Hebrew  congregations  and 
the  Independent  order  of  B'nai  B'rith." 
12-0996  JX1428.R8K8 

759  Marshall,  Louis.     Russia  and  the  American  passport.    Address 

...  to  the  delegates  at  the  twenty-second  council  Union 
of  American  Hebrew  congregations,  Thursday,  January 
10,  1911,  together  with  resolution  unanimously  adopted. 
[New  York,  1011]     16  p.    23h_cm. 

Issued  also  as  U.  S.  Senate  doc.  839,  61st  Cong.,  3d  sess. 
11-5507  JX4253.R8M2 

760  The  passport  question  between  the  United  States  and  Russia. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1012,  v.  6: 
186-191.  JXl.A6,v.6 

On  abrogating  the  Treaty  of  1832. 

761  Sulzer,  William.     The  Russian  passport  question.     Speech  in 

the  House  of  representath'es,  December  13,  1911. 
[Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911]  8  p.     24-cm. 

ca  12-855  JX4253.R8S8 


158  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

702  U.  S.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on  foreign  affairs.    The 
abrogation  of  the  Russian  treaty.     Report   <to  accom- 
pany H.  J.  res.  166. > 
[Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911]   U  p.     23$cm.     (62d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.     House.     Rept.  179) 
Submitted  by  Mr.  Sulzer. 
Referred  to  the  House  calendar  and  ordered  printed  Dec.  12, 

1911. 
Joint  resolution  166  provides  for  the  termination  of  the  treaty 
of  1832  between  the  United  States  and  Russia  on  the  ground 
that  Russia  has  continually  violated  the  provisions  of  the 
treaty  by  refusing  to  recognize  passports  granted  to  Ameri- 
can citizens,  on  account  of  race  or  religion. 
11-35948  JX4253.TJ6A5    1911 

763 Termination  of  treaty  between  the  United 

States  and  Russia. 
[Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911]  34  p.    23cm. 

Hearing  of  Feb.  16,  1911,  on  House  joint  resolution  no.  284, 
providing  for  the  termination  of  the  treaty  concluded  at  St. 
Petersburg,  Dec.  18,  1832,  on  the  ground  that  Russia  has 
violated  the  treaty  by  imposing  restrictions  on  American 
citizens  of  Jewish  faith  in  Russia.  D.  J.  Foster,  chair- 
man of  committee. 

JX234.A5     1911 

[Washington,  Govt,  print  off.,  1911]  64  p.    23cm. 

Hearings  of  Feb.  16  and  Feb.  22,  1911. 
11-35164  JX234.A5    1911a 

7G4 Termination  of  the  treaty  of  1832  between 

the  United  States  and  Russia.     Hearing  before  the  Com- 
mittee on  foreign  affairs  of  the  House  of  representatives, 
Monday,  December  11,  1911. 
Washington,  Govt,  print  off.,  1911.     303  p.      23hcm. 
lion  William  Sulzer,  chairman. 

Statements  of  William  G.  McAdoo,  Mayer  Sulzberger,  Louis 
Marshall,  Oscar  S.  Straus,  etc. 

JX1428.R8A5     1911 

<Rov.  ed.> 

Washington,  Govt,  print  off.,  1911.    336  p.    23\cm. 

"Appendix  tv.  The  passport  question  in  Congress,  1879-1909": 
p.  304-320. 
12-3455-0  JX1428.R8A5     1911a 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  159 

765  TJ.   S.      Congress.     Senate.     Committee   on  foreign  relations. 

Treaty  of  1832  with  Russia.     Hearing  before  the  Com- 
mittee on  foreign  relations,  United  States  Senate,  Sixty- 
second  Congress  on  S.  J.  res.  GO  .  .  .  December  13,  1911. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  of.,  1911.    50  p.    23cm. 
Shelby  M.  Cullom,  chairman. 

Statements  of  Louis  Marshall,  Mayer  Sulzberger,  and  Oscar  S. 
Straus,  on  a  joint  resolution  providing  for  the  termination 
of  the  treaty  .  .  .  concluded  at  St.  Petersburg  Dec.  18,  1832. 
Appendix  (p.  43-50)  consists  of  translations,  as  follows:  Con- 
sular treaty  between  the  German  Empire  and  Russia  of 
Dec.  8  (Nov.  28)  1874. — Treaty  .  .  .  between  Austria-Hungary 
and  Russia,  of  Feb.  2  (15)  1906. — Treaty  .  .  .  between  France 
and  Russia  of  March  20  (April  1)  1874,  with  modifications 
by  the  commercial  convention  of  Sept.  16  (29)  1905. — Trans- 
lation and  summary  of  a  debate  in  the  French  chamber  of 
deputies,  Dec.  27,  1909. 
12-25038  JX1428.R8A5    1911b 

766  President,  1909-1913   (Taft)     Treaty  of  1832  between 

the  United  States  and  Russia.  Message  from  the  Presi- 
dent of  the  United  States,  transmitting  copy  of  a  notice 
forwarded  by  the  secretary  of  state  to  the  American  am- 
bassador at  St.  Petersburg  relative  to  the  termination 
of  the  treaty  of  1832  between  the  United  States  and 
Russia. 

[Washington,   Govt,   print,   off.,  1911]     2  p.     21(.cm.     (62d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.     Doc.  161) 

11-35992  JX1428.R8A5    1911a 

1844— GERMANIC  STATES 

767  Calhoun,  John  C.     [Letter  to  Henry  Wheaton.    June  28,  1844.] 

(In  Wheaton,  Henry.    Elements  of  international  law,  6th  ed., 

p.  cvi-cviii,  Boston,  1855.     23cm.) 
Calhoun  expresses  regret  at  "  the  omission  of  the  Senate  to 

act  finally  on  the  treaty  with  the  Zollverein  States." 

JX2495.E3     1855 

768  Fisk,   George  Mygatt.     Die  handelspolitischen  und   sonstigen 

volkerrechtlichen  Beziehungen  zwischen  Deutschland  und 
den  Vereinigten  Staaten  von  Amerika.  Eine  historisch- 
statistische  Studie. 
Stuttgart,  J.  G.  Cottd'sche  Buchhandlung  nachf.,  1897.  xiv, 
254  p-  22\cm.  (Miinchener  volkswirtschaftliche  Studien, 
hrsg.  von  L.  Brentano  und  W.  Lots.    20.  stuck) 

Die  Versuche  Wheatons,  einen  Vertrag  mit  dem  Zollverein  zu 
vereinbaren,  p.  81-91. 
G-1030  HF3099.F53 


160  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

769  K.,  T.  L.    Germany,  and  the  commercial  treaty  of  Berlin. 

Hunt's  merchants'1  magazine,  Dec.  1844,  v-  11  i  491-SOi. 

HFl.M5,v.ll 

770  Lawrence,  William  Beach.     Introductory  remarks. 

(In  Wheaton,  Henry.  Elements  of  international  law.  Gth  ed. 
p.  xii-exciv.     Boston,  1855.     :2.Tm.) 

P.  xciii-cx  outline  Wheaton's  negotiations  with  the  Zollverein 
and  include  a  letter  of  June  28,  1844,  from  J.  C.  Calhoun 
expressing  regret  at  "the  omission  of  the  Senate  to  act 
finally  on  the  treaty  with  the  Zollverein  States." 

JK2495.E3     1855 

771  Meier,  Ernst.     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertragen. 

Leipzig:  Duncher  &  Humblot,  1874.    sciii,  368  p.    23cm. 
See  p.  180-181. 
2-18652  JX4171.T5M4 

772  U.    S.     Congress.     Senate.     Committee    on    foreign    relations. 

[Report  by]  Mr.  Choate,  ...  on  the  1st  instant,  the  con- 
vent ion  with  Prussia  and  the  other  states  of  the  Germanic 
association  of  customs  and  commerce.     June  14,  1844. 

(In  Journal  of  the  executive  proceedings  of  the  Senate,  v.  6, 
p.   3:53-336.     Washington,    1887.     23cm.)  Serial  no.  430 

On  the  treaty  negotiated  by  Mr.  Wheaton.  Holds  that  the 
Senate  is  constitutionally  incompetent  to  ratify  the  treaty, 
and  also  that  the  treaty  sets  forth  an  unequal  value  of 
stipulated  equivalents. 

773 [Report  by]  Mr.  Archer,  ...  a  message 

relating  to  the  convention  with  Prussia,  and  other  states 
of  the  Germanic  association  of  Customs  and  commerce, 
and  to  whom  was  referred,  on  the  23d  December,  the  said 
convention.     Feb.  26,  1845. 

(In  Journal  of  the  executive  proceedings  of  the  Senate,  v.  6, 
p.  406-411).     Washington,  1887.     23cm.)  Serial  no.  448 

A  reaffirmation  of  the  views  expressed  in  the  report  pre- 
sented  by   Mr.  Choate  the  year  before. 

771  —     Tn  asury  dept.     Report  from  the  secretary  of  the  treas- 

ury [R.  J.  Walker]  on  the  state  of  the  finances.     Dec.  3, 
1845. 
[  Washington,  184*5.]   957  p.  23™.     (29th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Doc.  no.  8.)  Serial  no.  471 

Also  appears  as  House  doc.  no.  6.  29th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

Serial  no.  481 
Report  of  R.  J.  Walker.     Argues    (p.    12)  that  opposition  to  the 
Zoll-Verein    treaty    Is   on    the    part    of    the    manufacturing 
interest. 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   EESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  161 

775  "Wheaton,  Henry.     [Letter  to  John  C.  Calhoun ;  Berlin,  Dec.  24, 

1845.] 

(In    American    historical    association.     Annual    report    1899. 
Vol.    II.     Calhoun    correspondence,    p.    10G3-1065.     Wash- 
t  ington,  1900.     23cm.) 

On  the  treaty  negotiated  with  the  Zollverein,  which  the  Sen- 
ate in  1S44,  failed  to  ratify. 

E172.A60     1899,v.2 

776  [Wurm,  C.  F.]     Die  Ratifikation  von  Staatsvertragen. 

Deutsche  Vierteljahrs  Schrift,  1845,  v.  8, 1  Heft,  p.  163-239. 

AP30.D45,v.8 

Vereinigte  Staaten  von  Nordamerika  and  Preussen  (fiir  den 
deutschen    Zollverein)    1844,    p.    225-233. 

777  Zimm.erm.ann,    Alfred.     Geschichte   der   preussisch-deutschen 

Handelspolitik. 
Oldenburg  und  Leipzig,  Schulze,  1892.    v  p.  1  I.,  850  p. 

24cm. 

Negotiations  of  Mr.  Wheaton:  p.  294-296;  Text  of  the  Con- 
vention of  1844:  p.  599-606. 
l-G-1529  HF1545.Z7 

1844— TEXAS 

778  Benton,  Thomas  Hart.     Speech  of  Mr.  Benton,  of  Missouri,  de- 

livered in  the  Senate  of  the  United  States,  May  16,  18, 
and  20,  1844,  in  secret  session  on  the  treaty  for  the  an- 
nexation of  Texas. 
"Washington,  J.  and  G.  S.  Gideon,  printers,  1844-    28  p. 
22\cm. 

10-1547  F390.B49 

779  Same. 

Congressional  globe,  28th   Cong.   1st  sess.    Appendix,  p. 

474-486.  J11.G5     1843-44 

780  Clay,  Henry.     [Letters]  on  the  Texas  question.    April  17  and 

July  27,  1844. 
Nile?  register,  M ay  4,  Aug.  31,  1844,  v.  66: 152-153;  p.  439. 

JK1.N5.V.66 

781  Field,  David  Dudley.     [The  annexation  of  Texas.] 

{In  his  Speeches,  arguments,  and  miscellaneous  papers, 
Edited  by  Titus  Munson  Coan,  v.  3,  p.  1-5.  New  York,  1890. 
22*cm.) 

E415.7.F45,v.3 
137190°— 20 11 


162  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

782  Gallatin,    Albert.     [Letters]    to   D.   Dudley    Field.      17th   De- 

cember. 1844  and  10th  February.  1845. 

(hi  The  Writings  of  Allien   Gallatin,  ed.  by  Henry  Adams. 

v.  2,  p.  005-610.    Philadelphia,  1879.    25em.) 
On  the  constitutional  character  of  the  resolution  for  annexing 

Texas  by  legislative  act. 

E338.G16,v.2 

783  Hoist,  Hermann  Eduard  von.     John  C.  Calhoun. 

Boston,  Nt  w  York,  Houghton,  Mifjlvn  and  company,  1892. 
vi,  356  p.     18cm.     (American   statesmen,   ed.   by  J.   T. 

Mors, .  jr.     [v.  2,!]) 

Texas,  p.  222-260. 

..."  appeal  from  the  Senate,  which  had  the  unquestionahle 

right  to  reject  a  treaty,  to  the  House  of  Representatives, 

to  which  no  power  had  been  given  by  the  Constitution  in 

relation  to  treaties,"  page  246. 

10-12004  E340.C15H63 

784  Sedgwick,  Theodore.     Thoughts  on  the  proposed  annexation  of 

Texas  to  the  United  States.  First  published  in  the  New 
York  Evening  post,  under  the  signature  of  Veto,  (Theo- 
dore Sedgwick.)  Together  with  the  address  of  Albert 
Gallatin,  ll.  d.  delivered  at  the  Tabernacle  meeting,  held 
on  the  24th  of  April,  1844.  2d  ed. 
Ni  "•  York.  Printed  by  S.  11*.  Benedict  &  co.,  1844.  56  p. 
J.'hcm. 

Regards  the  treaty  of  annexation  sent  by  the  President  to  the 
Senate  in  excess  of  the  rights  conferred  upon  the  treaty- 
making  power. 
3-73  F390.S46 

785  U.  S.     Congress.     Debate  in  the  Senate  concerning  the  treaty 

for  the  annexation  of  Texas. 
Congressional  globe,  28th  Cong.  1st  scss.,  1843-1844.    Ap- 
pendix.   (See  Index,  p.  mi.) 

J11.G5     1843-44 

786  Senate.      Committee    on    foreign    relations.      Report 

[from]  the  Committee  on  foreign  relations,  to  which 
have  been  referred  sundry  joint  resolutions  and  a  bill  on 
the  subject  of  the  annexation  of  Texas,  and  also  sundry  in- 
structions of  state  legislature-,  and  memorials  and  peti- 
tions on  the  same  subject.    Feb.  4,  18  !•">. 

[  Washington,  1845.]     23  P.     23™.     (28th   Cong.  2d  sess. 
Senate.    Doc.  79.)  Serial  no.  451 

Includes  a  discussion  of  the  treaty-making  power  with  refer- 
ence to  the  acquisition  of  foreign  territory. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  163 

787  TJ.  S.     29th  Congress.     Special  session  of  the  Senate.     1845. 

[Resolutions]  That  in  executing  the  authority  conferred 
by  the  joint  resolution  of  Congress  entitled  "A  joint  reso- 
tion  for  the  annexation  of  Texas  to  the  United  States,"  the 
President  of  the  United  States,  will  best  conform  to  the 
provisions  of  the  Constitution  by  resorting  to  the  treaty- 
making  power  for  the  purpose  of  accomplishing  the  ob- 
jects of  that  resolution.  That  the  Secretary  be  directed  to 
lay  before  the  President  of  the  United  States  a  copy  of 
this  resolution.     [March  10,  1845  and  March  20,  1845.] 

(In  Journal  of  the  executive  proceedings  of  the  Senate  of  the 
United  States  of  America,  vol.  VI,  p.  429-453.  Washington, 
1887.     23cm.)  Serial  no.  448 

788  Van  Buren,  Martin.     Letter  on  annexation.    April  20,  1844. 

Niles*  register,  May  4,  1844,  v.  66:  153-157.         jki.N5,v.66 

789  Walker,  Robert  James.     Letter  of  Mr.  Walker,  of  Mississippi, 

relative  to  the  reannexation  of  Texas :  in  reply  to  the  call 
of  the  people  of  Carroll  County,  Kentucky,  to  communi- 
cate his  views  on  that  subject. 
Washington,,  Printed  at  the  Globe  office,  1844-   32  p.    25cm. 
Methods  by  which  territory  may  be  acquired :  p.  4-5. 
10-5370  F390.W183 

790 Speech  of  Mr.  Walker,  of  Mississippi :  delivered  in  the 

United  States  Senate,  May  20  and  21,  in  secret  session  on 
the  treaty  for  the  reannexation  of  Texas.     (The  injunc- 
tion of  the  secrecy  removed.) 
Washington,  Printed  at  the  Globe  office,  1844-    %0  p.    24\cm. 

10-1553  F390.W19 

791  Woodbury,  Levi.     Speech  of  Mr.  Woodbury,  of  New  Hamp- 

shire, in  executive  session,  on  the  treaty  for  the  reannexa- 
tion of  Texas  to  the  United  States :  delivered  in  the  Senate 
of  the  United  States,  June  4,  1844. 
{Washington?  1844]     30  p.    24\cm. 

18^621  F390.W88 

1848— MEXICO 

792  Reeves,  Jesse  S.    The  treaty  of  Guadalupe-Hidalgo. 

American  historical  review,  Jan.  1905,  v.  10:  309-324. 

E171.A57,v.lO 


164  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

793  U.  S.     Treaties,   etc.,   1845-1849    {Polk)      Message    from    the 

President  of  the  United  States,  communicating  a  copy  of 
the  treaty  with  the  Mexican  Republic,  of  February  2,  1848, 
and  of  the  correspondence  in  relation  thereto,  and  recom- 
mending measures  for  carrying  the  same  into  effect.  July 
6,  1848.  Eead,  and  ordered  to  be  printed. 
[  Washington,  1848]  72  p.  26cm.  {30th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate    Ex.  [doc]  60) 

11-2903  E408.TJ581 

1850— GREAT  BRITAIN   (CLAYTON-BULWER  TREATY) 

794  Bell,  John.     Speech  of  Hon.  John  Bell,  of  Tennessee,  upon  our 

relations  with  Great  Britain,  delivered  in  the  Senate  of 
the  United  States.  February  26,  1856. 
Washington,  Printed  at  the  Congressional  globe  office,  1856. 

15  p.     24\cm. 

11-10827  F1436.B43 

795  Bigelow,  John.     Breaches  of  Anglo-American  treaties;  a  study 

in  history  and  diplomacy. 
New  York,  Stnrgis  &  Walton  company,  1917.    1  p.  I.,  v-xi, 
248  p.     in  fold.  maps.    19\cm. 

"  About  two-thirds  of  the  work  is  taken  up  with  .  .  .  the  Clay- 
ton-P.ulwor  treaty." — I'rei". 
Bibliography:  p.  231-236. 
17-11357  JX1428.G7B5 

796  Clayton,  John  Middleton.     Speech  delivered  in  the  Senate  of 

the  United  States  on  the  8th  of  March,  1853,  in  vindica- 
tion of  the  Central  American  treaty  concluded  with  Great 
Britain  on  the  19th  of  April,  1850. 
Washington,  Printed  by  Kirhwood  &  McGill,  1853.     43  p. 
23cm. 

9-9SG0  F1436.C63 

797  Speech  ...  on  the  Central  American  treaty  of  April 

19,  1850;  delivered  in  the  Senate  of  the  United  States, 
March  17  and  19,  1856. 

Washington,    Printed    at    the    Congressional   globe    office. 
1856.    21  p.    22\™. 

11-255]  t  F1436.C64 

798  Cling-man,  Thomas  Lanier.     Speech  .  .  .  against  the  Clayton- 

Bulwer  treaty,  and  in  favor  of  American  ascendency  in 
tin'  Gulf  of  Mexico  and  Central  America.    Delivered  in 
the  House  of  represent  at  ive~.  May  5,  1858. 
Washington,  Printed  at  th<  Congressional  globe  office, 1858. 

16  />■    24cm. 

11-25513  F1436.C66 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  165 

799  [Comegys,  Joseph  Parsons]     The  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty  and 

the  report  of  the  committee  of  the  House  on  foreign  rela- 
tions against  it. 
[n.  p.,  1880]     cover-title,  %  p.     24cm. 
Signed :  A  Delawarean. 
6-5359  TC773.C73 

800  Douglas,  Stephen  Arnold.     Speech  of  Hon.  Stephen  A.  Doug- 

las of  Illinois,  on  the  Monroe  doctrine.    Delivered  in  the 
Senate  of  the  United  States,  February  14,  1853. 
Washington,  Printed  by  L.  Towers,  1853.    cover-title,  16 
p.    22cm. 

Explaining  the  author's  opposition  to  the  ratification  of  the 
Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 
ca  18-417  JX1425.D75 

801  Everett,  Edward.     Speech  ...  on  the  Central  American  treaty. 

Delivered  in  the  Senate  of  the  United  States,  March  21, 

1853. 
Washington,  Printed  at  the  Congressional  globe  office,  1853. 
13  p.    %4cm. 

11-25512  F1436.E93 

802  Keasbey,  Lindley  Miller.     The  early  diplomatic  history  of  the 

Nicaragua  canal. 
Newark,  N.  J.,  The  Holbrook  printing  company,  1890.    viii, 
130  p.     fold.  map.     23cm. 

6-4974  TC784.K23 

803  The  Nicaragua  canal  and  the  Monroe  doctrine;  a  politi- 
cal history  of  isthmus  transit,  with  special  reference  to 
the  Nicaragua  canal  project  and  the  attitude  of  the  United 
States  government  thereto. 

New  York  [etc.]  G.  P.  Putnam's  sons,  1896.    osvii,  622  p. 
4  maps  (incl.  front.)     23\cm. 

3-31714  TC784.K24 

804  The  terms  and  tenor  of  the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 

American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.    Annals, 

Nov.  1899,  v.  U:  285-309.  Hl.A4,v.i4 

805  Moore,  John  Bassett.     A  digest  of  international  law. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1906.    8  v.    21&em.     (U.  S. 
56th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    House.    Doc.  551.) 

Clayton-Bulwer  treaty :  v.  3,  p.  130-210. 

JX237.M7,v.3 


166  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

80G  Olney,  Richard.     The  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty;   memorandum. 
(Reprint) 
Washington,  1900.    16  p.    Ucm. 

2-18453  F1438.051 

807  [Squier,  Ephraim  George]     Question  anglo-americaine.    Docu- 

ments officiels  echanges  entre  les  Etats-Unis  et  l'Angle- 
terre  au  sujet  de  l'Amerique  Centrale  et  du  traite  Clayton- 
Bulwer. 

Pans,  Stassin  et  Xavier,  1856.  2  p.  I.,  225  p.,  1  I.  fold, 
map.     22cm. 

4-9902  F1438.S77 

808  Travis,  Ira  Dudley.     The  history  of  the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 

[Ann  Arbor,  The  Association,  1900]  ix,  312  p.  front, 
(fold,  map)  24rm.  (Publications  of  the  Michigan  po- 
litical science  association,     [vol.  iii,  no.  8]) 

Bibliography:  p.  [309]-312. 
2-7o.:T  H31.M6    vol.3 

F1438.T78 

809  U.  S.     Congress.    House.    Committee  on  foreign  affairs.    The 

Clayton-Bulwer  treaty.     Report.     April  16,  1880. 
[Washington,  1880.]     7  p.     23''m.      (46th   Cong.,  2d  sess. 
House.    Report  no.  1121.)  Serial  no.  1937 

Recommending  that  steps  be  taken  to  abrogate  the  treaty. 

810 Interoceanic  canal  and  the  Monroe  doc- 
trine.    [Report]     Feb.  14,  1881. 
[Washington,  1881.]     xi,(l),49p.    23cm.     (46th  Cong.,  3d 
sess.     House.    Report,     no.  224.)  Serial  no.  1982 

Reporting  resolutions  affirming  the  Monroe  doctrine,  espe- 
cially as  applied  to  the  control  of  an  isthmian  canal,  and 
requesting  President  to  take  steps  for  the  abrogation  of 
treaties  in  conflict  with  the  declaration  of  principles  con- 
tained in  the  resolutions.  P.  1-49  are  given  to  notes  of  a 
hearing  Jan.  11-27,  1881.  The  notes  include:  Views  of  Mr. 
Allen  Thomdike  Rice,  Mr.  Crapo,  Mr.  S.  L.  Phelps,  Admiral 
Aiiiini'ii,  James  B.  Eads,  Seiior  Maximo  Jerez,  William  H. 
"\\viib,  ;iik1  .Mr.  Thompson. 

811 Interoceanic  canal  and  the  Monroe  doc- 
trine.    Views  of  the  minority.       March  4,  1881. 
[Washington,   1881.]     9   p.     23cm.     (46th   Cong..   3d  sess. 
H0U8e,      Report,     no.  224,  pt.  2.)  Serial  no,  1982 

Signed  by  Benjamin  Wilson. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     167 

812  TJ.  S.     Congress.    House.     Committee  on  foreign  affairs.    The 
construction  or  control  of  interoceanic  canals  at  the  Isth- 
mus of  Darien  and  in  Central  America  by  European  gov- 
ernments.    Report.     March  2,  1889. 
[Washington,    1889.']    28   p.    23™.     (50th    Cong.    2d   sess. 

House.      Report  no.  lf.167.)  Serial  no.  2675 

"  Views  of  the  minority,"  p.  13-28. 

813 Select  committee  on  the  inter-oceanic  ship  canal. 

The   Monroe   doctrine.      [Report]    .  .  .    March   3,    1881. 

{Washington,   1881.]     9  p.     23cm.      (46th   Cong.   3d  sess. 

House.    Report  no.  390.)  Serial  no.  1983 

Recommends  the  adoption  of  resolutions,  reported  to  the 
House  of  Representatives  March  8,  1880,  affirming  the  Mon- 
roe doctrine,  especially  as  applied  to  the  control  of  an  inter- 
oceanic canal,  and  requesting  the  President  to  take  steps  for 
the  abrogation  of  treaties  in  conflict  with  the  declaration  of 
principles  contained  in  the  resolutions. 

814  Senate.     Resolution    [submitted  by  Mr.   Eaton,  "that 

the  President  of  the  United  States  be  requested  to  trans- 
mit to  the  Senate  copies  of  all  correspondence  between 
this  government  and  any  foreign  government  since  Feb- 
ruary, 1869,  respecting  a  ship  canal  across  the  Isthmus 
between  North  America  and  South  America,  together 
with  copies  of  any  project  of  treaties  respecting  the  same 
•which  the  Department  of  State  may  have  proposed  or 
submitted  since  that  date  to  any  foreign  power  or  its 
diplomatic  representative"].  Dec.  4,  1879. 
[Washington,  1879.]  1  p.  23cm.  (46th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Misc.  doc.  no.  9.)  Serial  no.  1890 

815 Committee  on  foreign  relations.    Report  [from] 

the  committee  on  foreign  relations,  to  whom  was  referred 
the  message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States  of  the 
4th  of  January,  and  to  whom  also  has  been  referred  the 
resolution  of  the  Senate  adopted  on  the  27th  of  the  same 
month.  Feb.  11,  1853. 
[Washington,  1853.]  17  p.  23cm.  (32d  Cong.  2d  sess. 
Senate.    Rept.  no.  407.)  Serial  no.  671 

On  alleged  treaty  violation  by  Great  Britain  through  the  es- 
tablishment of  a  new  colony  in  Central  America.  With  ref- 
erence to  the  Senate  resolution,  the  committee  reported : 
"Resolved,  (as  the  opinion  of  the  committee,)  That  the  dec- 
laration on  the  part  of  the  British  government,  and  the  reply 
thereto  by  the  Secretary  of  State,  as  preliminary  to  the  ex- 
change of  ratifications  of  the  treaty,  concluded  at  Washing- 
ton, between  the  governments  of  Great  Britain  and  the 
United  States,  on  the  19th  April,  1850,  import  nothing  more 


168  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

than  an  admission  on  the  part  of  the  two  governments,  or 
their  functionaries,  at  the  time  of  such  exchange  that  noth- 
ing contained  in  the  treaty  was  to  be  considered  as  affecting 
the  title,  or  existing  rights,  of  Great  Britain  to  the  English 
settlements  in  Honduras  Bay. 
"  And,  consequently,  in  the  opinion  of  the  committee,  that  no 
measures  are  necessary  on  the  part  of  the  Senate,  to  be 
taken  because  of  such  declaration  and  reply." 

816  U.  S.      Congress.     Senate.     Committee    on   foreign   relations. 
[Resolution    reported]    from   the    committee   on    foreign 
relations.     Feb.  16,  1881. 
[Washington,  1881.']    1  p.   23cm.    (46th  Cong.,  3d  sess.   Sen- 
ate.   Misc.  doc.  no.  42.)  Serial  no.  1944 
Affirming  that  the  consent  of  the  United  States  is  a  necessary 
condition  precedent  to  the  construction  of  an  Isthmian  canal 
or  participation  in  its  use  by  other  nations. 

817 Report  [from]  the  committee  on  foreign 

relations  [on  the  Maritime  canal  company  of  Nicaragua 
and  the  interests  of  the  United  States.]     Jan.  10,  1891. 
[If 'ashing ton,  1891.]     215  p.    plates,    maps,    plans.    23cm. 
(51st  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Report  1944-) 

Serial  no.  2826 
The  report  is  of  twenty   pages;   the  rest  of  the  document  is 
given   to   various  appendices  and   the  report  of  a   hearing, 
May  22,  1890. 

818   Dept.   of  state.     Tigre   island   and   Central   America. 

Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States,  trans- 
mitting documents  in  answer  to  a  resolution  of  the  House 
respecting  Tigre  island,  &c,  &c.     July  18,  1850. 
[Washington.    1850.]     328  p.     folded  maps.     23cm.      (31st 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    House.    Ex.  doc.  no.  75.)        Serial  no.  579 
On  April     19,  1850,  the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty  was  concluded 
and  on  July  5,  it  was  proclaimed.     The  text  of  the  treaty 
is    here    given,    together    with    correspondence   between    the 
American  Secretary  of  State  and  the  British  plenipotentiary 
at  the  time  it  was  concluded,  and  a  report  by  the  Secretary 
of  State  relative  to  negotiations  with  Central  America,  witli 
;i   copy   of  the  special   convention   with   Nicaragua,  of   Sept. 
15,  1849. 

819 Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

commui  icating,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the 

Senate,  information  in  relation  to  the  difficulties  between 

the  British  authorities  and  San  Salvador.     Feb.  28,  1851. 

[Washington,   185//}     99  p.     folded   map.     ..'->'"'.      (31st 

Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  43.)      Serial  no.  591 

In  regard  to  the  British  seizure  of  the  Island  of  Tigre,  in  the 
Cult  of  Fonseca,  <><t.  16,  1849,  for  the  satisfaction  of  claims 
of  British  subjects. 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  169 

820  U.  S.     Dept.  of  state.    Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 

States,  communicating,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution 
of  the  Senate,  information  in  relation  to  the  firing  into 
and  seizure  of  the  American  steamship  Prometheus  by  a 
British  vessel  of  war.  Dec.  15,  1851. 
{Washington,  1851.']  5  p.  23cm.  (32d  Cong.,  1st  sess.  Sen- 
ate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  6.)  Serial  no.  614 

821  Message   from   the   President    of    the    United 

States,  in  answer  to  a  resolution  of  the  Senate  calling  for 
information  in  relation  to  the  establishment  of  a  new 
British  colony  in  Central  America.    Jan.  4,  1853. 

[Washington,  1853.]  4  p.  23cm.  (32d  Cong.,  2d  sess.  Sen- 
ate. Ex.  doc.  no.  12.)  Serial  no.  660 
Includes  the  declaration  of  Bulwer  with  reference  to  the  treaty 
signed  April  19,  1850,  "  that  her  Majesty  does  not  under- 
stand the  engagements  of  that  convention  to  apply  to  her 
Majesty's  settlement  at  Honduras,  or  to  its  dependencies," 
and,  also,  the  memorandum  of  Mr.  Clayton  on  this  declara- 
tion. 

822 Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

communicating,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the 
Senate,    certain    correspondence    in    relation    to    Central 
America.    Jan.  21,  1853. 
[Washington,  1853.]     106  p.     23cm.     (32d  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  27.)  Serial  no.  660 

Papers  communicated  in  response  to  a  Senate  resolution  call- 
ing for  "  the  correspondence  between  the  Hon.  Abbott  Law- 
rence and  Lord  Palmerston,  or  the  government  of  the  United 
States,  relative  to  Central  America,  and  also  any  other  cor- 
respondence which  relates  to  the  claims  of  Great  Britain 
to  the  Mosquito  coast,  or  to  any  portion  of  the  territory  of 
Honduras  or  Yucatan." 

823   Message   from   the   President   of   the   United 

States,  in  answer  to  a  resolution  of  the  Senate  requesting 
copies  of  correspondence  and  documents  relative  to 
Nicaragua,  Costa  Rica,  and  the  territory  claimed  by  the 
Mosquito  Indians.  Jan.  27,  1853. 
[Washington,  1853.]  2  p.  23cm.  (32d  Cong.,  2d  sess.  Sen- 
ate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  28.)  Serial  no.  660 


170  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

82-1  U.  S.  Dept  of  state.  Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 
States,  communicating  a  report  from  the  Secretary  of 
state,  embodying  the  substance  of  recent  communications 
from  the  British  minister  on  the  subject  of  interoceanic 
canal,  by  the  Nicaragua  route.  Feb.  18,  1853. 
[Washington,  1853.]  6  p.  23cm.  (32d  Cong.,  2d  sess.  Sen- 
ate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  /fjf..)  Serial  no.  665 

Also   a i •pears   as   House   ex.    doc.   no.   56,   32d   Cong.,   2d    sess. 
Report    of    Mr.    Everett,   and    includes   the   substance   of  com- 
munications  on    "the    relations    of    Great    Britain    to    the 

protectorate  of  Mosquito,  which  she  expresses  herself  de- 
sirous of  relinquishing  on  terms  consistent  with  her  hon- 
orable  engagements    to    the    Indians    of   that    name." 

825   Message   from   the    President   of   the    United 

States,  communicating,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution 
of  the  Senate,  information  in  relation  to  the  transactions 
between  Captain  Hollins,  of  the  United  States  ship 
Cyane,  and  the  authorities  at  San  Juan  de  Nicaragua. 
Dec.  19,  1853. 

[Washington,  1853.]    39  p.  23cm.     (33d    Cong.,    1st    sess. 

Senate.      Ex.  doc.  no.  8.)  Serial  no.  694 

826   Message    from   the   President   of   the   United 

State-,  communicating  in  compliance  with  a  resolution 
of  the  Senate,  further  correspondence  growing  out  of  the 
treaty  of  Washington  of  July  4,  1850.     Dec.  31,  1853. 

[  Washington,  1853.]     19  p.    23cm.     (33d  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no  13.)  Serial  no.  694 

827 Message    from    the    President    of    the    United 

States  communicating,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of 
the  Senate,  information  respecting  the  bombardment  of 
San  Juan  de  Nicaragua.    July  31,  1854. 
[Washington,  1854.]    30  p.   23™.    (33d  Cong.  1st  sess.    Sen- 
ate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  85.)  Serial  no.  702 

Includes  documents  submitted  in  response  to  the  Senate  reso- 
lution calling  upon  the  President  for  "all  the  information 
in  his  possession  respecting  the  bombardment  of  Greytown, 
or  San  Juan  de  Nicaragua,  by  Captain  Hollins,  in  command 
of  the  United  States  ship  Cyane,  with  copies  of  all  orders 
or  instruct  ions,  if  any,  given  by  the  executive  to  said  Hollins 
in  relation  thereto." 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN"   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  171 

828  U.  S.    Dept.  of  state.    San  Juan  de  Nicaragua.    Message  from 
•     the  President  of  the  United  States  [July  31,  1854]  trans- 
mitting reports  in  reference  to  the  destruction  of  San 
Juan.de  Nicaragua. 
[Washington,  1854.]     31   p.     23cm.     (33d   Cong.,   1st   sess. 
House.     Ex  doc.  no.  126. )  Serial  no.  734 

829 Documents  relative  to  Central  American  affairs, 

and  the  enlistment  question. 
Washington,  C.  Wendell,  planter,  1856.     1^85  p.     fold.  map. 

23cm. 

Printed  by  direction  of  the  House  of  representatives. 

Contents. — Corresponds  between  Great  Britain  and  the 
United  States,  in  relation  to  Central  American  affairs,  com- 
municated to  the  first  session  of  the  Thirty-fourth  Congress 
by  the  President  of  the  United  States  with  his  annual  mes- 
sage.— Correspondence  in  relation  to  Central  American  af- 
fairs, and  the  Clayton  and  Bulwer  convention.— Correspond- 
ence in  relation  to  enlistment  of  troops  within  the  United 
States  by  the  agents  of  Great  Britain. — The  trial  of  Henry 
Hertz  et  al. 
12-40476  F1438.TJ58 

830 Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

transmitting,  in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the  Sen- 
ate of  January  10,  1856,  a  copy  of  a  letter  from  Lord  John 
Russel  to  Mr.  Crampton,  dated  January  19,  1853.  Jan. 
11,  1856. 
[Washington,  1856.]  3  p.  23cm.  (34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  3.)  Serial  no.  815 

Contains  statement  that  the  British  government  intends  "  to 
adhere  strictly  to  the  treaty  of  Washington  of  the  19th  of 
April,  1850,  and  not  to  assume  any  sovereignty,  either  direct 
or  indirect,  in  Central  America." 

831 Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

communicating  a  report  of  the  Secretary  of  State,  in  com- 
pliance with  a  resolution  of  the  Senate  of  the  17th  ultimo, 
calling  for  copies  of  certain  correspondence  and  other  pa- 
pers relative  to  the  republics  of  Nicaragua,  Costa  Rica, 
the  Mosquito  Indians,  and  the  convention  between  the 
United  States  and  Great  Britain  of  April  19,  1850.  Feb. 
14,  1856. 
[Washington,  1856.]  lJfi  p.  23cm.  (34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
/Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  25.)  Serial  no.  819 

The  Senate  resolution  of  the  date  noted  requested  the  Presi- 
dent, if  compatible  with  the  public  interest,  "  to  communi- 
cate to  the  Senate  copies  of  any  correspondence  which  took 


172  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

place  between  Daniel  Webster,  Secretary  of  State,  and  the 
British  minister  and  the  minister  from  Costa  Rica,  in  re- 
spect to  a  projet  which  was  submitted  to  Nicaragua.  Costa 
Rica  ,and  the  Mosquito  Indians,  and  a  copy  of  such  projet 
with  the  instructions  given  to  Mr.  Walsh,  the  special  agent, 
deputed  by  the  United  States  to  present  that  projet  to  the 
states  of  Nicaragua  and  Costa  Rica,  as  also  of  such  other 
correspondence  as  may  have  passed  between  him  and  the 
said  Secretary  of  State  on  the  subject;  as  also  copies  of  the 
correspondence  with  Mr.  Kerr,  charge1  d'affaires  of  the 
United  States  in  Nicaragua  in  reference  thereto,  together 
With  the  government  of  Nicaragua  or  its  minister,  in  respect 
to  the  same  projet;  and  also  copies  of  any  letters  not  here- 
tofore communicated,  which  may  have  been  addressed  to 
this  government  by  the  minister  of  Nicaragua  or  the  min- 
ister of  Great  Britain,  in  reference  to  the  construction  and 
purport  of  the  convention  between  the  United  States  and 
Great  Britain,  signed  April  19,  1850,  and  proclaimed  July  5, 
1S50,  and  of  the  replies  made  to  them,  if  any." 

832  U.  S.  Dept.  of  state.  Message  of  the  President  of  the  United 
Stale-,  communicating  sundry  documents  in  relation  to 
the  affairs  with  the  government  of  Nicaragua,  and  infor- 
mation that  the  new  minister  from  that  government  had 
been  accredited  by  this  government.  May  15,  1856. 
[Washington,  1856.]  176  p.  23rm.  (34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  68.)  Serial  no.  822 

The  accompanying  papers  cover  the  dates  Jan.  1(5,  18o4-April 
10,  1856.  The  document  also  appears  as  House  ex.  doc.  no. 
103,  34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

833 Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States,  in 

further  answer  to  the  resolution  of  the  17th  January  last, 
communicating  correspondence,  not  previously  communi- 
cated to  the  Senate,  touching  the  construction  and  pur- 
port of  the  convention  with  Great  Britain,  of  the  19th  of 
April,  1850,  relative  to  Central  America.  May  29,  1856. 
[Washington,  1856.']  10  p.  23im.  (34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  82.)  Serial  no.  823 

Transmits  a  copy  of  an  Instruction  of  May  24,  L856,  from  the 
Secretary  of  state  to  the  minister  of  the  United  States  at 
London. 

834  -  Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the  Senate  of  the  7th 
instant,  relating  to  the  refusal  of  the  government  of  Hon- 
duras to  receive  a  commercial  agent  from  this  country. 
Aug.  12,  L856. 
[Washington,  1856.1  r>  /'■  -•>""'•  (Hth  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  105.)  Serial  no.  825 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     173 

835  U.  S.  Dept.  of  state.  Message  of  the  President  of  the  United 
States,  communicating,  in  compliance  with  the  resolution 
of  the  Senate  of  the  17th  instant,  correspondence  between 
the  Department  of  State  and  the  ministers  from  Great 
Britain  and  France,  in  relation  to  losses  sustained  by  citi- 
zens of  those  countries  at  the  bombardment  of  Greytown. 
Dec.  23,  1857. 
[Washington,  1857.]  11  p.  23cm.  {35th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  9.)  Serial  no.  918 

836 ■    Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

communicating,  in  compliance  with  the  resolution  of  the 
Senate,  the  correspondence  between  the  Department  of 
State  and  the  minister  of  Bremen,  on  the  subject  of  claims 
for  losses  alleged  to  have  been  sustained  by  subjects  of 
the  Hause  towns  at  the  bombardment  of  Greytown.  Dec. 
29,  1857. 
[Washington,  1857.]  24  p.  23cm.  (35th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  10.)  Serial  no.  918 

837 Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States, 

communicating,  in  compliance  with  the  resolution  of  the 
Senate  of  January  4,  1858,  the  correspondence,  instruc- 
tions, and  orders  to  the  United  States  naval  forces  on 
the  coast  of  Central  America,  connected  with  the  arrest 
of  Wm.  Walker  and  his  associates,  at  or  near  the  port  of 
San  Juan  de  Nicaragua.  Jan.  7,  1858. 
[Washington,  1858.]  38  p.  23cm.  {35th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  13.)  Serial  no.  918 

838  Nicaragua — seizure  of  General  Walker.     Mes- 
sage from  the  President  of  the  United  States,  relative  to 
the  seizure  of  General  William  Walker  and  his  followers 
in  Nicaragua.     Jan.  11,  1858. 
[Washington,  1858.]     82  p.    23cm.     (35th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House.      Ex.  doc.  no.  24--)  Serial  no.  950 

839 Message  of  the  President  of  the  United  States 

communicating,  in  compliance  with  the  resolution  of  the 
Senate  of  the  7th  instant,  information  in  relation  to  the 
condition  of  the  commercial  relations  between  the  United 
States  and  the  Spanish- American  states  on  this  conti- 
nent, and  between  these  countries  and  other  nations.  July 
14,  1870. 
[Washington,  1870.]  13  p  23cm.  (41st  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  112.)  Serial  no.  1407 


174  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

840  U.  S.     Dept.  of  state.    International  ship-canal.    Resolution  of 
the  House  of  Representatives  and  letter  from  the  Secre- 
tary of  State  in  relation  to  an  international  ship-canal. 
May  20,  1872. 
[Washington,   1872.']      2  p.     23cm.      (J$d  Cong.,  M  sess. 

House.      Misc.  doc.  no.  219.)  Serial  no.  1527 

"  It  has  not  been  the  policy  of  this  Government  to  complicate 
the  practical  question  of  the  construction  of  such  a  canal 
by  encouraging  discussions  or  negotiations  with  European 

powers  on  the  subject." 

841 The  Darien  interoceanic  canal.     Message  from 

the  President  of  the  United  States,  transmitting  a  report 
from  the  secretary  of  state  relative  to  the  steps  taken  by 
the  Government  of  the  United  States  to  promote  the  con- 
struction of  an  interoceanic  canal  across  the  Isthmus  of 
Darien.  June  13,  1879. 
[Washington,  1879.]     3  p.    23cm.     (46th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House  Ex.  doc.  no.  10.)  Serial  no.  1875 

842 Interoceanic  canal.  Message  from  the  Presi- 
dent of  the  United  States,  transmitting,  in  response  to  a 
resolution  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  copies  of  cor- 
respondence in  relation  to  the  interoceanic  canal.  March 
8,  1880. 
[Washington,  1880.]  2  p.  23cm.  (46th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
House  Ex.  doc.  no.  57.)  Serial  no.  1925 

Correspondence  Is  printed  with  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  112,  -ICth 
Cong.,  2d.  sess. 

843 Message    from    the    President    of    the    United 

States,  in  response  to  Senate  resolution  of  Feb.  11,  1880, 
covering  report  of  secretary  of  state,  with  accompanying 
documents,  in  relation  to  the  proposed  interoceanic  canal 
between  the  Atlantic  and  Pacific  oceans.  March  8,  1880. 
[Washington,  1880.]  152  p.  23cm.  (46th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  112.)  Serial  no.  1885 

Papers  transmitted  in  response  to  a  Senate  resolution  re- 
questing "copies  <»f  all  correspondence  between  this  govern- 
ment and  any  foreign  government  since  February,  1869, 
respecting  a  ship-canal  across  the  Isthmus  between  North 
America  and  South  America,  together  with  copies  of  any 
projet  of  treaties  respecting  the  same  which  the  Depart- 
ment of  State  may  have  proposed  or  submitted  since  that 
date  to  any  foreign  power  or  its  diplomatic  representative." 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  175 

844  U.  S.    Deft,  of  state.    Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 

States,    transmitting  the  report  of  the  Secretary  of  State 
in  response  to  Senate  resolution  of  the  14th  October  1881, 
with  accompanying  document,  relative  to  the  projected 
interoceanic  canal  at  Panama.     Oct.  24,  1881. 
[Washington,  1881.]      4   p.    23cm.      (47th   Cong.,   Special 

sess.     Ex.  doc.  no.  5.)  Serial  no.  1985 

Gives  the  letter  of  instruction  to  the  United  States  minister  in 
London. 

845  Message  from  the  President    of    the    United 

States,  transmitting,  in  response  to  Senate  resolution  of 
December  12,  1881,  a  report  from  the  secretary  of  state, 
touching  the  proposed  modification  of  the  Clayton- 
Bulwer  treaty  of  April  19,  1850,  between  the  United 
States  and  Great  Britain.     Dec.  15,  1881. 

[Washington,  1881.]     7  p.    23cm.     (47th   Cong.,  1st  sess. 
/Senate.      Ex.  doc.  no.  16.)  Serial  no.  1986 

Gives  Mr.  Blaine's  instruction  to  Mr.  Lowell. 

846  The  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty   and  the  Monroe 

doctrine.  A  letter  from  the  secretary  of  state  to  the 
minister  of  the  United  States  at  London  dated  May  8, 
1882,  with  sundry  papers  and  documents  explanatory  of 
the  same,  selected  from  the  archives  of  the  Department 
of  state. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1882.    203  p.    23cm.     (47th 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate.    Ex.  doc.  194.)         Serial  no.  1991 
The  letter  of  the   Secretary  of  State  communicates,   "  some- 
what at   length,   the  opinions  entertained   here  respecting 
the    traditional    continental    policy    of   the    United    States 
and  the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty." 
The  explanatory  docunfents  and  papers  cover  the  dates  Feb. 
10,  1763- June  1,  1882. 
10-3786  JX 1425.  A3    1882 

847  Message  from  the  President    of    the    United 

States,  transmitting,  in  further  compliance  with  Senate 
resolution  of  December  12,  1881,  the  remainder  of  the 
correspondence  touching  the  desired  modification  of 
the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty.  Jan.  27,  Feb.  17,  June  6, 
1882. 

[Washington,  1882.]     3  pts.    23cm.     (47th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  78.    Pts.  1-3.)  Serial  no.  1989 


176  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

848  U.  S.  Dcpt.  of  .state.  Message  from  the  President  of  the  United 
States,  transmitting,  in  response  to  the  Senate  resolution 
of  the  18th  instant,  a  report  of  the  Secretary  of  State  and 
accompanying  papers  relating  to  the  treaty  between  the 
United  States  and  Great  Britain,  signed  April  19,  1850. 
Dec.  19.  1883. 
[Washington,  1883.']  15  p.  23cm.  (48th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Senate.     Ex.  doc.  no.  26.)  Serial  no.  2162 

849 [Dispatches,  1881-1882,  of  Mr.  George  Maney, 

formerly  our  minister  at  Bogota,  relative  to  the  Panama 
canal.]  *  Dec.  10,  1881. 
[Washington,  1884.]     8  p.     23cm.     (48th   Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Misc.  doc.  no.  12.)  Serial  no.  2170 

850 Message   from   the   President    of    the    United 

States,  in  response  to  the  Senate  resolution  of  December 
4,  1894,  transmitting  a  report  from  the  Secretary  of  State, 
with  accompanying  papers,  relating  to  affairs  at  Blue- 
fields,  in  the  Mosquito  territory.  Jan.  3,  1895. 
[Washington,  1895.]  207  p.  23cm.  (53d  Cong.,  3d  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  no.  20.)  Serial  no.  3275 

"  Great  Britain,  it  is  proper  to  say,  has  given  this  Govern- 
ment the  most  positive  assurance  that  she  asserts  no  right 
of  sovereignty  or  protection  over  the  territory,  but  on  the 
contrary  respects  the  full  and  paramount  sovereignty  of  the 
Government  of  Nicaragua."     Report  of  Mr.  Greshani,  p.  3. 

851 Correspondence  and  other  papers  relating  to  the 

proposed  interoceanic  ship  canal,  being  a  reprint  of  an 
executive  document  of  the  special  session  of  March  4, 
1857,  and  of  document  no.  194  of  the  Forty-seventh  con- 
gress, first  session.  Feb.  8,  1900. 
[Washington,  1900.]  (2),  203  p.  23cm.  (56th  Cong.,  1st 
sess.     Senate.     Doc.  161.)  Serial  no.  3853 

The  first  reprint  noted  was  "originally  printed  as  an  execu- 
tive document,  special  session  of  March  4,  1857";  the  other 
document  noted  appears  as  Senate  ex.  doc.  no.  194,  47th 
Cong.,  1st  sess.,  "  The  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty  and  the  Monroe 
doctrine." 

852 Correspondence  in  relation  to  an  interoceanic 

canal  between  the  Atlantic  and  Pacific  oceans,  the  Clay- 
ton-Bulwer treaty  and  the  Monroe  doctrine,  and  the  treaty 
between  the  United  States  and  New  Granada  of  Decem- 
ber 12,  1846,  comprising  a  reprint  of  Senate  executive 
docs.  no.  112,  4Gth  Congress,  2d  session;  no.  194,  47th  Con- 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     177 

gress,  1st  session;  and  no.  2G,  18th  Congress,  1st  session; 
and  correspondence  not  heretofore  communicated  to  Con- 
gress.   March  21,  1900. 
[Washington,  1900.']    548  p.    23cm.     (56th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
/Senate.    Doc.  231.)  Serial  no.  3853 

Includes  also  Senate  misc.  doc.  no.  12,  48th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
"  Correspondence  not  heretofore  communicated  to  Congress," 
p.  437-548. 

853  Dept  of  state.    History  of  amendments  proposed  to  the 

Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911.    31  p.    23\cm.     {61st 
Cong.,  3d  sess.    /Senate.    Doc.  746.)  Serial  no.  5943 

A  brief  history  of  the  amendments  proposed  and  considered 
relative  to  the  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty  with  Great  Britain, 
resulting  in  the  treaty  submitted  December  14,  1901.  Pre- 
pared in  the  Department  of  state,  and  sent  by  Mr.  Hay  to 
the  Committee  on  foreign  relations. 
11-35109  TC773.U7    1911 

854 Navy  dcpt.  Report  of  the  Secretary  of  the  navy,  com- 
municating in  compliance  with  a  resolution  of  the  Senate, 
the  correspondence  between  the  president  of  Nicaragua 
and  Commodore  Paulding  in  relation  to  the  capture  of 
Walker  and  his  command  in  December,  1857.  December 
23,  1858. 
[Washington,  1858.]  5  p.  23cm.  (35th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.    Ex.  doc.  10.)  Serial  no.  981 

855 President  (Pierce).     Message  from  the  President  of  the 

United  States  to  the  two  houses  of  Congress,  at  the  com- 
mencement of  the  first  session  of  the  thirty-fourth  Con- 
gress.   Dec,  31,  1855. 
[Washingto?i,  1855]     120  p.    23cm.     (34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
House.     Ex.  doc.  1.)  Serial  no.  840 

Also  appears  as  Sen.  ex.  doc.  no.  1,  34th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
Includes  a  review  of  affairs  in  Central  America  with  reference 
to  the  treaty  of  April  19,  1850,  and  transmits  papers  on  the 
subject. 

856  President   (Buchanan)     Message  of  the  President  of 

the  United  States,  to  the  two  houses  of  Congress  at  the 
commencement  of  the  first  session  of  the  thirty-fifth  Con- 
gress.   Dec.  8,  1857. 
[Washington,  1857.]      56  p.    23cm.     (35th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
/Senate.     Ex.  doc.  11.)  Serial  no.  919 

Clayton-Bulwer  treaty,  p.  9-13. 
137190°— 20 12 


178  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

857  U.  S.    Presidi  nt  (Buchanan).    Message  of  the  President  of  the 

United  States  to  the  two  houses  of  Congress  at  the  com- 
mencement of  the  second  session  of  the  thirty-fifth  Con- 
gress.    Dec.  6,  1858. 
[Washington,  1858.]     72  p.    23™.     (35th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate  Ex.  doc.  1.)  Serial  no.  974 

Clayton-Bulwer  treaty,  p.  12-13;  Central  American  affairs,  p. 
19-22,  51-67. 

858  Treaties,  etc.,  1849-1850  (Taylor)     Convention  between 

the  United  States  and  Great  Britain,  for  facilitating  and 
protecting  the  construction  of  a  ship  canal  between  the 
Atlantic  and  Pacific  Oceans,  and  for  other  purposes.  Con- 
cluded April  19,  1850  .  .  .  By  the  President  of  the 
United  States    ...     a  proclamation. 

[Washington,  1850.]    5  p.   23cm. 

Proclamation  with  text  of  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 
6-6559  TC773.TJ7    1850 

859 The  Clayton  and  Bulwer  convention,  of  the  19th 

April,  1850,  between  the  British  and  American  govern- 
ments, concerning  Central  America :  with  the  correspond- 
ence between  the  negotiators,  agreeing  that  the  conven- 
tion excludes  British  Honduras  from  its  operation;  and 
also,  the  correspondence  between  the  Earl  of  Clarendon 
and  Mr.  Buchanan,  United  States  minister  at  London,  in 
relation  to  the  true  construction  of  this  convention. 
London*  Triibner  and  co.,  1856.    63  p.    20cm. 

11-24509  F1436.TJ58 

8G0  Williams,  Mary  Wilhelmine.     Anglo-American  Isthmian  diplo- 
macy, 1815-1915. 
[Baltimore,  The  Lord  Baltimore  press,  1916]     xii,  356  p. 
double  map.    18\cm.     (Prize  essays  of  the  American  his- 
torical association.    1914) 
Bibliography  :  p.  331-345. 
16-14077  JX1398.1.W5      1916a 

1853— MEXICO 

861  Smith,  Gerrit.     Speech  on  the  Mexican  treaty  and  "Monroe 
doctrine."    June  27,  1854. 

(In   his    Speeches  ...  in   Congress,   p.   287-303.     New   York, 
1855.     19*"".) 

E431.S64 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  179 

862  U.  S.     33d  Cong.,  1st  sess.    The  Congressional  Globe.     1853- 

1854. 
City  of  Washington:  Printed  at  the  office  of  John  C.  Rives, 
185 4y   3  parts  and  appendix.    4°  • 

"There  is  a  provision  in  the  [Gadsen]  treaty  for  the  payment 
by  the  United  States  to  Mexico  of  the  sum  of  $7,000,000 
on  the  exchange  of  ratifications,  and  the  further  sum  of 
$3,000,000  when  the  boundaries  of  the  ceded  territories  shall 
be  settled.  To  be  enabled  to  comply  with  the  stipulation, 
according  to  the  terms  of  the  treaty  relative  to  the  payments 
therein  mentioned,  it  will  be  necessary  that  Congress  should 
make  an  appropriation  of  $7,000,000  for  that  purpose,  before 
the  30th  instant,  and  also  the  further  sum  of  $3,000,000,  to 
be  paid  when  the  boundaries  shall  be  established.  I  there- 
fore respectfully  request  that  these  sums  may  be  put  at  the 
disposal  of  the  Executive."— Message  of  President  Pierce, 
June  20,  1854,  Globe,  p.  1466. 

Bill  to  enable  the  President  to  fulfill  the  third  article  of  the 
treaty,  discussed,  p.  1476,  1519,  1520-1524,  1535-1536,  1536- 
1549,  1561-1565. 

The  speeches  by  Solomon  G.  Haven,  p.  1537-1540,  Joshua  R. 
Giddings,  p.  1541-1542,  Israel  Washburn,  p.  1542-1543,  Wil- 
liam W.  Boyce,  p.  1543-1545,  and  John  S.  Millson,  p.  1546- 
1548,  are  especially  to  be  noted. 

Speeches  reported  in  the  Appendix  are  as  follows  By  J.  Glancy 
Jones,  p.  1008-1011;  By  Gerrit  Smith,  p.  1015-1017;  By  P. 
Phillips,  p.  1018-1021 ;  By  R.  W.  Peckham,  p.  1028-1031 ;  By 
Thomas  H.  Benton,  p.  1031-1037 ;  By  T.  H.  Bayly,  p.  1042- 
1045 ;  By  T.  S.  Bocock,  p.  1045-1050. 

863  President  (Pierce).  Treaty — United  States  and  Mex- 
ico. Message  from  the  President  of  the  United  States, 
transmitting  a  copy  of  the  treaty  between  the  United 
States  of  America  and  the  republic  of  Mexico,  June  20, 

1854. 
[Washington,   1854..]     5   p.    23cm.     (33d   Cong.,   1st  sess. 

House.      Ex.  doc.  109.)  Serial  no.  726 

In  the  message  Congress  is  asked  for  appropriations  to  make 
the  treaty  effective. 

1854— GREAT  BRITAIN 

864  Davis,  Agnes  M.     Eeciprocity  treaty  of  1854. 

Women's   Canadian   historical  society,   Ottawa.     Transac- 
tions, 1915,  v.  6:  104-112. 


180  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

865  Robinson,   Chalfant.     A  history  of  two  reciprocity  treaties: 

the  treaty  with  Canada  in  1854,  the  treaty  with  the  Ha- 
waiian Islands  in  1876,  with  a  chapter  on  the  treaty-mak- 
ing power  of  the  House  of  representatives. 
[New  Haven,  Conn.,  The  Tuttle,  Morehouse  &  Taylor  press, 
1904]  ®%0  p.  fold,  map,  fold,  tab.,  diagrs.  (1  fold.) 
2JV>". 

Bibliographies:  p.  [78]-82,  [157J-160,  [176] 
5-41966  HF1732.A1R5 

866  Sumner,   Charles.     Termination   of  the  Canadian  reciprocity 

treaty.     Speeches  in  the  Senate,  on  the  joint  resolution 
giving  notice  for  the  termination  of  the  Canadian  reci- 
procity treaty,  December  21, 1864,  January  11  and  12, 1865. 
(In  his  Works,    v.  9,  p.  178-191.    Boston,  1874.    20*cm.) 

E415.6.S93.V.9 

Citations :  Story  on  the  Constitution,  vol.  2,  sec.  1838 ;  Ware  v. 
Hylton,  3  Dallas,  R.,  261 ;  The  Prize  Cases,  2  Black.  R.,  671 ; 
Brown  v.  The  United  States,  8  Cranch,  131,  132,  133. 

867  U.  S.     38th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     The  Congressional  Globe. 

Washington:  Congressional  globe  office,  1864-    4  V^8-    4°- 

Steps  were  taken,  but  unsuccessfully,  during  the  first  session 
of  the  thirty-eighth  Congress  to  abrogate  the  Canadian  reci- 
procity treaty  of  1854.  For  resolutions  and  discussions,  see 
p.  19,  1387,  2333-2338.  2364-2371.  2452,  2453-2456,  2476- 
2482,  2482-2484,  2502-2509,  and  Appendix,  p.  119-120. 

868  38th  Cong.,  M  sess.     The  Congressional  Globe. 

Washington:  Congressional  globe  office,  1865.    2  pts.     4°  • 

During  the  second  session  of  the  thirty-eighth  Congress  a 
joint  resolution  was  passed  authorizing  the  President  to 
terminate  the  Canadian  reciprocity  treaty  and  to  appoint 
commissioners  to  negotiate  a  new  treaty. 

Action  in  the  House  of  Representatives,  p.  31-33,  35,  265,  267, 
276-277,  291. 

Action  in  the  Senate,  p.  34,  35,  71,  95-97,  204-213,  226-234,  293. 

Mr.  Collamer  (p.  209-210)  held  that  the  Canadian  treaty  was 
in  conflict  with  the  revenue-raising  clause  of  the  Constitu- 
tion, and  Mr.  Howe  (p.  211-212)  took  issue  with  this  view. 

869  Congress.     House.     Committee     on     foreign     affairs. 

Commercial  relations  with  Canada   and  other  states  on 
the  American  Continent.     Report.     July  5,  1884. 

[  Washington,  1884.}     ■>'  />■     %3cm-      (48th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House.     Report  2140.)  Serial  no.  2259 

Report  on  a  joint  resolution  requesting  the  President  to  ne- 
gotiate with  the  government  of  Great  Britain  for  the  re- 
newal of  the  reciprocity  treaty  of  1854. 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  181 

"  The  committee  ...  in  recognition  of  the  fact  that  the  Con- 
stitution has  prescribed  that  all  measures  affecting  the  reve- 
nues of  the  Government  should  originate  in  the  House,  con- 
sider it  eminently  fit  that  the  House  should  give  expression 
to   its   opinion    regarding   international    agreements   which 

'    may  affect  such  revenues." 

870  Congress.    Senate.     Committee  on  finance.    Reciprocity 

with  Canada.  Compilation  of  documents  relating  to  the 
proposed  agreement  of  1911  and  to  the  treaty  of  1854,  and 
its  subsequent  operation. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1911.     [846]  p.    %2\cm. 

Special  message  of  President  Taft,  Jan.  26,  1911,  with  corre- 
spondence ;  H.  R.  32216  "An  act  to  promote  reciprocal  trade 
relations  with  the  Dominion  of  Canada  ..."  introduced 
in  the  House  Jan.  28,  1911 ;  Reports  and  hearings  of  the 
Committee  on  ways  and  means,  etc.,  etc. 
11-16477  HF1732.C2A4    1911c 

871  Whitman,  William.     Objections  to  reciprocity  on  constitutional 

and  practical  grounds. 
Boston,   The  Rockwell  and  Churchill  press,  1904.    35  p. 
23cm. 

5-22961  HF1731.W6 

1867— RUSSIA  (Alaska  purchase) 

872  The   Alaska   purchase.     A  resolution   was   presented   by  Mr. 

Butler  of  Mass.,  Dec.  7, 1867,  "  That  so  much  of  the  Presi- 
dent's message  as  relates  to  the  payment  of  money  for  the 
Russian  possessions  which  are  the  subject  of  negotiation 
between  the  several  Governments  be  referred  to  the  Com- 
mittee on  Appropriations.  Disagreed  to ;  referred  to  the 
Committee  on  Foreign  affairs.  The  resolution  was 
brought  up  again,  Dec.  9,  1867,  and  was  debated  by  Na- 
thaniel P.  Banks,  Eobert  C.  Schenck,  Cadwalader  C. 
Washburn,  and  Elihu  B.  Washburne. 

(In  Congressional  globe,  40th  Cong.,  2d  sess.  pt.  1,  p.  92-95.) 
Dec.  11,  1867  the  question  was  again  brought  up  on  a  resolu- 
tion presented  by  Mr.  Washburn  of  Wisconsin,  that  any 
more  purchase  of  territory  would  be  inexpedient.  Debated 
by  Cadwalader  C.  Washburn,  Congressional  Globe,  40th 
Cong.,  2d  sess..  pt.  1,  p.  135-139 ;  John  M.  Broomall,  p.  139- 
143 ;  Elihu  B.  Washburne,  p.  143-144. 
The  purchase  of  Alaska  was  again  brought  up  for  debate 
March  14,  1868  and  was  discussed  by  William  Higby,  Con- 
gressional globe,  40th  Congress,  1st  session,  pt.  2,  pp.  1870- 
1874,  and  Cadwalader  C.  Washburn,  pp.  1875-1876.     These 


182  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

debates  were  principally  directed  to  the  treaty-making 
power.  In  May  186S  a  bill  providing  for  an  appropriation 
to  carry  into  effect  the  treaty  with  Alaska  was  introduced 
by  Nathaniel  P.  Banks;  was  not  debated  until  June  30,  1868, 
when  Mr.  Banks  addressed  the  committee,  his  speech  was 
published  in  the  Appendix.  William  Loughbridge  of  Iowa, 
spoke  on  the  question.  Congressional  globe,  40th  Cong.,  2d 
sess.,  pt.  4,  p.  3621-3625 ;  The  debate  was  continued  by  Mr. 
Boyer  and  Mr.  Pruyn,  their  speeches  were  published  in  the 
Appendix,  James  A.  Johnson,  of  California,  spoke  on  the 
question,  p.  3625-362S ;  July  1,  1868,  the  bill  was  debated  by 
Orange  Ferris,  James  Mullins,  Leonard  Myers  and  John  A. 
Peters,  p.  3661-3670.  The  bill  was  again  discussed,  July  7, 
1S68,  by  William  Higby,  Dennis  McCarthy,  Green  B.  Rauin 
&  Rufus  P.  Spalding,  p.  3805-3814.  July  10,  1868,  Mr.  Orth, 
Mr.  Blair  and  Mr.  Culloni  obtained  leave  to  have  their 
speeches  printed,  as  part  of  the  debates  on  the  bill.  These 
were  published  in  the  Appendix. 

July  14,  1868,  Mr.  Banks,  Mr.  Schenck,  Mr.  Stevens  of  Penn., 
and  Mr.  Mungen  spoke  on  the  bill,  p.  4052-4055.  Mr.  Banks 
speech  was  published  in  the  Appendix. 

A  report  from  the  committee  on  conference  was  presented  to 
tin'  House,  July  23,  1868,  by  Mr.  Banks,  and  was  debated  by 
Mr.  Loughbridge  and  others,  Congressional  globe,  40th  Cong., 
2d  sess.  pt.  5,  p.  4392-1394. 

873  Blaine,  James  Gillespie.     Twenty  years  of  Congress :  from  Lin- 

coln to  Garfield.    With  a  review  of  the  events  which  led 
to  the  political  revolution  of  1860. 
Norwich,  Conn.,  The  Henry  Bill  publishing  company,  1884- 
86.    2  v.    fronts.,  ports.,  fold.  map.    2Scm. 

The  purchase  of  Alaska :  v.  2,  p.  333-339. 
2-19439  E661.B63 

874  Loughbridge,  William.     [The  rights,  the  powers,  and  the  con- 

stitutional prerogatives  of  the  House  of  Representatives. 
Speeches  on  the  House  bill  making  an  appropriation  of 
money  to  carry  into  effect  the  treaty  with  Eussia  of  March 
30,  1867.] 
Congressional  Globe,  40th  Congress,  2d  session,  pt.  4,  June 
30,  1868,  p.  3621-3625;  pt.  5,  July  23,  1868,  p.  4393-4394. 

875  Meier,  Ernst.     Uber  den  Abschluss  von  Staatsvertriigen. 

Leipzig,  Durwker  &  Humblot,  1874.    xiii,  368  p.    23cm. 

"  Der  Vertrag  mit  Russland  wegen  der  Abtretung  von  Alaska, 
L868,"  p.  181-19L 
2-18652  JK4171.T5M4 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN"  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  183 

876  Sumner,  Charles.     The  cession  of  Russia  America  to  the  United 

States.     Speech  in  the  Senate,  on  the  ratification  of  the 
treaty  between  the  United  States  and  Russia,  April  9. 

1867. 

[In  his  Works,  vol.  11,  p.  181-349.    Boston,  1877.    20Fm.) 

E415.6.S93,v.ll 

■ Same. 

{In  his  Complete  works.  Statesman  ed.,  vol.  15,  p.  1-169. 
Boston,  1900.     23cm.) 

E415.6.S95,v.l5 

877  U.  S.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on  foreign  affairs.     Re- 

port .  .  .  relating  to  the  treaty  with  Russia,  May  18, 1868. 
[Washington,  1868.]     65  p.    23cm.     (40th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
House.    Report  37.)  Serial  no.  1357 

Report  presented  by   Mr.   Banks ;   treaty-making  power   dis- 
cussed, p.  1-12. 
Mr.  Washburn  submitted  the  views  of  the  minority,  treaty- 
making  power  discussed,  p.  44-51. 

878 Dept.  of  state.   Message  from  the  President  transmitting 

correspondence  in  relation  to  Russian  America.    February 
17,  1868. 
[Washington,  1868.]     361  p.    23cm.     (40th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 

House.     Ex.  doc.  177.)  Serial  no.  1339 

"  Probably  this  treaty  stands  alone  in  the  history  of  diplomacy, 
as  an  important  treaty  conceived,  and  initiated,  prosecuted 
and  completed,  without  being  preceded  or  attended  by  pro- 
tocols or  despatches."  Notes  of  secretary  of  state,  printed 
on  page  3  of  the  documents  accompanying  the  President's 
message. 

879  Wharton,  Francis.     A  digest  of  the  international  law  of  the 

United  States  .  .  .  Vol.  II. 
Washington:  Govt,  print,  off.,  1887.     (2),  832  p.    23\cm. 

JX237.W5  1887,v.2 
"  The  tendency  of  the  majority  of  the  House  was  evidently  to 
sanction  the  Alaska  purchase,  but  to  couple  the  approval  of 
the  treaty  with  a  reservation  of  the  right  of  the  House  to 
approve  or  disapprove  in  all  cases  in  which  the  sanction  of 
the  House  is  necessary  to  execute  a  treaty  "  p.  21. 

880  Yeaman,  G.  H.     The  treaty-making  power. 

Nation,  Apr.  30,  1868,  v.  6:31^9-350.  AP2.N2,v.6 

Discusses  the  constitutional  question  arising  from  the  reluc- 
tance of  the  House  to  make  the  appropriation  for  the  pur- 
chase of  Alaska. 


184  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1875— HAWAIIAN  ISLANDS 

881  Banks,  N.  P.     Hawaiian  treaty.     Speech  in  the  House  of  Repre- 

sentatives, April  10,  1876. 
Congressional  record,  Jf.Jf.th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  v.  1,  pt.  6,  Ap- 
pendix, p.  25-63.  Jll.R5,v.4 

..."  if  the  House  shall  negative  the  legislation  necessary  to 
render  this  treaty  effective,  in  my  opinion  it  will  he  a  nullifi- 
cation of  one  of  the  most  important  powers  of  the  Constitu- 
tion "...  page  63. 

Cites  various  precedents  in  support  of  this  position. 

882  Kelley,  William  D.     The  Hawaiian  treaty. 

Congressional  record.  IfJfth   Cong.,  1st  session  v.  If.,  pt.  2, 
March  6.  1876,  p.  Uf95-lJf98.  Jli.R5,v.4,Pt.2 

Attacks  the  treaty  on  constitutional  grounds  and  upon  the 
merits  of  the  treaty  itself. 

883  Morrill,  Justin  S.     The  Hawaiian  treaty. 

C ongressional  record,  Jf.'/th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  v.  Jf,  pt.  6,  Aug. 
lJf,  1876,  p.. 5567-5568.  jii.R5,v.4,  pt.  6 

"Our  Constitution  provides  that  all  revenue  bills  shall  origi- 
nate in  the  House  of  Representatives.  Where  did  this  bill 
really  originate?  Clearly  it  originated  in  the  State  Depart- 
ment, where  the  treaty  was  made,  and  not  in  the  House  of 
Representatives.  It  is  therefore,  in  my  judgment,  not  only 
a  plain  violation  of  the  spirit  of  the  Constitution,  but  it  is 
of  the  most  vicious  character ;  for  if  the  Executive  and  the 
Senate  may  interfere  and  make  a  treaty  with  so  unimpor- 
tant a  kingdom  as  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  we  may  make  it 
with  all  other  powers." 

884  Hawaiian    reciprocity   treaty.     Speech   in   the  United 

Stale-  Senate,  executive  session,  March  18,  1875. 

AYashington:  Govt,  print,  off.,  1875.     llf.  p.    23cm. 
Regards  the  treaty  as  unconstitutional. 

885  Robinson,   Chalfant.     A  history  of  two  reciprocity  treaties: 

the  treaty  with  Canada  in  1854,  the  treaty  with  the  Ha- 
waiian Islands  in  187G.  with  a  chapter  on  the  treaty-mak- 
ing  power  of  the  House  of  representatives. 
[X>  w  II  lie, ,,.  ('onn.,  The  Tuff  I, .  Mori  house  &  Taylor  press, 
1904]  mO  p.  fold,  map,  fold,  tab.,  diagrs.  (1  fold.) 
23\cm. 

Bibliographies:  p.  [Tsj-bi',  L157J-1G0,  [176]. 
5-419G6  HF1732.A1R5 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  185 

886  Thomas,    Philip    F.     The    Hawaiian   treaty.     Speech    in    the 

House,  May  8,  1876. 
Congressional  record,  44th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  v.  4,  pt.  6,  Ap- 
pendix, p.  184-190.  Jll.R5,v.4,App. 

'An  argument  in  support  of  the  contention  that  in  the  treaty 
in  question  the  House  is  competent  to  judge  of  its  ex- 
pediency and  act  accordingly. 

887  Tucker,  J.  R.     Hawaiian  treaty. 

Congressional  record,  44th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  vol.  4,  pt.  4-,  May 
8, 1876,  p.  3031-3037.  Jii.R5,v.4,Pt.4 

Discusses  in  part  the  question  of  constitutional  powers  and  in 
part  economic  considerations  involved. 


XT.  S.     44th  Cong.,  1st  sess.     Congressional  record.     Vol.  4. 
Washington:  Govt,  print,  off.,  1876.    8  pts.    4°> 

H.  R.  612-To  carry  into  effect  a  convention  between  the 
United  States  and  His  Majesty  the  King  of  the  Hawaiian 
Islands,  signed  30th  day  of  January,  1875:  Introduced,  p. 
300 ;  Referred  to  the  committee  of  ways  and  means,  p. 
300 ;  Reported  back,  considered,  and  •  passed  by  House,  p. 
1268,  1419-1426,  1461-1465,  1488-1499,  1596-1604,  2270-2281, 
2360,  3031-3037;  Referred  to  the  Senate  committee  on  for- 
eign relations,  p.  3083 ;  Reported  back,  considered,  and  re- 
ferred to  the  Senate  committee  on  finance,  p.  4261 ;  Recon- 
sidered and  passed  by  the  Senate,  p.  4265,  4266,  5462,  5463, 
5485-5491,  5522-5524,  5533-5535,  5563-5572;  Approved  by 
the  President,  p.  5691. 

Jll.R5,v.4 

889  Congress.    House.     Committee    on    ways    and   means. 

Report  .  .  .  The  bill  (H.  R,  612)  to  carry  into  effect  a 
convention  between  the  United  States  and  His  Majesty 
the  King  of  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  signed  on  the  30th  day 
of  January,  1875.    Feb.  24,  1876. 

[Washington,  1876.]     12  p.    23cm.     (44th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House.     Report.     116.)  Serial  no.  1708 

"  The  treaty,  in  consequence  of  its  abolition  of  the  duty  now 
imposed  by  law  in  the  United  States  on  the  articles  enum- 
erated in  the  schedule,  requires  an  act  of  Congress  to  carry 
it  into  effect.  Unlike  most  of  the  treaties  made  with  for- 
eign nations,  not  only  the  consent  of  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives is  required  to  give  it  validity,  but  the  proposition 
to  do  so  must  begin  there,"  p.  3. 

890  Hawaiian  treaty.    The  views  of  the  mi- 
nority. 

{Washington,  1876.]     6  p.     23cm.  (44th   Cong.,  1st  sess. 

House.    Report.    116,  p.  2.)  Serial  no.  1708 

A  discussion  of  the  expediency  of  the  treaty ;  not  of  consti- 
tutional principles  involved. 


186  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

891  U.  S.    47th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Congressional  record. 

Washington:  Govt,  print,  off.,  1882.    5  v.    4°. 

S.  Res.  122,  providing  for  the  termination  of  the  Hawaiian 
reciprocity  treaty  of  Jan.  30,  1875,  introduced  by  Mr.  Mor- 
rill, p.  921;  referred  to  committee  on  finance,  p.  1003-1005; 
reported  back  with  amendment  and  referred  to  committee 
on  foreign  relations,  p.  3322. 

Jll.E,5,v.l4 

892  Congress.     House.     Committee  on  finance.    Report  .  .  . 

joint  resolution  (S.  Res.  122)  providing  for  the  termina- 
tion of  the  reciprocity  treaty  of  Jan.  30,  1875,  between 
the  United  States  of  America  and  His  Majesty  the  King 
of  the  Hawaiian  Islands.     Feb.  27,  1883. 

[Washington,   1883.']     8  p.    23cm.     (47th   Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Report,  1013.)  Serial  no.  2088 

"  The  present  reciprocity  treaty  with  the  Hawaiian  islands  is 
obviously  adverse  to  the  interests  of  the  United  States,  and 
so  much  more  than  would  now  be  asked  for  by  Hawaii,  that 
nothing  less  than  its  abrogation  affords  a  sufficient  remedy. 
Even  those  who  would  prefer  a  modification  merely  must 
see  that  the  first  step  to  that  end,  or  to  obtain  any  satis- 
factory result,  is  to  wholly  abrogate  the  present  treaty. 
Doubtless  the  notice  of  its  abrogation  might  be  lawfully 
given  by  the  President,  or  it  may  be  done  by  Congress." 

Views  of  the   minority  : 

'■  When  our  Constitution  was  framed  no  compact  between  two 
different  nations  such  as  a  reciprocity  treaty  was  known  or 
ever  existed;  and  the  power  of  the  President  'with  the  ad- 
vice and  consent  of  the  Senate,  to  make  treaties,  provided 
two-thirds  of  the  Senate  concur,'  must  be  accepted  as  a 
limitation  of  the  power  to  just  what  was  then  known  and 
understood  to  be  comprehended  by  the  words  'to  make 
treaties.'  The  Constitution  can  not  be  changed  by  any  mod- 
ern diplomatic  inventions."  .  .  . 

"  Our  Constitution  does  not  lack  harmony,  and  all  of  its  pro- 
visions show  that  it  was  never  intended  that  the  President 
and  the  Senate  should  have  even  the  initiative  in  regulating 
trade  or  commerce. 

"A  still  greater  inhibition  of  this  modern  shape  of  the  treaty 
power  is  found  in  another  provision  of  the  Constitution. 
which  provides  that — 'All  bills  for  raising  revenue  shall 
originate  in  the  House  of  Representatives;  but  the  Senate 
may  propose  or  concur  with  amendments  as  on  other  bills.' 

"  N.  reciprocity  treaty  could  be  made  that  would  not  be  a 
direct  Infraction  Of  tins  provision  of  the  Constitution,  as 
all  such  treaties  must  necessarily  curtail  the  boundaries 
within  which  revenues  are  or  can  be  raised.  If  such  a 
treatj  could  be  made  with  one  nation  it  would  be  possible 
to  make  like  treaties  with  all,  and  thus  the  power  of  the 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     187 

House  of  Representatives  to  originate  revenue  bills  would 
be  suspended  and  frittered  away.  It  does  not  help  the  main 
question  in  the  least  to  obtain  the  consent  of  an  existing 
House  of  Representatives  to  pass  a  law  in  conformity  with 
or  to  carry  out  the  provisions  of  such  a  treaty.  The  power 
'  of  the  House  to  originate  revenue  bills  inheres  forever,  and 
no  existing  House  can  exercise  that  power  so  as  to  deprive  a 
succeeding  House  of  any  of  its  proper  Constitutional  func- 
tions." 

893  Congress.     Senate.     History   of  Hawaiian  treaty   and 

Cuban  reciprocity.  History  of  the  Hawaiian  treaty,  with 
a  report  to  terminate  the  treaty,  signed  by  Justin  S.  Mor- 
rill, Daniel  W.  Vorhees,  and  Nelson  W.  Aldrich;  also  a 
history  of  the  agitation  for  Cuban  reciprocity  with  the 
United  States,  and  opinions  as  to  the  probable  results  of 
Cuban  reciprocity,  by  Charles  H.  Dietrich.  Data  and 
tables  compiled  by  Truman  G.  Palmer.     March  2,  1903. 

[Washington,  1903.]     27  p.    23cm.     (57th  Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate,    doc.  206.)  Serial  no.  4430 

Includes  Senate  report  no.  1013,  47th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  from  the 
Committee  on  finance,  with  views  of  the  minority  on  Consti- 
tutional principles  involved  in  the  Hawaiian  treaty. 

1883— MEXICO.     1884— SPAIN 

894  U.    S.     Congress.     House.      Committee   on   ways    and  means. 

Mexican  treaty  of  January  20,  1883.     Adverse   report. 
May  25,  1886. 
[Washington,  1886.]    52  p.    folded  map.   23cm.    (49th  Cong., 
1st  sess.    House.    Report.    2615.)  Serial  no.  2443 

"  The  bill  under  consideration  is  intended  to  give  practical 
effect  to  the  pending  commercial  treaty  between  the  United 
States  and  Mexico.  Although  the  right  to  negotiate  treaties 
is  vested  by  the  Constitution  in  the  President  and  the  Senate, 
the  pending  treaty  expressly  stipulates  that  it  shall  not  be 
operative  until  laws  necessary  to  carry  it  into  execution 
shall  have  been  passed  by  the  Congress  of  the  United  States 
and  the  Government  of  the  United  Mexican  States. 

"  The  purpose  and  object  of  this  proviso  is  evident.  The  treaty 
pending,  being  purely  commercial  and  dealing  with  questions 
of  revenue  only,  which  under  the  Constitution  are  subject  to 
the  exclusive  control  of  Congress,  could  not  be  negotiated  or 
carried  into  practical  effect  without  affirmative  action  on  the 
part  of  the  legislative  branch  of  the  Government." 

Majority  report  presented  by  Mr.  Maybury,  p."  1-7. 

Minority  report,  presented  by  Mr.  Hewitt,  p.  15-30. 


188  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

895  U.  S.   Congress.     St  naU  .     Journal  of  the  executive  proceedings 
of  the  Senate  of  the  United  States  of  America  from  De- 
cember  3,   1883,  to   March  :',.  1885,  inclusive.      Vol.  24. 
Printed  by  order  of  the  Senate  of  the  United  States.. 
'Washington:  Govt,  print,  off.,  1901.    797  p.   23cm. 

Resolution  to  inquire  into  tariff  and  revenue  features  of  the 

.Mexican  treaty,  p.  128;  Disagreed  to,  p.  129. 
Resolution   to   consider   the   Spanish   treaty  in   open   session, 
p.  385. 

1884— HAWAIIAN  ISLANDS 

89G  U.  S.     Congress.     House.     Committee  on  the  judiciary.    Treaty 

with  the  Hawaiian  islands.     Report    [by  J.  11.  Tucker 

from]  the  committee  on  the  judiciary.     March  3,  1887. 

[Washington,  1887.']     23  p.    23™.      (pfh   Cong.,  2d  sess. 

House.     Report,  ^177.  Serial  no.  2501 

The  body  of  the  committee's  report  is  almost  identical  with 
House  report  no.  2GS0,  4Sth  Congress,  2d  session.  These 
two  reports  set  forth  in  detail  the  view  which  sets  a  limit 
on  the  power  of  the  Senate  to  make  treaties  affecting  duties 
levied  by  Congress. 

The  report  concludes ; 

"The  concurrent  wills  of  both  Houses  and  of  the  President 
to  the  imposition  of  a  duty  are  substituted  by  a  treaty  hav- 
ing the  force  of  law,  which  imposes  the  duty  despite  the 
the  dissent  of  the  House,  unless  President  and  Senate  agree 
to  relinquish  it. 

"  Your  committee  believe  that  this  is  a  radical  change  in  the 
equilibrium  of  the  Constitution,  which,  unless  reversed, 
will  become  dangerous  to  the  rights  of  the  people,  by  pro- 
moting the  intervention  of  foreign  nations  in  our  domestic 
policy  of  taxation,  through  the  agency  of  a  minority  of  the- 
tax-payers  of  the  country. 

"Your  committee,  therefore,  with  great  respect,  recommend 
the  adoption  of  the  following  resolutions: 

•"(1)  That  the  President,  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent 
of  the  Senate,  cannot  negotiate  a  treaty  which  shall  be 
binding  on  the  United  States,  whereby  duties  on  imports 
are  to  be  regulated,  either  by  imposing  or  remitting,  in- 
creasing or  decreasing  them,  without  the  sanction  of  an  act 
of  Congress ;  and  that  the  extension  of  the  term  for  the 
operation  of  the  original  treaty  or  convention  with  the  Gov- 
ernment of  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  proposed  by  the  supple- 
mentary runvention  of  December  <;,  isst.  will  not  be  bind- 
i'i-  on  the  United  States  without  like  sanction,  which  was 
provided  Cor  in  the  original  treaty  and  convention,  ami  was 
given  by  ad  of  <  Songress. 

•"(•_' 1  Thai  the  President  is  respectfully  requested  to  with- 
hold final  action  upon  the  proposed  convention,  and  to  con- 
dition its  final  ratification  upon  the  sanction  of  an  act  of 
Congress,  in  respect  of  the  duties  upon  articles  to  be  im- 
ported from  tin-  Hawaiian  Islands.'" 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  189 

1894— JAPAN 

897  American  journal  of  international  law.     Editorial.    The 

Japanese  school  question. 
Ameri'can  journal  of  inter-national  law,  Jan.,  Apr.  1907,  v.  1: 
150-153;  449-4-52.  jxi.A6,v.1 

898  Anti-federalist.     The  United  States  can  enforce  its  law. 

North  American  review,  Dec.  21, 1906,  v.  183:  1239-1250. 

AP2.N7,v.l83 

899  Baldwin,  Simeon  E.     Schooling  rights  under  our  treaty  with 

Japan. 

Columbia  law  review,  Feb.  1907,  v.  7 :  85-92. 

900  Barstow,  Hollen  M.     The  treaty  power  and  police  regulation. 

American  lawyer,  Jan.  1908,  v.  16: 18-25. 
Gist  of  the  treaty  with  Japan. 

901  Fort,  J.  F.     [Extract  on  the  right  of  a  state  to  enact  legislation 

contravening  international  treaties]     Address  at  Union 

League  Club  celebration. 
Chicago  legal  news,  Feb.  27,  1909,  v.  41 :  243. 
New  Jersey  law  journal,  Mar.  1909,  v.  32:  168-171. 

902  Foster,  David  J.     The  treaty  power  of  the  government. 

Congressional  record,  59th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  41,  pt.  2,  Jan. 
16,  1907:  1231-1238;  Jan.  22,  1907:  1522-1523. 

An  argument  that  the  United  States  by  treaty  stipulation, 
may  relieve  the  subjects  of  a  foreign  power  of  the  disabilities 
of  alienage  respecting  the  public  schools. 

Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2 

903  Fulton,  C.  W.     American  schools  and  Japanese  pupils. 

North  American  review,  Dec.  21, 1906,  v.  813: 1225-1228. 

AP2.N7,v.l83 

901  Gilbert,  George  E.     The  Japanese  school  question.     Speech  in 
the  House  of  Representatives,  Feb.  12,  1907. 
Congressional  record,  59th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  41,  Appendix: 

52-55.  .  Jll.R5,v.41,App. 

The  treaty-making  power  of  the  general  government  can  not 
invade  the  reserved  rights  of  the  states. 


190  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

905  Hayes,  Everis  A.     The  treaty-making  power  of  the  government 

and   the   Japanese   question.     Speech    in   the   House    of 

representatives,  Jan.  23,  1907. 
Congressional  record,  59th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  1^1,  pt.  2: 

1579-1583.  jii.R5,v.4i,Pt.2 

Holds  that  "the  authority  to  make  a  treaty  under  the  Con- 
stitution must  be  discovered  by  exactly  the  same  process 
as  the  authority  to  pass  a  statute  .  .  .  The  provision  of  the 
Constitution  reserving  to  the  states  or  to  the  people  all 
powers  not  granted  to  the  Federal  Government  must  be  just 
as  binding  upon  the  treaty-making  power  as  upon  any  other 
branch  of  the  government." 

906  Hazeltine,  Mayo  W.    Would  England  side  with  Japan  against 

the  United  States? 
North  American  review,  Dec.  21,  1906,  v.  183:  1280-1284.. 

AP2.N7,v.l83 

907  Hyde,  Charles  Cheney.     The  segregation  of  Japanese  students 

by  the  school  authorities  of  San  Francisco. 
Green  bag,  Jan.  1907,  v.  19:  38-lfi. 

Treats  of  the  subject  under  the  headings,  first,  whether  the 
treaty  of  1894  has  been  violated,  second,  the  interpretation 
of  the  treaty,  third,  the  validity  of  the  treaty,  and  fourth, 
the  liability  of  the  United  States  to  Japan  if  the  treaty 
has  been  violated.  Concludes  that  a  treaty  is  the  supreme 
law  of  the  land. 

908  Ignotus  [pseud.']     Is  the  United  States  a  world  power? 

North  American  review,  Dec.  7,  1906,  v.  183:  1107-1119. 

AP2.N7.V.183 

909  Ion,  Theodore  P.     The  Japanese  school  incident  at  San  Fran- 

cisco from  the  point  of  view  of  international  and  con- 
stitutional law. 
Michigan  law  review,  Mar.  1907,  v.  6:  326-31$. 

910  Lewis,  William  Draper.     Can  the  United  States  by  treaty  con- 

fer on  Japanese  residents  in  California  the  right  to  at- 
tend the  public  schools? 
American  law  register,  Feb.  1907,  v.  55:75-90. 
Footnote  references  to  eases. 

"  If  these  conclusions  are  correct,  our  Federal  Government  has 
under  the  Constitution  power  to  make  a  treaty  with  Japan 
or  any  other  foreign  nation  giving  to  the  subjects  or  citizens 
oJ  the  foreign  nation  residing  in  one  of  the  States  the 
right  to  attend  the  public  schools  of  the  State  on  the 
same  terms  as  native  or  naturalized  citizens.  In  the  Con- 
stitution itself  we  find  nothing  to  restrain  the  President 
from  negotiating,  and  two  thirds  of  the  Senate  from  ratify- 
ing such  a  treaty."     p.  88. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  191 

911  Miller,   Shackleford.     [Address  on  the  treaty-making  power, 

before  the  Jefferson  school  of  law.] 
Congressional  record,  59th  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  J/J,  pt.  2:  1519- 

1522.  Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2 

Asks  the  question  whether  the  President  and  Senate  can  con- 
stitutionally make  a  treaty  with  Japan  that  will  confer  the 
right  on  Japanese  citizens  of  California  to  have  themselves 
and  their  children  educated  in  the  public  schools  at  the  pub- 
lic expense,  and  answers  the  question  in  the  negative. 

912  Robbins,  A.  H.     A  cloud  upon  the  horizon  which  threatens  our 

dual  form  of  government. 
Central  law  journal,  Feb.  12, 1909,  v.  68: 115-117. 

Editorial  comment  on  the  controversy  between  the  President 
of  the  U.  S.  and  California  legislature. 

913  Root,  Elihu.    The  real  question  under  the  Japanese  treaty  and 

the  San  Francisco  school  board  resolution. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1907,  v.  1: 
273-286. 

Address  before  the  first  annual  meeting  of  the  American  so- 
ciety of  international  law. 
"  The  treaty-making  power  is  not  distributed ;  it  is  all  vested 
in  the  national  government ;  no  part  of  it  is  vested  in  or 
reserved  to  the  states.  In  international  affairs  there  are  no 
states ;  there  is  but  one  nation,  .  .  ."  p.  278. 
M  The  great  question  which  overshadowed  all  discussion  of  the 
treaty  of  1894  was  the  question :  Are  the  people  of  the 
United  States  about  to  break  friendship  with  the  people  of 
Japan?  That  question,  I  believe,  has  been  happily  an- 
swered in  the  negative."    p.  286. 

914  Sherley,  Swagar.     The  treaty-making  power.     Speech  in  the 

House  of  representatives,  Jan.  22,  1907. 
Congressional  record,  59th  Cong.,  2d  sess.,  v.  Jf.1,  pt.  2: 1515- 

1522.  Jll.R5,v.41,pt.2 

Discusses  first,  violations  of  treaty-rights  of  aliens,  and,  then 
the  extent  of  the  treaty-making  power.  Holds  that  "  the 
reserved  powers  of  the  states  are  a  limitation  upon  the 
treaty-making  power." 

Appended  is  the  address  of  Judge  Shackleford  Miller. 

1897— GREAT  BRITAIN 

915  Andre,  Alexandre.     Le  traite  anglo-americain  d'arbitrage  de 

1897. 
Revue   generale   de   droit  international  public,   Nov.-Dec. 
1911,  v.  18:  654-666.  JX3.B56,v.l8 


192  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

916  U.  S.      Treaties,  etc.,  1893  1897  {CI  veland)     .  .  .  Arbitration 

with  Great  Britain.  Message  from  the  President  .  .  . 
transmitting  a  treaty  between  the  United  States  and  Great 
Britain  for  the  arbitration  of  matters  in  difference  be- 
tween  the  two  countries,  signed  al  Washington,  January 
11,  L897. 
[Washington,  Gov't  'print,  off.,  1905]  33  p.  23cm.  (58th 
Cong.,  3d  sess.     Senate.     Doc.  161) 

At  head  of  title:  Confidential— Executive  D— Fifty-fourth  Con- 

gress,  second  session. 
Signed:  Richard  oiney.     Julian  I'aunceforte  [ !] 
Injunction  of  secrecy  removed  and  ordered  printed  February 

l  I.   1905. 
Extracts  from  the  Executive  journal  of  the  Senate,  February 

8-May  5,  1897:  p.  S-33. 
6-12239 

1897— HAWAIIAN  ISLANDS 

917  Changing*  the  Constitution. 

Nation,  July  31,  1898,  v.  67:  ',',.  AP2.N2,v.67 

With  regard  to  the  annexation  of  Hawaii  by  joint  resolution. 
"With  the  Change  now  made  in  the  Constitution  it  will  re- 
quire only  a  bare  majority  in  both  Houses  of  Congress  to 
annex  territory  in  any  part  of  the  world." 

918  Cooley,  Thomas  M.     Grave  obstacles  to  Hawaiian  annexation. 

Forum.  June,  1893,  v.  15:  389-4.06.  AP2.F6,v.i5 

919  Schouler,  James.     Mr.  Cleveland  and  the  Senate. 

Forum,  Mar.,  1897,  v.  23:  65-74..  AP2.F6,v.23 

"The  Hawaiian  conquest,"  p.  (39. 
1901— GREAT  BRITAIN   (HAY-PAUNCEFOTE  TREATY) 

920  Anderson,  Chandler  Parsons.     Panama   canal  tolls.     An  ad- 

dress  on  the  issues  between  the  United  States  and  Great 
Britain  in  regard  to  Panama  canal  tolls,  as  raised  in  the 
recent  diplomatic  correspondence. 
Washington  |  Govt,  print,  off.]  1913.    11  p.   23\cm.    (\TJ.  S.] 
63d  Gong.,  Ut  *  88.    Senate  Doc.  32) 

13  35372  HE537.9.T7A7 

921  Baty,  Thomas.     The  Panama  tolls. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  Nov.  1912,  v.  38:  91-96. 

922  Panama  tolls  question. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  Mar.  1914,  v.  23:  389-396. 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  193 

923  Cox-Sinclair,  E.  S.     The  international  status  of  the  Panama 

canal. 

Law  magazine  and  review,  Nov.  1912,  v.  38:  1-15. 

924  Davis,  George  W.     Fortification  at  Panama. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Oct.  1909,  v.  3:  885- 
908.  JXl.A6,v.3 

A  reply  to  Hains's  article  in  the  April  number,  opposed  to 
fortification.  Proves  by  extracts  from  the  Clayton-Bulwer 
treaty,  presidential  messages,  etc.,  that  the  United  States 
has  the  right  to  fortify  the  canal. 

925  Dunn,  Russell  L.     The  Panama  canal  toll  and  the  constitution. 

Case  and  comment,  May,  1914,  v>  20:261-273. 

926  Dykes,  D.  O.     The  Panama  canal  and  treaty  rights. 

Juridical  review,  Jan.  1913,  v.  24:  261-273. 

927  Elliott,  C.  B.     A  review  of  the  Panama  canal  tolls  controversy. 

Minnesota  state  bar  association.    Proceedings,  1914.   P- 110- 
124. 

928  Escobar,   Francisco.     President   Roosevelt's   message   and   the 

canal. 

North  American  review,  Jan.  1904,  v.  178:  122-132. 

Discusses  the  treaty-making  power  and  the  international  law 
of  recognition. 

AP2.N7,v.l78 

929  Grahame,  Leopold.     The  canal  diplomacy.     Justification  for 

the  British  protest. 
North  American  review,  Jan.,  1913,  v.  197 :  31-39. 

AP2.N7,v.l97 

930  Green,  John  B.     The  Panama  canal.     Trade,  treaties  and  tolls. 

Case  and  comment,  Nov.,  1913,  v.  20:  402-406. 

931  Hains,  Peter  C.     Neutralization  of  the  Panama  canal. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.,  1909,  v.  3: 

354-394.  JXl.A6,v.3 

"  There  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  Hay-Pauncefote  treaty  was 
made  with  a  view  of  neutralizing  the  canal ;  if  it  fails  to  ac- 
complish this  purpose  there  is  still  time  to  correct  its  de- 
fects .  .  .  But  it  is  confidently  claimed  that  the  treaty  does 
neutralize  the  canal  .  .  .  and  that  the  construction  of  forti- 
fications commanding  the  approaches  thereto  will  destroy 
neutralization." 
137190°— 20 13 


194  LIBEARY   OF   CONGRESS 

932  Kennedy,  Crammond.     The  canal  fortifications  and  the  treaty. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1911,   r    5: 
020-638.  jxi.A6,v.5 

In  favor  of  neutralization  of  the  canal. 

933  Neutralization  and  equal  terms. 

American    'journal  of  international  law,  Jan.,  1913,  v.  7: 

&7-50.  JXl.A6,v.7 

"  Tlie  United  States,  having  freed  itself  by  the  Hay-Paunce- 
fote  treaty  from  certain  requirements  of  the  Clayton-Buhver 
treaty  .  .  .  should  see  to  it  that  the  general  principles  of 
neutralization  and  equal  terms,  expressly  preserved,  re- 
affirmed  and  reconsecrated  as  they  are  in  the  treaty  now  in 
force,  shall  suffer  no  impairment  in  the  administration  of 
this  self-assumed  trust  for  mankind." 

934  Latane,   John   H.     The  neutralization    features   of   the  Hay- 

Pauncefote  treaty. 

American  historical  association.    Report,  1902,  v.  1,  p.  289- 

303.  E172.A60     1902,v.l 

A  discussion  of  the  general  principles  involved  in  term  "  neu- 
tralization." 

935 The  Panama  canal  act  and  the  British  protest. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.,  1913,  v.  7: 

17-26.  JXl.A6,v.7 

Treats  of  the  effect  of  the  Hay-Pa uncefote  treaty  on  Great 
Britain's  claim  for  free  use  of  the  canal. 

936  McGrath,  P.  T.     The  Bond-Hay  treaty.     A  new  phase  of  the 

Anglo- American  dispute. 
Nineteenth  century  and  after,  June,  1903,  v.  53:  924-935. 

AP4.N7,v.53 

937  Olney,  Richard.     Canal  tolls  legislation  and  the  Hay-Paunce- 

fote  treaty. 
Laicyer  and  banker,  June,  1913,  v.  6: 164-171. 

938  Panama   canal   tolls   and   the   Hay-Pauncefote  treaty. 

An  address  on  Panama  canal  tolls  legislation  and  the 
Hay-Pauncefote  treaty,  read  before  the  American  society 
of  international  law. 

"Washington  \  Govt,  print,  off.']  1913.    10  p.    23cm.    ([U.  S.] 
63d  Cong.,  1st  scss.    /Senate.    Doc.  33) 

13  35378  HE537.9.T704 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL   TREATIES  195 

939  Oppenheim,  Lassa  Francis  Lawrence.     The  Panama  canal  con- 

flict  between   Great   Britain   and   the  United   States   of 
America;  a  study. 
Cambridge  [Eng.~\  University  press,  1913.    2  p.  I.,  57,  [i]  p. 

19¥*1. 

13-6704  HE537.9.T705 

940  Panama    canal    act.     Protest    by    the    British    government. 

American  reply. 
Canada  law  times,  Feb.  1913,  v.  33:77-83. 

941  Richards,  Sir  Henry  Erie.     The  Panama  canal  controversy ;  a 

lecture  delivered   before   the   University   of   Oxford  on 
October  25,  1913. 
Oxford,  The  Clarendon  press;  London,  New  York   [etc.] 
H.  Milford,  1913.    48  p.    23cm. 

Appendix :  a.    Clayton-Bulwer    treaty,    1850. — b.    Hay-Paunce- 
fote  treaty,  1901. — c.  Treaty  between  the  United  States  and 
Panama   (Hay-Varilla)   1903. 
14-5223  HE537.9.T7B5 

941a  Robbins,  A.  H.     Exemption  of  Panama  canal  tolls  as  affect- 
ing the  Hay-Pauncefote  treaty. 
Central  law  journal,  Feb.  20,  1914,  v.  78:128-129. 

942  Smith,  George  B.     The  Panama  canal. 

Illinois  law  review,  June,  1912,  v.  7 :  98-118. 

943  Taylor,  Hannis.    Rule  of  treaty  construction.    An  address  on 

the  rule  of  treaty  construction  known  as  rebus  sic  stanti- 
bus :  a  discussion  of  the  Clayton-Bulwer  and  Hay-Paunce- 
fote treaties  in  relation  to  the  Panama  canal. 
Washington  [Govt,  print,  of.]  1913.    8  p.    23cm.     ([U.  S.] 
63d  Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  31) 

13-35371  HE537.9.T7T3 

944  Tower,   Charlemagne.     The  treaty  obligations  of  the  United 

States  relating  to  the  Panama  canal. 
American  philosophical  society.    Proceedings,  Apr.  1913,  v. 
52: 234-242.  Qll.P5,v.52 

"  Treats  historically  our  obligations  in  regard  to  the  canal 
as  determined  by  the  various  treaties." 

945  Essays  political  and  historical. 

Philadelphia  and  London,  J.  B.  Lippincott  company,  1914- 
306  p.    map.    21\cm. 

The  treaty  obligations  of  the  United  States  relating  to  the 
Panama  canal,  p.  38-53. 
14-18488  JX1395.T6 


196  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

946  Treaty  rights  in  the  Panama  canal. 

Law  journal,  July  20,  1912,  v.  4,7:  458. 

947  U.  S.    Dept.  of  state.    Diplomatic  history  of  the  Panama  canal. 

Correspondence  relating  to  the  negotiation  and  applica- 
tion of  certain  treaties  on  the  subject  of  the  construction 
of  an  interoceanic  canal,  and  accompanying  papers. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  of .,  19U.    xii,602  p.   23\cm.    (63d 
Cong..  2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  4?4) 

Includes  a  report  of  the  secretary  of  state,  with  papers  rela- 
tive to  the  construction  of  the  Panama  canal. 
14-30413  JX1398.5.A5     1914 

948 History  of  amendments  proposed  to  the  Clay- 

ton-Bulwer  treaty. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1011.    31  p.    23\cm.      (61st 
Cong.,  3d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  71fi) 

A  brief  history  of  the  amendments  proposed  and  considered 
relative  to  the  Clayton-Buhver  treaty  with  Great  Britain, 
resulting  in  the  treaty  submitted  December  14,  1901.  Pre- 
pared in  the  Department  of  state,  and  sent  by  Mr.  Hay  to 
the  Committee  on  foreign  relations. 
11-35109  TC773.TJ7    1911 

949  Treaties,  etc.  Canal  treaties.  Executive  documents  pre- 
sented to  the  United  States  Senate,  together  with  pro- 
ceedings by  the  Senate  thereon  relative  to  the  Panama 
canal. 

Washington,   Govt,   print,   off.,  19  U.    84  p.    23cm.     (63d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  1)56) 

Contents. — Clayton-Buhver  treaty. — Hay-Pauncefote  treaty. — 
Senate  proceedings  on  the  treaty  of  1900. — Treaty  of  1901. — 
Ratification  of  treaty  of  1901. — Statement  by  Secretary 
Hay.  —  Hay-Herran  treaty  (with  Colombia) — Hay-Bunau- 
Varilla  treaty  (with  Panama) 
14-30250  TC774.TJ6     1914 

950  Interoceanic   canal    .   .   .   the   Clayton-Bulwer 

treaty;  the  Hay-Pauncefote  treaty,  with  amendments 
thereto  .  .  .  and  the  treaty  that  was  ratified  on  December 
sixteenth,  nineteen  hundred  and  one,  together  with 
amendments  proposed  thereto,  and  the  votes. 

{Washington,   Govt,  print,   off.,   1901]    17  p.   230m.     (57th 
Cong.,  1st  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  85) 

TC773  U7     1901 

[Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1902]     25  p. 

23cm.    (57th  Cong.,  1st  sess.  Senate.  Doc.  85. 

4-352-3  TC773.U7    1902 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO  SPECIAL  TREATIES     197 

951  U.  S.     Treaties,  etc.    The  Panama  canal.    Treaties  and  acts  of 
Congress  relating  to  the  Isthmian  canal. 
Washington  [Govt,  print,  off.]   1911,.     55  p.     23cm. 

14-30249  TC774.U6     1914a 

952 Treaties  and  acts  of  Congress  relating  to  the 

Isthmian  canal.     (Reprinted  from  the  Annual  report  of 
Isthmian  canal  commission,  1911) 
Washington  [Govt,  print,  off.]  1011.    1  p.  I,  p.  51,3-681. 

%3\cm. 

11-35029  TC774.U6     191  Id 

953 Treaties  and  acts  of  Congress  relating  to  the 

Panama  canal,  1917. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  of.,  1917.     180,  xxxviii  p.    21,\cm. 
18-26036  TC774.TJ6     1917c 

954  Wambaugh,  Eugene.    The  right  to  fortify  the  Panama  canal. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1911,  v.  5: 
615-619.  jXl.A6,v.5 

Concludes  that  the  United  States  has  the  right  to  fortify  the 
canal. 

955  White,  Harold  F.    The  legal  aspects  of  the  Panama  canal. 

Illinois  law  review,  Feb.  1911,,  v.  8:  1,1,2-1,61. 

1902— CUBA 

956  Cullom,  Shelby  M.     The  treaty-making  power. 

Congressional  record,  57th  Cong.,  1st  sess..  v.  35,  Jan.  29, 
1902,  p.  1104-1111.  Jll.R5,v.35 

957  Trade  relations  with  Cuba.     [Speech  in  the  Senate  of 

the  United  States.     Dec.  7.  1903.] 

Congressional  record,  58th  Cong.,  2d  sess.    v.  38,  part  1, 

Dec.  7,  1903,  p.  13-15.  Jil.R5,v.38,pt.l 

Constitutional    discussion    regarded    as    necessary    since    the 

Senate  has  amended  the  Cuban  treaty  making  it  effective 

only  when  approved  by  Congress.   . 

958  McCall,  Samuel  W.     Cuban  reciprocity.     Speech  in  the  House 

of  Representatives,  Nov.  19,  1903. 

Congressional  record,  58th  Cong.,  1st  sess.,  Nov.  19,  1903, 

v.  37,  p.  385-387.  Jll.R5,v.37 

Submits  that  "  if  we  concede  to  the  Senate  the  right  to  pass 

legislation  by  treaty  and  the  right  to  impose  taxation  by 

treaty  we  will  have  surrendered  the  last  vestige  of  popular 

representative  government  in  the  United  States." 


198  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

959  Morgan,  John  T.  [The  Cuban  treaty  and  the  situation  in  the 
Caribbean  Sea.  the  Gulf  of  Mexico,  and  other  coasts  and 
islands.  Speech  in  the  Senate  of  the  United  States,  Dec.  9, 
L903.] 
Congn  ssional  n  cord,  58th  (  <>ng.,  2d  sess.  v.  38,  pt.  1,  Dec. 
9, 1903,  p.  72-82.  jii.B5,v.38,pt.i 

Points  out  "  some  dangers  ...  in  the  assumption  by  the  Presi- 
denl  of  treaty-making  powers  without  the  consent  of  Con- 
gress." 

9G0  Morrell,  Edward  De  V.     [The  Cuban  treaty.     Speech  in  the 

House  of  Representatives,  Nov.  IT,  1903.] 

Congressional  record,  58th  Cong.,  1st  sess.    v.  37,  Nov.  17, 

1903,  p.  309-310.  Jii.R5,v.37 

"All    measures    affecting   the   revenue    must   emanate   in   the 

House  of  Representatives." 

961  Teller,  Henry  M.     Trade  relations  with  Cuba.     Speech  in  the 

Senate  of  the  United  States,  Tuesday  and  Wednesday, 
Dec.  8  and  0.  1003. 

Congressional  record,  58th  Cong.,  2d  sess.  v.  38,  pt.  1,  Dec. 

8  and  9,  1903,  />  37-46,  07-72.  jn.R5,v.38,pt.l 

Includes  an  affirmation  of  the  power  of  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives to  originate  revenue  hills,  and  continues  with  a 
discussion  of  the  merits  of  the  treaty. 

962  U.  S.     Congress.    House.     Committee  on  ways  and  means.    Re- 

port from  the  committee  on  ways  and  means,  to  whom  was 
referred  the  bill  (H.  R.  1921)  to  carry  into  effect  a  con- 
vention between  the  United  States  and  the  republic  of 
Cuba,  signed  on  the  11th  day  of  December,  in  the  year 
1902. 
[Washington,  1003.]  4,  3  p.  23cm.  {58th  Cong.,  1st  sess. 
House.     Report.     1.)  Serial  no.  4577 

963  Senate.    Committee  on  foreign  relations.    Jurisdiction 

of  the  Senate  to  act  upon  reciprocity  treaties.     Report. 
Dec.  15,  1902. 

[Washington.    1902.]     3  p.     23cm.     (57th   Cong.,  2d  sess. 
Senate.     Doc.  47.)  Serial  no.  4420 

964  Williams,  John  S.     Cuban  reciprocity.     Speech  in  the  House 

of  Representatives.  Nov.  19,1903. 
Congressional  record,  58th  Congress,  1st  session,  v.  37,  Nov. 
10,  1003,  p.  380-385. 

Includes  discussion  of  the  constitutionality  of  the  Cuhan 
treaty.  Jll.R5,v.37 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN   RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  199 

1911— JAPAN 

965  American  journal  of  international  law.     Editorial.    The 

American-Japanese  discussions  relating  to  the  land  tenure 
law  pi  California. 
American  jowvial  of  international  law,  July,  191 4,  v.  8: 
571-578.  JXl.A6,v.8 

966  New  Japanese  treaty  of  commerce  and  navigation. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.,  1911,  v.  5:  44®- 

44S.  JX1.A6.V.5 

967  Anti-alien  legislation  in  California.     Statements  and  messages 

by  Gov.  Hiram  W.  Johnson.     Comment  on  California's 
attitude  by  eastern  investigators. 
[San  Jose,  Col,,  1913?}    18  p.    24cm. 

Contents. — Land  law  enacted  by  Legislature. — State  within 
its  rights. — What  of  dignity  of  California? — Governor  John- 
son's answer  to  Secretary  of  state  Bryan. — California's  side 
of  it  [by  E.  Hungerford,  in  "  Harper's  weekly  "  of  June  7, 
1913]— Japan  in  California  [by  P.  C.  Macfarlane,  in  "Col- 
lier's "  of  June  7,  1913] 
14-31130  JV6888.C2A7 

968  Boyd,  James  H.     Treaty-making  power  of  the  United  States 

and  alien  land  laws  in  states. 
California  law  review,  M ay,  1918,  v.  6:  279-294. 

969  Butte,  George  Charles  Felix.     Die  kalifornische  Landerwerb- 

frage. 

Miinchen  und  Leipzig,  Duncker  &  Humblot  \1913?~\    cover- 
title,  p.  [171]-186.    23™. 

"  Sonderabdruck    (nicht   im   Buchhandel)    aus   Jahrbuch   des 
Volkerrechts.     [11.  2]  " 
14-22259  JV6888.B8 

970  California.     Laws,  statutes,  etc.     An  act  relating  to  the  rights, 

powers  and  disabilities  of  aliens  and  of  certain  companies, 
associations  and  corporations  with  respect  to  property  in 
this  state,  providing  for  escheats  in  certain  cases,  pre- 
scribing the  procedure  therein,  and  repealing  all  acts  or 
parts  of  acts  inconsistent  or  in  conflict  herewith.  < Ap- 
proved May  19,  1913.  > 
{Sacramento  f  1913]     2  p.    22\™. 

13-13634  JX6570.U7C2     1913 


200  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

971  Collins,  Charles  Wallace.     Will  the  California  alien  land  law 

stand  the  tost  of  the  Fourteenth  amendment? 
Yale  law  journal.  Feb.  1914,  v.  23:  830-338. 

"The  California  law  will  in  all  probability  be  declared  void, 
because  to  uphold  it  would  limit  the  protection  of  the 
Fourteenth  Amendment  to  citizens  and  to  those  eligible  to 
citizenship." 

972  Dilla,    Harriette   M.     The    constitutional    background    of   the 

recent  Japanese  anti-alien  land  bill  controversy. 
Michigan  law  review,  May,  1914,  v.  12:573-684-. 

973  Gadsby,  John.     The  Japanese  law  relating  to  foreigners'  right 

of  ownership  of  land. 
Law  quarterly  review,  Jan.  1914,  v.  30:  91-96. 

974  Kawakami,  Kiyoshi  Karl,  ed.     The  Japanese  question,  a  sym- 

posium. 
San  Francisco,  Gal.,  The  Japanese- American  news  [n.  d.~\ 
cover-title,  1  I.,  53  p.    23cm. 

Contents. — 1.  Introductory  remarks,  by  K.  K.  Kawakami. — 
2.  Eye  to  eye,  by  B.  I.  Wheeler. — 3.  Japan  and  the  United 
Stales,  by  R.  L.  Wilbur. — 4.  The  Japanese  question  in 
America,  by  W.  Macarthur. — 5.  California  and  the  Japan- 
ese, by  G.  M.  Stratton. — 6.  The  United  States  and  Japan. 
by  J.  W.  Mullen. — 7.  What  the  West  might  learn  from 
Japan,  by  G.  Kennan. — 8.  America  and  Japan — War  or 
peace,  by  J.  Jones. — 9.  The  Japanese  question  in  America, 
by  C.  K.  McClatchy. — 10.  Treaty  obligations,  by  Hon.  E. 
Root.— 11.  Lest  we  forget,  by  J.  Foord— 12.  The  Pacific 
coast  peril,  by  F.  B.  Loomis. — 13.  The  Japanese  question  in 
the  United  States,  by  W.  T.  Bonsor. — 14.  America  and  race 
problem,  by  Rev.  C.  F.  Aked. 
A 16-417  DS849.U6K3 

975  Mahon,  J.     The  Japanese  question. 

American  law  review,  Sept.  1914,  v-  48:  698-713. 

976  The  new  treaty  of  commerce  and  navigation  [Japanese]. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1911,  v.  5:  442- 
448.  JXl.A6,v.5 

977  Scherer,  James  Augustin  Brown.     The  Japanese  crisis. 

New    Fork,  Frederick  A.  Stokes  company  [c1916]  5  p.  I., 
3  148  p.    19$cm. 

Contents.  Entroduction. — California  and  the  opening  of 
Japan.  The  coming  Of  the  Japanese  to  California. — Is  Japan 
militant? — Are  the  Japanese  assimilable? — Is  agricultural 
competition  safe? — The  alien  land  law. — Appendices:  Trans- 
lation of  the  Japanese  land  law.  Text  of  the  California 
land  law.  The  American-Japanese  treaty  of  1911.  An 
argument  for  nondiscrimination. 
16-91 MJ  E183.8.J3S3 


CONSIDERATIONS  IN  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  201 

978  Sisson,  Thomas  U.     [Alien  ownership  of  land  in  the  United 

States].    Speech  in  the  House,  Apr.  28,  1913. 
Congressional  record,  63d  Cong.  1st  sess.,  v.  50,  pt.  1:  632- 

640.  Jll.R5,v.50,pt.l 

979  Treaty-making    power    of    the    federal    government. 

Speech  in  the  House,  May  23,  1913. 

Congressional  record,  63d  Cong.,  1st  sess-,  v.  50,  pt.  2: 
1712-1721.  Jll.R5,v.50,pt.2 

1912— ARBITRATION  TREATIES 

980  American  journal  of  international  law.    Editorial.    The 

American  theory  of  international  arbitration. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1908,  v.  2: 
387-391.  JXl.A6,v.2 

981  The  Bryan  peace  treaties. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Oct.  1913,  v.  7: 
823-829.  JXl.A6,v.7 

982  The  effect  of  Mr.  Bryan's  peace  treaties  upon  the  rela- 
tions of  the  United  States  with  the  nations  at  war. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1915,  v.  9: 
P4-496.  JXl.A6,v.9 

"  The  treaties  signed  with  France,  Great  Britain,  and  Russia 
should  prevent  war  over  any  disputes  that  might  arise  be- 
tween the  United  States  and  any  one  or  all  of  the  allied 
powers." 

983  New  general  arbitration  treaty  with  Great  Britain. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1911,  v.  5: 

451-459.  JXl.A6,v.5 

984  The  pending  treaty  of  arbitration  between  the  United 

States  and  Great  Britain. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Jan.  1912,  v.   6: 
167-177.  JXl.A6,v.6 

On  the  differences  arising  between  the  Executive  and  the 
Senate  on  the  treaty-making  power. 

985  Recent  arbitration   treaties  concluded   by   the  United 

States. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1908,  v.  2: 
624-630.  JX1.A6.V.2 


202  LIBRARY  OF   CONGRESS 

980  American  journal  of  international  law.     Secretary  Bryan's 
peace  plan. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1914,  v.  8: 
565  571.  jxi.A6,v.8 

Contains  a  list  of  countries  which  have  entered  into  treaties; 
July  24,  193  I. 

^S7 Treaties  of  arbitration  with  Great  Britain  and  France. 

A  merican  journal  of  international  law,  Apr.  1912,  v.  6: 

460-463.  JX1.A6.V.6 

988  Andre,  Alexandre.     Le  Senat  americain  et  les  traites  d'arbi- 

trage  avec  la  Fiance  et  La Grande-Bretagne  du3aout  1911. 
Revue  generale  de  droit  international  ■public,  May-June, 
1912,  v.  19:  350-355.  JX3.R56,v.i9 

Texte  du  traite,  v.  IS:  654-657. 

989  Arbitration  treaties  and  senatorial  prerogatives. 

Bench  and  bar,  Nov.  1911,  v.  27:  45-49. 

990  Bacon,  Augustus  O.     General  arbitration  treaties.     Speech  in 

the  Senate,  Mar.  6,  1912. 
Congressional   record,   62d   Cong.   2d  seas.,   v.    48,   pt.   3: 
2865-2877.  Jil.R5,v.48,pt.3 

991  Senate  amendments  to  the  arbitration  treaties. 

North  American  review,  May,  1912,  v.  195:  673-686. 

AP2.N7,v.l95 

992  Balch,  Thomas   Willing.     Etats-Unis  d'Amerique.     Differend 

avec  la  Grande-Bretagne  en  ce  qui  concerne  la  question 
des  droits  le  canal  de  Panama  .  .  . 
Revue   generale   de   droit  international  public,   Nov. -Bee. 
1913,  v.  20:  747-750.  JX3.R56,v.20 

Letter  also  printed  in  The  Sun,    Dec.  2,  1913,  p.  6. 

993  Burton,   Theodore  E.      Arbitration    treaties.      Speech    in    the 

Senate,  Feb.  6,  1912. 

Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  48,  pt.  2:  1750- 
/ ;  7  7 

Jll.R5,v.48,pt.2 

991  General    arbitration   treaties.     Speech   in   the   Senate, 

Mar.  7,  1912. 
Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  2d  sess.t  v.  48,  pt.  3:2950- 
2952.  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3 


CONSIDERATIONS   IN"  RESPECT  TO   SPECIAL  TREATIES  203 

995  Dennis,    William    Cullen.     The   arbitration   treaties    and    the 

Senate  amendments. 
American  journal  of  international  law,  July,  1912,  v.  6: 

614-628.  JXl.A6,v.6 

Concludes  ".  .  .  that  the  value  of  these  treaties  lies  in  their 
usefulness  as  models  and  in  their  inspirational  power  as 
respects  future  treaties,  ...  it  is  submitted  that  to  ratify 
the  treaties  as  amended  would,  on  the  whole,  hinder  rather 
than  help  the  cause  of  peace  through  justice." 

996  Finch,  George  A.     The  Bryan  peace  treaties. 

American  journal  of  international  law,  Oct.  1916,  v.  10: 
882-890.  JXi.A6,v.lo 

A  classification  of  the  provisions  of  the  peace  treaties  so  far 
ratified  (19)  showing  the  different  forms  used  with  respect 
to  the  various  countries. 

The  texts  of  the  treaties  are  to  be  found  in  the  Supplement  to 
the  Oct.  number  of  this  magazine. 

997  Hyde,  Charles  C.     The  general  arbitration  treaties. 

North  American  review,  Jan.  1912,  v.  195:  1-1 4. 

AP2.N7,v.l95 

998  Lodge,  Henry  Cabot.     General  arbitration.     Lecture  delivered 

...  at   the   Naval   war   college   extension,   Washington, 
D.  C,  February  13,  1913. 
Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1913.     12  p.     23cm. 

13-35138  JX1963.L5 

999  The  general  arbitration  treaties  with  Great  Britain  and 

France.     Speech  in  the  Senate  of  the  United  States  on 
February  29,  1912. 

Washington,  Govt,  print,  off.,  1912.     34  p.     23hjm.     ([U.  S.] 
62d  Cong.,  2d  sess.    Senate.    Doc.  353.) 

"List  of  arbitration  treaties  and  conventions  submitted  to  and 
acted  upon  by  the  Senate  " :  p.  30-34. 
12-35349  JX1987.G7     1912 

1000  Same.    Speech  in  the  Senate,  Feb.  29,  1912. 

Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  48,  pt.  3:  2596- 

2607.  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3 

List  of  arbitration  treaties  and  conventions  submitted  to  and 
acted  upon  by  the  Senate :  p.  2605-2607. 

1001  Root,  Elihu.    Speech  in  the  Senate,  Mar.  7,  1912,  on  the  general 

arbitration  treaties. 
Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  48,  pt.  3:2934- 

2940.  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3 


204  LIBRARY   OF   CONGRESS 

1002  Scelle,  Georges.    Les  traites  generaux  d'arbitrage  des  fitats- 

Unis  avec  la  France  et  l'Angleterre. 
Questions  diplomatique s  et  coloniales,  Apr.  1,  1918,  v.  33: 

393-407.  JX3.Q4,v.33 

1003  Sherman,  Gordon  E.     The  permanent  neutrality  treaties. 

Yali    Uw  journal.  Jan.  1915,  V.  24'.  217-241. 

1001  Smith,   Hoke.     General   arbitration  treaties.     Speech   in  the 
Senate.  Mar.  7,  1912. 
Congressional  record,  (I'd  (Jong.  2d  sess.,  v.  jft,  pt.  3:  2944- 

2950.  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3 

1005  Tryon,  James  Libby.    The  advance  made  by  treaties  of  arbi- 
tral ion. 

Yale  law  journal,  Nov.  1914,  v.  24:  56-64. 

"Deals  with  the  history  and  progress  of  arbitration  and  other 
pacific  methods  of  settling  international  disputes,  from  the 
standpoint   of  American   experience. 

100G  U.    S.     Treaties,  etc.,  1913-  (Wilson)      General   peace 

treaties  of  1914  all  ratified  and  made  public. 
Washington,  Govt,  print  off.,  1915.     [114]  p.    23cm. 

Made  up  of  twenty-eight  pamphlets  in  the  doc.  series:  63d 
Cong.,  2d  sess.  Confidential.  Executive,  all  having  the 
title:  "Advancement  of  the  cause  of  general  peace;  ...  Mes- 
sage from  the  President  of  the  United  States  transmitting 
a  treaty"  ...  and  including,  respectively,  the  text  of  treaties 
with  Norway.  Salvador,  Guatemala,  Honduras,  Nicaragua, 
Netherlands,  Bolivia,  Persia,  Portugal,  Costa  Rica,  Switzer- 
land, Venezuela,  Denmark,  Italy,  Uruguay,  Argentina,  Brazil, 
Chile,  Peru,  China,  France,  Great  Britain,  Spain,  Russia, 
Ecuador,  Greece,  Paraguay,  and  Sweden. 
15-26571  JX1987.A4     1914c 

1007  Usher,  Roland  G.     The  significance  of  the  arbitration  treaties. 

Atlantic  monthly,  Apr.  1912,  v.  109:  447-456.    AP2.A8,v.i09 

1008  Wickersham,  George  W.     Our  compulsory  arbitration  trea- 

ties should  be  amend*  d. 
American  academy  of  political  and  social  science.    Annals, 
-lain  1917,  v.  72:200-207.  Hl.A4,v.72 

1009  Williams,  .John  Sharp.     General  arbitration  treaties.     Speech 

in  the  Senate.  Mar.  ."">.   L912. 

Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  %d  sess.,  v.  48,  pt.  3:  28%- 

2833  ■  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.3 

1010  Works,  John  D.     Speech  in  the  Senate,  Feb.  8,  191'2,  on  the 

genera]  arbitral  inn  t  reaties. 
Congressional  record,  62d  Cong.  2d  sess.,  v.  48,  pt.  2:  1834- 

18J''  Jll.R5,v.48,pt.2 


AUTHOE  INDEX 


[The  numbers  refer  to  the  items,  not  to  the  pages.] 


Abbott,  Lyman 253 

Abby,  J.  T 68 

Adams,   Charles  Francis 470,  581 

Adams,    Henry 313,  653 

Adams,   John 581 

Adams,  John  Quincy,  pres.  U.  S-      254, 

744 

Aked,   C.   F 974 

Albin,    Pierre 1 

Aldrieh,   Nelson  W 893 

Alger,  George  W 255 

Allen,    William 744 

American  Jewish  year  book 753,  754 

American    journal    of    interna- 
tional   law 897,965,966,980-987 

American  remembrancer 582 

Ames,  Fisher 583-587,  638 

Ames,  Herman  V 525 

Ammen,  Admiral 810 

Amos,    Sheldon 83, 193 

Anderson,  Chandler  P  ___  257,  718,  920 

Andre,  Alexandre 915,988 

Anson,  Sir  William  R 194 

Antoine,  Ch.  F 35 

Anzilotti,    Dionisio 2-4 

Appert,   G 5 

Archer,  William  S 744 

Atlay,  J.  Beresford 183 

B 572 

Bache,  B.  F 638 

Bacon,  Arthur 195 

Bacon,  Augustus  O 259,  990,  991 

Bagehot,  Walter 196 

Baker,  Andrew  J 526 

Baker,  Sir  George  S.  hart 6,  50 

Balch,  Thomas  W 992 

Baldwin,  Simeon  E 260,  899 

Bancroft,  George 472 

Banks,  Nathaniel  P 872,  877,  881 

Barbe-Marbois,    Frangois,    mar- 
quis de 654 

Barbeyrac,  Jean 7 

Barbour,  James 688 


Barbour,  Philip  P 

Barclay,  Sir  Thomas 

Barrett,  James  T 

Barstow,  Hollen  M 


688 

8 

261 

900 

Barthelemy,  Joseph 214 

Bascom,  John 262 

Basdevant,  Jules 132a,  132b 

Baty,  Thomas 921,922 

Bayard,   James   A 733 

Bayard,  James  A.,  2d 570 

Bayly,   T.    H 862 

Beardsley,    Samuel 744 

Bell,  John 794 

Bellot,  H.  H.  L 263 

Benjamin,  J.  P 733 

Bennett,  Edmund  H 548 

Benton,  Thomas  H 569, 

673, 687,  778,  779,  862 

Bergbohm,  Carl 9,85 

Bergh,  Albert  E 340 

Bergson,  Jules 52 

Bernard,  Mountague 10 

Bigelow,  John 264,795 

Bigelow,  Melville  M 552,577 

Bikle,  Henry  W 265 

Binney,    Horace 744 

Bird,  C.  B 266 

Blackstone,  Sir  William 197 

Blaine,  James  G 873 

Blair,  Austin 872 

Blount,  Thomas 63S 

Bluntschli,  Johann  K 11,12 

Bocock,  T.  S 862 

Boeck,  Ch.  de 29 

Bohm,  Leopold,  graf  von 143 

Bonfils,  Henry  J.  F.  X 13 

Bonsor,  W.  T 974 

Bonucci 14 

Borchard,  Edwin  M 36 

Borchardt,    Felix 15 

Borden,  R.  L 273 

Bouldin,  T.  T 744 

Bourgeois,  Ferdinand 198 

205 


206 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


Bourne,  E.  G 495 

Boutell,    Henry    S G91. 692 

B<  in  well,  George  S 527 

Boyce,  William  W SG2 

Boyd,  James  H 207,968 

Boyer,  B.  M 872 

Brant,  R.  W 54a 

Breckenridge,  John 658 

Brodhead,  Richard 733 

Broomall,  John  M 872 

Bryan,  Henry  L 449 

Bryant,  Edwin  E 528 

Bryee,  James,   viscount 529 

Buonamici,  Francesco 16 

Burges,  T 744 

Burgess,  John  W 199,268 

Burr,  Charles  II 269 

Burton,  Theodore  E 993,994 

Butler,  Charles  Henry 200, 

270,  271,  473,  490,  491 

Butler.   Pierce 588 

Butte,  Georg  C.  F 969 

Cadwalader,  John  L 272,440,454 

Cains.     See  <'arey,  Mathew. 

Calhoun,  John  C 530, 

680,  OSS,  767,  770,  783 
California.     Laics,  statutes,  etc-      970 

Callahan,  James  M 693,694 

<  'a  Inline,  Alphonse  de 17 

Calvo,  Carlos IS 

Calwer,  Richard 19 

Cambreleng,  C.  C 744 

Camillus    [pseud.]     See  Hamil- 
ton, Alexander. 

Campbell,  A.  C 48 

Campbell,  George  W 688 

Canada.     1)<  pt.   of   external   af- 
fairs         273 

Capelle,  Leon 132b 

Carey,  Mathew 582 

Cass,  Lewis 733 

Cato     [pseud.]     See    Livington, 

R.  R. 
Cat  i,. 11.  .\.  McK 20 

Cavalcanti,  Amaro 201 

Cavarretta,  Giuseppe 21 

Chambrun,    Charles    A.     de    P. 

marquis  de 274,275 

Chambrun,  Pierre  de 275 

Charles,  Garfield 457 

Chilton,  Thomas 744 

Chltty,    Joseph 167 

Choate,  Rufus 772,  77:: 


Claiborne,  N.  H 744 

Clancy,  Charles  S 276 

Clay,  Henry 726,746,780 

Clayton,  A.  S 744 

Clayton,  J.  C 277 

Clayton,  John  M 733,  796,  797,  821 

Clingman,  Thomas  L 798 

Clunet,  Edouard 202 

Cobbett,  Pitt 22 

Cobbett,  William 589-591 

Cocke,  William 658 

Cockes,  William  A 278 

Coleman,  William  C 279 

Collamer,  Jacob 437,733 

Collins,  Charles  W 971 

Comegys,  Joseph  P 799 

Conway,  Eustace 23 

Conway,  Moncure  D 592 

Cooley,  Thomas  Mel 659,918 

Corwln,  Edward  S 2S0-283,  531 

Coudert,  Frederic  R 24 

Coulter,  R 744 

Courtney,  L.  H.  C.  1st  baron 203 

Cox,  Homersham 204,205 

Cox-Sinclair,  E.  S 923 

Coxe,  Brinton 532 

Craik,  Sir  Henry 233 

Cralle,  Richard  K 530 

Crandall,  Samuel  B 25,206, 

207,  284,  285, 474 

Crapo 810 

Creasy,  Sir  Edward  S 26 

Crittenden,  John  J 733 

Croswell,   Simon   G 286 

Cullom,  Shelby  M 287, 

765,  872,  956,  957 

Currey,  John 288 

Curtis,  George  T 533 

Gushing,  Caleb 289,  729 

Cuthbert,  Alfred 688 

D.,  A.  J 290 

Dahlgren,  Madeleine  V 274 

Dallas,  Alexander  J 593-595 

Dallas,  George  Mifllin 208 

Dana,  Samuel  W 570,655 

Dauzat,  Albert 27,209 

Davis,  Agnes  M 864 

Davis,    Garrett 704 

Davis,  George  B 28 

Davis,  George  W 924 

Davis,  J.  C.  Bancroft 291- 

293,  453,  455 
Dawson,  Henry  B 804 


AUTHOR  INDEX 


207 


Day,   Clive 446 

Dayton,  Jonathan 658 

Delawarean,    pseud.      See    Co- 
megys,  J.  P. 

Demombynes,  Gabriel 210 

Dennis,  William  G 995 

Depew,  Chauncey  M 565 

Deseamps,  E.  E.  F.  baron—  132a,  132b 

Despagnet,  F.  C.  R 29 

De  Sumichrast 242 

Devlin,  Robert  T 294 

Dickey,  Francis  W 30 

Dietrich,  Charles  H 893 

Dilla,   Harriette  M 972 

Dillon,  John  M 371 

Dodcl,  Walter  F 211 

Donati,   Donato 31 

Douglas,   Stephen  A 800 

Drucquer,  M.  N 50 

Du  Bouzet,  Ch 32 

Duer,  William  A 534,  535 

Dunn,  Russell  L 925 

Dupriez,  Leon 212,  213 

Duwalt,  G.  W 296 

Dykes,  D.  O 926 

E 297 

Eads,  James  B 810 

Easton,  Rufus 688 

Edmond,  William 570 

Edwards,  P.  L 660 

Egert,  B.  P 755 

Eliot,  Edward  C 298 

Elliot,  James 657 

Elliot,  Jonathan 299, 

300,  492,  501,  596,  661,  681 

Elliott,  Charles  B 301,927 

Ellsworth,  Oliver 493,494,597 

Erich,  Rafael 33 

Escobar,  Francisco 928 

Esmein,  Adhemar 214 

Evarts,  William  M 302 

Everett,  Edward 740,  744,  801 

Ewald,  Alexander  C 215 

Fairlie,  John  A 303 

Falconer,  Wm.  A 495 

Farra,  R.  A 34 

Farrand,  Max 518 

Farrar,  Timothy 526 

Farwell,  Nathan  A 704 

Fauchille,  Paul 132b 

Federalist 304-306,  495 

Fenwick,  C.  G 166 

Ferris,  Orange 872 


Fessenden,  W.  P 733 

Field,  David  D 781 

Finch,  George  A 996 

Fiore,  Pasquale 35,  36 

Fish,  Carl  R 37,  307 

Fisk,  George  M 38,  768 

Fleming,  William  H 308 

Flood,  E.  C 309 

Foley,  John  P 341,  612 

Foord,  J 974 

Foot,  S 733 

Ford,  Paul  Leicester 305, 

338,  495,  575,  611,  644,  663 

Ford,  Worthington  C 580,640 

Forsyth,  John 688,690 

Fort,  John  F 310,  901 

Foster,  David  J 763,902 

Foster,  John  W 39,  311,  312,  695,  706 

Foulke,  Roland  R 40 

Franklin,  pseud 589,  598 

Fromentin,  Eligius 688 

Fulton,  C.  W 903 

Furber,  George  P 434 

Gadsby,  John 973 

Gallatin,  Albert 313, 

570,  599-602,  638,  782 

Gaston,  William 688 

Geffcken,  F.  H 41,  52 

Gholson,  Thomas,  jr 688 

Gibbs,  George 603 

Giddings,  Joshua  R 862 

Gilbert,  George  E 904 

Giles,  William  B 604,  638 

Gilpin,  Henry  D 368,  502 

Glenn,  Edwin  F 43 

Glier,  L 44 

Gneist,  Rudolf  von 216 

Goddard,  Calvin 655,  656 

Gold,  Thomas  R 688 

Goodhue,  Benjamin 571 

Gordon,  William 570 

Gorius,  Fr 217 

Gould,  John  M 541 

Grahame,  Leopold 929 

Graydon,  William 314 

Gt.  Brit.  Foreign  office 45,  218 

Treaties,  etc 605 

Green,  John  B 930 

Gregory,  Charles  N 120,  316 

Griffith,  AVilliam 46 

Griswold,  Roger 606, 

655,  656,  657,  666 
Grotius,  Hugo 47,  48 


208 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


Gulick,  S.  L 317 

H.,  S.  R 318 

Bains,  Peter  C 924,931 

Hale,  J.  P 733 

Hall,  J.  P 319 

Hall,  William  E 49 

Halleck,  Henry  W 50 

Hamilton,  Alexander 304-306.  320- 

323,  495,  496,  497,  582,  607,  60S 

Hamilton,    Alexander 324 

Hanson,  Alexander  C 688 

Hardin.  Benjamin 6SS,  744 

Hare,  John  I.  C 537 

Harris,  George  W 365 

Harrison,  Benjamin,  pres.  U.  S__      538 

Hart,  Albert   I? 328,539 

Hartmann,  Adolf 51 

Haswell,  John  II 455 

Haven.  Solomon  G 862 

Hayden,  R 325 

Hayes,  Everis  A 905 

Hazeltine,  .Mayo  W 906 

Heffter,  August  W 52 

Helvidius    \  pseud.]     See    Madi- 
son, James. 

Henriques,  H.  S.  Q 756 

Hepp,  Francois -r>''> 

Herbette,   Maurice 1 

Herod,  Joseph  R 54 

Hershey,  Amos  S 720 

Hertslet,  Sir  Edward 54a,  54b,  219 

Hewitt,  Abram  S 894 

Higby,   William 872 

Higgins,  A.   P 49 

Hill,  David  Jayne 48,326,327 

Hill,  Mabel 328 

Hod-ins,  Thomas 243,719,720 

Holland,  Thomas  E 55 

Hollins.    Capt 827 

Holls,  Frederick  W 56 

Holmes,  O.  W.,  jr 541 

Hoist.  Hermann  E.  VOn___  329,540,783 

Holtzendorff,  F.  J.  W.  P.  von 57 

Hopf,  Jules    92,93 

Hopkinson,  Joseph 688 

Hornbeck,  Stanley  K 53,58,446 

Hosack,  John 59 

Howe,  Timothy  O 437 

Huger,  Benjamin 655,  OSS 

Hungerford,    E 907 

Hum.  i  iharles  H 609 

Hunt,  Gaillard 330,370,517 

Hunt,   Harry  E 696 


Hyde,  Charles  Cheney 60, 

331-333,  907,  997 
Idman,  K.  G 61 

Ignotus   [pseud.] 908 

Imberg,  Kurt  E 334 

[ngraham,  Edward  D 167 

Institute  of  international  law 62 

Ion,  Theodore  P 63,909 

Iredell,  James 498 

Jackson,  George 658 

Jackson,  Mrs.  Helen  M.  F.  Hunt-      573 

Jacomet,  Robert 64 

Jameson,  J.  F 508 

Jay,  John 304-300,335,336,495 

Jefferson,  Thomas,  pres.  U.  S_—  337- 
342,  574,  575,  610-612, 
643,   644,   662-664,  666 

Jellinek,  Georg 65 

Jenks,  Edward 230 

Jerez,-  Maximo 810 

Jeze,  Gaston 343,495 

Johnson,  Hiram  W 967 

Johnson,  James  A 872 

Johnson,  Reverdy 704 

Johnson,  R.  W 733 

Johnson,  Richard  M 744 

Johnston,  Henry  P 335 

Johnston,  Richard  H 340 

Jones,  Frangois  S 344 

Jones,  G.  W 733 

Jones,  J 974 

Jones,  J.  Glancy 862 

K.,  I.  L 769 

Kappler,  Charles  J 445 

Kasson,  John  A 345,  346 

Kaufmann,  Erich 67 

Kawakami,  K.  K 974 

Keasbey,  Lindley  M 802-804 

Keith,  Arthur  B 244-246 

Kelley,  William  I) 882 

Kellogg.  Frank  P. 347 

Kennan,    J 974 

Kennedy,  Crammond 932,933 

Kent,  James 68,541 

King,  Charles  R 613 

Ki.,_.   Rufus 613,  6S8,689 

Kittera,  John  W   570 

Kliiber,   Jobann   L 69 

Kohler,  Josef 14 

Kouomanoudi,  Constantin 70 

Kubn.  Arthur  K 348,  758 

Laband,  Paul 220 

Laghi,  Ferdinando 71 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


209 


Lantsheere,  de 213 

Lapradelle,  Albert  de 166,  221 

Lardy,  C 11 

Latane,  John  H 934,  935 

Lawrence,  Abbott 822 

Lawrence,  Thomas' J 73,  74 

Lawrence,    William 349 

Lawrence,  William  Beach_  350,  654,  770 

Leake,  Walter 351 

Lee,  Arthur 481 

Lee,  Charles 614,  615 

Lee,  Richard  Henry 499,  500 

Lee,   Sidney 222 

Lehr,   Ernest 75 

Leo,  Alfred 84 

Leoni,  A 76 

Levermore,  Charles  H 697 

Levi,   Leone 77 

Lewis,  William  D 197,  352,  910 

Lincoln,  Enoch 353 

Lipscomb,  Andrew  A 340 

Liszt,  Franz  von 78 

Littlefield,  Charles  E 354 

Livingston,  Edward 609.  616,  638 

Livingston,  Robert  R 582,  617 

Lodge,  Henry  Cabot 306, 

322,  355-357,  407,  495,  998-1000 

Loomis,  F.  B 974 

Lorimer,  James 79 

Loughbridge,  Williamr___  358,  872,  874 

Love,  James 744 

Low,  A.  Maurice 359,  360,  378 

Lowndes,  William 688 

Ludwig,  Ernest 80 

Lyman,   Theodore 361, 

566,  618,  645,  649,  665.  6S2 

Lyon,  Asa 6S8 

Lyons,  Lord 706,  707 

McAdoo,  William  G 764 

Macarthur,  W 974 

McCall,  Samuel  W 362,  958 

McCarthy.   Dennis 872 

McClain,  Emlin 542,  543 

McClatchy,  C.   K 974 

McDermott,  Hugh  F 730 

Macdonnel,  John 247 

Macdonell,  Sir  John 81 

Macfarland,  H.  B.  F 363 

Macfarlane,  P.  C 967 

McGrath,  P.  T 721,  722.  936 

McHenry,  James 619 

McKean,  Thomas 564 

Maclay,  Edgar  S 364 

137190—20 14 


Maclay,  William 364,  365 

McMaster,  John  B 507.  620,  666 

Macon,   Nathaniel 688 

Madison,  James,  pres.  V.  S—  304-306, 
320.  330,  366-370,  482,  501, 
502,  517,  621,  622,  638,  650 

Mahon,    J 975 

Maine,  Sir  H.  J.  S 82 

Mallory,  S.  R 733 

Malloy,  William  M 450,  457 

Maney,  George 849 

Mann,  James  R 698 

Manning.  William  O 83 

Marcus  [pseud.]     See  Iredell, 

James. 

Marshall,  John 371,576,611,623 

Marshall,  Louis 759,764,765 

Martens,  F.  F 84,85 

Martens,   Georg  F.   von S6-94 

Mason,  Alfred  B 540 

Mason,  George 498,512 

Mason,  J.  M 733 

Massachusetts.    Convention, 

1788 503,  504 

Maxey,  Edwin 95 

Maybury,  W.  C 894 

Meier,   Ernst 96,  373, 

624,  667,  6S3,  741,  771,  875 

Merignhac,  Alexandre 97 

Michon,    Louis 223,  374 

Mikell,  William  E 375 

Mill,  J.  S 98 

Miller,  Samuel  F 483,  544,  668 

Miller,  Shackelford 376,911 

Mills,  Elijah  H 688 

Millson,  John  S 862 

Milovanovic,  M 99.  99a 

Mitchell,  Samuel  L 656,  657 

Miyakawa,  Masuji 377 

Moody,  William  H 378 

Moore,  John  Bassett 100, 

271, 379-381,  805 

Moore,  S.  McD 744 

Moore,  William  H 224 

Moran,    Francis 467 

Moreau,  F.  P.  L 225 

Morey,  William  C 382 

Morgan,  John  T 383,959 

Morine,  Alfred  B 723,  724 

Morrell,  Edward  De  V 960 

Morrill,  Justin  S 384-386, 

883, 884,  893 
Morris,  Gouveneur 671 


210 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


Morris,  Heman  W '*'>ST 

Moser,  Johann  J 101 

MUnch,   Bans 102 

Muhlenberg,   Frederick  A 625 

Mullen,  .1.  VV  974 

Mullins,  James 872 

Mungen,   William 872 

Munro,    William   B 495 

Munroe,  J.  E.  C L03 

Murhard,  Frederich  W.  A 90,91 

Myers,  Denys  1' 104,  105 

Myers,    Leonard s~- 

Nelson,   Henry  L 388,389 

New   York    (State)    Convention, 

L788 505 

Neyron,  Peter  J 106 

Nicholas,  John 570 

Nicholas,  Wilson  C 658,669 

Nicholson,  Joseph  II 656,657 

Nippold,  Otfried i<>7 

Noailles,  Jules  C.  V.  due  de 545 

Nys,  Ernest 108,  L09 

Ogden,  Rollo 392,  ::!>:{ 

Olivi,   Luigi IK) 

Olney,  Richard 111, 

806,916,937,938 

Oncken,    A 112 

Onls,  Luis  de 727,728 

Oppenheim,  Lassa  F.  L__  113,  114,939 

Orth,  G.  S 872 

Otis,  Harrison  G 570 

Ottley,  Henry 226 

Paciflcus    [pseud.]     See   Hamil- 
ton, Alexander. 

Paignon,   Eug&ne 115 

Paine,  Robert  T 394 

Palmer,  Truman  G 893 

Palmer,  Walter  B 446 

Palmerston,  Lord 822 

Paschal,  George  W 546 

Patterson,   Christopher   S 395,547 

Patterson,  William 506 

Pauncefote,  Julian 916 

Pax    [pseud.]     See   McDermott, 
H.  F. 

Peckham,  R.  W 862 

Penaud,  Edouard 169-171 

Pennsylvania.       Historical     so- 

<-i<-tu 507 

Peter     Porcupine,     pseud.     See 
Cobbett,  William. 

Peters,  John  A 872 

Pflnum 110 


Phelps,  s.  I 810 

Philbert,    V 117 

Phillimore,  G.  G 118 

Phillimore,  Sir  R.  J.  bart 119 

Phillimore,  Sir  Walter  G.F.oart_      120 

Phillips,  P 862 

Phillipson,    Coleman 121,152 

Pic,    P 122 

Pickens,  F.  W 744 

Pickering,  Timothy.-  020,  658,  606,  688 

Pierce,  Franklin 396 

Pierre,   Eugdne 227 

Pinckney,   Charles 508,582 

Pinkney,  William 084-686,688 

Pitkin,  Timothy 627 

Pomeroy,  John  N 548 

Ponsonby,  A.  A.  W.  H 123 

Pradier-Foder€,  Camille 125 

Rradier-Fodeiv,  P.  L.  E 12 4.  125 

Prudhomme,   A 126 

Pruyn,  J.  V.  S.  L 872 

Pufendorf,  Samuel,  freiherr 

von 127-131 

Purviance,   Samuel  D 657 

Putney,  Albert  H 398 

Quabbe,  Georg 132 

Ramsay,  David 509 

Randolph,  Carman  F 399 

Randolph,  Edmund—  510,592,628  630 

Randolph,  John 655,656,057,688 

Rankin,  Robert  R 631 

Raum,  Green  B 872 

Rawle,   William 549 

Raynall,  G.  T.  F 567 

Reeder,  Robert  P 547 

Reeves,  Jesse  S 792 

Renault,  Louis 132a-132b 

Reynolds,  James  B 688 

Rice.  Allen  T 810 

Richard,    Henry 133 

Richards,  Sir  Henry  E 941 

Richardson,   Hamilton  P 511 

Rivier,  Alphonse  P.  O 134 

Robbins,  A.  H 912,941a 

Roberts,   Jonathan 688 

Robertson,  David 523 

Robertson,  John 744 

Robertson,  Thomas  B 688 

Rol.Inet   de  Clery 229 

Robinson,   Chalfant__  401.402,865,885 

Rodney,  Cresar  A 657 

Rogers,  Henry  W 403 

Rolln-Jaequemyns,  M.   G 185 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


211 


Root,  Elihu 913, 1001 

Root,  Erastus 688 

Rowland,  Kate  M 512 

Riittimann,  Johann  J 404 

Ruyssenaers,  L.  H 132b 

Salvioli,  Gabrielle" 136 

Saimver,  Charles 93 

Satow,  Sir  Ernest  M 140 

Saulsbury,  Willard 704 

Scala,  Rudolf  von 141 

ScammeU,  E.  H 699 

Scelle,  Georges 1002 

Sehenck,  Robert  C 872 

Scherer,  James  A.  B 977 

Schley,  William 744 

Scbmalz,  T.  A.  H 142, 143 

Schmidt,  Bruno 144 

Schoen 145 

Schouler,    James 632,670,919 

Schrault,  Max  von 146 

Schuyler,  Eugene 405,  731 

Scott,  E.  H 516 

Scott,  James  B 147 

Sedgwick,  Theodore 633,  63S,  784 

Seligmann,  Ernst 148 

Sergeant,  Thomas 550,  551 

Sewall,  Samuel 570 

Seward,  William  H 706,  707,  733 

Sheffey,  Daniel 688 

Shepheard,  Wallyn  P.  B 149 

Sherley,  Swagar 914 

Sherman,  Gordon  E 28,150,1003 

Sherwood,  H.  L 54a 

Sisson,  Thomas  U 978,979 

Skelton,  Oscar  D 151,248 

Smilie,  John .       656 

Smith,  Sir  Frederick  E.  bart 152 

Smith,  George  B 942 

Smith,  Gerrit 861,862 

Smith.  Goldwin 249,  495 

Smith,  Hoke 1004 

Smith,  Samuel 570 

Smith,  William  Alden 700 

South  Carolina.     Constitution —      484 

Spalding,  Rufus  P 872 

Sparks,  Jared  ___  441,  442,  579,  639,  671 

Spear,  Samuel  T 408-411,513 

Squier,  Ephraim  G 807 

Stanford,  Richard 688 

Stephen,  Henry  J 230 

Stevens,  Tbaddeus 872 

Stidham,  Mrs.  Clara  H.  Kerr 412 

Stoerk,  Felix 153 


Stone,  Frederick  D 507 

Story,   Joseph 413,552,577,672 

Stratton,  G.  M 974 

Straus,  Oscar  S 764,  765 

Stuart,  C.  E 733 

Stuart-Linton,  C.  E.  T 250 

Sulzberger,  Mayer 764,  765 

Sulzer,  William 761,  762,  764 

Sumner,  Charles 701, 

704,  732, 733,  866,  876 

Sutherland,  George 553 

Sutherland,  J.  B 744 

Sutherland,  William  A 554 

Tariff  commission,  London 154 

Taylor,  Hannis 155,  414,  943 

Taylor,  John 658,  6S8 

Teller,  Henry  M 415,  961 

Teubern,  Ernest  G.  freiherr  von_       156 

Thatcher,  Samuel 657 

Thayer,  James  B 555 

Thomas,  Philip  F 886 

Thompson 810 

Thompson,  B.  M 416 

Thompson,  Joseph  P 157 

Thorpe,  Francis  N 556 

Throop,  Enos  T 688 

Tiffany,   Joel 557 

Todd,  Alpheus 231,  232,  251 

Toombs,   R 733 

Toucey,   I 733 

Tower,  Charlemagne 944,  945 

Traill,  Henry  D 233 

Tracy,  Uriah 658 

Travis,  Ira  D 808 

Trescot,  William  H 56S,  635,  646 

Triepel,  Heinrich 94,  160 

Tryon,  James  L 1005 

Tucker,  Henry  St.  G 688 

Tucker,  Henry  St.  George 283, 

422-424,  484a,  558,  559 
Tucker,  John  Randolphs  559,  887,  896 

Tucker,   St.   George 560 

Tupper,  Sir  C.  H 252 

Twiss,  Sir  Travers 161,  235 

Ullniann.   Emanuel,    ritter   von_       162 
United  States: 

Bureau  of  rolls  and  library-       514 
Bureau  of  statistics  (Treas- 
ury dept.) 425,426 

Bureau  of  trade  relations 163 

Congress 569 

636,  673,  687,  743,  785 
1st  Cong 578 


212 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


United  States.    Congress — Continued. 

4th  Cong 637,638,651,652 

5th   Cong 570,571 

8th  Cong—r 674,  675 

14th  Com,.,  1st  si  ss      688,  689,  690 

15th  Cong.,  1st  sess 702 

28d  Cong.,  2d  s<  <>   744 

29th  Cong 787 

SSd  Cong.,  1st  sess 8G2 

.;;///  Cong t:;."» 

88th  Cong.,  tsi  sess  __        703,  s''>7 
88th  com/.,  2d  sess—  437,704,868 

.'/'ill!  Cong.,  tst  sess 888 

46th  Conn.,  2d  sess 438 

47th  Cong.,  2d  sess 891 

House 427 

Comm.  on   finance s'.t2 

Com  in.    on    foreign    af- 
fairs      128    131,  745, 

762  764,    809  812,    869,    877 
Select  com.  on  the  inter- 
oceanic  ship  canal 813 

Comm.     on       the      ju- 
diciary   432,  S9G 

Comm.    on     ways     and 
means—  433,  SS9.  894,  962 

Senate  236, 

434,  4::'.),  647,  814,  893,  895 

Comm.  on  finance S70 

c<>, mil.  on  foreign  illa- 
tions  435,436, 

725,  734,  740,  765,  772, 
773.  786,  815-817,  963 
Constitutional      convention, 

1787 515-521 

Continental  congress 485  488 

Dcpt.  of  state 104,  237.  440- 

444,  4S9,  676,  705-707,  735-737, 
747-749,  818-853,  S78,  947,  948 

Laws,  statutes,  etc 445 

Navy   dcpt 708,854 

President 709-714, 

750,  7.11,  7<;<;.  855,  856,  857,  SG3 
St  e  also  names  of  Presi- 
dents. 

Tariff   commission 446,  117 

7  / 1  asury  dept 774 

Tn  aties,  etc     ._  448   158,  677,  678, 
793,  858.  859,  916,  949  953,  L006 

Usher,  Roland  (J 10117 

Van  Buren,  Martin 7xs 

Vattel,  Emmerich  de I0»i,  167 

Verge,  Ch 168 


Veto,  pseud.     See  Sedgwick, 
Theodore. 

Viallate,  Achille 459 

Vincent,  Ren6 169-171 

Viner,  Jacob 446 

Virginia.     Convention,  1788__  522,523 

Visser,  L.  E 172 

Vogels,    Aloys 238 

Vorhees,   Daniel  \V 893 

Vosberg-Rekow,  .Max 173,174 

Wade,  B.  P 733 

Walker,  R.  J 774 

Walker.  Robert  J 789,790 

Walker,  Thomas  A 175,  L76 

Walpole,  Sir  Spencer 232,239 

Wambaugh,  Eugene !>7>4 

Washburn,  Albert  H 177 

Washburn,  Cadwalader  C 872,877 

Washburn,  Israel 862 

Washburne,  Elihu  B 872 

Washington,  Bushrod 576 

Washington,  George,  pres.  U.  S-    579, 
580,  623,  639,  640 

Washington,  II.  A 337, 

574,  610,  643,  662 

Watkins,  Tobias 727 

Watmough,  J.  (J 744 

Watson.  David  K 561 

Waultrin.  Rene 715 

Wayne.  J.  M 744 

Webb,  William  H 810 

Webster,  Daniel 461,738 

Webster,  Noah 7,1:4 

Webster,  Sidney 679 

Webber-  Hans 178.716 

Weil.   Bruno 179 

Weller,  J.  B 733 

Wells,  William  H 65S 

Wells,  William  V 461a 

West  lake,  John 180, 181 

Wharton,   Francis 182, 

1  13.  CIS,  77.2.  879 

Wheaton,  Henry 183, 

770,  742,  777,.  777 

Wheeler,  B.  I 974 

Wheeler,  Everett  P 462 

White,  Harold  F <).v, 

W'hite,   Samuel r,:,s 

Whiting,  William 5Q2 

■Whitman,  William 871 

Whitney,  Edward  B 403 

WickersLam,  George  W 1008 


AUTHOR   INDEX 


213 


Wicquefort,  \braham  van 184 

Wilbur,  R.  L 974 

Wild,  Robert 717 

Wilde,  Richard  H 688 

Williams,  John 638,641 

Williams,  John  S 964, 1009 

Williams,  Mary  W 860 

W7illoughby,  Westel  W 563 

Willson,  Beckles 464 

Wilson,   Benjamin 811 

W  ilson,  George  G 64 

Wilson,  Henry 704 

"\\  ilson,    James 564 

Wilson,  W'oodrow,  pres.  U.  S__ __       465 
Wolcott,  Oliver 603,  642 


Wolff,  Christian,  freAherr  von_  185-187 

Woodburn,  James  A 466.467 

Woodbury,  Levi 791 

Woolsey,  Theodore  D 188 

Woolsey,  Theodore  S 188,  46S 

Works,  John  D 1010 

Wright,    Quincy 1S9, 190 

Wright,  Robert 658,  688 

Wurm,  C.  F 191,776 

Wyse,  Francis 469 

Wythe,   George 470,472,481 

Yates,  Robert 520 

Yeaman,  G.  H 880 

Zimmermann,  Alfred 777 

Zorn,  Ph 240 


SUBJECT  INDEX 


[The  numbers  refer  to  the  items,  not  to  the  pages.] 

In  addition  to  the  references  given  under  certain  items  such  as  President, 
Senate,  etc.,  which  relate  to  special  articles  only,  the  reader  should  also  consult 
the  general  treatises  iu  the  sections  on  Treaty-making  power  in  the  United 
Slates  (items  253-364). 


Abrogation  of  treaties : 

See  Termination  of  treaties;  U.  S. 
Treaties:  Denmark,  1826; 
France.  1778;  Gt.  Brit..  1817  ;  Gt. 
Brit.,  1850;  Gt.  Brit.,  1854;  >t"s- 
sia,  1832. 

Agreements 12, 

13,  18,  22,  39.  84,  85, 
110,    140,    1G0,    167 

U.  S 261, 

282,285,331,381,457 

Alaska  purchase    872-880 

Algiers,  Treaty,  0.  S.,  1795-..  643-648 

Alien   land   laws 296, 

96o-979 
Aliens,  Rights  of,  and  treaties—       95, 
224,285,289,317,372,562 
See  also  U.  S.  Treaties:  Ja- 
pan, 1894;  Japan,  1911. 

Alliances 33, 

52,   57,   101,  113,   160, 

107,  185-187,  221,  285 

Bibliography   33 

Anglo-American    treaties 264 

Bibliography  264 

See  also  Clayton  -  Bulwer 
treaty  ;  Panama  c  a  n  a  1 
question  ;  ami  F.  s.  Treat- 
ies: Gt.  Brit. 

Annexation,  Treaties  of: 

Se<     Territory,    Acquisition 

or  cession  of,  by  t  rent y. 

Annulment  of  treaties : 

St  <  Termination  of  |  peal  les. 
Appropriation,    Treaties    Involv- 
ing         285, 

•111.  Ill',  r,  it.  <;:,  |  »;r,S,  S61-863 
Se<     also    i".    s.    Treaties: 
franc,       1808;      Mexico, 
1858 :  Russia.  2867. 
214 


Arbitration  treaties 111,  178 

Brazil    201 

France    227 

U.  S 236, 

253,    334,    354,    363,    379,    381, 
394,  414,  457,  915,  916, 980-1010 

List  of 451 

Austria-Hungary : 

Commercial    treaties.  219,  440,  4  17 

Treaty-making  power 206, 

207,  210,  218,  223,  s.u\ 

Baden   218 

Balkan  states  207 

Bavaria 218 

Belgium  206,  207. 

210,  212,  213,  218,  223,  235,  237 
Brazil : 

Arbitration    treaties 201 

Treaty-making  power 237.285 

Bulgaria  210,  218 

Canada : 

Commercial    treaties 446,4  17 

Most-favored     nation     trea- 
ties  151,  248 

Treaties,   United  States 273 

Treaty-making  power 241-252 

Cancellation  of  treaties: 

.V'  e  Termination  of  treaties. 
(  Vntral  American  affairs  : 

See  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty. 

Chile    207,237 

Classication   of  treaties 12,97 

Clayton  -Bulwer     treat  y, 

1850   73,794-860 

Bibliography   795,808,860 

•  'oast  in::    trade 114 

Colonies.  Gt.  Brit 241   252 

Commercial    treaties 32,38, 

52,  78,  84,  85,  97,  112-114, 
117.  146,  168,  17(1.  173,  174, 
285,  286.  337.  368,  381,  405,  418, 
446,  447,  461,  470,  480,  485,  498 


SUBJECT   INDEX 


215 


Commercial  treaties — Continued. 

Collection  of,  general 219 

U.    S 322,  323,  42.5-130,  457, 

500,  507,  510,  537,  540,  544,  562 
See  also  Most-favored  nation 
treaties ;  Reciprocity  trea- 
ties. 
Confederate  states  of  America_  200,  424 
Confederation,  1774-1787,   Trea- 
ties and  treaty-making  power 

under 322,323,470-489 

Congress : 

Duty  to  enforce  treaties__  285,  462 
Legislation  to  give  effect  to 

treaties 6,  285,  313 

Power  to  abrogate  treaties 415 

Rights         of,         concerning 

treaties 285, 

329,  350,  387,  409,  411,  439 
See   also   House   of    Repre- 
sentatives ;    Senate. 
Constitution,      Treaties      subordi- 
nate   to 399 

Constitutional  aspects  of  treaty- 
making  power 6, 

190,  257,  265,  268,  283,  285, 
286,  287,  291,  292,  294,  310, 
312,  326,  327,  345,  349,  354,  400, 
411,  423,  468,  525-564,  582,  595 
Consular   officers,   Rights  under 

treaties 24,  80,  285 

"  Convention,"    definition 285,  381 

Conventions,   U.   S.  Compilation 

of 451-457 

Copyright   treaties 57,  285 

Costa  Rica 237,  285 

Cuba  : 

Treaties,  U.  S.  1902 956-964 

Treaty-making  power 285 

Danish  Sound  dues 729-738 

Denmark 207,  210,  218,  236 

Dependencies 285 

See  also  Gt.  Brit.  Colonies. 
Dissolution  of  treaties : 

See  Termination  of  treaties. 

Effect  of  treaties 12,  31,  71,  97 

See    also    War,    Effect    on 
treaties. 
Efficacy  of  treaties : 

See  Legal  force  and  execu- 
tion. 

Enforcement  of  treaties 107, 165, 

269,  282,  284,  285,  319,  333,  381 


Execution  of  treaties 18, 

28,  31,  33,  35,  36,  84,  85,  97,  224 
See    also    Legal    force    and 
execution. 
Expiration  of  treaties : 

See  Termination  of  treaties. 

Extradition  treaties 176, 

285,  294,  332,  380,  457,  469 
Federal  convention,  i787,  Treaty- 
making   power   as   considered 

in    490-524 

Federal  courts,  Jurisdiction  of 285 

Finland 210 

Florida  treaty,  1821 254,285 

Forms  of  treaties 85, 107,  285 

France : 

Commercial    treaties 446,  447 

Most-favored-nation 446,  447 

Ratification  of  treaties___  140,  228 
Treaty-making  power 198, 199, 

206,  207,  209,  210,  212, 
214,  218,  221,  223,  225, 
227,  229,  236,  237,  420 

Treaties — 

U.  S.  i778 470,  565-571 

U.  S.  1803 653-679 

U.  S.  1831—  350,  468,  739-752 
Germany : 

Most-favored-nation__  44,  446,  447 
Ratification  of  treaties___  140,  228 

Treaties 102,  240 

U.  S.  18M 386,  767-775 

Treaty-making  power 206, 

207,  209,  210,  212,  217, 
218,  220,  223,  236,  238 

Great  Britain : 

Most-favored-nation 45, 

75,  154,  446,  447 
Ratification  of  treaties___  140,  228 

Treaties,  Collections  of 22a,  42 

•     See  also  Treaties,  Col- 
lections, General. 

Commercial 219,  446,  447 

Guaranty 103 

U.  S.  1794 581-642 

U.  S.  1815 680-690 

U.  S.  1817 691-717 

U.  S.  1818 718-725 

U.S.  1850  (Clayton-Bul- 

tver) 73,  794-860 

U.  S.  185k 864-871 

U.  S.  1897 915,  916 


216 


SUBJECT   INDEX 


Great  Britain     Continued. 

Treaties,  Collections  of    Con. 
r.  S.  1901  I  Eay-Paunce- 

fott  ) 920  955,  992 

Treaty-making  power    22,192  194, 

196,  L97,  199,  200,  203- 

210,  215,  216,  222-224, 

226,   230  234,   236,   237 

Great  Britain,  Colonies: 

Ratification  of  treaties 228 

Treaty-making  power 241-252 

Greal    Lakes,   Limitation  of  ar- 
mament on 285,  691-717 

Greece  .     -  207,  210,  218,  236,  237 

Guaranty,  Treaties  of 41, 

57,  61,  99,  99a,  103,  L13,  132 

Bibliography 61,  L32 

Guatemala 237,  285 

Hawaiian   Islands  : 

<  lommercial  treaties    285,  146,  447 
Treaties — 

r.  S.  7875 881   893 

r.  s.  t884 896 

r.  s.  1897 917-919 

Hay-Pauncefote  treaty—  920-955,992 

Hesse-Darmstadt 218 

II  story  of  treaties 7,  47,  4S,  71, 

127  131,  141,  166,  167,  184-187 

Honduras 237,  285 

House   of    Representatives    and 

treaty-making  power 2nd, 

285,  302,  322,  323,  329,  330,  337, 
-.  366,  i< il.  402,  412.  427-432, 
436  138,  461a,  168,  500,  539,  540, 
597,  599  602,  604,  606,  608-611, 
613  616,  619,  62]  623,  625,  626, 
633,  638  644,  654,  684  690,  726 

Bibliography 402 

ilso  Appropriation,  Trea- 
ties involving  ;  U.  S.  Treat- 
ties,  Cuba,  1902;  Ha- 
waiian Is.,  1875,  t884; 
Mexico,    1888. 

Indian  treaties 200,285, 

364,  365,  371    381,   U2,  417, 
445,  471,    176,  478,  572  580 
International  agreements : 

Agreements. 
International  arbil  ration : 

Set      Arbitration,     Interna- 
tional. 
Interoceanic  canals : 

Bulwer  treaty  ; 
Panama  canal  question. 


Interpretation  of  treaties 3.  5. 17. 

iv.  22  28,  31,  33,  47,  48,  50,  60, 
71,  73,  74,  '.'7.  113,  122,  126,  166, 
167,  17."),  185-187.  285,  294,    157 

Bibliography 60, 122 

Inviolability  of  treaties 71 

Ireland 210 

Isthmian  canals : 

S<  <   <  !laj  ton  Bulwer  treaty  ; 
Panama  canal  question. 
Italy: 

Commercial  treaties  .  219,  446,447 

Ratification  of  treaties 22S 

Treaty-making  power 206,207, 

209,  210,  212,  218,  223,  236,  237 
Japan : 

Commercial  treaties     219,  1 16,  1 17 
Treaties — 

U.  S..  1894 s;i7  '■"  l 

U.  S.,  1911 965  070 

Treaty-making  power.  207,  218,  2:17 

Japanese  school  question 897  01  1 

Jay  treaty--  .322,323,411,468,581-  642 

Bibliography 631 

Judicial  decisions  and  treaties—     200. 
270  272. 440 

Digest  of 285 

Language  of  treaties 188,285 

Law  of  treaties—      69,74,107,  L89.285 

Legal   U<vrv  and  execution 35,36, 

71,  84.  85,  ]ii7.  113, 148,  285,  410 
S<  -    also  Ex<  cution  of  trea- 
ties. 
Legislation  to  give  effect  to  trea- 
ties : 
See  Congress. 
Legislative  bodies  in  relation  to 

treaty-making  power 27, 170, 

195,  213,  223,  227,  238,  337.  3  i3 

Bibliography 27, 170 

See  also  House  of  Represent- 
atives ;  Senate. 

Liberia 237 

Limitation  of  armament  on  Croat 

Lakes 2S5.G91-717 

Limitations  of  treaties .  161,189 

Limitations      of      treaty  making 

power 200,  257, 

267,337,351,  122,553,558,559,582 

also  Constitutional  as- 
pects. 

Louisiana    treaty 285, 

468,653  1  ;70 
Luxemburg 207 


SUBJECT   INDEX 


217 


Mexico : 

Treaties — 

U.  S.  1S48 792,  793 

U.  S.  1853 350,  861 

U.  S.  1883 894,  895 

Treaty-making  power 207,  236 

Migratory  bird  law 460 

Mississippi,  Navigation  of  the—      285, 

522, 523 
Monroe  doctrine : 

See  Clayton-Bulwer  treaty ; 
U.  S.  Treaties,  Mexico, 
1853. 

Montenegro 210 

Morocco 237 

Most-favored-nation    treaties 15, 

19,  21,  25,  34,  38,  44,  53,  54,  58, 
75,  78,  80,  112, 116, 118,  146, 149, 
151,  154,  156,  163,  172,  177,  248, 
285,  337,  346,  446,  447,  486 

Bibliograph 15,  34,  44, 45, 156 

Municipal     law,     Operation     of 

treaties  as 285,410 

Naval  forces  on  Great  Lakes 285, 

691-717 

Negotiation  of  treaties 18,39,79, 

SI,  97, 107, 183,  282,  284,285,412 

Netherlands 206, 

207,  210,  218,  223,  237 

Neutrality  treaties 150,  285 

Newfoundland      fisheries      d  i  s- 

pute 718-725 

Nicaragua 237,  285 

See     also     Clayton-Bulwer 
treaty. 
Non-political  interests,  Unions—       113 
North     German     Confederation 

treaty,  1868 431 

Norway 207,  210,  218,  236,  237 

Objects  of  treaties 113 

Obligation  of  treaties 4,10, 

35,  55.  74,  9S,  107,  133, 
159,  166,  167,  285,  391 

Outworn  treaties 20 

Panama 237,  285 

Panama  canal  question 920-955 

Paraguay 237,  285 

Paris,  Treaty  of,  1803 653-679 

Parties  to  treaties 113 

Passport  question,  Russian —  753-766 

Patent  treaties 57 

Peace,  Treaties  of 18,  28,  50,  52 

97,  120,  121.  134,  166,  167,  183 
185-187,  194,  285,  541,  980-1010 
137190°— 20 15 


Peace,  Treaties  of — Continued. 

Bibliography 120 

See  also,  War,  Termination 
of. 

Perfecting  treaties 31 

Persia 237,  285 

Peru 237,  285 

'Political  treaties 78,  97, 168,  285 

Portugal 207,  210.  218.  236 

Postal  treaties 57,  285,  381 

President,  France : 

Diplomatic  powers  of 199 

United  States 199,254, 

259,  263,  274,  275,  282,  284,  285, 
303,    308,    318,    321-324,    373. 
375,   406,   461a,   464,   548,   598 
Private       international       law. 

Treaties  of 97,  224 

Protection,  Treaties  of 113 

"  Protocol  "  definition 285,  381 

Protocols,    U.    S 457 

Prussia 212 

Public     international     law. 

Treaties  of 97 

Ratification  of  treaties 28,  31, 

33,  39,  71,  79,  84,  85,  96, 
97,  113,  115,  140,  148,  191, 
195,  220,  228,  285,  344,  389 

Rebus  sic  stantibus 14, 

67, 136, 144,  285,  943 

Bibliography 67 

Reciprocity  treaties 38,  285, 

287,    302,   311,   346,   381,   383- 
387,  395,  401,425,426,429,430, 
432,  433,  435,  436,  446,  447,  457 
See    also   Commercial    trea- 
ties ;    Most-favored-nation 
treaties;    Treaties:   U.   S. 
Cuba,    1902;    U.     S.     Gt. 
Brit.,  185k;  U.  S.  Hawai- 
ian Islands,  1875;  Zollve- 
rein  treaty,  181^. 

Reconfirmation  of  treaties 113 

Renewal  of  treaties—  71, 113, 166, 167 
Repudiation  of  treaties : 

See  Termination  of  treaties. 

Reservations 178,  201 

Revenue   laws,   Treaties  involv- 
ing a  modification  of 285 

Rights  of  legation  and  treaty- _        50 

Rumania 207,  210 

Rush-Bagot  convention 691-717 

Russia : 

Breach  of  treaties 72 

Most-favored-nation 446,  447 


'J  is 


SUBJECT    INDEX 


Russia — Continued. 

Ratification  of  treaties...  140.  228 
Treaties — 

T.  S.  1832 753-700 

r.  s.  1861  358,872-880 

Treaty-making  power.  207,  210,  218 

Russian  passport  question 753-700 

Salvador 207, 237 

Sanctity  of  treaties 30, 

63,  137  139,285 

Savages,  Treaties  with 82,  ISO 

Saxony 218 

Secrel  treaties 108.203,285,412 

Senate     -. 195, 200, 

254,  256,  259,  271,  274,  275,  284, 
285,  335-337,  355-357,  359,  360, 
362,  373,  375,  378,  388-390,  392, 
393,  405-407,  412.  401a,  404-408 

Amendment  of  treaties 284, 

285,  410 

Arbitration  treaties 236, 

258,451,459,980-1010 
Reciprocity  treaties..  287,302,311 
Rejection  Of  treaties.  228,284,285 

Secrel  sessions 285,  134 

Treaties  rejected  by 228 

Servia 207,  210,  218 

Siam 237 

Sound  dues,  Danish 729-738 

Spain : 

Commercial  treaties.-  219,  446,  447 
Treaties — 

U.  S.  17.95 G49-G52 

U.  S.  1819 720-728 

U.  S.  188J, 895 

Treaty-making  power 207, 

209,  210,  218,  223,  230.  237 

State  laws  and  treaties 255,200, 

269  271,  270,  278,  279,  281, 
285.  289,  294-296,  298,  30S, 
309,  315,  310,  319,  325,  337- 
340a,  348,  382,396-398,403, 
410.  479,  486,  490,  505,  507 
See  also  Supremacy  of  trea- 
ties;  D.  s.  Treaties:  Ja- 
pan, 1894;  Japan,  1911. 

Strengthening  of  treaties 12 

Supremacy  of  treaties 277, 

278,  295,  297,  399,  409-411, 
|so.  481,  496,  513,  547,  654 
Sureties  for   fulfillment    Of  trea- 
ties  1GG,  107,  285 


Suspension  of  treaties 153 

Sweden 207,  210,  218,  230,  237 

Switzerland.  207,  210,  212,  218.  230.  237 

Telegraph  treaties 57 

Termination  of  treaties 12,22, 

31,    33,    35,    39,    00,    71,    78,    84, 
85,  97,   107,    113.   158,    106,    107, 
282,     285,     291,     350,     409,     412 
Se<      also     V.     S.     Treaties, 
Hawaiian  Is.   1875;  Rus- 
sia, 1857. 
Territory.  Acquisition  or  cession 

of,  by  treaty 205,285, 

294,    337-340a,   353.   371,    399, 
403,    412,    413,    408,    541,    548 
See    also    U.    S.    Treaties: 
France,    1808;    Hawaiian 
Is..    1897;    Russia,    1867; 
Texas.    ls','h 

Texas,  Annexation  of,  1844 285, 

313,  778-791 
Texts  of  treaties: 

See  Treaties.  Collections. 
Third    states.    Participation   of, 

in  treaties 85,113 

Trade-marks    treaties 57 

Treaties 13.31.52.54a. 

54b,  56,  57,  59,  65,  69,  77-79, 
81,  84,  85.  97,  101,  106,  108-110, 
113,  124,  125,  134,  140,  142,  143, 
152,  157,  162,  166,  167,  179.  285 
Collections,  General.  1,54a, 54b. 70. 
86-94.  132a,  132b,  109-171,  188 

Canada  273 

France 202 

Germany 240 

Great  Britain 22a.  42 

United  States 100,182, 

294,  299,  300.  314.  44S-459 

History    of 7.47,48.71, 

127-131,  141,  100.  107,  184-187 
See    also   Commercial    trea- 
ties, Extradition  treaties, 
Peace,  Treaties  of,  etc. 

"Treaty"    lefinltion  285,381 

Treaty   rights  ...  83,  101.  183,  224,352 
Turkey : 

Commercial   treaties    219,  446   1 17 
Treaty-making  power    207,  210.  218 
Unconstitutional      l  a  w      a  n  d 
treaties  460 


SUBJECT  INDEX 


219 


United  States: 

Agreements 261,  282, 

285,  331,  381,  457 

Arbitration   treaties 236,  253, 

258/334,    354,    363,    379,    381, 
394,    414,    915,    916,    980-1010 

Commercial  treaties 322, 

323,  425-430,  500,  507, 

510,  537,  540,  544,  562 

Most-favored-nation   treaties       19, 

25,     38,    75,     177,    285, 

337,   346,  446,   447,   486 

Ratification  of  treaties—  140,228 

Treaties,  Abrogated 452-457 

Collections   of 100,182, 

294,  299,  300, 314, 448-459 

Fidelity  to 337-340a 

Judicial    decisions 200, 

270,  272,  285,  440 

Treaties  in  force 448-i57 

Treaties     rejected      by 

Senate 228 

Algiers,  1795 643-648 

Cuba,  1902 956-964 

Denmark,  1826 729-738 

France,  1778 470,565-571 

France,   1803 653-679 

France,  1831 350, 

468,  739-752 
Germanic  states,  1844-  386, 
767-775 
Great  Britain,  119k—  581-642 
Great  Britain,  1815—  680-690 
Great  Britain,  1817__  691-717 
Great  Britain,  1818—  718-725 

Great  Britain,  1850 73, 

794-860 
Great  Britain,  185k—  864-871 
Great  Britain,  1897—  915. 916 

Great  Britain,  1901 920- 

955,  992 
Hawaiian     Islands, 

1875 881-893 

Hawaiian     Islands, 

1884 896 


United  States— Continued. 
Treaties — Continued. 

Hawaiian     Islands, 

1897 917-919 

Indians,      Creek, 

1790 572-580 

Japan,  1894 897-914 

Japan,  1911 965-979 

Mexico,  1848 792,793 

Mexico,  1853 861-863 

Mexico,  1883 894,  895 

Russia,  1832 753-766 

Russia,  1867 358, 

872-880 

Spain,  1795 649-652 

Spain,  1819 726-728 

Spain,  1884 895 

Texas,  18U 285, 

313,  778-791 
Treaty-making  power: 

General  discussions, —      209, 
218,  223,  253-469 
Under    the    Confedera- 
tion    470-489 

In  the  Federal  con- 
vention     490-524 

Writings  on  the  Consti- 
tution      525-564 

Considerations  in  re- 
spect to  Special  trea- 
ties   565-1010 

Validity  of  treaties 71, 

76,  97, 165.  202,  220 

Venezuela 207,  237 

Violation  of  treaties 105 

Voidance  of  treaties 113,285 

War,  Effect  of,  on  treaties 22, 

28,     29,     62,     64,     74. 
123,  158,  176,  194,  285 

Bibliography  64, 123 

War,  Termination  of 49, 121 

See  also  Peace,  Treaties  of. 

Wurtemberg    218 

Zollverein,  treaty,  1844 386, 

767-775 


o 


This  book  is  DUE  on  the  last  date  stamped  below 


DUG    L3  19 
±  0  1953 


AF 


Form  L-9    35m-8,'28 


%'fc '.  i  ■■-' 


■  6464 


C8U5 

U.S.    Library 
3f_  Con gr  o  s  s  >    Pi v-i-- 
3ToiTor~Blbl'io- 


graphy   -   List   of 
¥&£&&&&CGp  on  the 
treaty-making  power, 

C7i.  C 


A 


2. 


